Swapped a dual boot drive into another computer and it will only boot Windows ?
I have 2 computers, nearly identical, similar age. AMI BIOS in both. I swapped the M.SATA drives from each. One drive has F31. One has dual boot Windows 10 + F31. The F31 alone hard drive boots and runs fine in the first computer. So does the dual boot drive. The dual boot hard drive will only boot Windows in the 2nd computer. I can't get it to boot Fedora at all. The BIOS settings appear to be identical. The first computer that boots both drives fine has BIOS version F4. I installed the lastest BIOS in the second computer that doesn't boot. It is version F2, but a much later version. I'm using legacy (compatibility, non efi ) mode. The BIOS gives me 2 options: P4: Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA Windows Boot Manager (P4: Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA) If I select the first option, the Linux boot partition the computer boots and displays: "Reboot and Selct proper Boot device or... " I've checked fstab on both drives. The UUIDs are correct and they are set up the same, except the dual boot drive has 2 extra entries for the Windows install. Why won't the dual boot drive boot Fedora on the 2nd computer ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 2020-01-13 13:08, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 13/1/20 11:39, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-01-13 04:49, Stephen Morris wrote: >>> I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to >>> F31 and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome >>> Classic or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. >> I installed F29 Workstation from the LiveDVD in a QEMU VM. >> I then updated, installed the dnf upgrade plugin and rebooted. >> I then did the upgrade from F29 to F31. >> >> Looks fine. >> >> Should I be doing an additional step to try and recreate the issue? > No, that is what I did. The Gnome Terminal displays 2 overlayed windows and > only the one that is the bottom of the two accepts input. Firefox displays > pages alternating between the page content overlaying the address bar and the > address bar overlaying pages, and as a result if the page has menus I can't > select the menus. The issue didn't occur in F29 with Wayland. > In the vm where I removed my account from sudoers (I've got it back again > now) I got these issues under Wayland, but they did not happen with Gnome in > Xorg nor with KDE, and not only does it happen with Firefox V72 it also > happens with Firefox V74.0a1 which was installed from a tar file in F30. In > that image F31 was an upgrade from F30 where these issues were not present. I > am running the VM's in Vmware Player V15 which has been updated each time > maintenance became available. Also with this issue occurring in the VM with > KDE installed, reinstalling Gnome via dnf group install did not rectify the > issue, and nor did installing a custom operating system via dnf group > install. As a side issue Thunderbird V74.0a1 does not appear to exhibit the > issue. > One other thing I've just remembered with this issue, if I have the Gnome > Terminal or Firefox un-maximised the issue doesn't occur, it only occurs if > they are maximised. I don't know if the screen resolution has anything to do > with it, the monitor runs at a resolution of 3840x2160, but because I'm in a > vm I have to run it at 3840x2075(9:5). You're using VMware Player, I'm using virt-manger. VMware Player is not free, is it? Have you asked on the VMware support groups if anyone is seeing that sort of issue? And, have you tried selecting a lower resolution? Anyway, the max resolution in full-scree mode for my VM's are 2560X1440 (16:9). -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 13/1/20 11:39, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-01-13 04:49, Stephen Morris wrote: I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to F31 and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome Classic or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. I installed F29 Workstation from the LiveDVD in a QEMU VM. I then updated, installed the dnf upgrade plugin and rebooted. I then did the upgrade from F29 to F31. Looks fine. Should I be doing an additional step to try and recreate the issue? No, that is what I did. The Gnome Terminal displays 2 overlayed windows and only the one that is the bottom of the two accepts input. Firefox displays pages alternating between the page content overlaying the address bar and the address bar overlaying pages, and as a result if the page has menus I can't select the menus. The issue didn't occur in F29 with Wayland. In the vm where I removed my account from sudoers (I've got it back again now) I got these issues under Wayland, but they did not happen with Gnome in Xorg nor with KDE, and not only does it happen with Firefox V72 it also happens with Firefox V74.0a1 which was installed from a tar file in F30. In that image F31 was an upgrade from F30 where these issues were not present. I am running the VM's in Vmware Player V15 which has been updated each time maintenance became available. Also with this issue occurring in the VM with KDE installed, reinstalling Gnome via dnf group install did not rectify the issue, and nor did installing a custom operating system via dnf group install. As a side issue Thunderbird V74.0a1 does not appear to exhibit the issue. One other thing I've just remembered with this issue, if I have the Gnome Terminal or Firefox un-maximised the issue doesn't occur, it only occurs if they are maximised. I don't know if the screen resolution has anything to do with it, the monitor runs at a resolution of 3840x2160, but because I'm in a vm I have to run it at 3840x2075(9:5). regards, Steve I ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tried to install F30 and F31 on 2 separate Partition on 1 external disk
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 13:38:10 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 1/12/20 9:05 AM, stan via users wrote: > > bootable OSs in stanzas. That's what I'm puzzled about. How does > > UEFI boot know which directory to use as the canonical directory > > when it starts? Does it present a menu so the user can choose? > > You have to create boot entries in the nvram that point to the boot > loaders and you set the order that they are tried in. Most also have > an option to see the whole list and pick one. Thanks, that makes sense. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 13/1/20 08:44, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/12/20 12:49 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 8/1/20 08:26, Stephen Morris wrote: On 8/1/20 08:07, Stephen Morris wrote: On 7/1/20 09:38, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 08:24:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, I have just upgraded to F31 from F30 using dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=31. Before I did the upgrade I updated F30 to the latest maintenance level. When I booted into Gnome on F31 there was no activities menu to be able to launch any application, the only way I could launch applications (if I knew the application command) was to use alt-f2. Did you try what happens if you create and use a new user account? I created a new account and on that account the Gnome Activities menu is there, but the dual window and web page issue are present on the new account. The issue also appears to not be present on the new account or my existing account under KDE. Just further to this, the issue appears to only be in Gnome under Wayland, it does not appear to be present in Gnome under Xorg. I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to F31 and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome Classic or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. Interesting that it happens in a VM. Does it happen if you do a clean install of F31 directly? I'll download an F31 livedvd and try that. regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
First ~500ms of audio gets dropped
One of my laptops has a minor, but an annoying, glitch with audio playback. I've observed this behavior with both Firefox and other audio playback applications. When audio playback starts /for the first time/, maybe the first 400-500ms of audio gets dropped, and then the rest of the audio plays fine. What's interesting is that pausing the audio for a few seconds and resuming it does not result in dropped audio. But if the audio playback gets paused for a longer period of time, resuming it once again drops the initial 400-500 milliseconds of audio. This happens only on one of my laptops. All of them are based on the XFCE spin, and generally have the same set of packages. This must be hardware related. This is my hardware (lspci -v): 00:03.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor HD Audio Controller (rev 06) Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer Device 6504 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 35 Memory at f7e14000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel Kernel modules: snd_hda_intel I'd be curious to compare notes with anyone else that has the same audio hardware. The most annoying part of this is that this manages to perfectly drop the "new mail" notification from one of my Firefox extensions. By the time the audio hardware decides to do its job, the horse already left the barn. pgp2hPQnjrBJF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: H.264
On 2020-01-12 17:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2020-01-12 16:20, Benjamin Lowry via users wrote: On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:04 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, How or what do I install to get the H.264 plug in that Parole Music Player complains about missing? Many thanks, -T Fedora doesn't package various codecs like H.264 for legal reasons; you need to enable the RPM Fusion Free repository, which is a supplemental repository that contains legally encumbered software. A guide is at < https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration>. After enabling it, I believe the package you are looking for is "gstreamer1-libav". -ben Hi Benjamin, You set me on the right path. It was the "gstreamer1-plugin-openh264" from "gstreamer1-plugin-openh264" repo that did the trick. That should have been the "fedora-cisco-openh264" repo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: H.264
On 2020-01-12 16:20, Benjamin Lowry via users wrote: On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:04 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, How or what do I install to get the H.264 plug in that Parole Music Player complains about missing? Many thanks, -T Fedora doesn't package various codecs like H.264 for legal reasons; you need to enable the RPM Fusion Free repository, which is a supplemental repository that contains legally encumbered software. A guide is at < https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration>. After enabling it, I believe the package you are looking for is "gstreamer1-libav". -ben Hi Benjamin, You set me on the right path. It was the "gstreamer1-plugin-openh264" from "gstreamer1-plugin-openh264" repo that did the trick. Thank you! -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On 2020-01-13 07:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2020-01-12 14:59, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-01-13 06:43, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Fedora 31, x64 >>> vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 >>> >>> I just downloaded >>> >>> $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 >>> >>> And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the >>> downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is >>> no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox >>> either. >>> >>> But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, >>> especially around 1:45. >>> >>> What the heck >>> >>> -T >>> >> >> Sounds just fine here in Taiwan. :-) :-) >> > > I am getting the same feedback from folks > over on the mozilla list too. What the heck?? FWIW, I get. [egreshko@meimei ~]$ ffprobe Eternal\ Love\ Michael\ Learns\ To\ Rock-J8Tkyj_KS98.webm ffprobe version 4.2.2 Copyright (c) 2007-2019 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 9 (GCC) configuration: --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share/ffmpeg --docdir=/usr/share/doc/ffmpeg --incdir=/usr/include/ffmpeg --libdir=/usr/lib64 --mandir=/usr/share/man --arch=x86_64 --optflags='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection' --extra-ldflags='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld ' --extra-cflags=' ' --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-version3 --enable-bzlib --disable-crystalhd --enable-fontconfig --enable-frei0r --enable-gcrypt --enable-gnutls --enable-ladspa --enable-libaom --enable-libdav1d --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libcdio --enable-libdrm --enable-libjack --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-libgsm --enable-libmp3lame --enable-nvenc --enable-openal --enable-opencl --enable-opengl --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-librsvg --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libssh --enable-libtheora --enable-libvorbis --enable-libv4l2 --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvmaf --enable-libvpx --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxvid --enable-libzimg --enable-libzvbi --enable-avfilter --enable-avresample --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --disable-static --enable-shared --enable-gpl --disable-debug --disable-stripping --shlibdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-libmfx --enable-runtime-cpudetect libavutil 56. 31.100 / 56. 31.100 libavcodec 58. 54.100 / 58. 54.100 libavformat 58. 29.100 / 58. 29.100 libavdevice 58. 8.100 / 58. 8.100 libavfilter 7. 57.100 / 7. 57.100 libavresample 4. 0. 0 / 4. 0. 0 libswscale 5. 5.100 / 5. 5.100 libswresample 3. 5.100 / 3. 5.100 libpostproc 55. 5.100 / 55. 5.100 Input #0, matroska,webm, from 'Eternal Love Michael Learns To Rock-J8Tkyj_KS98.webm': Metadata: ENCODER : Lavf58.29.100 Duration: 00:04:08.04, start: -0.007000, bitrate: 289 kb/s Stream #0:0(eng): Video: vp9 (Profile 0), yuv420p(tv), 854x480, SAR 1:1 DAR 427:240, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc (default) Metadata: DURATION : 00:04:08.01400 Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: opus, 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp (default) Metadata: DURATION : 00:04:08.04100 -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:52:05PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2020-01-12 15:37, Tim via users wrote: > >On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 14:43 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >>Fedora 31, x64 > >>vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 > >> > >>I just downloaded > >> > >>$ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 > >> > >>And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the > >>downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is > >>no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox > >>either. > >> > >>But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, > >>especially around 1:45. > >> > >>What the heck > > > >Have you pushed the playback volume up above 100%? > > It is around 30% > > Same on Firefox and Parole where there is no distortion I don't have youtube-dl, but I have the videodownloader plugin for Firefox. Downloaded it as mpeg-mp3 and it sounds fine to me. Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On 2020-01-12 15:37, Tim via users wrote: On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 14:43 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Fedora 31, x64 vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 I just downloaded $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox either. But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, especially around 1:45. What the heck Have you pushed the playback volume up above 100%? It is around 30% Same on Firefox and Parole where there is no distortion ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 2020-01-13 04:49, Stephen Morris wrote: > I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to F31 > and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome Classic > or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. I installed F29 Workstation from the LiveDVD in a QEMU VM. I then updated, installed the dnf upgrade plugin and rebooted. I then did the upgrade from F29 to F31. Looks fine. Should I be doing an additional step to try and recreate the issue? -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: H.264
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:04 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > How or what do I install to get the H.264 plug in > that Parole Music Player complains about missing? > > Many thanks, > -T Fedora doesn't package various codecs like H.264 for legal reasons; you need to enable the RPM Fusion Free repository, which is a supplemental repository that contains legally encumbered software. A guide is at < https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration>. After enabling it, I believe the package you are looking for is "gstreamer1-libav". -ben signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
H.264
Hi All, How or what do I install to get the H.264 plug in that Parole Music Player complains about missing? Many thanks, -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
Stephen Morris writes: Just for info, I installed F29 in a vm from scratch, and then upgraded to F31 from F29. The upgrade installed Firefox V72 and for me it worked fine (except under Wayland along with other packages). I don't normally use this version of Firefox, I use the nightly version of Firefox which is V74.0a1, and other than the Wayland issues it seems to work fine). The upgrade would've installed all the latest updates, which wouldn't reproduce this exact scenario. pgppssPo_R9QP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 14:43 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Fedora 31, x64 > vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 > > I just downloaded > > $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 > > And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the > downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is > no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox > either. > > But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, > especially around 1:45. > > What the heck Have you pushed the playback volume up above 100%? -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 6 15:49:49 UTC 2019 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On 2020-01-12 14:59, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-01-13 06:43, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 31, x64 vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 I just downloaded $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox either. But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, especially around 1:45. What the heck -T Sounds just fine here in Taiwan. :-) :-) I am getting the same feedback from folks over on the mozilla list too. What the heck?? -- ~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and Distortion
On 2020-01-13 06:43, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 31, x64 > vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 > > I just downloaded > > $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 > > And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the > downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is > no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox > either. > > But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, > especially around 1:45. > > What the heck > > -T > Sounds just fine here in Taiwan. :-) :-) -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
VLC and Distortion
Hi All, Fedora 31, x64 vlc-3.0.9-22.fc31.x86_64 I just downloaded $ youtube-dl --audio-format best --audio-quality 0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Tkyj_KS98 And in Firefox, I loaded the URL in one tab and the downloaded file in another. Side by side, there is no difference. Parole is no difference than Firefox either. But loading the file into VLC, distortion city, especially around 1:45. What the heck -T -- ~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 01/12/2020 01:54 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 12/1/20 08:12, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/11/2020 05:54 AM, Stephen Morris wrote: Is the only course of action I have to get it back to reinstall F29 and then upgrage to F31? Why would you do that when you can simply install F31 over your existing installation? F31 was an upgrade from F30 and I don't have the root account enabled to be able to reissue the dnf upgrade command. So? Just create a LiveUSB of F31 and use that to reinstall. HTH, HAND. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 1/12/20 12:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 12/1/20 04:18, Doug H. wrote: On Sat, 2020-01-11 at 23:54 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, By mistake I removed administration privileges from my account under kde, which is the only account that had it. Removing the privilege has removed my account from sudoers. Is the only course of action I have to get it back to reinstall F29 and then upgrage to F31? Nope, lots of simpler methods... 1. Of course, if you have the root password you can give your user sudo. 2. Boot to a maintenance CD and set a root password. I don't have the root account enabled and I don't have a maintenance CD for F31 as it was an upgrade from F30, which was an upgrade from F29. If you're comfortable with the command line, you can download the netinstall ISO and use rescue mode. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 1/12/20 12:54 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 12/1/20 08:12, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/11/2020 05:54 AM, Stephen Morris wrote: Is the only course of action I have to get it back to reinstall F29 and then upgrage to F31? Why would you do that when you can simply install F31 over your existing installation? F31 was an upgrade from F30 and I don't have the root account enabled to be able to reissue the dnf upgrade command. Ok, but if you're wanting to end up at F31 and you're reinstalling anyway, why start with F29 instead of just using the F31 installer? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 1/12/20 12:49 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 8/1/20 08:26, Stephen Morris wrote: On 8/1/20 08:07, Stephen Morris wrote: On 7/1/20 09:38, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 08:24:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, I have just upgraded to F31 from F30 using dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=31. Before I did the upgrade I updated F30 to the latest maintenance level. When I booted into Gnome on F31 there was no activities menu to be able to launch any application, the only way I could launch applications (if I knew the application command) was to use alt-f2. Did you try what happens if you create and use a new user account? I created a new account and on that account the Gnome Activities menu is there, but the dual window and web page issue are present on the new account. The issue also appears to not be present on the new account or my existing account under KDE. Just further to this, the issue appears to only be in Gnome under Wayland, it does not appear to be present in Gnome under Xorg. I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to F31 and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome Classic or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. Interesting that it happens in a VM. Does it happen if you do a clean install of F31 directly? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tried to install F30 and F31 on 2 separate Partition on 1 external disk
On 1/12/20 9:05 AM, stan via users wrote: bootable OSs in stanzas. That's what I'm puzzled about. How does UEFI boot know which directory to use as the canonical directory when it starts? Does it present a menu so the user can choose? You have to create boot entries in the nvram that point to the boot loaders and you set the order that they are tried in. Most also have an option to see the whole list and pick one. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 13/1/20 07:29, Stephen Morris wrote: On 13/1/20 03:32, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/11/20 6:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-01-12 10:24, Samuel Sieb wrote: FWIW, the "System Settings" process that I'm talking about simply places the user in the "wheel" group. Yes, that's what administrator rights means for a user. I also should have asked "how" the OP lost admin privileges since it was stated by the OP "Removing the privilege has removed my account from sudoers" which is inconsistent with the the "wheel" group assumption. For a typical user, not being able to use sudo would mean not being in sudoers. And in a way it's correct. If you aren't in the wheel group, you're not included by the sudoers file any more. Hi Samuel and ED, I encountered this issue as I was trying Gnome under Xorg and KDE as the upgrade I did from F30 to F31 has caused Wayland to not work properly on my system. I have another thread around the Wayland issue (as a side issue to this, in another vm image I reinstalled F29 from scratch and upgraded it to F31 and the Wayland issue still occurs). While I was checking whether KDE exhibited the issues I was looking at my account in settings and it had and it had the administrative privileges checkbox set. Incorrectly thinking that meant that administrative privileges were permanently set rather than through sudo, I unchecked the setting. After this I tried to use kwrite to update /etc/default/grub, as the upgrade to F31 overwrote the changes I had in there, but kwrite was unable to save my changes because I was not in sudoers. I also tried using sudo in both a KDE and Gnome shell, under KDE and Gnome, and under both when I used it I got the message that I wasn't in the sudoers list and that the violation would be reported. I do not have the root user active, as having installed KDE from Gnome via the Plasma group in dnf, I was not prompted to supply a root password, and I also thought that Fedora was like other distributions and disallowed the use of the root account. Following the instructions in the link provided by Patrick Laimbock I have enabled the root account by setting its password, and used it to add the administrative privilege back to my account under KDE. In testing whether the Wayland issue happened on a new account, I created an account for my wife which I have also added the administrative privilege to so that I have a backup account I can use if I cause this issue again. regards, Steve regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 12/1/20 08:12, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/11/2020 05:54 AM, Stephen Morris wrote: Is the only course of action I have to get it back to reinstall F29 and then upgrage to F31? Why would you do that when you can simply install F31 over your existing installation? F31 was an upgrade from F30 and I don't have the root account enabled to be able to reissue the dnf upgrade command. regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 12/1/20 04:18, Doug H. wrote: On Sat, 2020-01-11 at 23:54 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, By mistake I removed administration privileges from my account under kde, which is the only account that had it. Removing the privilege has removed my account from sudoers. Is the only course of action I have to get it back to reinstall F29 and then upgrage to F31? Nope, lots of simpler methods... 1. Of course, if you have the root password you can give your user sudo. 2. Boot to a maintenance CD and set a root password. I don't have the root account enabled and I don't have a maintenance CD for F31 as it was an upgrade from F30, which was an upgrade from F29. regards, Steve regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade of F30 to F31 Appears to Have not Worked Correctly
On 8/1/20 08:26, Stephen Morris wrote: On 8/1/20 08:07, Stephen Morris wrote: On 7/1/20 09:38, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 08:24:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi, I have just upgraded to F31 from F30 using dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=31. Before I did the upgrade I updated F30 to the latest maintenance level. When I booted into Gnome on F31 there was no activities menu to be able to launch any application, the only way I could launch applications (if I knew the application command) was to use alt-f2. Did you try what happens if you create and use a new user account? I created a new account and on that account the Gnome Activities menu is there, but the dual window and web page issue are present on the new account. The issue also appears to not be present on the new account or my existing account under KDE. Just further to this, the issue appears to only be in Gnome under Wayland, it does not appear to be present in Gnome under Xorg. I tried a reinstall from scratch of F29 in another VM and upgraded it to F31 and the issue is still there in Gnome under Wayland. If I start Gnome Classic or Gnome on Xorg the issue does not occur. regards, Steve regards, Steve regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox-72.0.1-1.fc31.x86_64 does nothing
On 12/1/20 13:18, stan via users wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:03:05 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: I held all Fedora updates for the last couple of weeks, and only updated firefox in order to pick up the critical vulnerability fix. I was planning to update fully again next week, but decided to just grab the firefox update now. The firefox 72 rpm installed without conflicts, but firefox just kept flipping me the finger, shaped like a blank page. It was not crashing, and there were no error messages if I ran it from a terminal. Just a big F. U. white screen. On a few occasions, Firefox started to load my home page, but reached the conclusion that https://mail.google.com/u/0 – my home page – was corrupted. I determined that this ust be a hidden ABI breakage with one of the dependent packages. Firefox 72 started working again after I installed all available updates. I reproduced this on three different machines, this sequence of events: firefix update is broke by itself, but starts working once all available Fedora updates are installed. Or if I downgrade to 71.0.15. But I ran out of available machines to experiment with. They're all now fully updated. But I grabbed the complete list of packages that was updated on one of the boxes, if anyone wishes to find the ABI breakage violator. One of the following packages must have an ABI break in it, that the current firefox build has a dependency on: Just for info, I installed F29 in a vm from scratch, and then upgraded to F31 from F29. The upgrade installed Firefox V72 and for me it worked fine (except under Wayland along with other packages). I don't normally use this version of Firefox, I use the nightly version of Firefox which is V74.0a1, and other than the Wayland issues it seems to work fine). regards, Steve My guess is nspr and nss. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 13/1/20 03:32, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/11/20 6:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-01-12 10:24, Samuel Sieb wrote: FWIW, the "System Settings" process that I'm talking about simply places the user in the "wheel" group. Yes, that's what administrator rights means for a user. I also should have asked "how" the OP lost admin privileges since it was stated by the OP "Removing the privilege has removed my account from sudoers" which is inconsistent with the the "wheel" group assumption. For a typical user, not being able to use sudo would mean not being in sudoers. And in a way it's correct. If you aren't in the wheel group, you're not included by the sudoers file any more. Hi Samuel and ED, I encountered this issue as I was trying Gnome under Xorg and KDE as the upgrade I did from F30 to F31 has caused Wayland to not work properly on my system. I have another thread around the Wayland issue (as a side issue to this, in another vm image I reinstalled F29 from scratch and upgraded it to F31 and the Wayland issue still occurs). While I was checking whether KDE exhibited the issues I was looking at my account in settings and it had and it had the administrative privileges checkbox set. Incorrectly thinking that meant that administrative privileges were permanently set rather than through sudo, I unchecked the setting. After this I tried to use kwrite to update /etc/default/grub, as the upgrade to F31 overwrote the changes I had in there, but kwrite was unable to save my changes because I was not in sudoers. I also tried using sudo in both a KDE and Gnome shell, under KDE and Gnome, and under both when I used it I got the message that I wasn't in the sudoers list and that the violation would be reported. I do not have the root user active, as having installed KDE from Gnome via the Plasma group in dnf, I was not prompted to supply a root password, and I also thought that Fedora was like other distributions and disallowed the use of the root account. regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tried to install F30 and F31 on 2 separate Partition on 1 external disk
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 04:55:42 + (UTC) Joerg Lechner via users wrote: > Hi,in my case, I think I have to modify grub.cfg to bring up the > entries for F30, F31 and Windows. But currently my know how about > Grub is to low, so I have to learn about Grub. I think all you have to do, if I'm understanding correctly how Steven did it, is run grub2-mkconfig -o grub.cfg in the /boot/efi/EFI/fedora directory. That will probe your system and find all bootable OSs, and then put stanzas for them into grub.cfg. I think that Steven must do the equivalent for the other OSs he has installed, so that their equivalent of grub.cfg also has all the other bootable OSs in stanzas. That's what I'm puzzled about. How does UEFI boot know which directory to use as the canonical directory when it starts? Does it present a menu so the user can choose? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Loss of Administrative Privileges on Only Account
On 1/11/20 6:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-01-12 10:24, Samuel Sieb wrote: FWIW, the "System Settings" process that I'm talking about simply places the user in the "wheel" group. Yes, that's what administrator rights means for a user. I also should have asked "how" the OP lost admin privileges since it was stated by the OP "Removing the privilege has removed my account from sudoers" which is inconsistent with the the "wheel" group assumption. For a typical user, not being able to use sudo would mean not being in sudoers. And in a way it's correct. If you aren't in the wheel group, you're not included by the sudoers file any more. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Help: F30/31 laptops only ones not able to connect to Wifi Linkhub hotspot
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 17:21:05 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-01-03 13:55, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > I have been lost for the past day and I need some help. > > > > There are 7 android devices and a linux mint laptop that effortlessly > > connect to a linkhub (Alcatel HH41NH). There is no limit to the number of > > devices that the linkhub can connect to. > > > > However, two Fedora laptops each running F30 and F31 are not able to > > connect. Both laptops are updated to the latest as of Tuesday December 31, > > 2019. > > > > We have tried all sorts of things but can not connect. dmesg seems to > > indicate that a connection is established but the log messages seem to > > indicate otherwise. > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions? We are a little lost. I am including the > > relevant dmesg, log messages and journatctl output. Happy to provide > > information as needed. > > Could you check to see if you have a file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts > with the name of > ifcfg-THE_SSID? > > If so, can you post it? > I apologize for the delay in posting this, but here it is: ESSID=noname MODE=Managed KEY_MGMT=WPA-PSK MAC_ADDRESS_RANDOMIZATION=default TYPE=Wireless PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=1313 UUID=9a20fcd4-428b-48d4-8bca-18f4a1fda394 ONBOOT=yes USERS=maitra IPV6_PRIVACY=no HWADDR=9C:B6:D0:8D:C0:AF MACADDR=permanent Thanks, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
