Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Tim via users]

On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 15:14 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> If I put the viasat unit into it's bridged mode I would expect output
> as 182.168.1.1 but not sure of that.

If you put it into bridge mode, it'll have the public IP that the ISP
assigns to you (previously that IP would have just been internal, now
it'd be on the outside network connection).  As such, it's only
suitable for connecting to one device (either one computer, or a
router).  Because most ISPs will only assign one IP to each customer.

If ISPs would assign multiple IPs to customers, then we could forgo
routers.  However, having a router gives you a fair bit of isolation
from outside probing.  Especially if it has a firewall.  NB:  A router
without actually having a firewall feature is not a firewall.

> However they insist that bridged mode can not be used, I think
> because it kills the voip interface which is integral to the viasat
> router/modem.

If VOIP is in-built to the box, I would believe that reason.  Do you
need VOIP?


> If I can make NAT work ...

I don't understand why this is so hard.  Most routers do NAT from their
default condition.  You have to go out of your way to stop them doing
it.

For your situation (NAT behind NAT), all you have to do is configure
its LAN side to use a different IP range than the WAN side (like my
prior mails have discussed).  It'll control the equipment on your LAN
side using DHCP, and you'll have to manually change any equipment not
using DHCP.


> I have an identical ASUS router in the barn set up as a bridge and it
> seems useless for anything else. I know that I can't access it's
> browser set up function without bringing it in here and plugging a
> cat5 cable into it.

Most routers will only let you configure them from something on its LAN
side, they'll block WAN access to its configurator (unless you enable
some remote access type of setting).  Likewise, many will disable
configuration control from the WiFi, unless you specifically set an
option to allow it.

I'm not sure why you'd want to use it as a router, in that situation,
anyway.  Surely you only need to act as a switch, there?



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: simple scan no longer prints?

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 8:44 PM, Todd Chester via users wrote:

I prefer stand alone scanners.


Interesting.  They are not very common now.


The extra step is annoying, especially since I had the
feature before


I'm curious what the use case is for printing something that you just 
scanned?  Is it for the purpose of making copies since you only have a 
stand alone scanner?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Laptop's display not visible in setting

[Ester Muñoz]

Hi everyone.
I upgraded yesterday my HP Pavilion from Fedora 29 to 30. Everything went
wonderfully, thank you all. I have a second monitor attached to it via
HDMI. All run perfectly and when I came back I realized the laptop's screen
was gray with the fedora logo on it. It is there but I can't use it, like
it is not part of the desktop.
In the GNOME settings I do not see any other screen than the monitor. Did
not give much thought to it, and went to sleep.
This morning, I disconnected the second monitor to see if booting only with
its own monitor would do something and no... gray screen again. The grub
screens appear on the laptops monitor but the login screen is on the
external monitor. I also tried the NVIDIA X server settings where both
screens were earlier and there is only one screen listed :-(
Can anyone help me out to make the laptop's monitor work again?

Thank you in advance
Ester
-- 
Ester Muñoz Aparicio
Tuokkostie 1C19 - 18200 - Heinola - Finland
GSM: (+358) 408019020
email: memunoz at gmail dot com
skype: ester.munoz.aparicio
IN SPAIN: C/ San Isidro 2 Urb. Altos del Cantal 11 - 04638 - Mojácar
(Almería) - Spain
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: simple scan no longer prints?

[Todd Chester via users]

On 5/9/19 5:45 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 5/9/19 11:25 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

It looks like I lost my ability to print directly
from Simple Scan.  Is this a regression or am I
missing something?


I see the same thing on F29 and thinking about it, it makes sense to me. 
  It's a scanning program, leave the printing details to the pdf viewer. 
  Generally, the scanner is part of a printer anyway, so if you want 
prints, then just use the copy function instead.


Thank you for the double check!

I prefer stand alone scanners.

The extra step is annoying, especially since I had the
feature before

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 7:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

On Thu, 9 May 2019 17:56:51 -0700 Samuel Sieb  wrote:


On 5/9/19 3:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me has 
been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf upgrade 
--releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:

You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to view system logs, 
"systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or "exit" to boot into default mode.
Give root password for maintenance.
(or press Control-D to continue):

One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in 
using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.


Using the live boot, you can chroot to the installed system and set the
root password.


Sorry but exactly how does one do this? I have no experience here with this.


In a terminal window, run "sudo -i".  Do "ls /mnt" to make sure there's 
nothing there.  (I don't remember if the live boot uses that by 
default.)  Assuming that /dev/sda2 is your root partition (replace with 
the real device), run "mount /dev/sda2 /mnt".  Then run "chroot /mnt" 
and "passwd root".  Then "exit", "umount /mnt", and reboot the system.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Thu, 9 May 2019 17:56:51 -0700 Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 5/9/19 3:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me 
> > has been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf 
> > upgrade --releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:
> >
> >You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" 
> > to view system logs, "systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or 
> > "exit" to boot into default mode.
> >Give root password for maintenance.
> >(or press Control-D to continue):
> >
> > One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in 
> > using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.
>
> Using the live boot, you can chroot to the installed system and set the
> root password.

Sorry but exactly how does one do this? I have no experience here with this.

Many thanks,
Ranjan
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 6:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Also missing from this report is the actual reason for getting dropped 
into emergency mode.


Emergency mode is not the issue here. The real issue is what caused the 
emergency mode. It's unlikely that anyone will be able to help you until 
you determine, from boot messages, or whatnot, the reason the system 
boot fails.


He can't get that information until he has a root password.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Ranjan Maitra]

On Thu, 09 May 2019 21:08:36 -0400 Sam Varshavchik  
wrote:

> Samuel Sieb writes:
>
> > On 5/9/19 3:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >> After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me
> >> has been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf
> >> upgrade --releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:
> >>
> >>You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" 
> >> to
> >> view system logs, "systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or
> >> "exit" to boot into default mode.
> >>Give root password for maintenance.
> >>(or press Control-D to continue):
> >>
> >> One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in
> >> using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.
> >
> > Using the live boot, you can chroot to the installed system and set the root
> > password.
>
> Also missing from this report is the actual reason for getting dropped into
> emergency mode.
>
> Emergency mode is not the issue here. The real issue is what caused the
> emergency mode. It's unlikely that anyone will be able to help you until you
> determine, from boot messages, or whatnot, the reason the system boot fails.
>

Thanks, I get: a stop process (?) is running on some device with a huge name. 
It runs for 1m 30s and then drops into this message. There is nothing untoward 
before this.

I will try and see if chrooting can be done using the livecd.

Thanks,
Ranjan
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Sam Varshavchik]

Samuel Sieb writes:


On 5/9/19 3:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me  
has been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf  
upgrade --releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:


   You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to  
view system logs, "systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or  
"exit" to boot into default mode.

   Give root password for maintenance.
   (or press Control-D to continue):

One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in  
using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.


Using the live boot, you can chroot to the installed system and set the root  
password.


Also missing from this report is the actual reason for getting dropped into  
emergency mode.


Emergency mode is not the issue here. The real issue is what caused the  
emergency mode. It's unlikely that anyone will be able to help you until you  
determine, from boot messages, or whatnot, the reason the system boot fails.


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 3:50 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me has 
been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf upgrade 
--releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:

   You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to view system logs, 
"systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or "exit" to boot into default mode.
   Give root password for maintenance.
   (or press Control-D to continue):

One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in 
using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.


Using the live boot, you can chroot to the installed system and set the 
root password.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 12:14 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
It's not clear to me how this could work? I have an identical ASUS 
router in the barn set up as a bridge and it seems useless for anything 
else. I know that I can't access it's browser set up function without 
bringing it in here and plugging a cat5 cable into it. It uses the 
software provide by ASUS in it's "client Bridge" mode, I tried it and it 
did what I needed and left it at that, it has been trouble free, 
effectively looks like another wired ethernet connection at this end, 
provides video and voice ...


You probably have to manually assign an IP address on its LAN interface. 
 Unless you're using something like openwrt or ddwrt, most routers 
don't support DHCP on the LAN interface.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to have dual boot on new laptop

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 3:35 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:

Hello,
I have a laptop with preinstalled Win10 where I want to side install 
fedora 30 too.
Current layout of partitions on disk is this one, if I start from an usb 
live:


Device             Start        End   Sectors   Size Type
/dev/nvme0n1p1      2048     534527    532480   260M EFI System
/dev/nvme0n1p2    534528     567295     32768    16M Microsoft reserved
/dev/nvme0n1p3    567296  998574734 998007439 475.9G Microsoft basic data
/dev/nvme0n1p4 998576128 1000214527   1638400   800M Windows recovery 
environment


My preferred method is to install gparted on the live image and use it 
to shrink the big Windows partition by at least half.  Then do the 
install into that space.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Ed Greshko]

On 5/10/19 8:28 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko  wrote:
>> On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
 If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of 
 the ASUS was
 something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.

 This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X

 There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.
>>>
>>> Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the 
>>> ASUS so that
>>> he can do traffic control.  He is getting too much traffic over the 
>>> internet link now
>>> that he doesn't have that.
>>
>> Oh, right.  Forgot all about that.
>>
>> Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution.  But I've run into issues with 
>> that.  It was
>> years ago so I can't recall the details.
>
> Double NAT has seemed to work ok for us. It would be interesting to hear of 
> counter
> examples. I'm talking only about outbound connections here, BTW.
>

Right, outbound was fine.  I'm pretty sure it was issues where port-forwarding 
or UPnP
services were involved.


-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: simple scan no longer prints?

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 11:25 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:

It looks like I lost my ability to print directly
from Simple Scan.  Is this a regression or am I
missing something?


I see the same thing on F29 and thinking about it, it makes sense to me. 
 It's a scanning program, leave the printing details to the pdf viewer. 
 Generally, the scanner is part of a printer anyway, so if you want 
prints, then just use the copy function instead.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Cameron Simpson]

On 10May2019 07:13, Ed Greshko  wrote:

On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the 
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.

This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X

There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.


Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the 
ASUS so that
he can do traffic control.  He is getting too much traffic over the internet 
link now
that he doesn't have that.


Oh, right.  Forgot all about that.

Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution.  But I've run into issues with 
that.  It was
years ago so I can't recall the details.


Double NAT has seemed to work ok for us. It would be interesting to hear 
of counter examples. I'm talking only about outbound connections here, 
BTW.


Cheers,
Cameron Simpson 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Ed Greshko]

On 5/10/19 2:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the 
>> ASUS was
>> something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.
>>
>> This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X
>>
>> There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.
>
> Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through the 
> ASUS so that
> he can do traffic control.  He is getting too much traffic over the internet 
> link now
> that he doesn't have that.

Oh, right.  Forgot all about that.

Double-NAT seems like it could be a solution.  But I've run into issues with 
that.  It was
years ago so I can't recall the details.

-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Upgrade to F30 on Dell Precision T1700 goes into emergency mode

[Ranjan Maitra]

Hi,

After a three successful upgrades to F30 from F29 under my belt, a cocky me has 
been floored. Everything went through fine (or so it seemed) using dnf upgrade 
--releasever 30 but I ended with, upon reboot:

  You are in emergency mode. After logging in, type "journalctl -xb" to 
view system logs, "systemctl reboot" to reboot, "systemctl default" or "exit" 
to boot into default mode.
  Give root password for maintenance.
  (or press Control-D to continue):

One problem is that I do not have a root password. I have actually gone in 
using a livecd and the devices (1 ext4 and 2 xfs) appear to be clean.

Any suggestions on how to proceed.

Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan




--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

how to have dual boot on new laptop

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Hello,
I have a laptop with preinstalled Win10 where I want to side install fedora
30 too.
Current layout of partitions on disk is this one, if I start from an usb
live:

# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 477 GiB, 512110190592 bytes, 1000215216 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: .

Device StartEnd   Sectors   Size Type
/dev/nvme0n1p1  2048 534527532480   260M EFI System
/dev/nvme0n1p2534528 567295 3276816M Microsoft reserved
/dev/nvme0n1p3567296  998574734 998007439 475.9G Microsoft basic data
/dev/nvme0n1p4 998576128 1000214527   1638400   800M Windows recovery
environment

Any suggestion on how to proceed?
Thanks in advance

Gianluca
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/09/19 07:23, Ed Greshko wrote:

So, your network kinda looks like the attached.  (no switch in my diagram)

Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces.  The interface that connects to the Radio 
Equipment,
does it have an IP address?  Do you know what it is?  And the second interface 
connects to
the switch and is 192.168.1.1.

.
Yeah, it "kinda" looks like that in some way ...

The Viasat unit has the line that goes to the microwave equipment at the 
dish which I assume is something like a one GHz intermediate frequency 
signal modulated with the date. I have no access to that, it does have 
two ethernet ports they state are identical and apparently can be used 
interchangeably, at this moment one is connected to the ethernet switch 
and feeding this computer assigned the ip  192.168.1.47 by the viasat 
router dhcp server. If I put the viasat unit into it's bridged mode I 
would expect output as 182.168.1.1 but not sure of that.


However they insist that bridged mode can not be used, I think because 
it kills the voip interface which is integral to the viasat router/modem.


You're saying the Modem and the ASUS are connected to the Switch.  And you have 
other
devices connected to the switch.  Those other devices would have IP addresses of
192.168.1.X.  Yes?

.
Yes 192.168.1.X and I need all the data to pass through my router, to 
the switch. The router provides extensive logging information that I use 
as well as being the dhcp server for everything not assigned a fixed ip 
and static addresses for the regular users as well as being the wifi 
access point. I could then turn off the viasat wifi or just leave it run 
and not use it if I put my router between theirs and my LAN and all the 
users on a different subset, arbitrarily tried 192.168.0.x. That leaves 
the voip phone working. If I can make NAT work ...


If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the 
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.

.
It's not clear to me how this could work? I have an identical ASUS 
router in the barn set up as a bridge and it seems useless for anything 
else. I know that I can't access it's browser set up function without 
bringing it in here and plugging a cat5 cable into it. It uses the 
software provide by ASUS in it's "client Bridge" mode, I tried it and it 
did what I needed and left it at that, it has been trouble free, 
effectively looks like another wired ethernet connection at this end, 
provides video and voice ...


This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X

There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-29/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

simple scan no longer prints?

[ToddAndMargo via users]

Hi All,

Fedora 30

$ rpm -qa simple-scan
simple-scan-3.32.2-2.fc30.x86_64

It looks like I lost my ability to print directly
from Simple Scan.  Is this a regression or am I
missing something?

-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Samuel Sieb]

On 5/9/19 4:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the 
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.

This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X

There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.


Except that from his original email, he wants all traffic to go through 
the ASUS so that he can do traffic control.  He is getting too much 
traffic over the internet link now that he doesn't have that.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Tim via users]

Allegedly, on or about 9 May 2019, Bob Goodwin sent:
> Everything I have read says Viasat's equipment must be used. ... It
> also contains a voip adapter for the telephone, before this "system
> upgrade" two months ago that was separate.

If it's a standard VOIP thing, then you probably can continue to use
separate VOIP adaptors.  If your phone plugged directly into their all-
in-one box, and/or requires special configuration by the service
provider, then I'd say no.


> I will attach a sketch of what I have to work with now. I did
> determine that their router/modem could be put into a bridged 
> mode but I could not get an internet connection with it and after a 
> visit from their "technician" it was decided I could not use that
> mode?

In bridged mode, the modem is purely a modem.  The first thing it
connects to on your system (e.g. your own router) is what the ISP sees
as the first thing on the network.  In that your case, your ISP might
need to authenticate your router (normally they'd *allow* their own
equipment).  But some ISPs don't disallow customer equipment, anything
you plug into the socket "just works."  If you can plug a computer
straight into their modem, and if that works, then plugging it into
your router ought to work.


> What I need most now is a good instruction for setting up the NAT
> stuff with my LAN ip changed to 192.168.0.xx which I think will make
> it easier for me to follow.

Your choice of LAN IPs (all on the same subnet) is probably why things
didn't work, before.

It shouldn't require anything special to set up NAT.  It's just going
to be the same kind of thing as the first time you set up your LAN. 
Set up your router to use the subnet that you want to use, let it
configure the equipment you haven't manually configured.  Then on the
rest of your gear that you need to manually configure, set them to use
new IPs in your new subnet range.  Your router would be already doing
NAT all by itself, anyway.

Forgetting your internet service, for the time being.  Just connect
your LAN equipment to your router, and get that all talking to each
other on your new IP subnet.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 4.16.11-100.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 22 20:02:12 UTC 2018 x86_64

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
There is no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see
the messages posted to the mailing list.

Television should really come with an intelligence knob.  I've tried
adjusting the brightness, but it didn't help.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: android emulator

[Aristeidis Dimitriadis]

I confirm Android Studio works fine with Fedora 30. If you are only
interested in the emulator, however, you can try the command line tools
(available for download from the same link). The download size is much
smaller and it includes the emulator and something like a package
manager for components of the SDK (called sdkmanager) which you can use
to download system images.

aristos

On 5/9/19 7:10 AM, Seth Kenlon wrote:
> There may be alternatives, but I do know that
> https://developer.android.com/studio works on Fedora (last I checked,
> which was Fedora 28 or 29).
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:08 PM Patrick Dupre  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Which android emulator can I use with fedora ?
>>
>> Thank.
>>
>> ===
>>  Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
>>  Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
>>  9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
>>  Tel: +33 (0)380395988
>> ===
>> ___
>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[George N. White III]

On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 07:21, Bob Goodwin  wrote:

>
>
> On 05/07/19 20:17, Tony Su wrote:
> > I've posted several times over the past 8 months or so about the
> > equipment I've been using on Cox and Spectrum, I don't even have to
> > tell the ISP what equipment I'm using... I just tell them I'm using my
> > own equipment on the Service Order, then hook up my own equipment. As
> > long as the equipment id compatible with their system, everything
> > happens more or less automaticatlly… The equipment is discovered,
> > recogniziaed, identified and then authorized firmware updates are
> > installed automatically (by the ISP). If all goes well, somewhere
> > between 20 t0 90 minutes after initial hookup, the system should be
> > working.
> >
> > You need to identify your equipment if you want help with your
> > different options. Nowadays, I think most SOHO residential gateways
> > come with web-based Administration. You may need to use a wired
> > connection instead of a wireless.
> .
> Everything I have read says Viasat's equipment must be used. Twenty
> years ago I might have experimented anyway but that's not something I
> can do now. The main difference I see is that their combination modem
> and router [Viasat RG1100] provides power to operate the radio equipment
> at the antenna, power over coax, 48 vdc I think it said. It also
> contains a voip adapter for the telephone, before this "system upgrade"
> two months ago that was separate.
>
> Until that time, for thirteen years, all I needed was their modem and
> the rest I provided. I will attach a sketch of what I have to work with
> now. I did determine that their router/modem could be put into a bridged
> mode but I could not get an internet connection with it and after a
> visit from their "technician" it was decided I could not use that mode?
>
> Presently it appears that the best solution is to NAT the WAN data to my
> router. I was experimenting with that approach yesterday, but I am still
> uncertain about the DD-WRT router configuration, still trying to come up
> with the right questions to ask for help here. The
> viasat equipment provides wifi that others have been using with poor
> results on their iPhones, etc, I am using one of the wired ethernet
> ports leaving a second port for connection to a  separate router.
>
> I want to turn down their wifi signal and use only my wifi router which
> will still leave their phone adapter functioning. I hope that explains
> things well enough to be understood. What I need most now is a good
> instruction for setting up the NAT stuff with my LAN ip changed to
> 192.168.0.xx which I think will make it easier for me to follow.
>
> Any further suggestions appreciated,
>
>
It appears you want to use your router as a wireless access point

In the figure on the above page, modem and router are the Viasat box and
you want to use your old router as the AP.  DD-WRT supports this, but
it is unusual in consumer routers.   You can find lots of material for the
college dorm room use case, e.g.: 5 tips for setting up your dorm room
wireless router





> Bob
>
> --
> Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
> http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
> box83  FEDORA-29/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Ed Greshko]

On 5/9/19 6:43 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/19 06:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same 
>> IP address?
>>
>> You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.
> .
> Yes and understood. The diagram simply shows what I have to start with, the 
> new
> router/modem plus the existing main components. There is a lot of peripheral 
> stuff not
> shown but I was asked about what I have if I understood the question.
>

So, your network kinda looks like the attached.  (no switch in my diagram)

Your Viasat Modem has 2 interfaces.  The interface that connects to the Radio 
Equipment,
does it have an IP address?  Do you know what it is?  And the second interface 
connects to
the switch and is 192.168.1.1.

You're saying the Modem and the ASUS are connected to the Switch.  And you have 
other
devices connected to the switch.  Those other devices would have IP addresses of
192.168.1.X.  Yes?

If I were trying to get this working I would make sure the Interface of the 
ASUS was
something like 192.168.1.5 and I would run the ASUS in Bridge mode.

This way everything on your network could have IP addresses of 192.168.1.X

There should be no reason to use NAT in the ASUS.

-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/09/19 06:29, Ed Greshko wrote:

Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same IP 
address?

You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.

.
Yes and understood. The diagram simply shows what I have to start with, 
the new router/modem plus the existing main components. There is a lot 
of peripheral stuff not shown but I was asked about what I have if I 
understood the question.


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-29/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Ed Greshko]

On 5/9/19 6:20 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Any further suggestions appreciated

Wasn't it pointed out quite some time ago that 2 devices can't have the same IP 
address?

You show your Viasat Modem and ASUS Router as both having 192.168.1.1.



-- 
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default 
color scheme
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Modem/Router/Router -

[Bob Goodwin]

On 05/07/19 20:17, Tony Su wrote:

I've posted several times over the past 8 months or so about the
equipment I've been using on Cox and Spectrum, I don't even have to
tell the ISP what equipment I'm using... I just tell them I'm using my
own equipment on the Service Order, then hook up my own equipment. As
long as the equipment id compatible with their system, everything
happens more or less automaticatlly… The equipment is discovered,
recogniziaed, identified and then authorized firmware updates are
installed automatically (by the ISP). If all goes well, somewhere
between 20 t0 90 minutes after initial hookup, the system should be
working.

You need to identify your equipment if you want help with your
different options. Nowadays, I think most SOHO residential gateways
come with web-based Administration. You may need to use a wired
connection instead of a wireless.

.
Everything I have read says Viasat's equipment must be used. Twenty 
years ago I might have experimented anyway but that's not something I 
can do now. The main difference I see is that their combination modem 
and router [Viasat RG1100] provides power to operate the radio equipment 
at the antenna, power over coax, 48 vdc I think it said. It also 
contains a voip adapter for the telephone, before this "system upgrade" 
two months ago that was separate.


Until that time, for thirteen years, all I needed was their modem and 
the rest I provided. I will attach a sketch of what I have to work with 
now. I did determine that their router/modem could be put into a bridged 
mode but I could not get an internet connection with it and after a 
visit from their "technician" it was decided I could not use that mode?


Presently it appears that the best solution is to NAT the WAN data to my 
router. I was experimenting with that approach yesterday, but I am still 
uncertain about the DD-WRT router configuration, still trying to come up 
with the right questions to ask for help here. The
viasat equipment provides wifi that others have been using with poor 
results on their iPhones, etc, I am using one of the wired ethernet 
ports leaving a second port for connection to a  separate router.


I want to turn down their wifi signal and use only my wifi router which 
will still leave their phone adapter functioning. I hope that explains 
things well enough to be understood. What I need most now is a good 
instruction for setting up the NAT stuff with my LAN ip changed to 
192.168.0.xx which I think will make it easier for me to follow.


Any further suggestions appreciated,

Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-29/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org