auto-kill process using too much memory
Hi, It happens sometimes that someone launches a process that uses too much memory. Then the computer starts swapping leaving the computer completely out of use. When the swap is full (I guess), the process is automatically killed and we can work again. But this can last 10-15 minutes. Would it be possible to kill any process using more than some LIMIT memory? The aim being to kill it before it starts swapping. Note that I am using F27 for now. Thanks in advance, F ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CJD6W6UBCSK3CBVE4NQAOE6P67MVGEZT/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 12:14 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:50 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:41 AM, Mike Wright wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:23 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode This covers both: http://www.devops-blog.net/iptables/iptables-settings-for-outgoing-ftp :m Hi Mike, That is a description of what is happening. I am looking for Fedora specific iptables instructions. iptables rules are processed by the kernel. They are distribution agnostic. :m Yippee!! I still the directions. What worked on RHEL, does not work on Fedora, so what am I doing wrong? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WADDN34MBMZJ4N4ZMUJ74EAMXS3VVZEY/
Script to wakeup monitor with speakers for cron mp3 alarm
Dear Fellow Fedora users, I had a script called upon by cron which played music at a certain time, for example 30 08 * * 1-5 ~/.dalarm And .dalarm had #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/xterm -e /usr/bin/mplayer -really-quiet -shuffle -playlist ~/.playlist It worked, but I did have speakers, now. I do not have external speakers, but a monitor with speakers, if there is no activity with the mouse, the speakers are not heard and while the script does work, the monitor is not active, it is on, but inactive. I am using KDE and I do not know which screensaver is working, the screen blanks and the monitor goes to sleep. How can I wake up the screen/monitor so I can hear the alarm playing. I remember trying $ xset dpms off Or similar and turn off screen blankinh, but that does not work anymore. How do I figure out a way to get it working? Thanks in Advance, Antonio Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QFWSCLI2BCTUL4LWE2GRSRSGHO6XVHP6/
Re: F28 Parole needs H.264 (High Profile) Decoder
On 21Aug2018 06:59, stan wrote: .mov is h264? .mov is the old mpeg standard extension, now completely off patent, yay! What does file say about the file?For what it's worth, parole played both mp4 (h264) and mov files on my system. The .mov and .mp4 extensions should hold ISO14496 files; ISO14496 is a container format and doesn't prescribe a specific video data format. I believe .mp4 files are ISO14496 files with H264 video inside them. Cheers, Cameron Simpson ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PVIXIM4A3AAY2K3CTSJHQ6GPXLUX26TX/
Re: plymouth vs. boot messages
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:41:54 + (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:15:15 -0700, stan wrote: > > > Can you post your boot command line? > > In /etc/default/grub I see > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=fedora/ root rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap > quiet" (all one line). Is that what you mean?? No, that's the template that grub-mkconfig uses. I mean the lines in the actual grub.cfg file in /boot. That file will be in /boot/grub2, or /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg, depending on whether you are using bios boot or efi boot. What I mean will look something like this: linux16 /vmlinuz-4.18.0-0.rc8.git2.1.20180813.fc28.x86_64 root=UUID=2fc9467a-303e-43db-91af-ba8807a581c2 ro SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 consoleblank=0 fbcon=scrollback:128k KEYTABLE=uneaf initrd16 /initramfs-4.18.0-0.rc8.git2.1.20180813.fc28.x86_64.img > > > Have you tried rebuilding the > > initramfs? > > I don't even know enough about that to tell which Wikipedia > hit on "initramfs" I should read; I certainly have not done anything > like "rebuild initramfs" . It's probably not necessary, but what it will do is configure the initramfs, the initial file system during boot, to match your hardware, so that during boot everything that is necessary to get started is present. Rebuilding would look something like this, run in /boot, and using the vmlinuz image you are targeting instead of 4.18.0.0 /usr/bin/dracut -f -H -v --debug initramfs-4.18.0-0.fc28.x86_64.img 4.18.0-0.fc28.x86_64 > > > > Have you changed disk configuration in any way? That is, > > does the /etc/fstab file match the actual hardware setup? > > I see: > # cat /etc/fstab > > # > # /etc/fstab > # Created by anaconda on Tue Oct 24 10:01:42 2017 > # > # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under > '/dev/disk' # See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or > blkid(8) for more info > # > /dev/mapper/fedora-root / ext4 > defaults1 1 > UUID=c2e91ff3-3d84-44de-b69a-a1bbbef9a920 /boot > ext4 defaults1 2 > /dev/mapper/fedora-home /home ext4 > defaults1 2 > /dev/mapper/fedora-swap swapswap > defaults0 0 > > but what I know of hardware would fit comfortably in a gnat's eye. This looks OK. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L7SRWVQBVHJ6YBGRHB57ZERMKLFFNGQK/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I would suggest trying to get your own openvpn config working if > possible. There might be a script that the binary uses to configure the > routing, see if you can find that. Try running "strings" on the binary. > You could also just create your own script that starts up the VPN and > then modifies the routing table. Remove those first two entries and > then add entries for whatever range you do want to go over the VPN. Yes, that seems to be one option. Another is to use network namespaces (ip-nets(8)) to isolate the VPN- using app from everything else. There are several scripts out there to do this but none of them run directly on Fedora, so some more digging is required. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WCQEBZ4T22FZJ6KFSSOW5FCLMPU7356U/
Re: Device defaults -OT maybe
On 08/23/18 13:10, Fred Erickson wrote: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.11.1. My Viasat system quit working earlier and I've been unable to work on this most of the day ... It is usually very reliable but it seems I have offended the gods recently. I was reading this thread and just out of curiosity, I typed"about:config" in my Firefox and searched for my routers ip address. It returned a long line of data that I had to copy and paste in a text editor to read. The beginning of the line read: "capability.policy.maonoscript.sites" followed by a long list of domain names, some I knew I had visited, some I didn't. Not knowing what "capability.policy.maonoscript.sites" meant, I did a web search on that. It is a No Script-Whitelist. So, what I am wondering is, do you use an add on in you browser that may have black listed your routers ip address?. A real long shot I know... ___ An interesting thought, "uMatrix" would seem a possibility, I often have deal with that, but it gives notification that it is blocking a site ... I also tried Google Chrome which I have added nothing to, it fails with a similar message. I've wasted a lot of time with this old router/bridge and I am about convinced it has died. It's supposed to have a dhcp server built in, I haven't seen anything from that, I even gave its MAC address a static address on my LAN on my main router, it never responds to anything I have tried. I used it for a long time, perhaps 8 years and it was working several weeks ago, but not now. Ithink it's finished. However it has kept me busy for a few days, more interesting than working crossword puzzles. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ML2KAXA2XIYL4RJHQ743M5WX2THFPGQ/
Re: new kernel?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Just curious, there has not been a kernel in testing for a while. When is the > next kernel expected to land in Fedora? I guess that it will be a 4.18.3 now > perhaps? Rebasing Fedora 27 and Fedora 28 to kernel 4.18.x has already been announced on kernel@ a week ago. The test day was yesterday, so I rather expect to see 4.18.4 in updates-testing as soon as this weekend. -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G5MERVA24TJHJCSVP3IM5P7EKPPMJLTJ/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 11:50 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:41 AM, Mike Wright wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:23 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode This covers both: http://www.devops-blog.net/iptables/iptables-settings-for-outgoing-ftp :m Hi Mike, That is a description of what is happening. I am looking for Fedora specific iptables instructions. iptables rules are processed by the kernel. They are distribution agnostic. :m ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZMEFIJQJVLHV63MMIJDFIASZVATVLTVI/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 11:41 AM, Mike Wright wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:23 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode This covers both: http://www.devops-blog.net/iptables/iptables-settings-for-outgoing-ftp :m Hi Mike, That is a description of what is happening. I am looking for Fedora specific iptables instructions. -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CJXW6ZXHD5ZLNRJWOYHQVO5FYPRZHBZE/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 11:23 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode This covers both: http://www.devops-blog.net/iptables/iptables-settings-for-outgoing-ftp :m ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NB6VPGQL3AX2GKODKH2256E3ZSE7HSXN/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 11:23 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/23/2018 11:10 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 08/22/2018 06:00 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/22/2018 04:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites and throws this error (written by me years ago): WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or more necessary modules have not been detected In /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config, you must add ip_nat_ftp and ip_conntrack_ftp to IPTABLES_MODULES. Delimiter is a space. For example: IPTABLES_MODULES=ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp To load changes, use: # /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables restart # systemctl restart iptables To check if modules are loaded, use lsmod 1) is Fedora doing FTP differently in iptables? 2) where do I find ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp now a days? I can't locate my notes at the moment. But I believe the way things are done in the netfilter framework has changed. If memory servers me the nf_conntrack_ipv4 will load, as needed, the necessary "helper". I use the standard firewall and these modules are loaded. xt_conntrack 16384 21 nf_conntrack_ipv6 16384 12 nf_defrag_ipv6 20480 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 11 nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack 147456 6 xt_conntrack,nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_nat_ipv4 libcrc32c 16384 2 nf_conntrack,nf_nat and ftp works fine. ip_nat_ftp does not exist on my system. But I do have nf_conntrack_ftp. I see nf_conntrack_ftp inserted # lsmod | grep nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp 20480 1 nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack 147456 9 xt_conntrack,nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ftp,ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_ipv4,xt_helper,nf_conntrack_ftp But it is not following the high ports that ftp uses: Aug 22 16:12:09 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 SRC=192.168.xxx.yyy DST=208.106.xxx.yyy LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=25991 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=59698 DPT=21023 WINDOW=29200 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Perhaps I missed this, but are you trying to set up an FTP _server_ on your machine or using it as an FTP client? The firewall rules for an FTP server would be significantly different--especially if you wish to provide both passive and normal FTP operations. Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode The advice given here: https://serverfault.com/questions/203546/client-side-iptables-rule-to-allow-active-ftp might be relevant. :m ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NA7XRWAHPLHOBHBOPEKTQBED6SKK5TOS/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/23/2018 11:10 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 08/22/2018 06:00 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/22/2018 04:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites and throws this error (written by me years ago): WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or more necessary modules have not been detected In /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config, you must add ip_nat_ftp and ip_conntrack_ftp to IPTABLES_MODULES. Delimiter is a space. For example: IPTABLES_MODULES=ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp To load changes, use: # /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables restart # systemctl restart iptables To check if modules are loaded, use lsmod 1) is Fedora doing FTP differently in iptables? 2) where do I find ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp now a days? I can't locate my notes at the moment. But I believe the way things are done in the netfilter framework has changed. If memory servers me the nf_conntrack_ipv4 will load, as needed, the necessary "helper". I use the standard firewall and these modules are loaded. xt_conntrack 16384 21 nf_conntrack_ipv6 16384 12 nf_defrag_ipv6 20480 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 11 nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack 147456 6 xt_conntrack,nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_nat_ipv4 libcrc32c 16384 2 nf_conntrack,nf_nat and ftp works fine. ip_nat_ftp does not exist on my system. But I do have nf_conntrack_ftp. I see nf_conntrack_ftp inserted # lsmod | grep nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp 20480 1 nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack 147456 9 xt_conntrack,nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ftp,ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_ipv4,xt_helper,nf_conntrack_ftp But it is not following the high ports that ftp uses: Aug 22 16:12:09 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 SRC=192.168.xxx.yyy DST=208.106.xxx.yyy LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=25991 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=59698 DPT=21023 WINDOW=29200 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Perhaps I missed this, but are you trying to set up an FTP _server_ on your machine or using it as an FTP client? The firewall rules for an FTP server would be significantly different--especially if you wish to provide both passive and normal FTP operations. Just ftp client and I want to support both active and passive mode ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EWCECDB6Y7HA5SHYEMWM67FVKRAI6GSN/
Re: I need iptables ftp nat help
On 08/22/2018 06:00 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > On 08/22/2018 04:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites >>> and throws this error (written by me years ago): >>> >>> >>> WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or >>> more necessary modules have not been detected >>> >>> In /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config, you must add ip_nat_ftp >>> and ip_conntrack_ftp to IPTABLES_MODULES. Delimiter is a >>> space. For example: >>> IPTABLES_MODULES=ip_nat_ftp ip_conntrack_ftp >>> >>> To load changes, use: >>> # /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables restart >>> # systemctl restart iptables >>> >>> To check if modules are loaded, use >>> lsmod >>> >>> >>> 1) is Fedora doing FTP differently in iptables? >>> >>> 2) where do I find >>> ip_nat_ftp >>> ip_conntrack_ftp >>> now a days? >>> >> >> I can't locate my notes at the moment. But I believe the way things >> are done in the >> netfilter framework has changed. >> >> If memory servers me the nf_conntrack_ipv4 will load, as needed, the >> necessary >> "helper". I use the standard firewall and these modules are loaded. >> >> xt_conntrack 16384 21 >> nf_conntrack_ipv6 16384 12 >> nf_defrag_ipv6 20480 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6 >> nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 11 >> nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 >> nf_conntrack 147456 6 >> xt_conntrack,nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_nat_ipv4 >> >> libcrc32c 16384 2 nf_conntrack,nf_nat >> >> and ftp works fine. >> >> ip_nat_ftp does not exist on my system. But I do have nf_conntrack_ftp. > > I see nf_conntrack_ftp inserted > > # lsmod | grep nf_conntrack_ftp > nf_conntrack_ftp 20480 1 nf_nat_ftp > nf_conntrack 147456 9 > xt_conntrack,nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_nat,nf_nat_ftp,ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_ipv4,xt_helper,nf_conntrack_ftp > > > > But it is not following the high ports that ftp uses: > > Aug 22 16:12:09 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 > SRC=192.168.xxx.yyy DST=208.106.xxx.yyy LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 > ID=25991 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=59698 DPT=21023 WINDOW=29200 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Perhaps I missed this, but are you trying to set up an FTP _server_ on your machine or using it as an FTP client? The firewall rules for an FTP server would be significantly different--especially if you wish to provide both passive and normal FTP operations. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? I don't know. Who cares? - -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWJR5MJSFSS435FWOZZCSKSD55JBC3KN/
Re: Device defaults -OT maybe
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:06:47 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > > -- > > Doing as you suggest, ping succeeds but Firefox still does not > connect with or without the :80. > > Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.11.1. > > My Viasat system quit working earlier and I've been unable to work on > this most of the day ... It is usually very reliable but it seems I > have offended the gods recently. > I was reading this thread and just out of curiosity, I typed "about:config" in my Firefox and searched for my routers ip address. It returned a long line of data that I had to copy and paste in a text editor to read. The beginning of the line read: "capability.policy.maonoscript.sites" followed by a long list of domain names, some I knew I had visited, some I didn't. Not knowing what "capability.policy.maonoscript.sites" meant, I did a web search on that. It is a No Script-Whitelist. So, what I am wondering is, do you use an add on in you browser that may have black listed your routers ip address?. A real long shot I know... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AMUFOA5RBJLCU55KNHVXDURF7OV3UBO4/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:04 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > > Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan > ha scritto: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > > > > > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > ha scritto: > > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split > > > tunnelling > > > > is > > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > > > > normal > > > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would > > > seem > > > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > > > > far. > > > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > > > > > > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels > > > like > > > > sharing it. > > > > > > > > > > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this > > > connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of > > > the > > > VPN settings. > > > > I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll > > look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would > > be different. > > > > Strange... this option has been present for a long time. > Did you install NetworkManager-openvpn package? > Are you using Fedora 28? As I explained later, I hadn't seen the option because it was off the bottom of the window. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MD2JF6MHUWIA2ZHHWZLM7RSCLZNZITIC/
Re: new kernel?
For me, it is good to be out of the 'Kernel of the week club'. A little peace and quite is a good thing. :) On 08/21/2018 11:58 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Thanks! I guess that I am just surprised that we have not had a new kernel for a while. We are at 4.17.14 and there is nothing on updates-testing so I was thinking that perhaps we are moving on to 4.18 hence the delay. Best wishes, Ranjan On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 11:22:32 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/22/18 11:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Just curious, there has not been a kernel in testing for a while. When is the next kernel expected to land in Fedora? I guess that it will be a 4.18.3 now perhaps? The latest build in koji for F28 is kernel-4.17.17-200 with the following in the changelog Fix CVE-2018-15471 (rhbz 1610555 1618414) I guess it is more than likely you won't see 4.18.3 until F29. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5VPRHJOH55SSIFNB6SESV2L3ZOMNBH4H/
Re: plymouth vs. boot messages
Beartooth writes: > In /etc/default/grub I see GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=fedora/ root > rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap quiet" (all one line). Is that what you mean?? Don't know if my messages are getting through, because I already sent a one related to this. If you have tried this, then ignore freely. But I already instructed you to try removing 'quiet' from kernel parameters, and it still seems to be there given what you wrote above. Does it help if you do the following: 1. edit away the 'quiet' from /etc/default/grub 2. run /usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg (Don't know if the target -o could be different for some systems. Perhaps first check that the file /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg exists.) Jarmo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GGH27AUSA4PE2I3O7QJ5N3ZQCKXIX4RX/
Re: Split tunnelling
Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling > is > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > normal > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > far. > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like > sharing it. > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the VPN settings. I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would be different. Strange... this option has been present for a long time. Did you install NetworkManager-openvpn package? Are you using Fedora 28? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZXOUFDJCHDLP4KAG5JY7XHUED543EOUK/
