Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Earl A Ramirez]

Thanks again all,

I copied the /etc/default/grub from the KVM, modified the
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX and everything is as expected now.

-- 
Kind Regards
Earl Ramirez
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

bluetooth mouse

[Jon LaBadie]

I have an old Dell Vostro 1500 laptop.  It was running
Fedora 17 with no problems with the bluetooth mouse I use.

After a fresh install of Fedora 24 Workstation I can't
get the mouse to reconnect after a boot.  Systemctl
reports bluetoothd 'Failed to obtain handles for
"Serviced Changed" characteristic'.  Both blueman-manager
and blueman-applet report the adapter is off and are
unable to turn it on.

I can go into bluetoothctl, power on the adapter and
connect to the mouse.  Things are fine until a reboot.

lshw reports the bluetooth adapter is a Broadcom BCM2045.

Any thoughts on how to get the adapter powered on at boot
and the mouse auto-reconnected as it nicely did 7 Fedora
releases ago.

Thanks, Jon
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh again..

[Niels Kobschätzki]

bruce writes:

> Hey... (again)
>
>
> Still trying to get my mind around how to solve this. Someone mentioned ssh
> forwarding, but I've not gotten it to work.
>
>
> Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
>
> box1
> box2
> box3
> box4
> box5
>
> Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
>
> On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to each
> box..
>
> From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
>
> From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the user1
> that I created/installed?
>
> I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
>
> What do I need to add to the local box, or to box1 / box2 to permit me to
> hop from box1 to box2 without having to add a key from/between box1 and
> box2?
>
> if ssh forwarding is the soln, what has to be added to which files, on
> which boxes?

I don't think that you can do that with ssh-forwarding. You generate a key-pair
- a private and a public key. You copied the public key already to the boxes, so
so you can login from the local box.
You would need now to copy also the private key to all the boxes into ~/.ssh of
the user which you want to use (user1). Since the
fitting public key is already everywhere in the authorized_keys-file in ~/.ssh,
you should then be able to log into box2 from box1. But beware: since every box
has now your private key, if one your remote boxes gets compromised all boxes
are compromised because the attacker can now log into the other boxes without a
password.
You might want to protect your private key with a strong password that doesn't
get cached by something like ssh-agent but which you need to type everytime when
you want to use your key if the boxes are exposed to the internet.

Niels
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh again..

[Ranjan Maitra]

i see: this is a fedora list, but have you tried posting to the centos ml? 
though, in my experience, there is less traffic there than here.

regardless of where you post, you should provide detailed output, including 
using ssh -vvv.

btw, can you log in with ssh? keygen is to get around typing a password each 
time, but does ssh itself work?

ranjan

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 22:53:21 -0400 bruce  wrote:

> Hey Ranjan
> 
> All boxes are running centos 6.5
> 
> the keys where created using key-gen
> 
> on each box, i created a user testuser1 for testing/ease
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Ranjan Maitra <
> maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com> wrote:
> 
> > What are these boxes running? Also, how did you create your ssh key(s)?
> >
> > Ranjan
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:07:38 -0400 bruce  wrote:
> >
> > > Hey... (again)
> > >
> > >
> > > Still trying to get my mind around how to solve this. Someone mentioned
> > ssh
> > > forwarding, but I've not gotten it to work.
> > >
> > >
> > > Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
> > >
> > > box1
> > > box2
> > > box3
> > > box4
> > > box5
> > >
> > > Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
> > >
> > > On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to
> > each
> > > box..
> > >
> > > From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
> > >
> > > From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the
> > user1
> > > that I created/installed?
> > >
> > > I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> > > having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
> > >
> > > What do I need to add to the local box, or to box1 / box2 to permit me to
> > > hop from box1 to box2 without having to add a key from/between box1 and
> > > box2?
> > >
> > > if ssh forwarding is the soln, what has to be added to which files, on
> > > which boxes?
> > >
> > > Thoughts/comments..
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> >
> > --
> > Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted
> > on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those
> > needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate
> > addresses.
> >
> > 
> > FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
> > Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
> >
> > --
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
> >


-- 
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.


Publish your photos in seconds for FREE
TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if4

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Earl A Ramirez]

On 8 July 2016 at 06:03, Stephen Morris  wrote:

> On 08/07/16 02:07, Edouard Fazenda wrote:
>
>> Hi Earl,
>>
>> On Fedora 24 it's the same configuration as Fedora 23, you have to edit
>> /etc/default/grub file and after run the grub2-mkconfig command to update
>> the grub.cfg Configuration file in /boot. Make sure that the symbolic link
>> of /etc/sysconfig/grub is still pointing to /etc/default/grub file.
>>
>> Cheers, Edouard.
>>
> Hi Earl, just following on from what Edouard said, I have never used
> /etc/sysconfig/grub to make grub changes, as until your thread I didn't
> know it existed. All the grub documentation I have seen has said to make
> changed directly to /etc/default/grub, which is what I have always done.
> Like Tom and you have both indicated I have always run
> grub2-mkconfig/grub2-install manually because I don't like the format of
> the grub menu built by grubby (which is automatically run when a new kernel
> is installed as Tom said). Also as I understand it, grubby does not use
> /etc/default/grub to build its grub menus.
>
> From what you have shown in your thread it looks like /etc/sysconfig/grub
> is linked to the wrong file. It seems to be linked to
> /etc/grub.d/00-header, so you may want to re-link it back to
> /etc/default/grub. I have checked on my F24 system and /etc/sysconfig/grub
> is a link to /etc/default/grub.
>
> regards,
> Steve
>
>
Thanks for the responses all, I have confirmed that the symbolic link
points to /etc/default/grub

$ ls -la /etc/sysconfig/
total 152
lrwxrwxrwx.   1 root root17 Jun 11 02:31 grub -> /etc/default/grub

when I use less to read /etc/default/grub, below is what I am seeing;
therefore, the /etc/default/grub file is not the same on this box, I will
whip up a F24 KVM instance and copy the /etc/default/grub file to this box
and I think I should be good.


# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#

### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
set pager=1

if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
  load_env
fi
if [ "${next_entry}" ] ; then
   set default="${next_entry}"
   set next_entry=
   save_env next_entry
   set boot_once=true
else
   set default="${saved_entry}"
fi

if [ x"${feature_menuentry_id}" = xy ]; then
  menuentry_id_option="--id"
else
*/etc/default/grub*


-- 
Kind Regards
Earl Ramirez
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Rami Rosen]

Hi, all,

> I have checked on my F24 system and /etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to 
> /etc/default/grub.

The same with me, on a fresh instalattion of Fedora 24:
ls /etc/sysconfig/grub -al
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 Jun 10 21:31 /etc/sysconfig/grub -> /etc/default/grub

Regards,
Rami Rosen
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh again..

[bruce]

Hey Ranjan

All boxes are running centos 6.5

the keys where created using key-gen

on each box, i created a user testuser1 for testing/ease

thanks




On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Ranjan Maitra <
maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com> wrote:

> What are these boxes running? Also, how did you create your ssh key(s)?
>
> Ranjan
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:07:38 -0400 bruce  wrote:
>
> > Hey... (again)
> >
> >
> > Still trying to get my mind around how to solve this. Someone mentioned
> ssh
> > forwarding, but I've not gotten it to work.
> >
> >
> > Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
> >
> > box1
> > box2
> > box3
> > box4
> > box5
> >
> > Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
> >
> > On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to
> each
> > box..
> >
> > From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
> >
> > From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the
> user1
> > that I created/installed?
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> > having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
> >
> > What do I need to add to the local box, or to box1 / box2 to permit me to
> > hop from box1 to box2 without having to add a key from/between box1 and
> > box2?
> >
> > if ssh forwarding is the soln, what has to be added to which files, on
> > which boxes?
> >
> > Thoughts/comments..
> >
> > Thanks
>
>
> --
> Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted
> on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those
> needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate
> addresses.
>
> 
> FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
> Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh again..

[Ranjan Maitra]

What are these boxes running? Also, how did you create your ssh key(s)?

Ranjan

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:07:38 -0400 bruce  wrote:

> Hey... (again)
> 
> 
> Still trying to get my mind around how to solve this. Someone mentioned ssh
> forwarding, but I've not gotten it to work.
> 
> 
> Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
> 
> box1
> box2
> box3
> box4
> box5
> 
> Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
> 
> On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to each
> box..
> 
> From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
> 
> From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the user1
> that I created/installed?
> 
> I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
> 
> What do I need to add to the local box, or to box1 / box2 to permit me to
> hop from box1 to box2 without having to add a key from/between box1 and
> box2?
> 
> if ssh forwarding is the soln, what has to be added to which files, on
> which boxes?
> 
> Thoughts/comments..
> 
> Thanks


-- 
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.


FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

[Rick Stevens]

On 07/07/2016 05:45 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Rick Stevens  > wrote:
> 
> The behavior of dnf sure looks like you have some weird
> options set in the dnf.conf or repo files (like excludes and such).
> 
> 
> Boot to the head
> 
> Turns out the two systems that failed were the two that get used a lot.
> On those, I had been having some kind of problem printing that required
> downgrading the cups packages in order to get it working again, so I had
> "exclude=cups*" in the dnf.conf file. Remove that and all is well. I was
> afraid that this was a problem that was much larger than it actually
> was, and in fact the example I chose is the only place it actually
> caused an issue.
> 
> One of those things where, after tearing my hair out for a few days,
> someone says "did you check this dumbass thing over here" and that turns
> out to be it. I don't know why I didn't think of checking the dnf.conf
> file to begin with.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who helped with this issue.
> 
> Note to self: remove excludes from dnf.conf before doing a
> system-upgrade

Just glad you got it sorted out. We've all been there, buddy!
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-I will go to my happy place. I WOULD go to my happy place   -
- if I knew where the @$>&$@#* it is!-
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

ssh again..

[bruce]

Hey... (again)


Still trying to get my mind around how to solve this. Someone mentioned ssh
forwarding, but I've not gotten it to work.


Say I have 5 boxes on my network,

box1
box2
box3
box4
box5

Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access

On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to each
box..

>From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.

>From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the user1
that I created/installed?

I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
having to have lots of pub/private keys ...

What do I need to add to the local box, or to box1 / box2 to permit me to
hop from box1 to box2 without having to add a key from/between box1 and
box2?

if ssh forwarding is the soln, what has to be added to which files, on
which boxes?

Thoughts/comments..

Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

[Greg Woods]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Rick Stevens  wrote:

> The behavior of dnf sure looks like you have some weird
> options set in the dnf.conf or repo files (like excludes and such).
>

Boot to the head

Turns out the two systems that failed were the two that get used a lot. On
those, I had been having some kind of problem printing that required
downgrading the cups packages in order to get it working again, so I had
"exclude=cups*" in the dnf.conf file. Remove that and all is well. I was
afraid that this was a problem that was much larger than it actually was,
and in fact the example I chose is the only place it actually caused an
issue.

One of those things where, after tearing my hair out for a few days,
someone says "did you check this dumbass thing over here" and that turns
out to be it. I don't know why I didn't think of checking the dnf.conf file
to begin with.

Thanks to everyone who helped with this issue.

Note to self: remove excludes from dnf.conf before doing a
system-upgrade

--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

[Rick Stevens]

On 07/07/2016 03:45 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Greg Woods  > wrote:
> 
> On 07/04/16 07:23, Greg Woods wrote:
> > I have upgraded 4 systems (two laptops and two desktops, all different 
> hardware) from
> > F23 to F24. Two of them are working fine, and the others seem to be 
> badly messed up in
> > the area of package management. The main symptom I see is that 
> google-chrome-stable was
> > uninstalled during the upgrade, and I can't reinstall it:
> 
> 
> I have not been able to resolve the original issue, but I was finally
> able to install google-chrome-stable. I believe this only worked because
> the google-chrome packages are intended to run on different distros, and
> the distros use different names for the packages, and so the
> dependencies for google-chrome-stable are on specific files rather than
> on packages (e.g. /usr/bin/foomatic-rip rather than cups-filters). It
> appears that google-chrome and a number of the cups packages were
> deleted during the upgrade for unknown reasons (presumably related to
> whatever the underlying package management problem is). I found this out
> because printing wasn't working any more either. (I did end up having to
> use "--allowerasing", but it seems like I always end up having to do
> that in order to get "dnf system-upgrade" to work. This is the first
> (and second) time that I have ever had anything like this happen as a
> result though).
> 
> Since I have my own copy of the fedora repos, I mounted it and went in
> to the Packages/c directory and installed the cups packages directly
> from RPMs. Doing this brought back memories of the pre-yum "dependency
> hell" days. I attempt to install cups-client*.rpm and it says "nothing
> provides cups-libs". So I add that RPM to the list and another is
> needed, etc. I ended up having to specify about 8 different RPMs in
> order to get cups-client and cups-filters to install. After installing
> those, I was able to install google-chrome-stable, and printing now works.
> 
> Unfortunately, "dnf list cups\*" still says there are no matching
> packages, whereas "rpm -qa | grep cups" shows them. So although chrome
> and printing are working again, the system is not updateable. So I still
> eventually need to find out what the heck happened during the upgrade
> and how to fix it.

Remember that rpm is querying the rpm database locally and doesn't
check the web. The behavior of dnf sure looks like you have some weird
options set in the dnf.conf or repo files (like excludes and such).
You could try "dnf -d 10 list cups*" and look carefully at the output.
Perhaps you'll see something odd in the repos or plugins or cache or
_something_.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.-
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Chrome blocks hibernation - SOLVED

[Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon]

On 06/19/2016 11:30 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 18:37 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 10:25 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
 Now if only there was some way the system could have told me
 that,
>>> say
 an error log where useful messages would appear rather than a lot
>>> of
 cryptic text that boils down to "something failed" ...
>>> Geeze! We should have noticed that it was "hibernation". Yeah,
>>> that 
>>> writes the entire RAM out to swap. Insufficient swap will sure
>>> cause
>>> hibernation to not work.
>> It doesn't write the entire RAM, just what's in use, but I get it.
>>
>> However I added a large swap file to bring the total up to 16GB and
>> it
>> *still* fails in the same way. And no, I'm not using more than 16GB
>> of
>> virtual memory:
>>
>> $ free
>>   totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache  
>>  available
>> Mem:   16361232 9910132  645876  497680 5805224  
>>5503832
>> Swap:  16588792 365310012935692
>>
>> The plot thickens.
> It turns out that hibernation can't used multiple swap areas, so the
> only solution is to have a large enough swap partition to start with.
>
> poc
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Might consider running a  watchdog process on either  chrome OR  your
swap file, which could throw an error if  mem_in_use <
mem_needed_for_hibernate

-- 

Corey W. Sheldon
PGP: 
0x5A88E539 / C006 564F FA67 CDEA E29B F202 8B4E 8943 5A88 E539
0xD2264944 / 6292 9ABD 6374 6AA7 6D4B 730F 5927 6298 D226 4944
Find me elsewhere: https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use only by the individual 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of this message is 
not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering 
the message to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you 
have received this communication 
in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

[Greg Woods]

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Greg Woods  wrote:

> On 07/04/16 07:23, Greg Woods wrote:
> > I have upgraded 4 systems (two laptops and two desktops, all different
> hardware) from
> > F23 to F24. Two of them are working fine, and the others seem to be
> badly messed up in
> > the area of package management. The main symptom I see is that
> google-chrome-stable was
> > uninstalled during the upgrade, and I can't reinstall it:
>

I have not been able to resolve the original issue, but I was finally able
to install google-chrome-stable. I believe this only worked because the
google-chrome packages are intended to run on different distros, and the
distros use different names for the packages, and so the dependencies for
google-chrome-stable are on specific files rather than on packages (e.g.
/usr/bin/foomatic-rip rather than cups-filters). It appears that
google-chrome and a number of the cups packages were deleted during the
upgrade for unknown reasons (presumably related to whatever the underlying
package management problem is). I found this out because printing wasn't
working any more either. (I did end up having to use "--allowerasing", but
it seems like I always end up having to do that in order to get "dnf
system-upgrade" to work. This is the first (and second) time that I have
ever had anything like this happen as a result though).

Since I have my own copy of the fedora repos, I mounted it and went in to
the Packages/c directory and installed the cups packages directly from
RPMs. Doing this brought back memories of the pre-yum "dependency hell"
days. I attempt to install cups-client*.rpm and it says "nothing provides
cups-libs". So I add that RPM to the list and another is needed, etc. I
ended up having to specify about 8 different RPMs in order to get
cups-client and cups-filters to install. After installing those, I was able
to install google-chrome-stable, and printing now works.

Unfortunately, "dnf list cups\*" still says there are no matching packages,
whereas "rpm -qa | grep cups" shows them. So although chrome and printing
are working again, the system is not updateable. So I still eventually need
to find out what the heck happened during the upgrade and how to fix it.

--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange messages from sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied after upgrade from F23 to F24.

[Stephen Morris]

On 08/07/16 08:11, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 07/07/2016 02:51 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:

On 07/07/16 09:49, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 07/07/16 06:10, Stephen Morris wrote:

Thanks Ed. I issued the command and got back Packager: None.
I then tried the same command on a package that I know only exists in
the Negativo17
repositories and that gave the same response of Packager : None.

Another option...

dnf info kmod-nvidia

Thanks Ed, I tried that command and it did tell me that it was indeed
installed and which repository it came from. I then tried a dnf info
kmod-nvidia* which showed me all the associated packages from the
Negativo17 and Rpmfusion repositories. It also told me that the
kmod-nvidia-$(uname -r) packages were installed and came from repository
@commandline, which I assume means they were compiled, which surprised
me because I thought the purpose of the kmod-nvidia metadata package was
to pull in and install the pre-compiled nvidia binary packages matching
the kernel, is that not correct?

"@@commandline" means that the RPM was installed from an RPM residing on
the local disk and not from the web. Any time you install an RPM from
a local disk file (regardless of where you downloaded it from), it will
appear to come from the "@@comandline" repo since dnf didn't go out and
fetch the RPM itself.
Thanks Rick, I had installed those packages manually at one point 
because the upgrade broke Xorg both for the nvidia packages an nouveau, 
but I thought I had uninstalled the manually installed versions before I 
eventually got to the install method that enabled the nvidia packages to 
work.



I also thought the akmod-nvidia package was in both the Negativo17 and
Rpmfusion repositories, but when I issue 'dnf info akmod-nvidia' it only
shows me information relative the installed version that came from the
Negativo17 repository. Shouldn't it have told me that there was an
installed version that came from the Negativo17 repository and an
uninstalled version in the Rpmfusion repository?

I would think under "Installed Packages" it would list the installed
one from "@@commandline" and under "Available Packages" the ones
available from Negativo17 and rpmfusion.

I'm not running akmod-nvidia on my F23 box, but searching for any
"akmod*" stuff:

[root@prophead ~]# dnf list akmod*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:56 ago on Thu Jul  7 14:51:02 2016.
Installed Packages
akmod-VirtualBox.x86_64 5.0.16-2.fc23  @@commandline
akmods.noarch   0.5.4-2.fc23   @@commandline
Available Packages
akmod-ndiswrapper.x86_641.60-1.fc23rpmfusion-free
akmod-nvidia.x86_64 1:358.16-1.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-nvidia-304xx.x86_64   304.131-2.fc23 rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-nvidia-340xx.x86_64   1:340.96-1.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-wl.x86_64 6.30.223.271-4.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-xtables-addons.x86_64 2.10-1.fc23rpmfusion-free

Yes, the akmod-VirtualBox and akmods.noarch were installed from RPMs I
had downloaded previously.
From the command you have listed and what the same command shows on my 
system, is that the akmod-nvidia packages in the two repositories are 
named differently, I thought they were the same name.


regards,
Steve




Just relative to the 2nd message in my original thread, isn't that
message for the standard F24 kernel, saying that it has an unsatisfiable
dependency on the associated kernel-core package? My issue with that is
if that is the case, how and why did a 'sudo dnf upgrade' issued the day
after the upgrade install that kernel, because I believe the missing
dependency should have stopped it from being installed, or am I missing
something?

regards,
Steve

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange messages from sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied after upgrade from F23 to F24.

[Rick Stevens]

On 07/07/2016 02:51 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 07/07/16 09:49, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On 07/07/16 06:10, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> Thanks Ed. I issued the command and got back Packager: None.
>>> I then tried the same command on a package that I know only exists in
>>> the Negativo17
>>> repositories and that gave the same response of Packager : None.
>> Another option...
>>
>> dnf info kmod-nvidia
> Thanks Ed, I tried that command and it did tell me that it was indeed
> installed and which repository it came from. I then tried a dnf info
> kmod-nvidia* which showed me all the associated packages from the
> Negativo17 and Rpmfusion repositories. It also told me that the
> kmod-nvidia-$(uname -r) packages were installed and came from repository
> @commandline, which I assume means they were compiled, which surprised
> me because I thought the purpose of the kmod-nvidia metadata package was
> to pull in and install the pre-compiled nvidia binary packages matching
> the kernel, is that not correct?

"@@commandline" means that the RPM was installed from an RPM residing on
the local disk and not from the web. Any time you install an RPM from
a local disk file (regardless of where you downloaded it from), it will
appear to come from the "@@comandline" repo since dnf didn't go out and
fetch the RPM itself.

> I also thought the akmod-nvidia package was in both the Negativo17 and
> Rpmfusion repositories, but when I issue 'dnf info akmod-nvidia' it only
> shows me information relative the installed version that came from the
> Negativo17 repository. Shouldn't it have told me that there was an
> installed version that came from the Negativo17 repository and an
> uninstalled version in the Rpmfusion repository?

I would think under "Installed Packages" it would list the installed
one from "@@commandline" and under "Available Packages" the ones
available from Negativo17 and rpmfusion.

I'm not running akmod-nvidia on my F23 box, but searching for any
"akmod*" stuff:

[root@prophead ~]# dnf list akmod*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:56 ago on Thu Jul  7 14:51:02 2016.
Installed Packages
akmod-VirtualBox.x86_64 5.0.16-2.fc23  @@commandline
akmods.noarch   0.5.4-2.fc23   @@commandline
Available Packages
akmod-ndiswrapper.x86_641.60-1.fc23rpmfusion-free
akmod-nvidia.x86_64 1:358.16-1.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-nvidia-304xx.x86_64   304.131-2.fc23 rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-nvidia-340xx.x86_64   1:340.96-1.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-wl.x86_64 6.30.223.271-4.fc23rpmfusion-nonfree
akmod-xtables-addons.x86_64 2.10-1.fc23rpmfusion-free

Yes, the akmod-VirtualBox and akmods.noarch were installed from RPMs I
had downloaded previously.

> Just relative to the 2nd message in my original thread, isn't that
> message for the standard F24 kernel, saying that it has an unsatisfiable
> dependency on the associated kernel-core package? My issue with that is
> if that is the case, how and why did a 'sudo dnf upgrade' issued the day
> after the upgrade install that kernel, because I believe the missing
> dependency should have stopped it from being installed, or am I missing
> something?
> 
> regards,
> Steve
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


-- 
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   "As for me, I aspire to be the Walmart Greeter in Hell." -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Stephen Morris]

On 08/07/16 02:07, Edouard Fazenda wrote:

Hi Earl,

On Fedora 24 it's the same configuration as Fedora 23, you have to 
edit /etc/default/grub file and after run the grub2-mkconfig command 
to update the grub.cfg Configuration file in /boot. Make sure that the 
symbolic link of /etc/sysconfig/grub is still pointing to 
/etc/default/grub file.


Cheers, Edouard.
Hi Earl, just following on from what Edouard said, I have never used 
/etc/sysconfig/grub to make grub changes, as until your thread I didn't 
know it existed. All the grub documentation I have seen has said to make 
changed directly to /etc/default/grub, which is what I have always done. 
Like Tom and you have both indicated I have always run 
grub2-mkconfig/grub2-install manually because I don't like the format of 
the grub menu built by grubby (which is automatically run when a new 
kernel is installed as Tom said). Also as I understand it, grubby does 
not use /etc/default/grub to build its grub menus.


From what you have shown in your thread it looks like 
/etc/sysconfig/grub is linked to the wrong file. It seems to be linked 
to /etc/grub.d/00-header, so you may want to re-link it back to 
/etc/default/grub. I have checked on my F24 system and 
/etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to /etc/default/grub.


regards,
Steve



2016-07-07 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Horsley >:


On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:45:30 +0800
Earl Ramirez wrote:

> run grub2-mkconfig

As near as I can tell, absolutely nothing ever runs
the grub2-mkconfig program, so unless you run it yourself
you can make permanent changes by simply editing the
grub.cfg file directly.

When dnf installs a new kernel, it simply looks at
the existing kernel lines in grub.cfg and copies the
same options to the new kernel line (or the "grubby"
program it runs does that).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




--

Edouard Fazenda
Tel : 0688451444



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange messages from sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied after upgrade from F23 to F24.

[Stephen Morris]

On 07/07/16 09:49, Ed Greshko wrote:


On 07/07/16 06:10, Stephen Morris wrote:

Thanks Ed. I issued the command and got back Packager: None.
I then tried the same command on a package that I know only exists in the 
Negativo17
repositories and that gave the same response of Packager : None.

Another option...

dnf info kmod-nvidia
Thanks Ed, I tried that command and it did tell me that it was indeed 
installed and which repository it came from. I then tried a dnf info 
kmod-nvidia* which showed me all the associated packages from the 
Negativo17 and Rpmfusion repositories. It also told me that the 
kmod-nvidia-$(uname -r) packages were installed and came from repository 
@commandline, which I assume means they were compiled, which surprised 
me because I thought the purpose of the kmod-nvidia metadata package was 
to pull in and install the pre-compiled nvidia binary packages matching 
the kernel, is that not correct?


I also thought the akmod-nvidia package was in both the Negativo17 and 
Rpmfusion repositories, but when I issue 'dnf info akmod-nvidia' it only 
shows me information relative the installed version that came from the 
Negativo17 repository. Shouldn't it have told me that there was an 
installed version that came from the Negativo17 repository and an 
uninstalled version in the Rpmfusion repository?


Just relative to the 2nd message in my original thread, isn't that 
message for the standard F24 kernel, saying that it has an unsatisfiable 
dependency on the associated kernel-core package? My issue with that is 
if that is the case, how and why did a 'sudo dnf upgrade' issued the day 
after the upgrade install that kernel, because I believe the missing 
dependency should have stopped it from being installed, or am I missing 
something?


regards,
Steve

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange messages from sudo dnf repoquery --unsatisfied after upgrade from F23 to F24.

[Stephen Morris]

On 07/07/16 12:36, Robin Laing wrote:

On 05/07/16 15:31, Stephen Morris wrote:

Hi,

I have issued the command specified in the subject as recommended on
site https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to see if there
are any old packages that should be removed because they would not be
working properly anyway, and received the following messages which to me
make no sense, unless I am completely misinterpreting the message.

The kernel mentioned in the first message is the last of the Fedora
23 kernels that is still installed after the upgrade to F24, while the
kernel listed in the 2nd message is the kernel installed by a sudo dnf
upgrade issued the day after the upgrade to F24. Hence the bottom line
is both kernels mentioned in the messages are installed, so why is dnf
reporting that it can't find them?

package kmod-nvidia-4.5.7-200.fc23.x86_64-2:367.27-1.fc24.x86_64
requires kernel-uname-r = 4.5.7-200.fc23.x86_64, but none of the
providers can be installed
package kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 requires kernel-core-uname-r =
4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64, but none of the providers can be installed


regards,

Steve



Did you get to boot into F24?  You said it was "after" the upgrade?

I have upgraded in the past and got stuck with old kernels before.  A 
bit of a mess to clean up but it worked.
I am using F24. Before the upgrade to F24 I had 3 kernels in F23 being 
maintained by dnf, when I upgraded to F24 the oldest F23 kernel was 
removed when the first F24 kernel was installed as per normal dnf 
functionality.
My main problem with the messages was I didn't understand how there 
could be an unsatisfiable dependency on a kernel that was already 
installed, and in the case of the first message was installed before the 
upgrade.


regards,
Steve




Robin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Is the Vivacious Colors theme supported by Fedora?

[Paul Smith]

Dear All,

Is the Vivacious Colors theme supported by Fedora?

Thanks in advance,

Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Edouard Fazenda]

Hi Earl,

On Fedora 24 it's the same configuration as Fedora 23, you have to edit
/etc/default/grub file and after run the grub2-mkconfig command to update
the grub.cfg Configuration file in /boot. Make sure that the symbolic link
of /etc/sysconfig/grub is still pointing to /etc/default/grub file.

Cheers, Edouard.

2016-07-07 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tom Horsley :

> On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:45:30 +0800
> Earl Ramirez wrote:
>
> > run grub2-mkconfig
>
> As near as I can tell, absolutely nothing ever runs
> the grub2-mkconfig program, so unless you run it yourself
> you can make permanent changes by simply editing the
> grub.cfg file directly.
>
> When dnf installs a new kernel, it simply looks at
> the existing kernel lines in grub.cfg and copies the
> same options to the new kernel line (or the "grubby"
> program it runs does that).
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 

Edouard Fazenda
Tel : 0688451444
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh questions/issue

[Cássio Pereira]

Try setting

ForwardAgent yes

on the ~/.ssh/config file for the host.

See a detailed guide here:
https://developer.github.com/guides/using-ssh-agent-forwarding/

Cheers.

On 7 July 2016 at 11:54, bruce  wrote:

> Hi/morn guys...
>
> Searching for answers/opinions on how to allow multiple users to access a
> number of different boxes via ssh, using ssh keys..
>
> Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
>
> box1
> box2
> box3
> box4
> box5
>
> Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
>
> On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to
> each box..
>
> From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
>
> From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the
> user1 that I created/installed?
>
> I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
>
> (Viewed some articles that seem to indicate I can do this)
>
> Thoughts/comments..
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
>


-- 
Cássio M. M. Pereira
AI Engineer
Veridu
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: ssh questions/issue

[Marcus Bean]

Yes, it is possible. I believe you would need to put the public key into
the authorized_keys file and install the keys on all of the boxes for user1.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:54 AM, bruce  wrote:

> Hi/morn guys...
>
> Searching for answers/opinions on how to allow multiple users to access a
> number of different boxes via ssh, using ssh keys..
>
> Say I have 5 boxes on my network,
>
> box1
> box2
> box3
> box4
> box5
>
> Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access
>
> On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to
> each box..
>
> From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.
>
> From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the
> user1 that I created/installed?
>
> I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
> having to have lots of pub/private keys ...
>
> (Viewed some articles that seem to indicate I can do this)
>
> Thoughts/comments..
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

How to change the GNOME colors theme from XFCE

[Paul Smith]

Dear All,

I am running F24 with XFCE. How to change the scheme of colors of
GNOME applications?

Thanks in advance,

Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

ssh questions/issue

[bruce]

Hi/morn guys...

Searching for answers/opinions on how to allow multiple users to access a
number of different boxes via ssh, using ssh keys..

Say I have 5 boxes on my network,

box1
box2
box3
box4
box5

Each box has a generic user - user1, with limited perms/access

On my local box, i create a pub/private ssh key. I copy the pub key to each
box..

>From my local box, I can then ssh -using the priv/pub key into box1.

>From box1, can I then hop/ssh over to box2, using the pub key for the user1
that I created/installed?

I'm trying to figure out how I can hop between boxes as needed without
having to have lots of pub/private keys ...

(Viewed some articles that seem to indicate I can do this)

Thoughts/comments..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: postgresql-setup upgrade returns error

[stan]

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:11:52 +0200
arnaud gaboury  wrote:

> I am left with a broken postgresql since my upgrade to Fedora 24.

[snip]

> What am I supposed to do now? It seems a trick would be to install
> last version 9.4.8 alongside, then run both 9.4.8 and 9.5 with my data
> for 9.4 and new empty data base for 9.5, then dump from older to new
> one db. Is it correct? Anyway to make postgresql-setup works ?

A search turned up this.  Does it help?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24379373/how-to-upgrade-postgresql-from-version-9-4-to-version-9-5-without-losing-data
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24: Network inoperable after a manual NetworkManager restart

[Joachim Backes]

On 07/07/16 14:51, Rami Rosen wrote:

Hi, Joachim,

Apologies, I could only answer just now. The problem is, for sure,
that restarting the Network Manager did not create the "nameserver
192.168.100.1" entry in /etc/resolv.conf. This is the entry which is
solely responsible for DNS name resolving, and its omission deprives
you from getting an answer to your ping request you mentioned.

I am unsure as to what is the exact reason.
I would suggest the following three actions, to further try to
understand the issue:


Hi Rami,

Today morning, I filed a BZ:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353184

The BZ seems now to be under examination.


1) post here the content of /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf


see attachment!


2) if this config file has "dns=dnsmasq" entry,  try to comment it and
restart NetworkManager, then see if /etc/resolv.conf is empty or not.
3) tell us if selinux is enabled on this machine (the output of
"getenforce" from the command line)


/etc/selinux/config has a line:

SELINUX=disabled

Kind regards and thanks for your efforts

Joachim Backes

--

Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64


Joachim Backes 
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
# Configuration file for NetworkManager.
#
# See "man 5 NetworkManager.conf" for details.
#
# The directory /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/ can contain additional 
configuration
# snippets installed by packages. These files are read before 
NetworkManager.conf
# and have thus lowest priority.
# The directory /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/ can contain additional configuration
# snippets. Those snippets override the settings from this main file.
#
# The files within one conf.d/ directory are read in asciibetical order.
#
# If /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/ contains a file with the same name as
# /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/, the latter file is shadowed and thus ignored.
# Hence, to disable loading a file from /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/ you can
# put an empty file with the same name.
#
# If two files define the same key, the one that is read afterwards will 
overwrite
# the previous one.

[main]
#plugins=ifcfg-rh,ibft


[logging]
# When debugging NetworkManager, enabling debug logging is of great help.
#
# Logfiles contain no passwords and little sensitive information. But please
# check before posting the file online. You can also personally hand over the
# logfile to a NM developer to treat it confidential. Meet us on #nm on 
freenode.
# Please post full logfiles except minimal modifications of private data.
#
# You can also change the log-level at runtime via
#   $ nmcli general logging level TRACE domains ALL
# However, usually it's cleaner to enable debug logging
# in the configuration and restart NetworkManager so that
# debug logging is enabled from the start.
#
# You will find the logfiles in syslog, for example via
#   $ journalctl -u NetworkManager
#
#level=TRACE
#domains=ALL
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: Schemas, filters, attributes and values

[Mitja Mihelič]

On 06/07/16 14:26, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:


On 07/06/2016 02:12 PM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:

Hi!

We would like to connect our services to 389DS. Each user would have 
an attribute that would determine their quota for each service.
We have a registered space within the OID tree for our organization 
and the attributes would go there.
For for the quota attribute I was thinking multivalue. Something like 
(numbers and names are arbitrary):

userQuota:
  mail:500
  ftp:20
  webapp1:30
  webapp2:35
The service would request the attribute and then parse out its own 
value. All nice and good for our in-house apps.


There is a problem, when a service like dovecot expects the value to 
be a number. Then, as we tested, the multivalue idea does not work.


Is there a way to use the filters so a query returns only the number 
(500 from mail:500)?

which attribute does dovecat request ?
Dovecot requests whichever attribute we configure it to use in 
dovecot-ldap.conf.ext. But the returned value must be a number.
if it requests userQuota you would have to return all values, and if 
you strip the qualifier and only return (500,20,30,35) how would the 
app know what is what ?
If userQuota is a multivalue attribute then there must be qualifiers 
present. There is no sense in having values that cannot be matched to a 
service.
Dovecot would probably only use the first number it got returned and 
ignore the rest. Or fail altogether. I saw no sense in testing this.


With quantifiers, in an app that is maintained by us that would present 
no problem. The app would get all values and parse out the the value for 
its own quota.
and if you write a plugin to return a single value, how would it know 
to return the number for mail and not ftp ?
That I do not know, which is the reason why I am asking for help. I was 
thinking the plugin could return the right value based on the bind DN or 
on the origin server.

I think the closet you could get is using tags:
userQuota;mail: 500
userQuota; ftp: 20
userQuota;webapp1: 30
userQuota;webapp2: 35

Could you explain what you mean by that? I am not familiar with 389DS tags.

Kind regards,
Mitja



Could it be done with 389DS plugins?

Kind regards,

--
Mitja Mihelič
ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia
tel: +386 1 479 8800, fax: +386 1 479 88 99
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org 




--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24: Network inoperable after a manual NetworkManager restart

[Rami Rosen]

Hi, Joachim,

Apologies, I could only answer just now. The problem is, for sure,
that restarting the Network Manager did not create the "nameserver
192.168.100.1" entry in /etc/resolv.conf. This is the entry which is
solely responsible for DNS name resolving, and its omission deprives
you from getting an answer to your ping request you mentioned.

I am unsure as to what is the exact reason.
I would suggest the following three actions, to further try to
understand the issue:

1) post here the content of /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
2) if this config file has "dns=dnsmasq" entry,  try to comment it and
restart NetworkManager, then see if /etc/resolv.conf is empty or not.
3) tell us if selinux is enabled on this machine (the output of
"getenforce" from the command line)

Regards,
Rami Rosen
http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen




On 6 July 2016 at 17:29, Joachim Backes  wrote:
> On 07/06/16 15:54, Rami Rosen wrote:
>> Hi, Joachim,
>>
>> Regarding DNS resolving: the  /etc/resolv.conf, which is generated by
>> Network Manager, as responsible for DNS resolving
>> Can you please post the output of
>> cat /etc/reslov.conf
>> after fresh reboot, before restarting NetworkManager, when
>> ping  succeeds,
>> and after restargin NetworkManager, when
>> "ping:  fails ?
>
> Hi Rami,
>
> /etc/resolv.conf before NM restart
> --
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> nameserver 192.168.100.1
>
> /etc/resolv.conf after NM restart
> --
> # Generated by NetworkManager
>
> journalctl -f before and after NM restart: See attached file "journalctl-f"
> (the dashed line in "journalctl-f" marks the restart)
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Joachim Backes
>
>
>
> --
>
> Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
> Kernel-4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64
>
>
> Joachim Backes 
> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 24 - Grub2 permanent cmdline changes

[Tom Horsley]

On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:45:30 +0800
Earl Ramirez wrote:

> run grub2-mkconfig

As near as I can tell, absolutely nothing ever runs
the grub2-mkconfig program, so unless you run it yourself
you can make permanent changes by simply editing the
grub.cfg file directly.

When dnf installs a new kernel, it simply looks at
the existing kernel lines in grub.cfg and copies the
same options to the new kernel line (or the "grubby"
program it runs does that).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

postgresql-setup upgrade returns error

[arnaud gaboury]

I am left with a broken postgresql since my upgrade to Fedora 24.
Starting the service retruns this error:


# /usr/libexec/postgresql-ctl start -D /db/pgsql/data -s -w -t 270
FATAL:  22023: database files are incompatible with server
DETAIL:  The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 9.4,
which is not compatible with this version 9.5.3.
LOCATION:  ValidatePgVersion, miscinit.c:1364
pg_ctl: could not start server
Examine the log output.

Note: my data are in /db/pgsql/data

-
# postgresql-setup --upgrade

 * Upgrading database.
ERROR: pg_upgrade tool failed
ERROR: Upgrade failed.
 * See /var/lib/pgsql/upgrade_postgresql.log for detai
--


# cat /var/lib/pgsql/upgrade_postgresql.log

-- connection to database failed: could not connect to server: No such
file or directory
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket "/home/postgres/.s.PGSQL.5432"?

could not connect to old postmaster started with the command:
"/usr/lib64/pgsql/postgresql-9.4/bin/pg_ctl" -w -l
"pg_upgrade_server.log" -D "/db/pgsql/data-old" -o "-p 5432 -b  -c
listen_addresses='' -c unix_socket_permissions=0700 -c
unix_socket_directories='/home/postgres'" start
Failure, exiting
-

What am I supposed to do now? It seems a trick would be to install
last version 9.4.8 alongside, then run both 9.4.8 and 9.5 with my data
for 9.4 and new empty data base for 9.5, then dump from older to new
one db. Is it correct? Anyway to make postgresql-setup works ?

Thank you for help

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org