Re: grub2-efi / grub2-tools problem
Le Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:53:03 +0100, Frank Elsner a écrit : >dnf system-upgrade download --allowerase --refresh --releasever=27 >gives >dnf system-upgrade: error: unrecognized arguments: --allowerase It is : --allowerasing -- M.B ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
This is not just Fedora specific behavior. I ran into this a few days ago on a Mac after adding a bunch of keys to my agent (one per AWS region). Even if you specify a key with “-i” it will still go for the agent, resulting in an Auth failure. Not sure if specifying a key in the config will over ride it though, I didn’t try that. The fact that SSH prioritizes the agent over a manually specified key definitely smells like an upstream bug though. That’s not just counter intuitive that’s a blatant disregard of an explicit command specified by the user. Cheers! Eric > On Nov 22, 2017, at 19:33, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Tom Horsley wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:06:11 +0100 cen wrote: >>> >>> Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh >>> directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. >> >> Why? I do lots of linux admin work and I only have two keys. > > I use a different key for each organization I'm working for/with. I have a > personal key, one for Fedora packaging, one for github, another for > bitbucket, and several for different companies where I perform admin work. > > You can certainly use one or two keys for all of that, but I don't think it's > the best practice to do so. Not everyone feels the same, but it's far from > unusual to have quite a few keys. > > -- > Todd > ~~ > If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for > reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed. > -- Albert Einstein > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM cen wrote: > Whose good idea in the history of Linux was to turn ssh agent on by > default when one has more than 5 private keys available? This is what I > just got: > > ssh -i mykey.pem user@myhost > Received disconnect from ... port 22:2: Too many authentication failures > Authentication failed. > > > Then I do export SSH_AUTH_SOCK="" and surprise! I am logged in. And I am > not even sure why this suddenly stopped working, I swear to God > specifying the key used to override the agent. > > So apparently the agent even overrides my -i flag which explicitly > specifies which key to use. Instead of taking my key as I specify, ssh > agent will go and try every single key file in my .ssh directory and > fail after 5 times because any sane remote ssh server will block you > after failing so many times. > > It does seem like command-line options should be used first. > Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh > directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. > > I think you're being unnecessarily unfriendly. There's no need for that. As for the number of keys, I don't know why anybody would need more than one "identity key" to identify a single individual on a single machine. I do tons of work with SSH, and I've never had more than 2, and the second was only a temporary one I created for a specific test and deleted 5 minutes later. Not that this matters... if you have need for more keys, that's up to you. > > Does everyone disable agent first thing after installing Fedora? How > else do you even manage to survive with this crap running? > > Do you mean Fedora? I suspect you mean GNOME. Specifically, gnome-keyring-daemon, which runs by default in GNOME, but I'm sure it can be disabled (never bothered to check; personally, I find it very useful, and if I didn't... I wouldn't store identity keys in it). > Why would agent even try with other keys if I SPECIFY the goddamn key! > It doesn't make any sense! > > Why are you putting identities in the agent at all if you're not using it? Or, why not just just set IdentityAgent to "none" in your ~/.ssh/config file if you don't want to use it? Or, use '-o IdentityAgent=none' on the command-line? Or do what you already did, and override SSH_AUTH_SOCK in your env. > How do I turn it off in all shells for all users forever? How do I nuke > this from system? .bash_profile export does not seem to cut it. > > Set IdentityAgent to "none" in /etc/ssh/ssh_config (Try 'man ssh_config' for more details) It won't work in .bash_profile for terminals inside GNOME because GNOME sets it after you log in and your session has already started. > Not to mention the same shit happens when you open gnome files and try > to connect to remote location, except you can't even specify the key in > the UI. It will just try a bunch of keys until you are blocked by remote. > > And there are numerous other programs who do this, like Filezilla. > > I just don't get it apparently.. > > I don't see why you're getting so upset. It's not hard to avoid using the agent if you don't want to use it. The easiest thing is to not put identities in it in the first place if you don't want them to be used. The next easiest is to change the ssh config to skip the agent. Neither are hard. But, I do agree with you on the unintuitive nature of not trying the identity from the command-line first. I'm sure a *friendly* request or patch (emphasis on friendly... vs. how you started this thread) to do that to the openssh upstream would be happy to consider it as an improvement to the user experience. Same with GNOME Files and the upstream GNOME devs. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!
Allegedly, on or about 22 November 2017, David A. De Graaf sent: > I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several > years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the > last straw. I can't say I've had any real problems with it. I used to have lots of problems with what was used before pulseaudio, whenever two things wanted to make a sound at the same time, the first one prevented the other, then they might jam each other up when the first thing had finished playing. I'll ask the obvious question: Do you do fresh installs, or update Fedora over the top of prior installations? -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 4.13.13-200.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 15 15:46:36 UTC 2017 x86_64 Boilerplate: All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. There is no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages posted to the mailing list. Windows (TM) [Typhoid Mary]. They refuse to believe that there's anything wrong with it, but everyone else knows Windows is a disease that spreads. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:06:11 +0100 cen wrote: Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. Why? I do lots of linux admin work and I only have two keys. I use a different key for each organization I'm working for/with. I have a personal key, one for Fedora packaging, one for github, another for bitbucket, and several for different companies where I perform admin work. You can certainly use one or two keys for all of that, but I don't think it's the best practice to do so. Not everyone feels the same, but it's far from unusual to have quite a few keys. -- Todd ~~ If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed. -- Albert Einstein signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
cen wrote: Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. Not at all. It just requires some config to handle that well. :) Does everyone disable agent first thing after installing Fedora? How else do you even manage to survive with this crap running? The agent is great. It certainly can be annoying with many keys, some of which is made worse by the agent being provided not by ssh but by gnome-keyring-daemon, I think. Why would agent even try with other keys if I SPECIFY the goddamn key! It doesn't make any sense! There is a way to avoid this though, using the IdentitiesOnly option in the ssh config: Host *.example.com IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_example_com Host *.example.net IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_example_net Host * IdentitiesOnly yes IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa Maybe that will be helpful as an alternative to disabling the agent entirely. -- Todd ~~ Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo. -- H. G. Wells signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!
On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote: pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced no sound. By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*"I was able to restore sanity. Yesterday I freshly installed Fedora 27 Live Xfce on an Acer laptop. Today, /var/log/messages had grown to -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 14787172 Nov 22 15:47 messages These 15 MB contain recurring lines like this: Nov 22 11:22:18 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16113 of pr ocess 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' high priority at nice level -11 . Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16116 of process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16121 of process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] socket-server.c: bind(): Address already in use Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to load module "module-esound-protocol-unix" (argument: ""): initialization failed. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Module load failed. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Failed to initialize daemon. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16110]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Daemon startup failed. which repeat every 5 seconds, and will rapidly destroy my system. I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the last straw. Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing: dnf remove pulseaudio which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa. pulseaudio should just go away! Can you now play a video thru your computer and monitor and local sound speakers and at the same time send an htmi signal to your TV set that includes cideo and sound? I don't think so. With the damned pulseaudio and sufficient messing around, you can do that. --doug ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
On 23Nov2017 00:06, cen wrote: Whose good idea in the history of Linux was to turn ssh agent on by default when one has more than 5 private keys available? This is what I just got: ssh -i mykey.pem user@myhost Received disconnect from ... port 22:2: Too many authentication failures Authentication failed. Then I do export SSH_AUTH_SOCK="" and surprise! I am logged in. And I am not even sure why this suddenly stopped working, I swear to God specifying the key used to override the agent. No, as far as I recall it merely uses that key in addition to the agent. What gets used first might depend on the key types, too. Have you experimented with specifying the key file in the ssh_config for whatever hosts require that key? Don't forget that the .ssh/config file accepts shell style globs in the Host clause names, quite handy for some things. Example from mine: Host *-direct ControlPath none Adjust to suit. I keep a no-ssh-agent wrapper script around to run commands without access to my agent. Usage: no-ssh-agent some-ssh-stuff ... So apparently the agent even overrides my -i flag which explicitly specifies which key to use. Instead of taking my key as I specify, ssh agent will go and try every single key file in my .ssh directory and fail after 5 times because any sane remote ssh server will block you after failing so many times. Have you examined the output of "ssh -v" for this connection? Have you confirmed that your -i key is being offered after all your agent keys? Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. Actually, no. I've been doing that kind of work (admin and dev) for decades and I don't think I've ever had as many a 5 keys in my agents. I've got 4 right now, 3 being my personal keys (rsa, dsa, ed25519) to accomodate different key type acceptance and 1 special key for a third party project I'm working on right now. I could probably get my personal keys down to 2 if I spent a little time auditing my target hosts. Does everyone disable agent first thing after installing Fedora? How else do you even manage to survive with this crap running? Shrug. I live mostly on a Mac right now, which also provides a shared agent for your desktop. Quite handy really. Why would agent even try with other keys if I SPECIFY the goddamn key! It doesn't make any sense! I am surprised that it tries the agent keys before the -i key; have you verified this with an "ssh -v"? How do I turn it off in all shells for all users forever? Don't. Turn it off for your own shells perhaps, probably in your .bashrc. How do I nuke this from system? .bash_profile export does not seem to cut it. Surprising. I thought the Fedora bashrc sourced the bash_profile. Cheers, Cameron Simpson (formerly c...@zip.com.au) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!
David A. De Graaf writes: Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing: dnf remove pulseaudio which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa. pulseaudio should just go away! Unfortunately, Firefox requires pulseaudio for sound. Firefox is not packaged with a dependency on pulseaudio, but without it installed you want hear all the important parts of car crash videos on Youtube. pgphPvRkY_wp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!
On 11/23/17 06:36, David A. De Graaf wrote: > pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few > weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced > no sound. > By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*" I was able to restore sanity. > > Yesterday I freshly installed Fedora 27 Live Xfce on an Acer laptop. > Today, /var/log/messages had grown to > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 14787172 Nov 22 15:47 messages > These 15 MB contain recurring lines like this: > > Nov 22 11:22:18 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16113 of > pr > ocess 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' high priority at nice level > -11 > . > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16116 of > process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16121 of > process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] socket-server.c: > bind(): > Address already in use > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to > load > module "module-esound-protocol-unix" (argument: ""): initialization failed. > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Module load > failed. > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Failed to > initialize daemon. > Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16110]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Daemon > startup failed. > > which repeat every 5 seconds, and will rapidly destroy my system. > > I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several > years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the > last straw. > > Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing: > dnf remove pulseaudio > which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. > > Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. > I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 > packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even > skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa. > > pulseaudio should just go away! > > Just a FWIW I'm running F27 with KDE and pulseaudio-11.1-6.fc27. The HW on one system is an Acer Aspire 5920 which I think is about 8 yrs old. The audio device is [root@acer log]# lspci | grep -i audio 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) 0 problems with pulseaudio Also 0 problems on my HP systems. -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:06:11 +0100 cen wrote: > Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh > directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. Why? I do lots of linux admin work and I only have two keys. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
SSH_AUTH_SOCK behavior is completely insane
Whose good idea in the history of Linux was to turn ssh agent on by default when one has more than 5 private keys available? This is what I just got: ssh -i mykey.pem user@myhost Received disconnect from ... port 22:2: Too many authentication failures Authentication failed. Then I do export SSH_AUTH_SOCK="" and surprise! I am logged in. And I am not even sure why this suddenly stopped working, I swear to God specifying the key used to override the agent. So apparently the agent even overrides my -i flag which explicitly specifies which key to use. Instead of taking my key as I specify, ssh agent will go and try every single key file in my .ssh directory and fail after 5 times because any sane remote ssh server will block you after failing so many times. Anyone doing linux admin or dev work has more than 5 keys in their .ssh directory, rendering the agent completely USELESS PIECE OF SHIT PROGRAM. Does everyone disable agent first thing after installing Fedora? How else do you even manage to survive with this crap running? Why would agent even try with other keys if I SPECIFY the goddamn key! It doesn't make any sense! How do I turn it off in all shells for all users forever? How do I nuke this from system? .bash_profile export does not seem to cut it. Not to mention the same shit happens when you open gnome files and try to connect to remote location, except you can't even specify the key in the UI. It will just try a bunch of keys until you are blocked by remote. And there are numerous other programs who do this, like Filezilla. I just don't get it apparently.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
pulseaudio MUST DIE!
pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced no sound. By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*" I was able to restore sanity. Yesterday I freshly installed Fedora 27 Live Xfce on an Acer laptop. Today, /var/log/messages had grown to -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 14787172 Nov 22 15:47 messages These 15 MB contain recurring lines like this: Nov 22 11:22:18 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16113 of pr ocess 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' high priority at nice level -11 . Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16116 of process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer rtkit-daemon[4896]: Successfully made thread 16121 of process 16113 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'dad' RT at priority 5. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] socket-server.c: bind(): Address already in use Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to load module "module-esound-protocol-unix" (argument: ""): initialization failed. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Module load failed. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16113]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Failed to initialize daemon. Nov 22 11:22:19 datacer pulseaudio[16110]: [pulseaudio] main.c: Daemon startup failed. which repeat every 5 seconds, and will rapidly destroy my system. I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the last straw. Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing: dnf remove pulseaudio which, amazingly, took out 34 packages. Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should. I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34 packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa. pulseaudio should just go away! -- David A. De GraafDATIX, Inc.Hendersonville, NC d...@datix.us www.datix.us ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
I have just moved all configs and certificates to /etc/openvpn/client/. And I launch the client as 'systemctl start openvpn-client@myconnection' On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, 12:02 AM Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 22.11.2017 20:59, Bill Shirley wrote: > > > What we've been talking about is the unit file > > (openvpn@client-ibecker2.service). > > Since fc26 (if i remembered correctly) there were separate systemd units > for openvpn server and client configurations. > > /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn-client@.service > /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn-server@.service > > Based on that, you should have a config file in /etc/openvpn/client/ > (ibecker2.conf for example) and your systemd unit file should be > openvpn-client@ibecker2.service > > best regards > Ulf > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
On 22.11.2017 20:59, Bill Shirley wrote: > What we've been talking about is the unit file > (openvpn@client-ibecker2.service). Since fc26 (if i remembered correctly) there were separate systemd units for openvpn server and client configurations. /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn-client@.service /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn-server@.service Based on that, you should have a config file in /etc/openvpn/client/ (ibecker2.conf for example) and your systemd unit file should be openvpn-client@ibecker2.service best regards Ulf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
That link is for something different. It's automatically created by the systemctl enable command. I have one too: [0:root@elmo ~]$ ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@server.service lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 42 Jul 17 2015 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@server.service -> /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service What we've been talking about is the unit file (openvpn@client-ibecker2.service). Your original post: sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2 Failed to startopenvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client- ibecker2.service not found. says 'not found'. There is no unit file in either /lib/systemd/system/ nor /etc/systemd/system/ Bill On 11/22/2017 2:01 PM, Neal Becker wrote: I have: ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@client- ibecker2.service lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 40 May 28 2015 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@client- ibecker2.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn@.service My link is in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants, not in /etc/systemd/system. Is this not correct? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
Bill Shirley wrote: > Is the .service file in /etc/systemd/system ? > [0:root@elmo ~ 2]$ ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 148 Aug > 6 2015 /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service Of course yours would > be openvpn@client-ibecker2.service > > Bill > > On 11/22/2017 7:02 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Was working before upgrade to f27. Now: >> >> sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2 >> Failed to start openvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client- >> ibecker2.service not found. >> >> According to >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Openvpn#Working_with_systemd >> >> I would need to have /etc/openvpn/client-ibecker2.conf, which is there >> (as it's been since 2015). >> >> I don't know why this isn't working, or how to debug it (systemctl >> doesn't seem to have any debug flags) >> ___ >> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org I have: ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@client- ibecker2.service lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 40 May 28 2015 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/openvpn@client- ibecker2.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/openvpn@.service My link is in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants, not in /etc/systemd/system. Is this not correct? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to have ~/.pam_environment processed -> having fun with SELinux
On 11/21/2017 11:30 PM, Timothée Floure wrote: ~/.pam_environment is a symbolic link to ~/.dotfiles/pam_environment. Symlinks aren't processed according to their target, so they tend to be problematic with SELinux. Consider using a hard link instead. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
Putting your localized file in /lib/systemd/system is the problem. The upgrade
wiped it out. Localizations should go in /etc/systemd/system
The Fedora 25 /lib/systemd/system/openvpn.service unit file from the rpm:
[Unit]
Description=OpenVPN Robust And Highly Flexible Tunneling Application On %I
After=network.target
[Service]
PrivateTmp=true
Type=forking
PIDFile=/var/run/openvpn/%i.pid
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/openvpn --daemon --writepid /var/run/openvpn/%i.pid --cd
/etc/openvpn/ --config %i.conf
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
This file should not be edited.
My /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service that I created:
.include /lib/systemd/system/openvpn@.service
[Unit]
After=syslog.target
After=network.target
[Service]
Environment="OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY=1"
The text between the @ and the dot ('server') in the unit name becomes the %i
variable for the unit file. In this case, it's the config file name and the
pid file name:
[0:root@elmo ~]$ ls -lZ /etc/openvpn/server.conf /var/run/openvpn/server.pid
-rw-r-. 1 root root system_u:object_r:openvpn_etc_t:s0 11400 Jul 24 07:07
/etc/openvpn/server.conf
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:openvpn_var_run_t:s0 5 Nov 18
20:55 /var/run/openvpn/server.pid
HTH,
Bill
On 11/22/2017 12:13 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
yeah somethings changed it used to be simple now we have to
create/copy files to systemd i just went through this today also
specifically in Section 5. Setting up automatic OpenVPN connection on
system start
*This step requires that you set up automatic login from the previous step.
https://hide.me/en/vpnsetup/fedora/openvpn/
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bill Shirley
wrote:
Is the .service file in /etc/systemd/system ?
[0:root@elmo ~ 2]$ ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 148 Aug 6
2015 /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service
Of course yours would be openvpn@client-ibecker2.service
Bill
On 11/22/2017 7:02 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Was working before upgrade to f27. Now:
sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2
Failed to start openvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client-
ibecker2.service not found.
According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Openvpn#Working_with_systemd
I would need to have /etc/openvpn/client-ibecker2.conf, which is there (as
it's been since 2015).
I don't know why this isn't working, or how to debug it (systemctl doesn't
seem to have any debug flags)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nextcloud upload restricted to 2MB
Hi there, thanks for all your answers, it was very helpful and actually what is going wrong. I wasn't aware of the fpm change. I switched back to preforking as described in point 6 and everything is working again like expected. Will have over the weekend a closer look at the mpm and try to configure it correctly. Many thanks for the fast help! Best regards, Florian > On 11/21/2017 02:59 PM, Florian Sievert wrote: >> If I remember correctly, this was the default upload size set by PHP. >> However, I set in F26 already in /etc/php.in the option and restarted >> apache. >> >> upload_max_filesize = 16G > >> Any idea what this might be/? /Anyone who can confirm that nextcloud >> is working for him on F27? > > This might be relevant: > https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/11/17/Fedora-27-changes-in-http-and-php > > I don't know what changes that might have regarding configuration. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
yeah somethings changed it used to be simple now we have to create/copy files to systemd i just went through this today also specifically in Section 5. Setting up automatic OpenVPN connection on system start *This step requires that you set up automatic login from the previous step. https://hide.me/en/vpnsetup/fedora/openvpn/ On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bill Shirley wrote: > Is the .service file in /etc/systemd/system ? > [0:root@elmo ~ 2]$ ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 148 Aug 6 > 2015 /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service > Of course yours would be openvpn@client-ibecker2.service > > Bill > > > On 11/22/2017 7:02 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > > Was working before upgrade to f27. Now: > > sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2 > Failed to start openvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client- > ibecker2.service not found. > > According to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Openvpn#Working_with_systemd > > I would need to have /etc/openvpn/client-ibecker2.conf, which is there (as > it's been since 2015). > > I don't know why this isn't working, or how to debug it (systemctl doesn't > seem to have any debug flags) > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: systemctl openvpn won't start
Is the .service file in /etc/systemd/system ? [0:root@elmo ~ 2]$ ls -lZ /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:systemd_unit_file_t:s0 148 Aug 6 2015 /etc/systemd/system/openvpn@server.service Of course yours would be openvpn@client-ibecker2.service Bill On 11/22/2017 7:02 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Was working before upgrade to f27. Now: sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2 Failed to start openvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client- ibecker2.service not found. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Openvpn#Working_with_systemd I would need to have /etc/openvpn/client-ibecker2.conf, which is there (as it's been since 2015). I don't know why this isn't working, or how to debug it (systemctl doesn't seem to have any debug flags) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Windows 10 KVM and reboot
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 20:56 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I do not remember if I initiated the reboot for some reason, or if it was a > Win10-initiated reboot. But the reboot went into some kind of a recovery > mode I have not seen before, in Windows. Instead of booting Windows 10, it > was some kind of recovery menu, giving me a few options to try. I do not > immediately recall which options tjeu were, but the the conclusion was the > same, no matter which recovery option I picked: an adamant claim that my > "hard drive" is fried. I've seen that a couple of times with Win10. Always thought it was PEBKAC so the first time I just reinstalled Windows. The second time I tried the options (vaguely remember it was the first one) and it worked. OT: What triggered the problem in the first place was my attempt to dual- boot the Win10 system (it lives on its own disk). The VM is configured with EFI (ovmf), that being the preferred option when doing VFIO passthrough, but my box is configured by default to try BIOS before trying EFI and I didn't use the magic incantation in my boot screen, so Windows decided there was something wrong and tried to "fix" it - in this case by downgrading the VM from EFI to BIOS. Anyway, having managed to correct that I can now dual-boot if required by proper magic in the (real) firmware. What I'd really prefer is to reinstall Fedora using EFI but that seems somewhat complicated to achieve. I asked about it here a while back and found the answers discouraging (not impossible, just a lot of work). I don't really need to dual-boot anyway at the moment. It was just a whim so I could check performance of my VM. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: grub2-efi / grub2-tools problem
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:34:54 +0100 Ger van Dijck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:24:48 +0100, Frank Elsner > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > known since release of Fedora 27: > > > > Error: > > Problem: package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 requires grub2-tools = > > 1:2.02-0.40.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed > > - grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 > > > > Any chance to get this problem solved? > > > > Upgrade otherwise not possible (at least here). > > > > > > --Frank Elsner > > > > > Hi Frank , > > > I had the same problem and put it on the Red Hat Network; But no one did > give any help. > > I solved the problem as follows : I did a relabel on the OS ( Fedora 26 ) > and added in the command " dnf system-upgrade download --refresh > --releasever=27 " the option --allowerase. What do you mean by "relabel"? dnf system-upgrade download --allowerase --refresh --releasever=27 gives dnf system-upgrade: error: unrecognized arguments: --allowerase > In my case then the updrade to Fedora 27 runs fine. Can't reproduce. --Frank Elsner ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: grub2-efi / grub2-tools problem
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:24:48 +0100, Frank Elsner wrote: Hello, known since release of Fedora 27: Error: Problem: package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 requires grub2-tools = 1:2.02-0.40.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 Any chance to get this problem solved? Upgrade otherwise not possible (at least here). --Frank Elsner Hi Frank , I had the same problem and put it on the Red Hat Network; But no one did give any help. I solved the problem as follows : I did a relabel on the OS ( Fedora 26 ) and added in the command " dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=27 " the option --allowerase. In my case then the updrade to Fedora 27 runs fine. Give it a try , saucces , Ger van Dijck.___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Video Download Helper will not run with Firefox 57
On 11/22/2017 07:43 AM, wwp wrote: Hello, On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:34:53 -0500 Temlakos wrote: Everyone: After updating Firefox I got a message to "refresh" it--that is, remove all add-ins. Foolishly I did so, thinking to reinstall them later using compatible versions. But I have not been able to get Video Download Helper to work. I followed their instructions to install a "companion application." That means working in a terminal version (actually, Konsole; I'm working in KDE). The messages I get all say the companion app is ready for use. But after repeated shutdowns and restarts, VDH still will not download anything. And that's the case for all extensions that didn't move to the webextension format. What a killer Firefox upgrade.. FYI: https://arewewebextensionsyet.com/ Thank you! That's the best resource I could have asked for. It led to another extension that restores the most important capability I had lost. All that remains is whether VDH will get with the program. The resource above said it had three "blocking bugs." I suppose that explains the trouble I had. Temlakos ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QEMU/KVM startup error in F27
On 11/22/17 20:01, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I think you mean "semodule -DB" as that's what the manpage gives as an > example (BTW the page is phenomenally hard to understand, not least > because at one point it uses MODE, at another it says "module" and at a > third it says KIND, and it isn't clear if these are supposed to be the > same thing). Yes, -DB is what I meant to type. > > Anyway, it had no effect. The error persists of course, but there is > still no AVC report. > > Thanks all the same. I suppose I've never encountered a situation where an AVC wasn't produced. Wonder how that is then diagnosed. Oh, well. -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
grub2-efi / grub2-tools problem
Hello, known since release of Fedora 27: Error: Problem: package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 requires grub2-tools = 1:2.02-0.40.fc26, but none of the providers can be installed - grub2-tools-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package grub2-efi-1:2.02-0.40.fc26.i686 Any chance to get this problem solved? Upgrade otherwise not possible (at least here). --Frank Elsner ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Video Download Helper will not run with Firefox 57
Hello, On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:34:53 -0500 Temlakos wrote: > Everyone: > > After updating Firefox I got a message to "refresh" it--that is, remove all > add-ins. Foolishly I did so, thinking to reinstall them later using > compatible versions. > > But I have not been able to get Video Download Helper to work. > > I followed their instructions to install a "companion application." That > means working in a terminal version (actually, Konsole; I'm working in KDE). > The messages I get all say the companion app is ready for use. But after > repeated shutdowns and restarts, VDH still will not download anything. And that's the case for all extensions that didn't move to the webextension format. What a killer Firefox upgrade.. FYI: https://arewewebextensionsyet.com/ Regards, -- wwp pgptB3dabbLQ3.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Video Download Helper will not run with Firefox 57
Everyone: After updating Firefox I got a message to "refresh" it--that is, remove all add-ins. Foolishly I did so, thinking to reinstall them later using compatible versions. But I have not been able to get Video Download Helper to work. I followed their instructions to install a "companion application." That means working in a terminal version (actually, Konsole; I'm working in KDE). The messages I get all say the companion app is ready for use. But after repeated shutdowns and restarts, VDH still will not download anything. Temlakos ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
systemctl openvpn won't start
Was working before upgrade to f27. Now: sudo systemctl start openvpn@client-ibecker2 Failed to start openvpn@client-ibecker2.service: Unit openvpn@client- ibecker2.service not found. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Openvpn#Working_with_systemd I would need to have /etc/openvpn/client-ibecker2.conf, which is there (as it's been since 2015). I don't know why this isn't working, or how to debug it (systemctl doesn't seem to have any debug flags) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QEMU/KVM startup error in F27
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 16:03 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/14/2017 02:31 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On trying to fire up a VM using virt-manager, I get "unable to map > > backing store for guest RAM: Permission denied". > > > > I use hugepages to lock down memory for the VM, which may be relevant > > for the error. This worked correctly on F26 just before the upgrade to > > F27. I have changed nothing in my VM configuration, nor in the config > > file for QEMU. However, temporarily turning off SElinux allows the > > startup to proceed, after which I can re-enable SElinux with no ill > > effects, i.e. the VM runs correctly. > > > > A complete relabel of my system (touch /.autolabel and reboot) has made > > no difference. > > > Possibly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481454 Certainly looks like it might be. I'll try adding a pointer to my BZ to see if anyone takes any notice. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QEMU/KVM startup error in F27
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 12:12 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/15/17 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 14:50 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote: > > > On 11/14/2017 02:31 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > On trying to fire up a VM using virt-manager, I get "unable to map > > > > backing store for guest RAM: Permission denied". > > > > > > > > I use hugepages to lock down memory for the VM, which may be relevant > > > > for the error. This worked correctly on F26 just before the upgrade to > > > > F27. I have changed nothing in my VM configuration, nor in the config > > > > file for QEMU. However, temporarily turning off SElinux allows the > > > > startup to proceed, after which I can re-enable SElinux with no ill > > > > effects, i.e. the VM runs correctly. > > > > > > > > A complete relabel of my system (touch /.autolabel and reboot) has made > > > > no difference. > > > > > > Have you checked the AVC reports from selinux? It smells like a bad > > > policy re: hugepages for KVMs. It's difficult to say without the actual > > > AVC denials. > > > > Not seeing anything. The only AVC reports in journalctl are about some > > dbus stuff unrelated to libvirtd. Interestingly the libvirtd startup > > lines in journalctl show: > > > > ... error : virAuditOpen:62 : Unable to initialise audit layer: Protocol > > not supported > > > > but it's not clear whether that has any relevance. As I say, toggling > > setenforce lets libvirtd start and from then on everything works. > > > > > > I added a comment to your BZ but thought it would be worth mentioning here as > well. > > If you find your problem going away by disabling selinux but you're not > getting an > AVC then it may be due to "donotaudit" in the policy. So, you should have > selinux > enabled and run "semodule -D" to turn off donotaudit and then run your test > and see > if you get an AVC. I think you mean "semodule -DB" as that's what the manpage gives as an example (BTW the page is phenomenally hard to understand, not least because at one point it uses MODE, at another it says "module" and at a third it says KIND, and it isn't clear if these are supposed to be the same thing). Anyway, it had no effect. The error persists of course, but there is still no AVC report. Thanks all the same. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nextcloud upload restricted to 2MB
I'm looking at the owncloud and nextcloud packages this week to update them. Apologies for this but it was an unexpected result of changes to httpd. The default httpd MPM changed from prefork to event, which disabled mod_php as it's not thread safe. For the incoming update once I've ironed out update issues (a lot to test) I'll be switching the recommended from mod_php to php-fpm whether you are using nginx or httpd. This will allow the default MPM on apache to be event for performance and simplify my upgrade tasks by ensuring both nginx and httpd use a common php-fpm config. This is the config I drop in place for nginx, the same will be used for httpd: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud/blob/master/f/nextcloud-php-fpm.conf I'm honestly struggling on time between work and family and Fedora at present ... anyone willing to step up and assist with testing, checking dependencies and so on would be most appreciated. As a work around for the time being on httpd change /etc/httpd/conf.d/00-mpm.conf to use prefork again if you don't want to manually install and configure php-fpm for nextcloud... that will automatically enable mod_php again and get the correct configuration. James On 22 November 2017 at 03:08, Bill Shirley wrote: > I ran into this on Fedora 25. > https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-users/msg479030.html > > I'm not running php-fpm.service. > > Bill > > > On 11/21/2017 7:24 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> >> On 11/21/2017 03:27 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> >>> On 11/21/2017 02:59 PM, Florian Sievert wrote: If I remember correctly, this was the default upload size set by PHP. However, I set in F26 already in /etc/php.in the option and restarted apache. upload_max_filesize = 16G Any idea what this might be/? /Anyone who can confirm that nextcloud is working for him on F27? >>> >>> This might be relevant: >>> >>> https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/11/17/Fedora-27-changes-in-http-and-php >>> I don't know what changes that might have regarding configuration. >> >> Essentially, F27 now uses Apache in event (multithreaded) mode rather >> than prefork (single-threaded) mode. PHP itself is multithread safe, but >> some of the libraries that may be used by it are NOT multithread-safe. >> Since mod_php is designed for single-thread use, you can't use it with >> Apache running in either event or worker (also multithreaded) modes. >> >> To get around this, PHP now runs as a separate process (called >> "php-fpm") and Apache talks to it using a mechanism called FastCGI via >> either a UNIX-domain socket or TCP/IP using (typically) localhost:9000. >> Since PHP is a separate process, if you make a change to /etc/php.ini, >> you must restart php-fpm: >> >> $ sudo systemctl restart php-fpm.service >> >> for it to take effect. >> >> Probably more than you wanted to know, but >> -- >> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - >> - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - >> -- >> - The trouble with troubleshooting is that trouble sometimes - >> - shoots back. - >> -- >> ___ >> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
HEADS UP: OpenSSH 7.6p1 in Fedora 27
Hello all, The OpenSSH 7.6p1 was submitted for testing in Fedora 27 [1]. Unfortunately I didn't manage to get it out before freeze since all the thing/bugs/upstream release somehow pilled up. On the other side, this package was already tested quite extensively during recent months by myself, using automated test cases and was in rawhide for last two weeks, where we caught last issues. If you have some "special" use case, please make sure it works for you after the update and leave a karma. [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-96d1995b70 Thank you, -- Jakub Jelen Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
