Re: Structural drawing CAD pkg, with 3D view of external appearance?

[Kevin Cummings]

On 03/12/16 05:43, Ron Leach wrote:
> List, good morning,
> 
> Looking for a CAD program to draw out floorplans etc for a new
> building.  I've access to several 2D packages but does anyone know of a
> package that could also display a kind-of 3D image of what the structure
> would finally look like?  Eg, the vertical faces, roof line(s) and
> overall shape.  We're running F23/XFCE.  I had heard about, but never
> used or seen, a package 'sweethome3d', and there is reference to it in
> (maybe earlier) repos, but dnf doesn't seem to find it now.

Did you Google it?

> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjDwabDpcHLAhUF2T4KHdttA90QFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sweethome3d.com%2F&usg=AFQjCNGyJ_zZ1Uo9IjGudG-snoexC2FdpQ

The Download page talks about Ubuntu, but there are jar files and
source files available for download as well

> I imagine people have tried to do this, before, and I wondered if anyone
> could recommend anything?
> 
> Grateful for any advice,
> 
> regards, Ron

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Issue with kernel-devel installation.

[Erik P. Olsen]

On 2016-03-14 at 10:08:41 Rick Stevens wrote:

> On 03/13/2016 03:20 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> 
> 
> >> Note that there is no versioning dependencies between kernel and
> >> kernel-devel so if you only dnf upgrade kernel (or dnf upgrade
> >> kernel-devel) they will fall out of sync.
> >>
> >> You need to dnf update kernel kernel-devel together (or not filter
> >> the dnf update at all) to keep them in sync.  
> >
> >
> > I think yum-extender for dnf is the culprit. I see today that
> > kernel-4.4.4-301.fc23 has become available and yum-extender does not
> > include kernel-devel in the update whereas dnf update does. Weird.  
> 
> I'd bugzilla that quickly.
 
OK, searching bugzilla I found that it has already been reported as bug
no 1286389.

-- 
Erik
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: OT: Linux Jobs

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 13:15 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> Jobs from:

Seriously?

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: anyone (still) using kdm?

[Sylvia Sánchez]

Hi Stephen!

Use LightDM. It works nicely with Plasma 5.
And you're right, SDDM is atrocious.



Cheers,
Sylvia



On Monday, 14 March 2016, Stephen Morris  wrote:

> On 12/03/16 07:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
>> interested in keeping it alive?
>>
>> -- Rex
>>
>> I am currently using SDDM following recommendations, but the startup
> performance and user display of SDDM are atrocious. What is unclear is
> whether its an upstream issue or a Fedora issue. Having said this switching
> back to KDM is going to be of no help if Fedora don't put KDM configuration
> back into System Settings. If Fedora are not going to put the KDM
> configuration back into System Settings and decide to remove it in favor of
> SDDM, then I will have to switch back to GDM, but that doesn't work
> properly, as there is no way that using SYSTEMCTL to stop GDM should shut
> down the Plasma 5 desktop.
>
> regards,
> Steve
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[Jack Craig]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:11 AM, jd1008  wrote:

> Hi all,
> time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
> conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
> dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
>


just a wag, could the math, skip blocks / offset from 0, is it not on
physical optic media BS? could you have 1k BS media?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Thinkpad software

[Porfirio Andres Paiz Carrasco]

On Mar 13, 2016 6:08 PM, "Timothy Murphy"  wrote:
>
> Is tp_smapi available in RPM format for Fedora-23?

Is available via copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tuxor/tp_smapi/

> There seem to be versions for Debian, Suze, et al,
> but if there is a Fedora version I can't find it.
>
> --
> Timothy Murphy
> gayleard /at/ eircom.net
> School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: DWA192 Network Connection Speed Slow

[Stephen Morris]

On 10/03/16 12:35, stan wrote:

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:55:05 +1100
Stephen Morris  wrote:



Thankyou for your response. I've just checked the config for the
4.4.3 kernel and CONFIG_ATH9K_CHANNEL_CONTEXT isn't set at all. I
could compile the kernel to set that flag, but is there any chance
that it would be set by default in the kernel, or does it cause
problems if the adapter isn't actually dual channel?

I'm not an expert on this, but my take on the code is that it had to be
explicitly set.  And I can't answer your question about whether it is a
problem for single channel if dual channel is set.  The code looked
pretty complex, I didn't look in depth, and I don't have the background
to really understand it.  An incompatibility would explain why it isn't
set, but I can't see expert developers like those who work on the
kernel not allowing for that situation to be harmless.

Before worrying about incompatibilities, you could try to compile a
kernel with the config switch set.  If that kernel works with your
card, then you could worry about how to deal with incompatibilities, if
there are any.  Maybe by booting different kernels for different cards;
crude but effective.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel

I don't really know enough to answer your questions, but I think this
is at least a possible explanation for your difficulties with the card
you have.
I could compile the kernel to set the flag, as a wireless connection 
speed jumping from 525Mbps on 2.4GHz to 1.3Gbps on 5GHz can be 
significant, especially when streaming. I'll need to research how to 
compile a kernel under Fedora, and what additional source packages I 
need (I found some documentation on this on the net), as it is about 10 
years since I last compiled a kernel.
I was just hoping it would be automatically done in the kernel, as with 
the previous usb card I had, I found it a pain to have to compile the 
driver every time the kernel changed and to have to go back to the web 
site every so often to get an updated version of the driver source 
because what I had didn't support the kernel I was using.


regards,
Steve

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: anyone (still) using kdm?

[Stephen Morris]

On 12/03/16 07:48, Rex Dieter wrote:

I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
interested in keeping it alive?

-- Rex

I am currently using SDDM following recommendations, but the startup 
performance and user display of SDDM are atrocious. What is unclear is 
whether its an upstream issue or a Fedora issue. Having said this 
switching back to KDM is going to be of no help if Fedora don't put KDM 
configuration back into System Settings. If Fedora are not going to put 
the KDM configuration back into System Settings and decide to remove it 
in favor of SDDM, then I will have to switch back to GDM, but that 
doesn't work properly, as there is no way that using SYSTEMCTL to stop 
GDM should shut down the Plasma 5 desktop.


regards,
Steve

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: conflict installing i686 version of "qt" on x86_64

[Christian Groessler]

On 03/14/16 19:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

Clearly a packaging bug. File a BZ again



Ok, submitted: bug 1317661


regards,
chris
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

OT: Linux Jobs

[jd1008]

Jobs from: Blizzard Entertainment - Entertainment and Media Industry, 
Danaher and more...
*Linux Kernel Developer* jobs within *25* miles of *Newport Coast, 
California*.


Still Active
Possible Match 	Senior Linux Systems Administrator - Entertainment and 
Media Indust...

Blizzard Entertainment - Entertainment and Media Industry in Irvine, CA
Script and *Develop*. Perhaps someday we’ll all be replaced by a script, 
but until that day, we do the ...
 

Possible Match 	Cloud Systems Engineer - Entertainment and Media 
Industry Opportunity

Blizzard Entertainment - Entertainment and Media Industry in Irvine, CA
... *Linux* *kernel* source, and even getting all the way down to the 
hardware. Programming and Scripting. Your ...
 


Possible Match  Software Developer Connectivity
Danaher in Brea, CA
Experience with design and implementation of networking protocols using 
C++ / Java across Windows and *Linux* ...
 


Possible Match  Senior Software Engineer, Windows, Low-Level
CyberCoders in Irvine, CA
... Windows *kernel* and driver development is a strong plus - 
Experience with Mac OSX, *Linux*, or Android ...
 

Possible Match 	Firmware Engineer - Firmware Development, C/C++, 
Embedded Linux

CyberCoders in Anaheim, CA
... *Linux* *Kernel* Development of Flash File System Busybox 
Integrating 3rd party packages to meet system ...

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[jd1008]

On 03/14/2016 01:00 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, jd1008  said:

$ ls -l
total 13662104K
-rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 5970991104 Mar 14 12:15 test
-rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 8018991104 Mar 14 12:02 Our_Group_Picnic.iso
{3507-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=Our_Group_Picnic.iso of=test bs=2K
skip=2915523K conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘Our_Group_Picnic.iso’: cannot skip to specified offset

Again, you are doing math wrong.  You told dd to skip to byte
6114294890496 (2 * 1024 * 2915523 * 1024) in a file that is only
8018991104 bytes long.  Nothing wrong with dd...


Well Chris, I was following Rick's suggestion.
Please have a look at his replies to me.

I removed the 'K' from the skip value and it worked.

Kind regards,

JD
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, jd1008  said:
> $ ls -l
> total 13662104K
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 5970991104 Mar 14 12:15 test
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 8018991104 Mar 14 12:02 Our_Group_Picnic.iso
> {3507-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=Our_Group_Picnic.iso of=test bs=2K
> skip=2915523K conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
> dd: ‘Our_Group_Picnic.iso’: cannot skip to specified offset

Again, you are doing math wrong.  You told dd to skip to byte
6114294890496 (2 * 1024 * 2915523 * 1024) in a file that is only
8018991104 bytes long.  Nothing wrong with dd...

-- 
Chris Adams 
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[jd1008]

On 03/14/2016 12:48 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:11:31AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M
conv=noerror,notrunc

works just fine.

5888 * 64M  is 368 GiB. Is your optical disk really that big?
For a smaller skip it should work just fine. On my system with a DVD:

 $ strace -o /tmp/tr dd bs=64M skip=5888 count=3 if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null
 dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument

 $ strace -o /tmp/tr dd bs=64M skip=1 count=3 if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null
 3+0 records in
 3+0 records out
 201326592 bytes (201 MB) copied, 44.0739 s, 4.6 MB/s
 $



You are correct here. My mistake.
But, please take a look at what I just replied to Rick.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[jd1008]

On 03/14/2016 11:29 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 03/14/2016 10:23 AM, jd1008 wrote:


On 03/14/2016 11:17 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 03/14/2016 10:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso 
bs=64M

conv=noerror,notrunc

works just fine.

So why is it that skip des not work on optical media?


Skip works fine, but you must specify the units. "skip=5888" doesn't
tell dd how far to skip. E.g. "skip=5888c" would skip 5888 bytes. From
the man page:

N and BYTES may be followed by the following multiplicative
suffixes: c=1, w=2, b=512, kB =1000, K=1024, MB=1000*1000,
M=1024*1024, xM=M  GB=1000*1000*1000, G=1024*1024*1024, and
so on for T, P, E, Z, Y.

I thought that bs=64M  applies to all io for input and output, and skip.
I did not specify ibs= nor obs=, just bs=


I've rarely used "ibs" and "obs" separately, just "bs". That being said,
I've always used the suffix with "skip".

It may be that "bs" does not set "ibs", so a "skip=5888" wouldn't have
the size. Don't know that for a fact, but it's possible. Stranger things
have been known to happen.

Well, it is also doing it on regular files. To wit:

$ ls -l
total 13662104K
-rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 5970991104 Mar 14 12:15 test
-rw-r--r-- 1 jd jd 8018991104 Mar 14 12:02 Our_Group_Picnic.iso
{3507-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=Our_Group_Picnic.iso of=test bs=2K 
skip=2915523K conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append

dd: ‘Our_Group_Picnic.iso’: cannot skip to specified offset
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000263412 s, 0.0 kB/s

real0m0.00s
user0m0.00s
sys 0m0.00s


So  What's with dd???

This is a new behavior as far as I know. I have been using it since bsd 2.X
and skip always worked.

Installed is package:  coreutils-8.23-11.fc22.x86_64
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[Dave Mitchell]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:11:31AM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> Hi all,
> time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
> conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
> dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s
> 
> but
> 
> {3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M
> conv=noerror,notrunc
> 
> works just fine.

5888 * 64M  is 368 GiB. Is your optical disk really that big?
For a smaller skip it should work just fine. On my system with a DVD:

$ strace -o /tmp/tr dd bs=64M skip=5888 count=3 if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument

$ strace -o /tmp/tr dd bs=64M skip=1 count=3 if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null
3+0 records in
3+0 records out
201326592 bytes (201 MB) copied, 44.0739 s, 4.6 MB/s
$


-- 
"I do not resent criticism, even when, for the sake of emphasis,
it parts for the time with reality".
-- Winston Churchill, House of Commons, 22nd Jan 1941.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: conflict installing i686 version of "qt" on x86_64

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 03/14/2016 07:18 PM, Christian Groessler wrote:

Hi,

I want to install the 32-bit version of QT on a x86_64 system (for
Skype, their Linux version seems to be quite outdated).

I'm getting this error:

--
# dnf install qt.i686
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:48 ago on Mon Mar 14 19:03:00 2016.
Dependencies resolved.


  Package Arch Version Repository  Size


Installing:
  krb5-libs i686 1.14.1-1.fc23
updates858 k
  openssl-libs i686 1:1.0.2g-2.fc23
updates998 k
  qt i686 1:4.8.7-5.fc23 updates 5.0 M

Transaction Summary


Install  3 Packages

Total size: 6.8 M
Installed size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] qt-4.8.7-5.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] openssl-libs-1.0.2g-2.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
   file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/NOTICE from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
   file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/README from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
   file /usr/share/licenses/krb5-libs/LICENSE from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
   file /usr/share/man/man5/k5identity.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
   file /usr/share/man/man5/k5login.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
   file /usr/share/man/man5/krb5.conf.5.gz from install of
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64

Error Summary
-

#
--


Seems to be a problem that 32 and 64 versions of the krb5-libs package
claim/provide the same file.

Any idea?


Clearly a packaging bug. File a BZ against these packages.

Ralf


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

conflict installing i686 version of "qt" on x86_64

[Christian Groessler]

Hi,

I want to install the 32-bit version of QT on a x86_64 system (for 
Skype, their Linux version seems to be quite outdated).


I'm getting this error:

--
# dnf install qt.i686
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:48 ago on Mon Mar 14 19:03:00 2016.
Dependencies resolved.

 Package Arch Version Repository  Size

Installing:
 krb5-libs i686 1.14.1-1.fc23 
updates858 k
 openssl-libs i686 1:1.0.2g-2.fc23 
updates998 k
 qt i686 1:4.8.7-5.fc23 updates
5.0 M


Transaction Summary

Install  3 Packages

Total size: 6.8 M
Installed size: 23 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] qt-4.8.7-5.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] openssl-libs-1.0.2g-2.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful 
transaction.

You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction check error:
  file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/NOTICE from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
  file /usr/share/doc/krb5-libs/README from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
  file /usr/share/licenses/krb5-libs/LICENSE from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
  file /usr/share/man/man5/k5identity.5.gz from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
  file /usr/share/man/man5/k5login.5.gz from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64
  file /usr/share/man/man5/krb5.conf.5.gz from install of 
krb5-libs-1.14.1-1.fc23.i686 conflicts with file from package 
krb5-libs-1.14-9.fc23.x86_64


Error Summary
-

#
--


Seems to be a problem that 32 and 64 versions of the krb5-libs package 
claim/provide the same file.


Any idea?


regards,
chris
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't get amarok to play mp3's via GStreamer backend

[CS DBA]

On 03/14/2016 11:52 AM, Greg Woods wrote:


On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:39 AM, CS DBA > wrote:


rpm -qa | grep -i gstreamer


It's working for me, and here's what I have:

gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
libnice-gstreamer1-0.1.13-2.fc23.x86_64
phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-tools-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.4.0-7.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-libav-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin-1.0.11-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
phonon-qt5-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-18.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-15.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.23-7.fc22.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-28.fc23.x86_64

Looks like I have a few more gstreamer1-plugins than you do, but I 
don't know if that's it.


--Greg





Thanks... that was it, works now


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't get amarok to play mp3's via GStreamer backend

[Greg Woods]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:39 AM, CS DBA  wrote:

> rpm -qa | grep -i gstreamer


It's working for me, and here's what I have:

gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
libnice-gstreamer1-0.1.13-2.fc23.x86_64
phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-tools-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.4.0-7.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-libav-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin-1.0.11-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
phonon-qt5-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-18.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-15.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.23-7.fc22.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-28.fc23.x86_64

Looks like I have a few more gstreamer1-plugins than you do, but I don't
know if that's it.

--Greg
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Can't get amarok to play mp3's via GStreamer backend

[CS DBA]

I've installed a number of the gstreamer rpm's (running Fedora 23) as 
shown below. However amarok will not play mp3's unless I change the 
backend to vlc.  Anyone know how to get it to work with the GStreamer 
backend?


Thanks in advance...


$ rpm -qa | grep -i gstreamer
libnice-gstreamer1-0.1.13-2.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.6.3-3.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.23-7.fc22.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.4.0-7.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-18.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-devel-docs-0.10.19-18.fc23.noarch
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-15.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-devel-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-good-extras-0.10.31-15.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-tools-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-good-devel-docs-0.10.31-15.fc23.noarch
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-docs-0.10.36-13.fc23.noarch
qt-gstreamer-1.2.0-8.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-devel-0.10.23-29.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-tools-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
phonon-qt5-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-5.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-fc-0.2-11.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64
PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin-1.0.11-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.23-29.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree-0.10.23-3.fc22.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-devel-docs-0.10.23-29.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-29.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.6.3-1.fc23.x86_64
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.36-13.fc23.x86_64



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[Rick Stevens]

On 03/14/2016 10:23 AM, jd1008 wrote:


On 03/14/2016 11:17 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 03/14/2016 10:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M
conv=noerror,notrunc

works just fine.

So why is it that skip des not work on optical media?


Skip works fine, but you must specify the units. "skip=5888" doesn't
tell dd how far to skip. E.g. "skip=5888c" would skip 5888 bytes. From
the man page:

N and BYTES may be followed by the following multiplicative
suffixes: c=1, w=2, b=512, kB =1000, K=1024, MB=1000*1000,
M=1024*1024, xM=M  GB=1000*1000*1000, G=1024*1024*1024, and
so on for T, P, E, Z, Y.

I thought that bs=64M  applies to all io for input and output, and skip.
I did not specify ibs= nor obs=, just bs=


I've rarely used "ibs" and "obs" separately, just "bs". That being said,
I've always used the suffix with "skip".

It may be that "bs" does not set "ibs", so a "skip=5888" wouldn't have
the size. Don't know that for a fact, but it's possible. Stranger things
have been known to happen.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   A squeegee, by any other name, wouldn't sound as funny.  -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: sshd logging changed?

[Tom Horsley]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:32:54 +0100
Jakub Jelen wrote:

> Can you please fill a bug on logwatch?

Here it is:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317620

Hopefully, this will get fixed as well:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279936
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[jd1008]

On 03/14/2016 11:17 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 03/14/2016 10:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M
conv=noerror,notrunc

works just fine.

So why is it that skip des not work on optical media?


Skip works fine, but you must specify the units. "skip=5888" doesn't
tell dd how far to skip. E.g. "skip=5888c" would skip 5888 bytes. From
the man page:

N and BYTES may be followed by the following multiplicative
suffixes: c=1, w=2, b=512, kB =1000, K=1024, MB=1000*1000,
M=1024*1024, xM=M  GB=1000*1000*1000, G=1024*1024*1024, and
so on for T, P, E, Z, Y.

I thought that bs=64M  applies to all io for input and output, and skip.
I did not specify ibs= nor obs=, just bs=

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[Rick Stevens]

On 03/14/2016 10:11 AM, jd1008 wrote:

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append
dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M
conv=noerror,notrunc

works just fine.

So why is it that skip des not work on optical media?


Skip works fine, but you must specify the units. "skip=5888" doesn't
tell dd how far to skip. E.g. "skip=5888c" would skip 5888 bytes. From
the man page:

N and BYTES may be followed by the following multiplicative
suffixes: c=1, w=2, b=512, kB =1000, K=1024, MB=1000*1000,
M=1024*1024, xM=M  GB=1000*1000*1000, G=1024*1024*1024, and
so on for T, P, E, Z, Y.

--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  You know you've landed gear-up when it takes full power to taxi.  -
--- Chuck Yeager -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Problem with dd and /dev/sr0

[jd1008]

Hi all,
time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M skip=5888 
conv=noerror,notrunc oflag=append

dd: ‘/dev/sr0’: cannot skip: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000301689 s, 0.0 kB/s

but

{3464-jd@localhost}$ time dd if=/dev/sr0 of=Our_Group_Picnic.iso bs=64M 
conv=noerror,notrunc


works just fine.

So why is it that skip des not work on optical media?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Issue with kernel-devel installation.

[Rick Stevens]

On 03/13/2016 03:20 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:



Note that there is no versioning dependencies between kernel and
kernel-devel so if you only dnf upgrade kernel (or dnf upgrade
kernel-devel) they will fall out of sync.

You need to dnf update kernel kernel-devel together (or not filter
the dnf update at all) to keep them in sync.



I think yum-extender for dnf is the culprit. I see today that
kernel-4.4.4-301.fc23 has become available and yum-extender does not
include kernel-devel in the update whereas dnf update does. Weird.


I'd bugzilla that quickly.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror -
-  and you'd be on your own, pal!-
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Major owncloud updates incoming

[James Hogarth]

On 14 March 2016 at 12:56, Ranbir  wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 15:42 +, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Just a quick reminder about the above.
> >
> > Owncloud 8.1.5 is in the process of going to the Fedora 23 testing
> > repo at the moment (just waiting the push).
> >
> > Fedora 22 will get a similar updates-testing in the next few days.
>
> Are these updates going to make it into the epel repo as well?
>
> -
>

EPEL7 certainly ... EPEL6 I'm not sure of yet.

Currently the oC in EPEL6 is 7.0 so we'd need to fix any dependency issues
there to get to 8.0 first and then carry on up the path similar to how
we've done with Fedora.

I'm really not keen on trying to maintain owncloud80, owncloud81,
owncloud82 and owncloud90 packages all in tandem - there's just not enough
hours in the day for me to cover more than $latest pretty much.

Of course given it's EPEL this will be over an extended period of time with
a lot of grace periods between updates to give everyone a chance to move on
up.

This also takes a backseat currently to just getting Fedora up to the
current version - hopefully shaking out any issues in the process to
provide a good experience for the EPEL users.

Note that if we can't get EPEL6 past 8.0 then it'll need to be retired as
the last 7.0.x update has been released upstream but that's a battle
for $future_me

If you'd like to do some early testing on EPEL7 then ifas/Didier has been
taking my patches and sources and building them for EL7 on his COPR:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ifas/owncloud/

YMMV and insert many other disclaimers here along with a reminder about
backups ;)

Do remember you cannot just upgrade straight to 8.2 but need to use the 8.1
packages first and ensure your owncloud instance is fully functional and
any apps you use are functioning correctly.

Bear in mind that in the 8.1 update the Contacts, Calendar and Documents
apps were moved out of core and into the store - so these need enabling
with external store access. They also need their own update in oC after
enabling, and whilst there are updates pending you can't install a new app.

Owncloud 8.1.5 is now in both Fedora 23 and Fedora 22 updates-testing and
will remain so for another week. Assuming that there are no issues reported
in bodhi I plan to push these stable one week Wednesday and then to push
the 8.2.X packages into rawhide and updates-testing for F24, F23 and F22.

At that time I'll start the EPEL7 process for 8.1.X as well.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Major owncloud updates incoming

[Ranbir]

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 15:42 +, James Hogarth wrote:
> Just a quick reminder about the above.
> 
> Owncloud 8.1.5 is in the process of going to the Fedora 23 testing
> repo at the moment (just waiting the push).
> 
> Fedora 22 will get a similar updates-testing in the next few days.

Are these updates going to make it into the epel repo as well?

-- 
Ranbir


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: sshd logging changed?

[Jakub Jelen]

On 03/12/2016 02:26 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:

I noticed I got a sshd update recently. Now I have bazillions
of messages about disconnects:

Disconnected from NN.NN.NN.NN port 41236 : 1 time(s)
  Received disconnect from NN.NN.NN.NN port 39642:11: disconnected by user : 1 
time(s)

Logging in and logging out are are normal activities
in a working ssh. How the devil can I stop this logging
of utterly useless information? (Which for me happens
every 5 minutes due to a cron job I have running at
work that phones home :-).
I don't think these messages were not there before. But the format 
changed a bit (added port number) and it is not handled by Logwatch as 
it should be.


Sorry I didn't notice earlier before pushing that into F23. But this 
needs to be fixed in Logwatch at least for F24. There is patch for the 
second line, but I have no idea why the first was not visible before. 
Can you please fill a bug on logwatch?


Kind regards,

--
Jakub Jelen
Security Technologies
Red Hat

--- /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sshd.old	2015-08-25 10:53:58.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/sshd	2015-08-25 10:53:58.0 +0200
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@
   $RefusedConnections{$1}++;
} elsif ( my ($Reason) = ($ThisLine =~ /^Authentication refused: (.*)$/ ) ) {
   $RefusedAuthentication{$Reason}++;
-   } elsif ( my ($Host,$Reason) = ($ThisLine =~ /^Received disconnect from ([^ ]*): (.*)$/)) {
+   } elsif ( my ($Host,$Reason) = ($ThisLine =~ /^Received disconnect from ([^ ]*) port [^ ]*: (.*)$/)) {
   # Reason 11 (SSH_DISCONNECT_BY_APPLICATION) is expected, and logged at severity level INFO
   if ($Reason != 11) {$DisconnectReceived{$Reason}{$Host}++;}
} elsif ( my ($Host) = ($ThisLine =~ /^ROOT LOGIN REFUSED FROM ([^ ]*)$/)) {
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org