Re: which antivirus sw for Fedora?
On 09/03/2018 09:52 PM, Frédéric wrote: I have to use antivirus sw what means "sw" SoftWare ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: which antivirus sw for Fedora?
> I have to use antivirus sw what means "sw" F ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
anaconda problem with local repo
Having many boxes to setup I decided to setup a local repo of fedora. I setup vsftpd for this repo. I won't go into every step unless someone asks. Either through pxe or netinst boot I'm able to boot into anacanda and setup everything except the software packages. Everything in the software spoke is empty. Then I point anaconda to another mirror and software spoke is fine. How I populate my copy: #rsync -av rsync:// mirror.utexas.edu/fedora/linux/releases/28/Everything/x86_64/os/ /srv/repos/fedora/28/x86_64/os I think I'm missing something in my repo. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: convert to EUFI boot?
On 09/03/2018 01:30 AM, ja wrote: On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 17:01 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 08/31/2018 10:06 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, Fedora 28, x64 Two questions: 1) Is there a way to convert a Fedora hard drive that is set up to boot off the old BIOS into a EUFI boot? 2) Is there a way to convert a Fedora hard drive that is set up to boot off the old BIOS into a dual BIOS and EUFI boot drive? Many thanks, -T I am wondering now if I set the drive up as EUFI, if I could modify it to dual boot off of both BIOS and EUFI Thank you! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Startup messages shown twice on EFI boot
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 3:14 PM Ronaldo Mercado wrote: > Hi, > > I get the same double messages on my home system (fedora 28). I am not > sure whether my system is EFI or not. > I would also be interested to know the reason and the solution. > Well, nice to know I'm not alone but looks like I'm no closer to figuring out the cause... Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: preferred desktop environment for MS Surface Pro 3
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 14:58:01 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 09/03/2018 09:40 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > The MS Surface (Pro) is a full-fledged computer with x86_64 architecture > > (and not ARM). My question is what sort of tools and software would make my > > experience on Fedora the best. I believe that touch is recognized (as it is > > on my Dell XPS 13) but I am asking if one of the many DEs are particularly > > suited to recognizing tablet mode input and opening up the on-screen > > keyboard (among other things). > > I don't know if any of them fully support using only touch. I know that > Gnome will bring up the on-screen keyboard if text fields are activated > using touch. Thanks very much. I found some Fedora=specific information here wrt the MS SP3. https://www.reddit.com/r/SurfaceLinux/comments/4pfamk/fedora_24_works_very_well_on_surface_pro_3/ However, it is not clear to me if KDE or LXQt has this feature of opening up of the on-screen keyboard so maybe Gnome is where I am headed. Best wishes, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: scp over wireless is slow
On 03Sep2018 13:07, Jakub Jelen wrote: SCP protocol is really slow, especially on networks with high latency (wireless). The reason why is mostly the size of buffers, which is very small and SCP waits for every part to be confirmed by the remote host before sending another part. This is categorically false. I've just read through the code to confirm. The only round trip stuff in scp is at the start and end of the file transfer, when it sends the starting file permissions and checks receipt, and at the very end. During the transfer it just chucks data at the TCP connection as fast as it will accept it. Its internal buffer isn't particularly large, but that is irrelevant because (a) the OS reads from files in a sensible fashion and (b) TCP colesces writes into the same packet if they arrive fast enough and there's room. So if you're transferring a lot of quite small files, the start/end file transaction can get in the way. But large files go through pretty much at the network speed (or the disc speed if the discs are slow and the network is fast). In years of using scp, it has always been pretty fast. And rsync notably slower for complete-file copies. I think Jakub has been misreading the code, probably the atomicio() function, which _doesn't_ do an end-to-end delivery of the current buffer; it is just a wrapper around the OS read/write call, which may return a short result if its underlying buffer empties/fills. That is a _local_ buffer, such as the TCP send buffer. Also, calling a home LAN wireless connection high latency is a bit special purpose. It may be higher latency than your wired ethernet, but it is still pretty low. By comparison, I just copied a decent sized file, using scp, over a satellite link. Round trip packet time of 600ms-700ms best case. Throughput was consistent with my ISP speeds: 5Mbps up, 25Mbps down. The network packet latency is _not_ a particular issue with scp, because it doesn't do the per-buffer end-to-end checks Jakub imagines. You can google "scp speed" and you will get a lot of answers, sometimes wrongly accusing the encryption or the compression, but really, the RTT and buffers are the fault as I write here: https://superuser.com/a/1101203/466930 I read that. It's a about a paragraph of text with no discussion. SCP should be really used only as fast hack for copying files in fast local networks. For all other cases, use SFTP or rsync if you need something more complex. Really, no. Use whatever works best. Scp is fine for large files. For incremental change, use rsync (which does a lot of checksum passing to skip identical data areas) and for lots of small files use tar or cpio piped over ssh, which removes another layer of round trip latency (the per-file sync). Cheers, Cameron Simpson ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: preferred desktop environment for MS Surface Pro 3
On 09/03/2018 09:40 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: The MS Surface (Pro) is a full-fledged computer with x86_64 architecture (and not ARM). My question is what sort of tools and software would make my experience on Fedora the best. I believe that touch is recognized (as it is on my Dell XPS 13) but I am asking if one of the many DEs are particularly suited to recognizing tablet mode input and opening up the on-screen keyboard (among other things). I don't know if any of them fully support using only touch. I know that Gnome will bring up the on-screen keyboard if text fields are activated using touch. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: scp over wireless is slow
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 13:14:51 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm using a Fedora install ISO as the test file I don't have specific numbers, but I just copied a couple of linux distro iso files (about 700-800 MB each) to a windows box I have that uses AC class wireless. Seemed almost as fast as wired to me. (This was using a windows share hosted on fedora 28 samba and pulling the files from windows). Maybe I'm just patient, but I didn't get the impression of slowness. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: scp over wireless is slow
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > SCP should be really used only as fast hack for copying files in fast > local networks. For all other cases, use SFTP or rsync if you need > something more complex. I also get the same results with sftp. sftp chris@f28s.local sftp> put test.bin ~9MBit/s server to workstation, per nload ~4.9MBit/s workstation to server, per nload Whether I push or pull the same file with samba, it's 39-44Mbit/s. I'm using a Fedora install ISO as the test file so it's not really compressible since most of the payload is already xz compressed. -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: scp over wireless is slow
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 22:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Fedora 28 Server >> Fedora 28 Workstation >> dd-wrt 802.11n Broadcom based router >> Connected wirelessly 5GHz, wired ethernet cable is physically >> disconnected from Server >> >> File transfer from Workstation to Server >> >> scp: scp itself reports ~620KB/s; where nload on the server reports >> ~4.9Mbit/s >> smb: GNOME reports 4.9MB/s; where nload on the server reports >> ~39.8Mbit/s >> >> Why? That's rather unexpected. >> >> Command is >> scp test.bin f28s.local:/srv/scratch >> >> Using nc, I get speeds slightly faster than smb. OK so encryption? If >> I connect wired, and then 'nmcli c down ' to disconnect the >> wireless connection: >> >> scp: 12MB/s, nload ~101Mbit/s >> smb: nload ~96Mbit/s >> >> So, it's not encryption. Why would scp be this much slower only >> with a wireless connection? And using: >> >> rync -avzhe ssh test.bin f28s.local:/srv/scratch >> >> Over wireless, this is just as bad as scp. > > > SCP protocol is really slow, especially on networks with high latency > (wireless). The reason why is mostly the size of buffers, which is very > small and SCP waits for every part to be confirmed by the remote host > before sending another part. > > You can google "scp speed" and you will get a lot of answers, sometimes > wrongly accusing the encryption or the compression, but really, the RTT > and buffers are the fault as I write here: > > https://superuser.com/a/1101203/466930 > > SCP should be really used only as fast hack for copying files in fast > local networks. For all other cases, use SFTP or rsync if you need > something more complex. Going from server to workstation, I get double the rate according to nload. 9.1Mbit/s server to workstation, and 4.9Mbit workstation to server. Same results with: rsync test.bin chris@f28h.local:~/Downloads Does that automatically do it over ssh and end up with the same problems? Separate issue, but related, dd-wrt reports MAC AddressInterfaceUptimeTX RateRX RateInfo SignalNoiseSNRSignal Quality 00:C2:C6:F0:52:53wl13:07:21243M270MN/A-49 -8940100% 34:02:86:CC:D8:69wl114:33:01135M135MN/A-36-89 53100% :53 is workstation :69 is server The Fedora Workstation Tx and Rx rate is usually 270M but during idle it's often 6M. This is a: 6c:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Wireless 8260 [8086:24f3] (rev 3a) The Fedora Server Tx and Rx rate is never greater than 135M even though it's closer to the AP. This is a: 02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Wireless 3165 [8086:3165] (rev 81) So for some reason, the server (an Intel NUC) never uses a rate higher than 135M. Anyway, in the case where the server is wired, the only 5Ghz wireless device is the workstation, so no relay. But if the server is wireless, then both server and workstation are competing and relay is happening. It might be this old WRT600N is starting to crap out, even though it's recently reflashed with a current version of dd-wrte. On 2.5Ghz, my Android phone freaks out every 2-3 days, kernel wake locks prevent the CPU from idling, and it soaks the battery at a 10%+ rate per hour doing nothing. Reboot the router? Problem solved for 2 more days. So does disassociating from that AP. Or airplane mode. Reassociating without rebooting the router instantly triggers the kernel wake locks. One of the weirder phone batter problems I've seen. -- Chris Murphy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: which antivirus sw for Fedora?
On 09/03/2018 05:16 AM, Joerg Lechner via users wrote: Hi, doing onlinebanking in my bank contract I read, I have to use antivirus sw, otherwise I would be responsible for probably misuse. So far I made onlinebanking, when I am logged in in Fedora without antivirus sw. But to be correct, as the bank says, I would like to use antivirus sw. For me it's no problem to have i.e a F28 installation with antivirus sw separatly for "critical" use of F28. I have F28 on an usb flash medium, and 32GB flash media are not too expensive, so fo all other usages of Fedora I don't need antivirus sw and can use another Fedora installation. Which antivirus sw should I prefer? Kind regards When I have asked about AV software for Linux, I am usually referred to Clamav. I assume all distros have it available. --doug ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
GUI setup for quasi real time process ?
We need a gui for a quasi real time process, which will run on a dedicated computer. We need to be able to view and control the process from a number of terminals, some on the local network, some remotely, over the Internet. I hope all the terminals will run Linux, but invariably someone will want to run Windows. What is the best way to set something like this up ? Use a web server to interface with the process and web browsers to view and control it ? Write a Java app to interface directly with the process ? All thoughts, ideas and advice is welcome. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: preferred desktop environment for MS Surface Pro 3
Hi, Many thanks! The MS Surface (Pro) is a full-fledged computer with x86_64 architecture (and not ARM). My question is what sort of tools and software would make my experience on Fedora the best. I believe that touch is recognized (as it is on my Dell XPS 13) but I am asking if one of the many DEs are particularly suited to recognizing tablet mode input and opening up the on-screen keyboard (among other things). Best wishes, Ranjan On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 11:58:13 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Do any of the Fedora desktops support touch screens? We had this > discussion ~1 year ago on the fedora-arm list about touch screens. > > > > On 09/03/2018 09:24 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to install Fedora on my MS Surface Pro 3. I do not have much > > experience with tablets so I was wondering which DE or spin I should put on > > it. I guess I would like the keyboard to change when the Surface changes > > from PC mode to tablet mode and vice-versa if possible. I would also be > > able to write on it and create documents in pdf, etc for notes. > > > > Am I better off using KDE or LXQt or Gnome? If the latter, is it worthwhile > > to install the Design Suite spin. I must say that I am not very keen on > > bloated software but I am open to it. I myself run a non-DE (openbox) > > environment on my computers and have never gone beyond trying a DE and > > giving up on it because it is noticeably a bit more sluggish. However, I do > > recognize that a tablet mode is different and perhaps better handled with a > > DE. So, I am open to all suggestions and also practical tips. > > > > Many thanks in advance and best wishes, > > Ranjan > > > > > > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: preferred desktop environment for MS Surface Pro 3
Do any of the Fedora desktops support touch screens? We had this discussion ~1 year ago on the fedora-arm list about touch screens. On 09/03/2018 09:24 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, I would like to install Fedora on my MS Surface Pro 3. I do not have much experience with tablets so I was wondering which DE or spin I should put on it. I guess I would like the keyboard to change when the Surface changes from PC mode to tablet mode and vice-versa if possible. I would also be able to write on it and create documents in pdf, etc for notes. Am I better off using KDE or LXQt or Gnome? If the latter, is it worthwhile to install the Design Suite spin. I must say that I am not very keen on bloated software but I am open to it. I myself run a non-DE (openbox) environment on my computers and have never gone beyond trying a DE and giving up on it because it is noticeably a bit more sluggish. However, I do recognize that a tablet mode is different and perhaps better handled with a DE. So, I am open to all suggestions and also practical tips. Many thanks in advance and best wishes, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
preferred desktop environment for MS Surface Pro 3
Hi, I would like to install Fedora on my MS Surface Pro 3. I do not have much experience with tablets so I was wondering which DE or spin I should put on it. I guess I would like the keyboard to change when the Surface changes from PC mode to tablet mode and vice-versa if possible. I would also be able to write on it and create documents in pdf, etc for notes. Am I better off using KDE or LXQt or Gnome? If the latter, is it worthwhile to install the Design Suite spin. I must say that I am not very keen on bloated software but I am open to it. I myself run a non-DE (openbox) environment on my computers and have never gone beyond trying a DE and giving up on it because it is noticeably a bit more sluggish. However, I do recognize that a tablet mode is different and perhaps better handled with a DE. So, I am open to all suggestions and also practical tips. Many thanks in advance and best wishes, Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: convert to EUFI boot?
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:07 PM ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 28, x64 > > Two questions: > > 1) Is there a way to convert a Fedora hard drive that > is set up to boot off the old BIOS into a EUFI boot? > I've been hoping to find a solution for this as well as I'm planning on upgrading my computer to a Ryzen 5 later this year. I think what I'm going to do since I'm upgrading to a M.2 SSD at the same time is: 1. Just do a plain install of Fedora to the new disk and then reboot in a live system (Fedora or maybe System Rescue CD since it'll have all the utilities I need) 2. Delete the default LVM VG it created 3. Move my "/" and "/var" volume groups over from the old SSD. 4. Tie in my /home drive which is still a 2TB spinning disk. 5. After that I should just have to check / update /etc/fstab. Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: scp over wireless is slow
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 22:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Fedora 28 Server > Fedora 28 Workstation > dd-wrt 802.11n Broadcom based router > Connected wirelessly 5GHz, wired ethernet cable is physically > disconnected from Server > > File transfer from Workstation to Server > > scp: scp itself reports ~620KB/s; where nload on the server reports > ~4.9Mbit/s > smb: GNOME reports 4.9MB/s; where nload on the server reports > ~39.8Mbit/s > > Why? That's rather unexpected. > > Command is > scp test.bin f28s.local:/srv/scratch > > Using nc, I get speeds slightly faster than smb. OK so encryption? If > I connect wired, and then 'nmcli c down ' to disconnect the > wireless connection: > > scp: 12MB/s, nload ~101Mbit/s > smb: nload ~96Mbit/s > > So, it's not encryption. Why would scp be this much slower only > with a wireless connection? And using: > > rync -avzhe ssh test.bin f28s.local:/srv/scratch > > Over wireless, this is just as bad as scp. SCP protocol is really slow, especially on networks with high latency (wireless). The reason why is mostly the size of buffers, which is very small and SCP waits for every part to be confirmed by the remote host before sending another part. You can google "scp speed" and you will get a lot of answers, sometimes wrongly accusing the encryption or the compression, but really, the RTT and buffers are the fault as I write here: https://superuser.com/a/1101203/466930 SCP should be really used only as fast hack for copying files in fast local networks. For all other cases, use SFTP or rsync if you need something more complex. Regards, -- Jakub Jelen Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: which antivirus sw for Fedora?
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 05:16 -0400, Joerg Lechner via users wrote: > Hi, > doing onlinebanking in my bank contract I read, I have to use antivirus sw, > otherwise I would be responsible for probably misuse. So far I made > onlinebanking, when I am logged in in Fedora without antivirus sw. But to be > correct, as the bank says, I would like to use antivirus sw. For me it's no > problem to have i.e a F28 installation with antivirus sw separatly for > "critical" use of F28. I have F28 on an usb flash medium, and 32GB flash > media are not too expensive, so fo all other usages of Fedora I don't need > antivirus sw and can use another Fedora installation. Which antivirus sw > should I prefer? AFAIK the only use most people have for AV software on Linux is when they're running a mail server and want to filter certain kinds of spam from reaching their Windows users. I do online banking in Fedora and have never installed AV software. My bank also has a general warning about using AV (which they seem to use as a catch-all term for any kind of anti-malware). I just ignore it. [BTW, anyone else see the irony that most banking websites will not let you use a password manager?]. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
which antivirus sw for Fedora?
Hi, doing onlinebanking in my bank contract I read, I have to use antivirus sw, otherwise I would be responsible for probably misuse. So far I made onlinebanking, when I am logged in in Fedora without antivirus sw. But to be correct, as the bank says, I would like to use antivirus sw. For me it's no problem to have i.e a F28 installation with antivirus sw separatly for "critical" use of F28. I have F28 on an usb flash medium, and 32GB flash media are not too expensive, so fo all other usages of Fedora I don't need antivirus sw and can use another Fedora installation. Which antivirus sw should I prefer? Kind regards ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: convert to EUFI boot?
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 17:01 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote: > On 08/31/2018 10:06 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Fedora 28, x64 > > > > Two questions: > > > > 1) Is there a way to convert a Fedora hard drive that > > is set up to boot off the old BIOS into a EUFI boot? > > > > 2) Is there a way to convert a Fedora hard drive that > > is set up to boot off the old BIOS into a dual > > BIOS and EUFI boot drive? > > > > > > Many thanks, > > -T > > I am wondering now if I set the drive up as EUFI, > if I could modify it to dual boot off of both BIOS > and EUFI > > > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org A9ROi1MeGT.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
