Re: Mirror iPhone in Totem -

2017-02-21 Thread Kalpa Welivitigoda 
On Feb 22, 2017 6:27 AM, "Bob Goodwin"  wrote:
>
>
> I found the following on Google:
https://www.google.com/#q=how+to+access+and+use+github
>
> *yum install totem*
>
> The next step is to clone the totem airplay plugin from github to the
totem plugin folder in your own machine:
>
> *cd ~/local/share/totem/plugins/airplay*
>
> *git clone https://github.com/dveeden/totem-plugin-airplay*
> create the folders first if you don’t have them.
>
> Next, open totem player.
>
> Enable the airplay plugin from the *edit > plugins configuration* screen.
You can now Airplay from iphone or ipad to linux!
>
> Can I make this work in Fedora 25? I tried this but github wants
"Username for 'https://github.com': Paraphrase" and I don't know how to
deal with that either?
>

Would you please elaborated more? Where or in what phase does github ask
for credentials?

> Perhaps there is a Fedora scheme for doing this? Any help appreciated.
>
> Bob
>
> --
> Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
> http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
> box10  FEDORA-25/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

mate-terminal launcher oddity

2017-02-21 Thread Jon LaBadie 
On a Fedora 25 system running the mate desktop environment
I have three terminal launchers in my top panel.  The
commands executed are:

 1.  mate-terminal
 2.  mate-terminal --geometry 96x30+130+280 -t MUMS -x ssh -Y mums
 3.  mate-terminal --geometry 96x30+90+130 -t CYBER -x ssh -Y cyber

If # 3. is launched when no other terminal session is running two
similar sized windows appear, one with the ssh session, the other
with no shell or ssh apparent.  If either window is closed, the
other closes as well.

But if another terminal session, 1. and/or 2. is already running
when I launch 3., 3. comes up as a single window.  Actually I
briefly see the extra window, but it immediately closes leaving
the one containing the ssh session.

I never see the extra window behavior when the nearly identical
launcher 2. is executed.

Perhaps the odd behavior of launcher 3. is somehow related to
mate-terminal running as a single process no matter how many
terminals are open.  But why the different behavior of 2. vs 3.?

Jon
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread jarmo 
Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:20:11 -0700
stan  kirjoitti:


> 
> I think this was a file collision with quassel.  It has been fixed (at
> least here).
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422007

Reason was, that I had "system-cofig-firewall" from F21. I removed
that, then update went ok.

Jarmo
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Importing OpenVPN. ovpn file in Fedora 25

2017-02-21 Thread Stephen Morris 

On 21/02/2017 16:13, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 02/21/17 12:43, Stephen Morris wrote:

Thanks Ed. After sending the email I went to that site and their site
has changed. I downloaded the .ovpn files their links were pointing at
for Singapore and Miami and imported them into Networkmanager which
set everything up, including pointing the CA Certificates entry at an
external location URL to get the certificate, which is a different
location for each server and is pointing at a .pem file. I found via
this method that their Australian servers still don't work and neither
does their Indian Server, and their Hong Kong server wants a pin in
order to connect.


Well, you certainly are seeing things different from what I'm seeing.

The openVPN config file for Singapore (gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com) contains

# host/port of vpn server
remote gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com 443 udp
# prompt for authentication
auth-user-pass
# equivalent to pull, tls-client
client
# redirect all outgoing traffic to the vpn gateway
redirect-gateway
# verify the server certificate for authenticity
remote-cert-tls server
cipher AES-256-CBC
proto udp
dev tun
keepalive 10 120
nobind
persist-key
persist-tun
# ssl certificate / key used for tls
#ca certs/ca.crt

-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-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-END CERTIFICATE-




I see no pointer towards an external URL.  The ca CERT is in the file
itself.  Also the Miami file contains the same CA.cert as does the file
SlickVPNcrt referenced in the Ubuntu setup.
Sorry Ed, I thought the first time I did the import it has 
http://gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com-ca.pen in the CA Certificates entry, but 
creating new entries no longer does that, so I'm not sure if there is 
different behaviour when the import function has never been used before 
to what happens when it has already been used once, as I can't reproduce it.


I was setting these definitions up under Gnome as I have found that if a 
definition is set up under KDE, with KDE storing the SSID password in 
Kwallet I think, when that definition is first used under Gnome I get 
prompted to re-enter the password before I can connect to my router. If 
he definition is created under Gnome it is usable under KDE without 
prompting. I am assuming this is because Gnome stores the password in 
the definition whereas KDE doesn't.


I also could see no difference in the Hong Kong, Miami, or Singapore
setups other than the name of the openVPN server.  Nothing to indicate a
PIN of any sort is needed.
Sorry Ed, my stupidity, I thought it was saying a pin was required but 
having retried the connection again now it is actually prompting for a 
password. I've checked the password I have in the definition and it is 
correct and the same as the password in the other connections that do work.


I'll re-talk to the vendor about these issues. I have already spoken to 
them once about not being able to use the Australian servers and just 
get the response to not use them because of the expensive cost of 
networking in Australia, so I am assuming at the moment that they have 
not been set up properly.


[egreshko@meimei ~]$ ll gw1.*
-rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1634 Feb 21 14:03 gw1.hkg2.slickvpn.com.ovpn
-rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1634 Feb 21 13:44 gw1.mia4.slickvpn.com.ovpn
-rw-rw-r--. 1 egreshko egreshko 1634 Feb 20 15:50 gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com.ovpn

[egreshko@meimei ~]$ diff gw1.hkg2.slickvpn.com.ovpn
gw1.mia4.slickvpn.com.ovpn
2c2
< remote gw1.hkg2.slickvpn.com 443 udp
---

remote gw1.mia4.slickvpn.com 443 udp

[egreshko@meimei ~]$ diff gw1.mia4.slickvpn.com.ovpn
gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com.ovpn
2c2
< remote gw1.mia4.slickvpn.com 443 udp
---

remote gw1.sin1.slickvpn.com 443 udp


I wouldn't compare what is being done on the Windows side since they
seem to have their own client.

In any event, since you are their customer you may want to contact them
for support.
Sorry Ed, I

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Stephen Morris 

On 22/02/2017 03:06, Honza Silhan wrote:

this is really complex task to get user understandable feedback. There
has been major improvement. Are you using DNF-2.0?
I am still using DNF-1.1 because there has never been an update to V2.0, 
has V2.0 actually been released, assuming it is not still beta?


regards,
Steve

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Mirror iPhone in Totem -

2017-02-21 Thread Bob Goodwin 


I found the following on Google: 
https://www.google.com/#q=how+to+access+and+use+github


*yum install totem*

The next step is to clone the totem 
airplay plugin from github to the totem 
plugin folder in your own machine:


*cd ~/local/share/totem/plugins/airplay*

*git clone 
https://github.com/dveeden/totem-plugin-airplay*
create the folders first if you don’t 
have them.


Next, open totem player.

Enable the airplay plugin from the *edit 
> plugins configuration* screen. You 
can now Airplay from iphone or ipad to 
linux!


Can I make this work in Fedora 25? I 
tried this but github wants "Username 
for 'https://github.com': Paraphrase" 
and I don't know how to deal with that 
either?


Perhaps there is a Fedora scheme for 
doing this? Any help appreciated.


Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-25/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Personal disputs in bugzilla (bug 1401166 )

2017-02-21 Thread Gordon Messmer 

On 02/20/2017 05:48 AM, Neil Thompson wrote:
At the very least, I think the package maintainer needs to be spoken 
to by fedora people - swearing at bug reporters on the Fedora Bugzilla 
is probably not "being excellent to each other".




I've opened a ticket for that, and another was opened to clarify the 
policy regarding where incidents of abuse should be reported.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread stan 
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:06:24 +0100
Honza Silhan  wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
>  wrote:
> > On 21 Feb 2017 at 7:23, jarmo wrote:

> >> Can't update because of broken depencies.
> >>
> >> 
> >>  Package  Arkkitehtuuri
> >> Versio AsennuslähdeKoko
> >> 
> >> Upgrading: iptables x86_64
> >> 1.6.0-3.fc25   updates416 k
> >> iptables-libsx86_64
> >> 1.6.0-3.fc25   updates 87 k
> >> Asennetaan uudelleen: iptables-services
> >> x86_641.6.0-2.fc25
> >> fedora  54 k Skipping packages with broken
> >> dependencies: iptables-services
> >> x86_641.6.0-3.fc25
> >> updates 53 k
> >>
> >> Transaktion yhteenveto
> >> 
> >> Upgrade  2 Packages
> >> Skip 1 Package
> >>
> >> Anyone else?

I think this was a file collision with quassel.  It has been fixed (at
least here).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422007

> >
> > Yes, I am seeing the same message. Had a number of other updates,
> > and those were not going thru either, so had to manually do a dnf
> > upgrade other to get those installed. Don't know why it said
> > skipping, but wouldn't continue.  
> 
> You can still proceed with the installation . It just informs you
> about skipped packages.

I used 
dnf -x iptables-services update
to let the rest of the updates go through.  Then when the quassel
problem was fixed, the update just went through.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Greg Harris 

On 2/21/2017 12:06 PM, Honza Silhan wrote:

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
 wrote:
 


Upgrade  2 Packages
Skip 1 Package

Anyone else?

Yes, I am seeing the same message. Had a number of other updates, and
those were not going thru either, so had to manually do a dnf upgrade other
to get those installed. Don't know why it said skipping, but wouldn't continue.

You can still proceed with the installation . It just informs you
about skipped packages.

Actually, no. DNF bails out completely on a failed transaction, leaving 
all other updates uninstalled.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Honza Silhan 
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
 wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2017 at 7:23, jarmo wrote:
>
> Date sent:  Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:23:03 +0200
> From:   jarmo 
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> 
> Subject:Update broken depencies
> Organization:   n/a
> Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users
> 
>
>> Can't update because of broken depencies.
>>
>> 
>>  Package  Arkkitehtuuri Versio   
>>   AsennuslähdeKoko
>> 
>> Upgrading:
>>  iptables x86_641.6.0-3.fc25 
>>   updates416 k
>>  iptables-libsx86_641.6.0-3.fc25 
>>   updates 87 k
>> Asennetaan uudelleen:
>>  iptables-servicesx86_641.6.0-2.fc25 
>>   fedora  54 k
>> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>>  iptables-servicesx86_641.6.0-3.fc25 
>>   updates 53 k
>>
>> Transaktion yhteenveto
>> 
>> Upgrade  2 Packages
>> Skip 1 Package
>>
>> Anyone else?
>
> Yes, I am seeing the same message. Had a number of other updates, and
> those were not going thru either, so had to manually do a dnf upgrade other
> to get those installed. Don't know why it said skipping, but wouldn't 
> continue.

You can still proceed with the installation . It just informs you
about skipped packages.

> In the past one could use --skip-broken with yum, and it would install the
> ones without a conflict.

DNF does this by default.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Tom Horsley  wrote:
> ...
> Of course it is interesting that the error message dnf produces
> says "Hey! You need the version of the package that is
> already installed!" and doesn't mention system-config-firewall
> anywhere.
>
> Makes you wonder why this bugzilla was closed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148627

this is really complex task to get user understandable feedback. There
has been major improvement. Are you using DNF-2.0?


Honza

>> Jarmo
>> ___
>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> +--+
>   Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor
>   Guam Community College  Computer Center
>   mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
>   mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
>   Guam - Where America's Day Begins
>   G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
>   http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
> +--+
>
> http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
> Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
> Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
> (Total Hours: 287,489)
>
> BOINC@HOME CREDITS
> ABC 16613838.513356 | EINSTEIN   128964094.788695
> ROSETTA 57524594.111601 | SETI   100996605.188932
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Need help with mounting an old logical volume

2017-02-21 Thread stan 
Caveat:  I don't use logical volumes, and my knowledge of them is
rudimentary at best.  But I think I can offer some crude help.  At
least it might point you in a direction.

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:44:02 -0500
Fulko Hew  wrote:

> To make a long story short, my laptop screen died, so I bought a new
> laptop. I installed Fedora 25.  Then I wanted to copy my old stuff
> off of the old drive

[snip]

> c) Having the UUID, I then used 'vgrename UUID fedora_old'

I'm only guessing, but this was probably the step that changed the
inodes (unless the drive is failing).  There is probably some different
default in F25 than there was in F23.

> d) Then I needed 'ls /dev/fedora_old' to see the 'sub-device' called
> 'root00'
> e) That let me 'mount /dev/fedora_old/root00 mydir'
> 
> That was good enough to allow me to copy some of my data off,
> but it wasn't showing anything in /home/fulko.

This doesn't make sense.  Is your home partition a separate partition
from /?  If it is, you'll have to mount it separately.  The empty
partition that you are trying to read under / will me masked by the
external assignment to home at boot.

> My next step was to plug an external monitor into that old laptop
> and reboot, and try to FTP the remainder of my data from /home/fulko.
> 
> That didn't work because the volume name was now changed.
> So I had to change it back.

Try this instead.  Use F25 to rename the volume back to fedora-old.
Then mount it in F25 and edit the fstab for the F23 install to use the
new name.  Better yet, use the UUID instead of the name.  Then reboot
F23 and it should find and use the new name. Are you using a separate
boot, or is boot part of the root partition? You might have to edit the
grub2 stanza in /boot/grub2/ to be sure that the UUID mentioned there is
the UUID of the root partition in your fstab.

[snip]

> Now what?

You hope for an expert here to comment.

> I'm afraid of running fsck on it to resolve whatever problems it may
> have, (because I'm afraid of screwing it up even more)
> and on the other hand, what did I do wrong to get problems in the
> place?
> 
> Comments and suggestions will be more than welcome.

I hope so.  :-)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Tom Horsley 
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:54:24 +1000
Michael D. Setzer II wrote:

> Yes, I am seeing the same message.

There is a bugzilla for this already:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327786

What I did was remove the system-config-firewall* packages.

Of course it is interesting that the error message dnf produces
says "Hey! You need the version of the package that is
already installed!" and doesn't mention system-config-firewall
anywhere.

Makes you wonder why this bugzilla was closed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148627
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Ed Greshko 
On 02/21/17 19:54, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Yes, I am seeing the same message. Had a number of other updates, and 
> those were not going thru either, so had to manually do a dnf upgrade other 
> to get those installed. Don't know why it said skipping, but wouldn't 
> continue. 
> In the past one could use --skip-broken with yum, and it would install the 
> ones without a conflict.
>
> Just rand dnf update on fc25 machine, and there are new updates, but still 
> seeing the iptables issues, so having to manually install the others.

When you run dnf with the --best parameter you should be told what
package is dependent on the older version.  In the case of jarmo it was
a very old package that is no longer included in F25.

-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to get others to do the work for you
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Update broken depencies

2017-02-21 Thread Michael D. Setzer II 
On 21 Feb 2017 at 7:23, jarmo wrote:

Date sent:  Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:23:03 +0200
From:   jarmo 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Update broken depencies
Organization:   n/a
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> Can't update because of broken depencies.
> 
> 
>  Package  Arkkitehtuuri Versio
>  AsennuslähdeKoko
> 
> Upgrading:
>  iptables x86_641.6.0-3.fc25  
>  updates416 k
>  iptables-libsx86_641.6.0-3.fc25  
>  updates 87 k
> Asennetaan uudelleen:
>  iptables-servicesx86_641.6.0-2.fc25  
>  fedora  54 k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>  iptables-servicesx86_641.6.0-3.fc25  
>  updates 53 k
> 
> Transaktion yhteenveto
> 
> Upgrade  2 Packages
> Skip 1 Package
> 
> Anyone else?

Yes, I am seeing the same message. Had a number of other updates, and 
those were not going thru either, so had to manually do a dnf upgrade other 
to get those installed. Don't know why it said skipping, but wouldn't continue. 
In the past one could use --skip-broken with yum, and it would install the 
ones without a conflict.

Just rand dnf update on fc25 machine, and there are new updates, but still 
seeing the iptables issues, so having to manually install the others.


> 
> Jarmo
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ABC 16613838.513356 | EINSTEIN   128964094.788695
ROSETTA 57524594.111601 | SETI   100996605.188932
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: question about packages

2017-02-21 Thread sberg 
- Original Message -
From: Cheng Rk [mailto:crq...@ymail.com]
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:08:32 + (UTC)
Subject: Re: question about packages

then a question is why don't you (Fedora) make a a vim package since `dnf 
install vim` is such a high demand?

It is available to install quite easily if you look for it.

[root@hostname ~]# dnf list vim\*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:32:16 ago on Tue Feb 21 04:50:08 2017.
Installed Packages
vim-common.x86_64   2:8.0.329-1.fc25
 @updates
vim-enhanced.x86_64 2:8.0.329-1.fc25
 @updates
vim-filesystem.x86_64   2:8.0.329-1.fc25
 @updates
vim-minimal.x86_64  2:8.0.329-1.fc25
 @updates

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org