Speech to text -

2020-11-16 Thread Bob Goodwin
Is there a voice to text program that will work with Fedora Linux as 
some of my friends have for their smart phones? It would not have to be 
free to be considered.


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Neal Becker
Yes, actually chrome had already been updated and just needed to be
restarted :)

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:18 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> /etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome-beta
>
> [google-chrome-beta]
> name=google-chrome-beta
> baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64
> enabled=0
> gpgcheck=1
> gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
>
> or do you mean
> dnf install google-chrome-unstable
>
> google-chrome-stable-86.0.4240.198-1.x86_64 is the current verion that
> is stable
>
> Didn't install it, but unstable is
> google-chrome-unstable  x86_64  88.0.4315.5-1
>
> [google-chrome]
> name=google-chrome
> baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64
> enabled=1
> gpgcheck=1
> gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub
>
>
>
> On 16 Nov 2020 at 16:11, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> Subject:Re: Update chrome?
> From:   Patrick O'Callaghan 
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date sent:  Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:11:38 +
> Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users
> 
>
> > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 10:40 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 07:01 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > > > There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome
> is
> > > > > telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update
> outside of
> > > > > dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?
> > >
> > > I've seen Chrome (when installed via the official rpm
> > > packaging from Google) report that it needs restarted to
> > > pick up an update that's been installed, but I've never seen
> > > it update itself on Linux.  (Not that I can't be wrong about
> > > that, of course.)
> > >
> > > The google-chrome repo managed by Google is generally kept
> > > up to date.  Are you positive that you haven't installed an
> > > update to Chrome since the last time you restarted the app?
> > >
> > > I know that several vulnerabilities discussed recently have
> > > already been patched and shipped to the google-chrome repo.
> > > The latest stable version on the Chrome release page is
> > > 86.0.4240.198, which is what's been in the google-chrome
> > > package repo since the middle of last week.
> > >
> > > > AFAIK the built-in updater is not going to coordinate with the RPM
> > > > database, so I wouldn't do this myself. It may not even install to
> the
> > > > same location.
> > > >
> > > > You can always try:
> > > >
> > > > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-chrome
> > > >
> > > > to see if there's a more recent version in the testing repo.
> > >
> > > Since google-chrome is not in the Fedora repos, it won't be
> > > in updates or updates-testing. ;)
> >
> > Oops, good point. Make that the Chrome repo(s) :-)
> >
> > poc
> > ___
> > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> ++
>  Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)
>  mailto:mi...@guam.net
>  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
>  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
>  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
>  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
> ++
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: systemd-resolved breakage

2020-11-16 Thread Anthony F McInerney
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 20:22, Tom H  wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Anthony F McInerney
>  wrote:
>
>
> > Can someone explain why systemd-resolved needs to symlink
> > /etc/resolv.conf to 4(or more) different places, instead of just
> > having those 'detected things' as options in
> > /etc/systemd/resolved.conf ?
>
> The different symlinks/files provide different options.


Yes I was well aware of that, most people who had to read the man page to
find out about the magic symlink and which one had broken their system also
know this now too.

I doubt that anyone would want resolved to create/modify the symlinks
> depending on "/etc/systemd/resolved.conf".
>
>
Which indeed, was my point, why would "anyone want resolved to
create/modify the symlinks" or even BE one, instead of just a static file,
that some other random app doesn't claim ownership of with a symlink, that
does some 'magic' with enforce options, you'll know about once you read the
man page.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Michael D. Setzer II via users
/etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome-beta

[google-chrome-beta]
name=google-chrome-beta
baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64
enabled=0
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub

or do you mean
dnf install google-chrome-unstable

google-chrome-stable-86.0.4240.198-1.x86_64 is the current verion that 
is stable

Didn't install it, but unstable is 
google-chrome-unstable  x86_64  88.0.4315.5-1 

[google-chrome]
name=google-chrome
baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub



On 16 Nov 2020 at 16:11, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Subject:Re: Update chrome?
From:   Patrick O'Callaghan 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:11:38 +
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 10:40 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 07:01 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > > There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome is
> > > > telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update outside of
> > > > dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?
> > 
> > I've seen Chrome (when installed via the official rpm
> > packaging from Google) report that it needs restarted to
> > pick up an update that's been installed, but I've never seen
> > it update itself on Linux.  (Not that I can't be wrong about
> > that, of course.)
> > 
> > The google-chrome repo managed by Google is generally kept
> > up to date.  Are you positive that you haven't installed an
> > update to Chrome since the last time you restarted the app?
> > 
> > I know that several vulnerabilities discussed recently have
> > already been patched and shipped to the google-chrome repo.
> > The latest stable version on the Chrome release page is
> > 86.0.4240.198, which is what's been in the google-chrome
> > package repo since the middle of last week.
> > 
> > > AFAIK the built-in updater is not going to coordinate with the RPM
> > > database, so I wouldn't do this myself. It may not even install to the
> > > same location.
> > > 
> > > You can always try:
> > > 
> > > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-chrome
> > > 
> > > to see if there's a more recent version in the testing repo.
> > 
> > Since google-chrome is not in the Fedora repos, it won't be
> > in updates or updates-testing. ;)
> 
> Oops, good point. Make that the Chrome repo(s) :-)
> 
> poc
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 10:40 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 07:01 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome is
> > > telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update outside of
> > > dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?
> 
> I've seen Chrome (when installed via the official rpm
> packaging from Google) report that it needs restarted to
> pick up an update that's been installed, but I've never seen
> it update itself on Linux.  (Not that I can't be wrong about
> that, of course.)
> 
> The google-chrome repo managed by Google is generally kept
> up to date.  Are you positive that you haven't installed an
> update to Chrome since the last time you restarted the app?
> 
> I know that several vulnerabilities discussed recently have
> already been patched and shipped to the google-chrome repo.
> The latest stable version on the Chrome release page is
> 86.0.4240.198, which is what's been in the google-chrome
> package repo since the middle of last week.
> 
> > AFAIK the built-in updater is not going to coordinate with the RPM
> > database, so I wouldn't do this myself. It may not even install to the
> > same location.
> > 
> > You can always try:
> > 
> > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-chrome
> > 
> > to see if there's a more recent version in the testing repo.
> 
> Since google-chrome is not in the Fedora repos, it won't be
> in updates or updates-testing. ;)

Oops, good point. Make that the Chrome repo(s) :-)

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Grub2 Boot Menu Hidden in Fedora 33

2020-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 13:23 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Sorry about that, the command I was actually using was "grub2-editenv - unset 
> menu_auto_hide" (from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu 
> ), I always have to look that up before using it.

Sorry about what? If you use HyperKitty you need to manually quote the
part you're replying to. It doesn't happen automatically.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Todd Zullinger
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 07:01 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome is
>> telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update outside of
>> dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?

I've seen Chrome (when installed via the official rpm
packaging from Google) report that it needs restarted to
pick up an update that's been installed, but I've never seen
it update itself on Linux.  (Not that I can't be wrong about
that, of course.)

The google-chrome repo managed by Google is generally kept
up to date.  Are you positive that you haven't installed an
update to Chrome since the last time you restarted the app?

I know that several vulnerabilities discussed recently have
already been patched and shipped to the google-chrome repo.
The latest stable version on the Chrome release page is
86.0.4240.198, which is what's been in the google-chrome
package repo since the middle of last week.

> AFAIK the built-in updater is not going to coordinate with the RPM
> database, so I wouldn't do this myself. It may not even install to the
> same location.
> 
> You can always try:
> 
> # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-chrome
> 
> to see if there's a more recent version in the testing repo.

Since google-chrome is not in the Fedora repos, it won't be
in updates or updates-testing. ;)

-- 
Todd


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: fstrim for ESP on SSDs

2020-11-16 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 11/15/20 7:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> FAT supports discards since kernel ~4.19.
> 
> fstrim doesn't have file system specific support, it directly calls
> FITRIM() ioctl and the kernel handles the file system specifics.

Got it.  So do you recommend putting the discard option then for as
little as it may do?

Thanks Chris.

-- 
Jorge
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Grub2 Boot Menu Hidden in Fedora 33

2020-11-16 Thread Andre Robatino
Sorry about that, the command I was actually using was "grub2-editenv - unset 
menu_auto_hide" (from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu ), 
I always have to look that up before using it.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 07:01 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome is
> telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update outside of
> dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?

AFAIK the built-in updater is not going to coordinate with the RPM
database, so I wouldn't do this myself. It may not even install to the
same location.

You can always try:

# dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-chrome

to see if there's a more recent version in the testing repo.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Update chrome?

2020-11-16 Thread Neal Becker
There are widely reported zero-days related to chrome, and chrome is
telling me "update" in the top right corner.  If I do update outside of
dnf, will the next dnf update still be effective?

Thanks,
Neal

-- 
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Grub2 Boot Menu Hidden in Fedora 33

2020-11-16 Thread Stephen Morris

On 16/11/20 10:38 am, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:14 AM Stephen Morris  wrote:

On 15/11/20 12:26 pm, Andre Robatino wrote:

I have a BIOS Fedora 33-only laptop, and "grub2-editenv - unset auto_hide_menu" 
worked on that.

That's interesting. I am running F33 in a VM in VMware Player and for me
that command did nothing, whereas it worked fine in F32.


What do you get for

grub2-editenv list

sudo grub2-editenv list returned the following:

saved_entry=e88dcf8d23334882b6e50bcd814c6cae-5.8.18-300.fc33.x86_64
menu_auto_hide=1
boot_success=1
boot_indeterminate=0

Having done this I've now worked out what the issue was, I was issuing 
the wrong command.
I was issuing   sudo grub2-editenv - unset auto_hide_menu    when 
it should have been   sudo grub2-editenv - unset menu_auto_hide.


regards,
Steve





___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org