[389-users] Re: a replication problem

2018-03-22 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
The error I’m basically getting is:

[23/Mar/2018:03:23:29.461074995 +] - ERR - NSMMReplicationPlugin - 
bind_and_check_pwp - agmt=“cn=HOST1-to-HOST2" (ipa203:389) - Replication bind 
with GSSAPI auth failed: LDAP error 49 (Invalid credentials) ()

Any ideas?

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 5:05 PM, Sergei Gerasenko  wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I ran into a rather significant problem. I needed to rebuild two nodes in my 
> topology and re-include them under the same hostnames. What I’m seeing now is 
> that the replication to these new nodes is broken. Replication from them 
> seems to work. I suspect that we have some stale metadata somewhere in the 
> topology whereby the old nodes are still present somewhere in the agreements 
> under other ids?
> 
> What’s the best way to troubleshoot this?
> 
> Thanks again,
>  Sergei
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adding an application to Fedora

2018-03-22 Thread chicago
Start by writing a bug report and following up at least once a week. 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: alternative to skype

2018-03-22 Thread chicago
>I think notes is a great system if used properly

Yeah, if just use the website and never open the app it is fine. 

Also pidgin is a great idea to talk to people who are on Skype. Ideally though 
when we say alternatives to Skype I assumed we meant we are replacing both ends 
of a conversation. 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] a replication problem

2018-03-22 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hi guys,

I ran into a rather significant problem. I needed to rebuild two nodes in my 
topology and re-include them under the same hostnames. What I’m seeing now is 
that the replication to these new nodes is broken. Replication from them seems 
to work. I suspect that we have some stale metadata somewhere in the topology 
whereby the old nodes are still present somewhere in the agreements under other 
ids?

What’s the best way to troubleshoot this?

Thanks again,
  Sergei
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: alternative to skype

2018-03-22 Thread Clovis Wichoski
I use Telegram.

Em sáb, 17 de mar de 2018 17:55, Patrick Dupre  escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> Is there an alternative to skype which would also allow me to exchange
> documents ?
>
> Thank.
>
> ===
>  Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
>  Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
>  Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
>  Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
>  189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: alternative to skype

2018-03-22 Thread Stephen Morris

On 22/3/18 11:40 pm, chicago wrote:

I've worked in seven different organizations, they all happened to use
Lotus Notes as their mail system

Say no more. You've suffered enough.


I think notes is a great system if used properly. The organization I 
currently work for is looking at replacing notes with outlook, and I 
think they are stupid. In my view outlook/exchange is microsofts attempt 
at replicating notes and it is a dismal failure.


regards,

Steve

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Where do I find this srpm?

2018-03-22 Thread Stephen Morris

On 23/3/18 4:46 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:48 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:

My Note 3 is a Samsung, but from what I've seen the only new phones that
have replaceable batteries are certain models from LG. Everyone else has
gone the "sleeker is better" or "waterproofing is easier with sealed
units" (not that they're ever waterproof) or some other trendy mantra.

https://thedroidguy.com/2018/01/5-best-android-smartphones-with-removable-battery-in-2018-1062773

poc


I bought bought a Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime as a replacement for my 
Samsung Galaxy S3 (which I think is running Android 4, as Samsung 
refused to provide upgrades on the grounds the phone wasn't capable of 
running later versions of Android) where the back was removable as it 
had to be as the phone is packaged without the battery installed, so the 
back has to be removed to insert the battery and the sim card. Also I've 
never had a Samsung phone where the back was not removable, because like 
the one I have now, all my previous Samsungs were distributed in the 
retail stores with the battery and sim card not installed in the phone. 
The only limitation on the battery not being replaceable is the stores 
that specialize in selling batteries not having one to fit the phone.


regards,

Steve



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: replication question

2018-03-22 Thread Mark Reynolds


On 03/22/2018 04:04 PM, JESSE LUNT wrote:
> When I access the 389ds2 using an ldap browser, I still do not see the
> user Root database. However, would I see it if it hasn't finished
> initializing?
You said you already created the userRoot database on 389ds2, so you are
saying you don't see it anymore?

Any chance I could see the dse.ldif from 389ds2?  Perhaps 389ds2 is not
properly configured?

Anyway you need to look at the logs next to figure out why the
initialization is not occurring.  The access log should show a
connection coming from 389ds1, and it binding as your replication
manager.  The errors log might also have useful info (on either server).

Mark
>
>
> Jesse
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Mark Reynolds  > wrote:
>
>> How man entries are in the 389ds1?
>>
>> You need to look at the access/errors logs on 389ds2 to see if 389ds1
>> is making contact and what is it doing.
>>
>> It's also possible it finished initializing.  Are there any entries
>> on 389ds2?  If you make an update on 389ds1 does it appear on 389ds2?
>>
>> On 03/22/2018 12:51 PM, JESSE LUNT wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>       I am trying to replicate my userRoot database to another
>>> 389LDAP server (supplier: 389ds1, consumer: 389ds2). The database on
>>> the supplier has not been replicated to any server for more than 2
>>> years. (yikes!!!). 
>>>
>>> I have been successful in backing up the database in question, and
>>> am now trying to create a replica agreement. I created the root
>>> suffix on the consumer side (389ds2) and then created a replication
>>> agreement from the admin console. The admin console has been in the
>>> state of wait while consumer is initialized. 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Here is the output from the repl-monitor script
>>>
>>> Enter password for (:): Master: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389
>>>  ldap://389ds1.northshore.edu:389/
>>> 
>>> Replica ID: 1212
>>> Replica Root: dc=northshore,dc=edu
>>> Max CSN: 5ab3dd8f04bc (03/22/2018 12:45:03)
>>> Use of uninitialized value in string at /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl
>>>  line 814, <> line 1.
>>> Use of uninitialized value in join or string at
>>> /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl  line 1151, <> line 1.
>>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389
>>>  ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>>> 
>>> Type: consumer
>>> Time Lag: - ?:??:??
>>> Max CSN: none
>>> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
>>> /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl  line 855, <> line 1.
>>> Last Modify Time:
>>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389 
>>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update
>>> started
>>> Update Started: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>>> Update Ended: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>>> Schedule: always in sync
>>> SSL: n
>>> Replica ID: 1971
>>> Replica Root: o=netscaperoot
>>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389
>>>  ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>>> 
>>> Type: consumer
>>> Time Lag: 0:00:00
>>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>>> Last Modify Time: 3/20/2018 12:26:52
>>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389 
>>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update
>>> succeeded
>>> Update Started: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>>> Update Ended: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>>> Schedule: always in sync
>>> SSL: n
>>>
>>>
>>> My question is... is this hung or is the replication initialization
>>> going to take days because of how long it has been since it has
>>> replicated the database?
>>> -- 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jesse
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>

___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: replication question

2018-03-22 Thread JESSE LUNT
When I access the 389ds2 using an ldap browser, I still do not see the user 
Root database. However, would I see it if it hasn't finished initializing? 


Jesse

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Mark Reynolds  wrote:
> 
> How man entries are in the 389ds1?
> 
> You need to look at the access/errors logs on 389ds2 to see if 389ds1 is 
> making contact and what is it doing.
> 
> It's also possible it finished initializing.  Are there any entries on 
> 389ds2?  If you make an update on 389ds1 does it appear on 389ds2?
> 
>> On 03/22/2018 12:51 PM, JESSE LUNT wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>   I am trying to replicate my userRoot database to another 389LDAP 
>> server (supplier: 389ds1, consumer: 389ds2). The database on the supplier 
>> has not been replicated to any server for more than 2 years. (yikes!!!). 
>> 
>> I have been successful in backing up the database in question, and am now 
>> trying to create a replica agreement. I created the root suffix on the 
>> consumer side (389ds2) and then created a replication agreement from the 
>> admin console. The admin console has been in the state of wait while 
>> consumer is initialized. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Here is the output from the repl-monitor script
>> 
>> Enter password for (:): Master: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389 
>> ldap://389ds1.northshore.edu:389/
>> Replica ID: 1212
>> Replica Root: dc=northshore,dc=edu
>> Max CSN: 5ab3dd8f04bc (03/22/2018 12:45:03)
>> Use of uninitialized value in string at /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl line 814, 
>> <> line 1.
>> Use of uninitialized value in join or string at /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl 
>> line 1151, <> line 1.
>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389 ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>> Type: consumer
>> Time Lag: - ?:??:??
>> Max CSN: none
>> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
>> /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl line 855, <> line 1.
>> Last Modify Time:
>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389
>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update started
>> Update Started: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>> Update Ended: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>> Schedule: always in sync
>> SSL: n
>> Replica ID: 1971
>> Replica Root: o=netscaperoot
>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389 ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>> Type: consumer
>> Time Lag: 0:00:00
>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>> Last Modify Time: 3/20/2018 12:26:52
>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389
>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update succeeded
>> Update Started: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>> Update Ended: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>> Schedule: always in sync
>> SSL: n
>> 
>> 
>> My question is... is this hung or is the replication initialization going to 
>> take days because of how long it has been since it has replicated the 
>> database?
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jesse
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mariadb-connector-c for MinGW

2018-03-22 Thread Dirk Gottschalk
Hi Michael.

Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2018, 17:35 +0100 schrieb Michal Schorm:
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> MariaDB, MySQL and their C & ODBC connectors maintainer here!
> 
> I agree with Michael Cronenworth, that the right way is to become a
> Fedora packager and start taking care of the new package.
> However, that can take some time and effort. (getting ready to become
> the packager, do a review of somebody's package, find a sponsor, get
> familiar with the infrastructure, propose a new package, a keep eye
> on it for few fedora releases )

Packaging for Fedora is my long term target. but, having a bunch of
other work to to, my target at this point is to build a package that is
simply usable for my convenience, i.e. after a reinstallation of the
system or for installation on other workstations. I'm sure, my package
doesn't reach the packaging guideline by now. But making it available
for others, since it works, is a good idea. The fine tuning for an
official release in Fedora can be done, when my time allows it.


> Posting the buildable package source files on Git{Hub,Lab,...} and
> asking somebody to build it in COPR seems like a good first step to
> me too.
> In adition, with latest COPR features, it should be possible to hook
> the external repo and rebuild automatically on each commit.

Yes, I have seen COPR works with GitHub. I have an FAS account for
years now, but I wanted to get some feedback here first.

I forked the Repo of mariadb-connector-c to my account. I make the
changes there and perhaps the MariaDB guys do a pull. My idea is to
contact them after the work is done.


> I don't understand MinGW at all, so my nex assumption may be wrong.
> If the changes to the sources are only cosmetic from Linux POV, but
> critical from MinGW POV, I'd be happy to offer the patch to MariaDB
> upstream. (Or you can do it yourself through either their JIRA or
> GitHub PR)

I use an old release for this, it's version 2.3.2 of the C connector,
the newer versions don't compile because of some functions and missing
portability. This issue is something I want to resolve in my holidays
in summer.


> Anyway, even though I don't work with MinGW, this sound's like cool
> package to have.
> I'd surely add it to Fedora wiki pages I wrote about MariaDB and
> software around.

I'll revise the package to make it conforming to the packaging
guidelines and to resolve the problem with version 3.x.x of the
connector. 

Regards,
Dirk


-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen
Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing connman broke my /etc/resolv.conf

2018-03-22 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 03/22/2018 08:58 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote:

After I installed the connman package, my system failed to resolve domain names. Even after 
removing connman, the errors persisted. I fiddled around with /etc/resolv.conf and noticed that I 
get "failed to write to linked file" errors. I performed "ls -l" and saw the 
following dangling symlink:
/etc/resolv.conf -> /var/run/connman/resolv.conf
After removing it and creating an empty file for /etc/resolf.conf, everything 
returned to normal.

Can the connman maintainer check if the package installs and removes itself 
correctly?


File a bug at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=conman
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Where do I find this srpm?

2018-03-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 09:48 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> My Note 3 is a Samsung, but from what I've seen the only new phones that
> have replaceable batteries are certain models from LG. Everyone else has
> gone the "sleeker is better" or "waterproofing is easier with sealed
> units" (not that they're ever waterproof) or some other trendy mantra.

https://thedroidguy.com/2018/01/5-best-android-smartphones-with-removable-battery-in-2018-1062773

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: replication question

2018-03-22 Thread JESSE LUNT
Hey Mark,

   Thanks Mark... I'll take a look. I wasn't sure if I could do that yet. 
That's a good idea.

Jesse



> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Mark Reynolds  wrote:
> 
> How man entries are in the 389ds1?
> 
> You need to look at the access/errors logs on 389ds2 to see if 389ds1 is 
> making contact and what is it doing.
> 
> It's also possible it finished initializing.  Are there any entries on 
> 389ds2?  If you make an update on 389ds1 does it appear on 389ds2?
> 
>> On 03/22/2018 12:51 PM, JESSE LUNT wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>   I am trying to replicate my userRoot database to another 389LDAP 
>> server (supplier: 389ds1, consumer: 389ds2). The database on the supplier 
>> has not been replicated to any server for more than 2 years. (yikes!!!). 
>> 
>> I have been successful in backing up the database in question, and am now 
>> trying to create a replica agreement. I created the root suffix on the 
>> consumer side (389ds2) and then created a replication agreement from the 
>> admin console. The admin console has been in the state of wait while 
>> consumer is initialized. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Here is the output from the repl-monitor script
>> 
>> Enter password for (:): Master: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389 
>> ldap://389ds1.northshore.edu:389/
>> Replica ID: 1212
>> Replica Root: dc=northshore,dc=edu
>> Max CSN: 5ab3dd8f04bc (03/22/2018 12:45:03)
>> Use of uninitialized value in string at /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl line 814, 
>> <> line 1.
>> Use of uninitialized value in join or string at /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl 
>> line 1151, <> line 1.
>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389 ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>> Type: consumer
>> Time Lag: - ?:??:??
>> Max CSN: none
>> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
>> /usr/bin/repl-monitor.pl line 855, <> line 1.
>> Last Modify Time:
>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389
>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update started
>> Update Started: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>> Update Ended: 03/22/2018 12:45:01
>> Schedule: always in sync
>> SSL: n
>> Replica ID: 1971
>> Replica Root: o=netscaperoot
>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>> Receiver: 389ds2.northshore.edu:389 ldap://389ds2.northshore.edu:389/
>> Type: consumer
>> Time Lag: 0:00:00
>> Max CSN: 5ab1364d000407b3 (03/20/2018 12:26:53 4 0)
>> Last Modify Time: 3/20/2018 12:26:52
>> Supplier: 389ds1.northshore.edu:389
>> Sent/Skipped: 0 / 0
>> Update Status: 0 Replica acquired successfully: Incremental update succeeded
>> Update Started: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>> Update Ended: 03/20/2018 13:58:15
>> Schedule: always in sync
>> SSL: n
>> 
>> 
>> My question is... is this hung or is the replication initialization going to 
>> take days because of how long it has been since it has replicated the 
>> database?
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jesse
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Where do I find this srpm?

2018-03-22 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/21/2018 03:02 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 21/3/18 9:13 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 19:18 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> Why don't I have a new phone? I don't want to spend $1K for a phone I
>>> will have to toss out when the battery dies because, with VERY few
>>> exceptions, you can't replace the battery in new phones. IMHO, this is
>>> absolutely inexcusable! I think only LG phones still have replaceable
>>> batteries. LG should be applauded for this, the rest of them should be
>>> ashamed of themselves. "Oh, the battery explodes! You'll need to replace
>>> the phone!" What? How about just replacing the defective batteries.
>> At least some of Motorola's phones also have replaceable batteries and
>> are reasonably priced.
> 
> I've mainly used samsung phones and I haven't had one where the battery
> is not replaceable. I've even had a samsung phone (many years ago) where
> you had to take the battery out to insert the sim card because the
> battery physically sat on top of the card cage.

My Note 3 is a Samsung, but from what I've seen the only new phones that
have replaceable batteries are certain models from LG. Everyone else has
gone the "sleeker is better" or "waterproofing is easier with sealed
units" (not that they're ever waterproof) or some other trendy mantra.

I think Samsung's last phone with a replaceable battery was the Note 5.
If you had a Note 7, you couldn't even take it on a plane! You had to
get the NEW Note 7 with the different colored battery meter so the TSA
and airlines would let you fly. Samsung ate a bunch of crap for that
one. Apple has had several recalls of phones because of defective
batteries. "Nope, you can't replace the battery, you need a new phone."
Utterly stupid.

I'm sure some of the various reasons the makers give are valid--to a
point. I'm also suspicious enough to also think it's a way to force one
to buy a new phone when one otherwise wouldn't. I hate to scrap a
perfectly good phone and be forced to pay $1K USD to get a decent
replacement. A prime example of "forced obsolescence".

Add to this that we are constantly harped at to be eco-sensitive. How is
scrapping an entire phone rather than a (formerly) easily replaced
component consistent with that?

Ok, I'm a curmudgeon and ranted enough about this. I'll shut up now.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Political Correctness: The insane doctrine that postulates that it -
- is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.   -
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mariadb-connector-c for MinGW

2018-03-22 Thread Michal Schorm
Hi Dirk,

MariaDB, MySQL and their C & ODBC connectors maintainer here!

I agree with Michael Cronenworth, that the right way is to become a
Fedora packager and start taking care of the new package.
However, that can take some time and effort. (getting ready to become
the packager, do a review of somebody's package, find a sponsor, get
familiar with the infrastructure, propose a new package, a keep eye on
it for few fedora releases )

Posting the buildable package source files on Git{Hub,Lab,...} and
asking somebody to build it in COPR seems like a good first step to me
too.
In adition, with latest COPR features, it should be possible to hook
the external repo and rebuild automatically on each commit.

I don't understand MinGW at all, so my nex assumption may be wrong.
If the changes to the sources are only cosmetic from Linux POV, but
critical from MinGW POV, I'd be happy to offer the patch to MariaDB
upstream. (Or you can do it yourself through either their JIRA or
GitHub PR)


Anyway, even though I don't work with MinGW, this sound's like cool
package to have.
I'd surely add it to Fedora wiki pages I wrote about MariaDB and
software around.

Michal

--

Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat


On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 09:53 AM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
>>
>> My questions now:
>> Is there any interest for those Packages?
>> If yes, what is the best way to distribute these packages? Copr?
>
>
> Yes, you may become a Fedora packager and publish the package in the Fedora
> repository.
>
> Fedora MinGW Packages:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=package=mingw-*
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>
> There is a MinGW mailing list that you may join and discuss anything further
> there.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Installing connman broke my /etc/resolv.conf

2018-03-22 Thread Artur Iwicki
After I installed the connman package, my system failed to resolve domain 
names. Even after removing connman, the errors persisted. I fiddled around with 
/etc/resolv.conf and noticed that I get "failed to write to linked file" 
errors. I performed "ls -l" and saw the following dangling symlink:
/etc/resolv.conf -> /var/run/connman/resolv.conf
After removing it and creating an empty file for /etc/resolf.conf, everything 
returned to normal.

Can the connman maintainer check if the package installs and removes itself 
correctly?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mariadb-connector-c for MinGW

2018-03-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 03/22/2018 09:53 AM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:

My questions now:
Is there any interest for those Packages?
If yes, what is the best way to distribute these packages? Copr?


Yes, you may become a Fedora packager and publish the package in the Fedora 
repository.

Fedora MinGW Packages:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob=package=mingw-*

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers

There is a MinGW mailing list that you may join and discuss anything further 
there.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


mariadb-connector-c for MinGW

2018-03-22 Thread Dirk Gottschalk
Hello.

I'm using MinGW for some of my projects which require to be usable also
on Windows. For this purpose I'm using MinGW to compule the Windows
binaries.

Some of this projects require MariaDB. In this case I found out that
there is no MinGW-Package of the C connector.

Being as lazy as I am, I built one by myself and put it in my local
repository.

Now, I want to share it with other Fedora users, so that they don't
have to fumble around with this situation, because you have to change
some things in the sources to compile it with MinGW. In most cases
there are just includes where they seem to have forgotten to take care
about the case sensitivity of filenames.

My questions now:
Is there any interest for those Packages?
If yes, what is the best way to distribute these packages? Copr?

Thanks in advance,
Dirk

-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen
Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: vlookup/hlookup/countif help for a spreadsheet

2018-03-22 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 22 March 2018, Antonio Olivares sent:
> I have a script that uses awk to generate reports for our soccer
> team.  This script was corrected by Jon LaBadie a very helpful
> person.  Unfortunately my colleagues do not have linux on their
> machines and they would like a spreadsheet to do the same so they can
> keep track of the season and to check how many PTS/GF/GA/DIF they
> have as a team.  I created one, but they do not understand it, uses
> decimals and integer part, and they get confused.

Tangential approach:  Use your script to create a webpage that they can
view in their preferred web browser.

It is possible to put a Linux shell on a Windows PC (e.g. a port of
BASH), so they could run your program.  Though, unless you need other
people to be able to enter data, than yourself, my first suggestion
seems simpler to manage.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 4.15.7-200.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 28 18:01:11 UTC 2018 x86_64

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
There is no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see
the messages posted to the mailing list.

The internet, your opportunity to learn from other peoples' mistakes.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: alternative to skype

2018-03-22 Thread Robbi Nespu
You discussion is out of topic. Do thread owner found the alternative? If
yes, stop bump the thread to much with unrelated to main topic.

Furthermore, i tried latest purple pidgin and send / received documents
working perfectly with you skype account.

It also lightweight compare to official skype application.

Give a try!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Show Gnome Alt-Tab window on all monitors

2018-03-22 Thread Laverne Schrock
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 03/21/2018 06:23 AM, Laverne Schrock wrote:
>
>> When I press Alt-Tab, the window switcher only appears on my primary
>> monitor.
>>
>> Is it possible to make the window switcher appear on all the monitors?
>> Perhaps there is some extension that I failed to find which does this?
>>
>
> How would that be displayed?  Do you want a duplicate copy of the switcher
> on the other monitor?
>

I think I would be happy with simple duplication, but I would be open to a
tool that does something more fancy.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


OT: vlookup/hlookup/countif help for a spreadsheet

2018-03-22 Thread Antonio Olivares
http://excel-example.com/templates/sport-tournament-template
Dear fellow fedora users,
I have a script that uses awk to generate reports for our soccer team.  This 
script was corrected by Jon LaBadie a very helpful person.  Unfortunately my 
colleagues do not have linux on their machines and they would like a 
spreadsheet to do the same so they can keep track of the season and to check 
how many PTS/GF/GA/DIF they have as a team.  I created one, but they do not 
understand it, uses decimals and integer part, and they get confused.  I am 
modifying the spreadsheet a bit to more as to what they want.  

However, I do not understand how to use countif/vlookup/hlookup to look for how 
many PTS they have, GF and GA so they can be tallied like SUMIF?  command.  If 
anyone is willing to help I can send you spreadsheet.  Last email I tried 
bounced because it had HTML and was big :(

for example   

PTS  TG  REG  OT  PKS :    PKS  OT  REG  TG                 
PTS
  3   TEAM1    2  1   1  0    2:1  0   0 1   1  
  TEAM3    0   
there are 10 games for each team and the team earns 3 PTS for a win in 
REGULATION, 2 PTS for a win in OT or PKS, 1 PT for a loss in OT/PKS and 0 PTS 
for a loss in REGULATION.   The PTS are tallied, the TG are the total goals:  
REG + OT as the PKS do not count in this area, they only determine who gets the 
2 PTS.  
the spreadsheet should tally the information

TEAM    GP  3-PTS 2-PTS 1-PT 0-PTS GF  GA  DIF  PTS
TEAM1  5 2        2        1      0        5     3     +2   11

There are some online examples, but they only contain W-win L-loss D-draw.  We 
do not have draws as the game has to be decided and we play OT and/or shoot PKS 
if the game is still tied.  

 The examples are here:

Sport tournament template in the site above, i cannot copy+paste correctlyWe 
only have two rounds and we only take care of our district we do not need more 
groups.  Ideas are appreciated.

Best Regards,


Antonio 
 
 


     
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: alternative to skype

2018-03-22 Thread chicago
>I've worked in seven different organizations, they all happened to use 
>Lotus Notes as their mail system

Say no more. You've suffered enough. 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adding an application to Fedora

2018-03-22 Thread Markku Kolkka
Robin Laing kirjoitti 22.3.2018 klo 2.20:
> Hello,
> 
> There is some discussion on a different list about adding an application
> to Fedora.  I looked at the web site
> https://developer.fedoraproject.org/start.html
> 
> and is this all that someone starts from?

No, that page is for people that want to use Fedora as a development
platform. To start adding/maintaining packages for FDedora OS itself
see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join

> 
> How about taking over a project that seems abandoned?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package

-- 
Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@iki.fi
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker

2018-03-22 Thread Federico Bruni



Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 8:21, Federico Bruni 
 ha scritto:

Let me add that I've tried also bluetoothctl.
I can pair it but after a few seconds it's disconnected:

[bluetooth]# trust AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Changing AC:89:95:DA:52:5E trust succeeded
[bluetooth]# pair AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Attempting to pair with AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
[CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: yes

Failed to pair: org.bluez.Error.AuthenticationCanceled
[CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: no




I've now searched this error and found a possible solution here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=180165

It says that installing bluez-hid2hci would solve the problem.
It was not installed on my system, so I'll give it a try when I'm back 
home.



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker

2018-03-22 Thread Federico Bruni

Let me add that I've tried also bluetoothctl.
I can pair it but after a few seconds it's disconnected:

[bluetooth]# trust AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Changing AC:89:95:DA:52:5E trust succeeded
[bluetooth]# pair AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Attempting to pair with AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
[CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: yes

Failed to pair: org.bluez.Error.AuthenticationCanceled
[CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: no



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker

2018-03-22 Thread Federico Bruni

Hi all

I've tried posting this message via the web interface yesterday, but I 
don't see it in the archives. So I'm sending it again by regular email.


I have two speakers:

$ hcitool scan
Scanning ...
AC:89:95:DA:52:5E   Beoplay M5_27502524
00:12:6F:3F:BD:D5   Mu-so Qb BT 7047

I can connect via bluetooth to both using my Android phone.
I can connect via bluetooth only to Mu-so using Fedora 27.

If I try the bluetooth connection using GNOME setting, I don't get much 
information. I just see that it tries the connection and after a while 
it fails.

On a terminal I get a timeout:

$ bt-device -c AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Connecting to: AC:89:95:DA:52:5E
Error: Timeout was reached

Finally, journalctl seems to suggest that may be some kernel problem?!?

Mar 22 07:36:45 fedora kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: last event is not cmd 
complete (0x0f)


I found the same error message in this bug report, which is for Fedora 
28 though:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514836#c15

Thanks in advance for any suggestion
Federico


PS The bluetooth service is running fine:

$ systemctl status bluetooth
* bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service
  Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; 
vendor preset: enabled)

  Active: active (running) since Thu 2018-03-22 07:25:05 CET; 26min ago
Docs: man:bluetoothd(8)
Main PID: 759 (bluetoothd)
  Status: "Running"
   Tasks: 1 (limit: 4915)
  CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service
  `-759 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd

Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service...
Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Bluetooth daemon 5.48
Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Starting SDP server
Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service.
Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Bluetooth management interface 
1.14 initialized
Mar 22 07:25:19 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Endpoint registered: 
sender=:1.69 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource
Mar 22 07:25:19 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Endpoint registered: 
sender=:1.69 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink

Mar 22 07:42:45 fedora bluetoothd[759]: No cache for AC:89:95:DA:52:5E


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Top-posting & list guidelines

2018-03-22 Thread Federico Bruni



Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 0:47, Richard England 
<"pdx.limey"@gmail.com> ha scritto:

On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this
when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now.


Same in Thunberbird.



Same in Geary. (well, not in current master for me.. the project moved 
from Cmake to Meson recently and this is the most annoying regression, 
not fixed yet)


Gmail used to have an extensione which allowed "selective reply", but 
they dropped it:

https://www.lifewire.com/how-to-reply-quoting-only-highlighted-text-in-gmail-1172095


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org