Re: F23 installer does not allow to reuse / partition
I just want to declare success! I installed the HDD (actually a PCIe drive) and everything installed without a glitch! Fedora 23 is working perfectly on the BeeBox now Thanks everyone! On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > If you haven't tried using 'strace mkfs." it's very educational. > All it does is write some stuff to the disk. It's mostly zeros, but > also the signature, UUID, stuff that makes up the superblocks. The > fact this fails, suggest the device can't even handle basic writes. So > there's no reason to believe that the installer would have any success > installing the OS to such a device. > > I'd expect there are kernel messages if mkfs fails - most likely write > failure to specific sectors. > > Chris Murphy > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- -- /\_/\ |O O| pepeb...@gmail.com Javier Perez While the night runs toward the day... m m Pepebuho watches from his high perch. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora] - No GUI after install bumblebee on Fedora 23
On 8 January 2016 at 02:22, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2016 5:00 p.m., "Earl A Ramirez" wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8 January 2016 at 01:15, James Hogarth > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7 January 2016 at 15:11, Earl A Ramirez > wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> I have a ASUS laptop with NVIDIA Optimus technology, therefore, I used > the Fedora documentation [0] to install bumbleeble using the third party > managed driver to install NVIDIA. After the installation I am no longer > seeing the NVIDIA when I use 'lspci | grep VGA'; however, when I use 'lspci > | egrep 'VGA|3D'' I can see the NVIDIA video card. > >>> > >>> $ lspci | grep VGA > >>> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 191b (rev > 06) > >>> > >>> $ lspci | egrep 'VGA|3D' > >>> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 191b (rev > 06) > >>> 01:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM107M [GeForce GTX 960M] > (rev a2) > >>> > >>> Also I no longer see the vgaswitcheroo under /sys/kernel/debug/. When > I try to boot with the kernel that NVIDIA was build on; the laptop locks up > just before the GUI and you will hear the fans blowing and the only way > around it is to power the laptop down. I have tried booting into that > kernel with different kernel parameters; E.g. nomodeset > rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau and even i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 and all > options and combinations fails. > >>> > >>> However when I boot from the kernel that NVIDIA was not compiled on I > can the the get a display that says "oops something went wrong, please try > again" and there is an option to log out, I can also switch to another > virtual console and have full access to the OS. I get the same behaviour > even if I use nomodeset; however, if I use i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 I > get the appropriate resolution. > >>> > >>> Can anyone shed some light on how to get the GUI, with bumblebee or > even the Intel graphic drivers? > >>> > >>> The packages that were installed are: > >>> $ rpm -qa | egrep 'bumblebee|bbswitch|primus|VirtualGL' > >>> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.x86_64 > >>> bumblebee-nvidia-352.63-2.fc23.x86_64 > >>> bbswitch-dkms-0.8.0-2.fc23.x86_64 > >>> bumblebee-nonfree-release-1.2-1.noarch > >>> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.i686 > >>> bumblebee-release-1.2-1.noarch > >>> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.i686 > >>> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.x86_64 > >>> bumblebee-3.2.1-9.fc23.x86_64 > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> Sounds like we practically the same laptop ... > >> > >> This will go a lot easier for you if you install kernel 4.3.3-300 from > updates-testing as that has the full skylake i915 support (so don't do > preliminary_hw_support on that). > >> > >> This looks suspicious ... Xorg should not see the NVIDIA driver if > you've managed to follow the bumblebee instructions correctly: > >> > >> (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so > >> [ 4.334] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" > >> [ 4.334] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 > >> [ 4.334] Module class: X.Org Server Extension > >> [ 4.335] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 358.16 Mon Nov 16 18:54:01 PST > 2015 > >> > >> Compare this to mine where optirun/bumblebee/primus works fine: > >> > >> [23.343] (II) LoadModule: "glx" > >> [23.343] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so > >> [23.345] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > >> [23.345]compiled for 1.18.0, module version = 1.0.0 > >> [23.345]ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 9.0 > >> > >> If the NVIDIA GLX libraries are loaded into xorg it'll trash your intel > stuff ... > >> > >> Are you sure you didn't install the NVIDIA proprietary drivers > (rpmfusion, negativo17 or directly) in some way other than only through the > bumblebee non-free repo? > >> > >> This is my configuration: > >> $ rpm -qa | grep -E 'nvidia|bumblebee|bbswitch|primus|VirtualGL' > >> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.i686 > >> bumblebee-3.2.1-9.fc23.x86_64 > >> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.i686 > >> bumblebee-release-1.2-1.noarch > >> bumblebee-nvidia-352.63-2.fc23.x86_64 > >> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.x86_64 > >> bbswitch-dkms-0.8.0-2.fc23.x86_64 > >> bumblebee-nonfree-release-1.2-1.noarch > >> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.x86_64 > >> > >> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX has in it nouveau.modeset=0 and > rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau > >> > >> Before I updated to 4.3.3 today the preliminary_hw_support=1 was needed > as well. > >> > >> What's the output of bumblebee-nvidia --check for you ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> users mailing list > >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > >> > > Hello James, > > > > Thanks, this is the output from bumblebee-nvidia --check > > > >
print chain is broken
Fedora 23. Everything is up-to-date. I discovered today that printing that involves PDF of HTML does not work, by which I mean that the job sits in the queue with 'processing' as status. echo 'foo' > lpr works fine, as does printing the problem pdf from a system running Fedora 19. The printer is USB-connected. Deleting and re-installing does not change the problem, nor does re-booting. Driver: HP LaserJet 1300 Series Postscript (recommended) /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-uss720.conf exists with content: blacklist uss720 I'd like to sort this out, but I have no clue where to start. Suggestions appreciated. thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installation instructions for NUT on Fedora 19 - that works
On 01/07/16 12:14, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trying to get NUT installed on an existing F19 server which sits beside > my > shiney new APC SmartUPS. It's connected using a serial cable on ttyS0. If its an APC UPS, shouldn't you be using apcupsd instead of nut? Its a standard fedora package. The last time I was running an APC UPS, I installed it, made a few edits to the configuration file, and it just worked. > I've found a number of web sites that tell you how to install NUT and get it > working, including one that said it worked where others didn;'t - it referred > to permissions issues with the RPMs. > > However, none of the instructions relate to F19 and even after making > allowances I still can't get it to work. > One thing that was missing was /var/run/ups which was the last thing I > created. However, as you can see below, it still doesn't work. > > I'm hoping eventually to have this server monitor the UPS, and then have all > other servers monitor through this server. > > Can anyone help with getting this working. Ta > > Gary -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing Component in KDE System Settings
On Friday 08 Jan 2016 07:28:04 Stephen Morris wrote: > Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings addin > that allows customization of the Display Manager login interface in F23? > I'm looking for the interface that lets you specify the theme to use if > you want one, and lets you control which users are display on the login > screen. I am assuming your using SDDM as the login manager, if so to change themes and some other "basic" options via System Settings you need to have sddm-kcm installed. It would then be available via the Startup and Shutdown option. For modifying the Users shown etc you could edit /etc/sddm.conf, I think there is a man page for this. Colin -- Fedora 23 (Twenty Three) Registered Linux user number #342953 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing Component in KDE System Settings
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 07:28 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings addin that allows customization of the Display Manager login interface in F23? I'm looking for the interface that lets you specify the theme to use if you want one, and lets you control which users are display on the login screen. Note that there is a list specifically for KDE on Fedora, see https://l ists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde.lists.fedoraproject.org/ poc Hey! Thanks for that. billo-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing Component in KDE System Settings
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 07:28 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings > addin that allows customization of the Display Manager login > interface in F23? I'm looking for the interface that lets you specify > the theme to use if you want one, and lets you control which users > are display on the login screen. Note that there is a list specifically for KDE on Fedora, see https://l ists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde.lists.fedoraproject.org/ poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installation instructions for NUT on Fedora 19 - that works
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 17:14 +, Gary Stainburn wrote: > However, none of the instructions relate to F19 and even after > making allowances I still can't get it to work. F19 is obsolete and unsupported, including for security patches. You really should be running at least F22, especially on a server. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Missing Component in KDE System Settings
Happens that isn't available anymore. I don't know if they plan to add this feature in the future or not. Cheers, Sylvia On Thursday, 7 January 2016, Stephen Morris wrote: > Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings addin that > allows customization of the Display Manager login interface in F23? I'm > looking for the interface that lets you specify the theme to use if you > want one, and lets you control which users are display on the login screen. > > regards, > > Steve > > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Missing Component in KDE System Settings
Can anyone tell me what has happened to the KDE System Settings addin that allows customization of the Display Manager login interface in F23? I'm looking for the interface that lets you specify the theme to use if you want one, and lets you control which users are display on the login screen. regards, Steve <>-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Fedora] - No GUI after install bumblebee on Fedora 23
On 7 Jan 2016 5:00 p.m., "Earl A Ramirez" wrote: > > > > On 8 January 2016 at 01:15, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7 January 2016 at 15:11, Earl A Ramirez wrote: >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I have a ASUS laptop with NVIDIA Optimus technology, therefore, I used the Fedora documentation [0] to install bumbleeble using the third party managed driver to install NVIDIA. After the installation I am no longer seeing the NVIDIA when I use 'lspci | grep VGA'; however, when I use 'lspci | egrep 'VGA|3D'' I can see the NVIDIA video card. >>> >>> $ lspci | grep VGA >>> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 191b (rev 06) >>> >>> $ lspci | egrep 'VGA|3D' >>> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 191b (rev 06) >>> 01:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM107M [GeForce GTX 960M] (rev a2) >>> >>> Also I no longer see the vgaswitcheroo under /sys/kernel/debug/. When I try to boot with the kernel that NVIDIA was build on; the laptop locks up just before the GUI and you will hear the fans blowing and the only way around it is to power the laptop down. I have tried booting into that kernel with different kernel parameters; E.g. nomodeset rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau and even i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 and all options and combinations fails. >>> >>> However when I boot from the kernel that NVIDIA was not compiled on I can the the get a display that says "oops something went wrong, please try again" and there is an option to log out, I can also switch to another virtual console and have full access to the OS. I get the same behaviour even if I use nomodeset; however, if I use i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 I get the appropriate resolution. >>> >>> Can anyone shed some light on how to get the GUI, with bumblebee or even the Intel graphic drivers? >>> >>> The packages that were installed are: >>> $ rpm -qa | egrep 'bumblebee|bbswitch|primus|VirtualGL' >>> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.x86_64 >>> bumblebee-nvidia-352.63-2.fc23.x86_64 >>> bbswitch-dkms-0.8.0-2.fc23.x86_64 >>> bumblebee-nonfree-release-1.2-1.noarch >>> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.i686 >>> bumblebee-release-1.2-1.noarch >>> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.i686 >>> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.x86_64 >>> bumblebee-3.2.1-9.fc23.x86_64 >>> >> >> >> >> Sounds like we practically the same laptop ... >> >> This will go a lot easier for you if you install kernel 4.3.3-300 from updates-testing as that has the full skylake i915 support (so don't do preliminary_hw_support on that). >> >> This looks suspicious ... Xorg should not see the NVIDIA driver if you've managed to follow the bumblebee instructions correctly: >> >> (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so >> [ 4.334] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" >> [ 4.334] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 >> [ 4.334] Module class: X.Org Server Extension >> [ 4.335] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 358.16 Mon Nov 16 18:54:01 PST 2015 >> >> Compare this to mine where optirun/bumblebee/primus works fine: >> >> [23.343] (II) LoadModule: "glx" >> [23.343] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so >> [23.345] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" >> [23.345]compiled for 1.18.0, module version = 1.0.0 >> [23.345]ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 9.0 >> >> If the NVIDIA GLX libraries are loaded into xorg it'll trash your intel stuff ... >> >> Are you sure you didn't install the NVIDIA proprietary drivers (rpmfusion, negativo17 or directly) in some way other than only through the bumblebee non-free repo? >> >> This is my configuration: >> $ rpm -qa | grep -E 'nvidia|bumblebee|bbswitch|primus|VirtualGL' >> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.i686 >> bumblebee-3.2.1-9.fc23.x86_64 >> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.i686 >> bumblebee-release-1.2-1.noarch >> bumblebee-nvidia-352.63-2.fc23.x86_64 >> VirtualGL-2.4-5.fc23.x86_64 >> bbswitch-dkms-0.8.0-2.fc23.x86_64 >> bumblebee-nonfree-release-1.2-1.noarch >> primus-1.1.03282015-2.fc23.x86_64 >> >> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX has in it nouveau.modeset=0 and rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau >> >> Before I updated to 4.3.3 today the preliminary_hw_support=1 was needed as well. >> >> What's the output of bumblebee-nvidia --check for you ? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >> > Hello James, > > Thanks, this is the output from bumblebee-nvidia --check > > bumblebee-nvidia --check > --force compile selected via /etc/sysconfig/nvidia/compile-nvidia-driver > Warning! This NVIDIA driver has not compiled successfully before on kernel 4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64! > Warning! This NVIDIA driver userland > /usr/lib64/nvidia-bumblebee/libGL.so.1 library is missing! > > > Warning
Re: No sound also with kernel 4.3.3-300
Il giorno Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:22:38 + James Hogarth ha scritto: > On 7 January 2016 at 11:10, Luigi Votta wrote: > > > Hello Feodra users, > > I've no sound on my (new) system (Skylake 6500, Asus H170-Pro), > > updated today to kernel (rebase) 4.3.3-300. > > > > In dmesg: > > [2.606535] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: CORB reset timeout#1, > > CORBRP=0 > > [2.610741] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: no codecs found! > > > > lspci: > > 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-H HD Audio > > (rev 31) > > > > Has anybody the same issue? > > > > Did this work on the previous kernel? > > As this is still in updates-testing and not stable I suggest that you > post to fedora-devel with issues and/or comment on the update itself > for visibility to the maintainers. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ce812a1e0 Ok I'll send there, thank you. pgphZiRALKRUr.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: No sound also with kernel 4.3.3-300
On 7 January 2016 at 11:10, Luigi Votta wrote: > Hello Feodra users, > I've no sound on my (new) system (Skylake 6500, Asus H170-Pro), > updated today to kernel (rebase) 4.3.3-300. > > In dmesg: > [2.606535] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: CORB reset timeout#1, > CORBRP=0 > [2.610741] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: no codecs found! > > lspci: > 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-H HD Audio (rev > 31) > > Has anybody the same issue? > Did this work on the previous kernel? As this is still in updates-testing and not stable I suggest that you post to fedora-devel with issues and/or comment on the update itself for visibility to the maintainers. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ce812a1e0 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
