Re: Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 6:15 AM Patrick O'Callaghan 
wrote:

> $ rpm -qd lutris
> /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> [poc@Bree ~]$ man lutris
> No manual entry for lutris
> [poc@Bree ~]$ ls -l /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1433 Jul 19 00:02 /usr/share/man/lutris.1
>




I ran into this yesterday. In my case i was doing 'man zram-genarator.conf'
and also for a few bcc tools programs. No entry.

Two Fedora 33 systems affected, Workstation and Server. But not a third
Workstation.

In the first case I reinstalled the zram-generator package. I noticed this
kicked off a mandb process. Problem fixed. On the second machine I found a
mandb rebuild service unit (I can't remember the exact name and I'm mobile
at the moment) and just did 'sudo systemctl start mandbwhatever.service'
and that also fixed it.

What I don't know is why it broke in the first place.


--
Chris Murphy

>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 - KDE broken after dnf update [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:27 AM Ed Greshko  wrote:

> You may want to post to the dedicated KDE list.  KDE on Fedora discussion <
> k...@lists.fedoraproject.org>.
>
> All of my KDE systems have been updated and are working normally. Some are
> recent F33 installs while
> others are systems which have been upgraded.  I don't use disk encryption.
>

I ended up rolling back the update with 'sudo dnf history undo
'. All back to normal now.

The KDE guys really should look into this.

Did you update from a separate tty ?

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: locale LC_CTYPE wrong...?

2020-12-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Dec2020 00:31, Iosif Fettich  wrote:
>After a fresh install of Fedora 33, I see occasional errors popping up in
>the console, similar to
>
>$ locale
>locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
>locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
>LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8,LANG=en_US.UTF-8

This line looks very wrong. Normally $LANG is a separate environment 
variable. I'd say someone/thing has misedited wherever these values are 
coming from and folded the $LANG setting only the $LC_CTYPE line 
somehow.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson 
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 12/7/20 4:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Man of La Mancha is a musical based on Don Quixote. I wouldn't regard
it as the same thing, but it's a matter of opinion.


Neither do I, but at least you can get an idea of what the story's about 
by watching it.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 12:41 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/7/20 4:45 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 22:06 -0700, home user wrote:
> > > Is Don Quixote available as an English-language movie?
> > Not really. There are several Spanish versions (see IMDB) but the book
> > is so expansive that it's hard to imagine a successful movie
> > adaptation.
> 
> The Man of La Mancha.

Man of La Mancha is a musical based on Don Quixote. I wouldn't regard
it as the same thing, but it's a matter of opinion.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 12/7/20 7:38 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> I disabled AutoFS and will try to see if the issue persist and keep
> you all posted.

HI Earl,

That makes sense.  Perhaps the "File Dialog" window tries to traverse
the mount point where AutoFS "auto mounts" the CIFS share ...and if that
share is inaccessible maybe that's what's causing the extreme latency.
Let's hope it's that... Keep us posted.

-- 
Jorge
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Earl Ramirez
Hi Jorge,


> Hi.  I agree with the other folks; this is way too abnormal.  Do you
> have a network share (CIFS/NFS etc) configured as a shortcut/bookmark
> in
> Nautilus?  
I completely forgot to mention that I have a CIFS share mounted with
AutoFS, this is included in the Ansible role that I use to configure
after a vanilla install of Fedora computers/laptops. I disabled AutoFS
and will try to see if the issue persist and keep you all posted. There
are no shortcut/bookmark for the mount. It is important to mention that
my wife and kids laptops do not experience the same behaviour and they
are all using the exact same setup.


> Could it be DNS resolution timing out? 
I will investigate and report back, I do not believe that it is DNS
though since the AutoFS configuration has the IP address of the CIFS
server.

>  I've seen such
> latency issue issues when unreachable DNS servers are configured.  
> Of
> course, if it's an app that has nothing to do with the network, like
> "calculator", then it won't applyI'm not sure if what you
> describe
> is with *every* application or not.
It's any application that you can use to open a file. Which is why I
believe that it can be related to the CIFS mount
> 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: thermald missing and problems

2020-12-07 Thread Fulko Hew
More followup...

a) I've tried the F33 Live LDE release, and I don't see thermald as part of
the distribution.

b) I then borrowed a Dell G3 15 (vintage: March 2020) and tried both KDE
Live and Workstation Live;
   and neither seem to be able to turn on the fan on either the Dell G3
3590, or my Inspiron 5567.

c) Trying gkrellm on both laptops, on the Inspiron shows a fan sensor but
doesn't turn the fan on,
   and the G3 shows no fan sensors available at all.  (I know it has 2
separate fans, CPU and GPU.)

I can't imagine that I'm the only person who's trying to use these Dell
laptops
or seeing these thermal issues.

Help
Fulko
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Joe Zeff

On 12/7/20 4:45 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 22:06 -0700, home user wrote:

Is Don Quixote available as an English-language movie?

Not really. There are several Spanish versions (see IMDB) but the book
is so expansive that it's hard to imagine a successful movie
adaptation.


The Man of La Mancha.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 - KDE broken after dnf update

2020-12-07 Thread Ed Greshko

On 08/12/2020 00:33, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:

I need your help again guys.


You may want to post to the dedicated KDE list.  KDE on Fedora discussion 
.

All of my KDE systems have been updated and are working normally. Some are 
recent F33 installs while
others are systems which have been upgraded.  I don't use disk encryption.

---
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Earl Ramirez
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 07:59 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> Something is seriously wrong with that machine!  I also use Fedora 33
> with 32G RAM but with a single Kingston SSD on BTRFS, with an old
> gen-2 
> i7 processor as my main desktop.  Its very fast, booting in 5sec, and
> apps come up in <1/2sec.
> 
> Assuming that your logs are clean and you're not showing disk or
> memory 
> errors or have rediculously-high CPU utilization, I would suspect the
> RAID controller is either misconfigured or broken. Is the RAID
> battery ok?
It's a software RAID, I will agree that something is seriously wrong
but I am unable to reproduce the same behaviour from a Live CD even if
I use the Live CD for 48 hours.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


F33 - KDE broken after dnf update

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
Hi,

Not a moment's respite.

I just did a 'sudo dnf update -y' on my Fedora 33 KDE system and now KDE is
completely broken after reboot.

Now when the system starts up, after I enter my password in SDDM I get a
message: "The application kde5 has requested to open the wallet kwallet5.
Please provide password"

I thought this was strange the first time, but then I saw KDE not even
starting, my wallpaper did not load, the taskbar was not there. But I could
use the terminal.

Hence I got the journalctl logs:

I found some misconfigurations after the update:

https://pastebin.com/raw/mnivS8ff
(This is the abbreviated log)

Full log below:
https://pastebin.com/raw/uiLWKLya



Those who don't want to look at the logs here are some interesting entries:




sddm-greeter[1507]: QObject: Cannot create children for a parent that is in
a different thread.
 (Parent is
QGuiApplication(0x7ffd15e6aeb0), parent's thread is
QThread(0x562f0855f980), current thread is QThread(0x562f086f8c30)

sddm-greeter[1507]: QObject: Cannot create children for a parent that is in
a different thread.
 (Parent is
QGuiApplication(0x7ffd15e6aeb0), parent's thread is
QThread(0x562f0855f980), current thread is QThread(0x562f086f8c30)

sddm-greeter[1507]: QObject: Cannot create children for a parent that is in
a different thread.
 (Parent is
QGuiApplication(0x7ffd15e6aeb0), parent's thread is
QThread(0x562f0855f980), current thread is QThread(0x562f086f8c30)

sddm-greeter[1507]:
file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-breeze-fedora/components/UserDelegate.qml:69:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'largeSpacing' of null
sddm-greeter[1507]:
file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-breeze-fedora/components/UserDelegate.qml:95:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'gridUnit' of null

sddm-greeter[1507]:
file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-breeze-fedora/components/UserDelegate.qml:75:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'longDuration' of null

kded5[1644]: colord: "/home/sreyan/.local/share/icc/." is not an ICC profile

kded5[1644]: plasma-nm: Unhandled active connection state change:  1

kwalletd5[1693]: Application ' "kded5" ' using kwallet without parent
window!



I need your help again guys.

Linux just does not give you a break.

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation [SOLVED]

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:43 PM Chris Murphy  wrote:

>
> The more predictable arrangement is a swap partition.
>

I did it.

The problem was that btrfs_map_physical script will actually output the
offset in bytes.

I had to divide by my block size 4096.

So the correct resume_offset is =  14745509888 / 4096

After that hibernation worked like a charm.
Got help from this thread on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/e623w8/hibernation_into_swapfile_on_btrfs_is_borked/f9nnzpl/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

But now I have broken my system after a dnf update.
Man, Linux does not give you a break.

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:14:14 +0800
Earl Ramirez wrote:

> The applications launches, the delay is when I am in an application and
> try to open a document on disk.

I've seen this when, for example, I've got an NFS mount to a system
that is not up at the moment. All the annoying file dialogs want
to be "helpful" and populate the browser with every single mountpoint
or even unmounted disks that appear to be attached (which is another
case, since if the disk has spun down, it has to spin back up again).

You could try running strace on the app just before opening a file
and see if something like a stat call is hanging during the
open.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Earl Ramirez
Thanks, Chris
> It takes 45 seconds to launch any application?  This is definitely
> not
> normal no matter the file system or arrangement.
The applications launches, the delay is when I am in an application and
try to open a document on disk. For example, I am in LibreOffice and
wants to open a document, I will click on File > Open, LibreOffice will
freeze and at approximately after 45 second Nautilus will open so that
I can select the file that I wants to open.  

> Can you provide exact reproducer steps?
> 
From any application, LibreOffice, Gedit, teXstudio select open and
here is where I experience the delays.

> 
> Can you install bcc-tools and then run this command:
> 
> sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/fileslower
Certainly.
> 
> And then reproduce the problem? Once the app launches, you can
> control-c to quit. Can you post the results? I think it's OK to just
> paste it into the email reply to list. By default it will show only
> IO
> that takes more than 10ms. It's possible it won't show anything,
> which
> would be good but still mysterious.
> 
> This is what I get with 'fileslower 1' which shows IO taking more
> than
> 1ms, while launching GNOME Maps. This is on NVMe. SSD might be a
> touch
> slower, possibly high single digit latencies.
> https://pastebin.com/UpY5QH8x
> 
> But if you're seeing higher than 100 let alone 1000 then the problem
> is related to files being read slowly. In that case it might also be
> useful to see if this is happening at the device level.
> 
> sudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/biolatency 5 15
> 
> Now try to reproduce it again. These values are in usec and should be
> less than 64K usec I'm guessing. Again you can past that whole thing
> into the email reply, it's just asciiart, it'll probably be OK :D
> 
> Example:
> https://pastebin.com/u9fbpbvw
> 
> Only the worst performers are likely to be revealing of a problem. It
> doesn't matter to me if you include all 15 or just the ones that have
> the highest values. In that example, it's the third block that ends
> in
> 32768 -> 65535. Do paste in the entire block though if you get this
> far.

Thanks for the details, I will use it and report back
> 
> You only need to increase it if you're regularly hitting the limit,
> i.e. it's full as reported by swapon. I'm not sure why the file
> system
> would make any difference in swap utilization. It tends to be related
> to the workload.
> 
> If so you can start out with:
> 
> sudo nano /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf
> 
> Add to it:
> [zram0]
> max-zram-size=8192

I copied the files from /usr/share/doc to /etc/systemd and made the
recommendation; however, when I restart the service I get the following
errors

Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar zram-generator[34236]: Error: Failed to
configure disk size into /sys/block/zram0/disksize
Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar zram-generator[34236]: Caused by:
Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar zram-generator[34236]: Invalid argument (os
error 22)
Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar systemd[1]: swap-create@zram0.service: Main
process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
░░ Subject: Unit process exited
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░ 
░░ An ExecStart= process belonging to unit swap-create@zram0.service
has exited.
░░ 
░░ The process' exit code is 'exited' and its exit status is 1.
Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar systemd[1]: swap-create@zram0.service: Failed
with result 'exit-code'.
░░ Subject: Unit failed
░░ Defined-By: systemd
░░ Support:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
░░ 
░░ The unit swap-create@zram0.service has entered the 'failed' state
with result 'exit-code'.
Dec 07 22:10:23 jaguar systemd[1]: Failed to start Create swap on
/dev/zram0.
░░ Subject: A start job for unit swap-create@zram0.service has failed



> Save and then:
> sudo systemctl restart swap-create@zram0.service
> 
> The logic behind capping at 4G is just to be conservative. i.e. to
> avoid the small amount of extra overhead for a larger zram device
> that
> may not get used; and also the case where something starts using so
> much swap that it sucks up memory, even though it's compressed on the
> zram device. There's a good chance the cap goes to 6G or 8G in F34,
> i.e. the lesser of 50% RAM or 8G. There's also some idea of bumping
> the percentage to something like 70%. (Quite a lot of use cases run
> at
> 1:1 zram to RAM, and upstream considers 2:1 reasonable due to the
> compression ratio. I think in Fedora land that's too aggressive for
> making it the default behavior, but on a case by case basis it's
> reasonable not least of which is that it's easy for users to fiddle
> with it, if they want.)

Good to know.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
L

Re: extensions install method in fedora 33

2020-12-07 Thread Amadeus WM via users
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:23:52 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 12/6/20 10:32 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:
>> Prior to Fedora 33 I would install gnome shell extensions from the
>> stock software manager. Under Categories -> Add-ons, there was an
>> Extensions tab, but there doesn't seem to be one anymore in F33.
> 
> Possibly that has been split out now.  Search for an application called
> "Extensions".
> 
>> Is the web browser the only way to install extensions now? And why do
>> gnome extensions get installed via a web browser anyway?
> 
> It's not the only way, see above.  But the browser install method
> worked, so why not?


It does work and I did use that to install extensions, but I'd rather 
have a single, unified way of installing stuff on my system. 

Searching for "extension" with dnf though, showed a bunch of extension 
rpms, which I was then able to install with dnf, like any other rpm, so 
it's all good. Then I had to enable them by running 

gnome-extensions-app

Thanks for the tip!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 07:33 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Typically man pages are under subdirectores in that dir ie
> man1/man2/ So it may be ignoring the top level directory by
> design.
> 
> I don't have any man "files" in that top directory, there are just
> directories below it that have the actual man pages in it.
> 
> It sounds like a rpm spec file is putting in the wrong place.
> 

Yes, obvious when one sees it :-)

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 14:35 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 12/7/20 2:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > $ rpm -qd lutris
> > /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> > [poc@Bree ~]$ man lutris
> > No manual entry for lutris
> > [poc@Bree ~]$ ls -l /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1433 Jul 19 00:02 /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> > 
> > I also ran 'mandb' just in case. No difference.
> 
> No surprise. This man page is installed into a bogus directory, i.e. 
> this is a packaging bug.
> 
> File a bug against this package to have it fixed.

OK, thanks.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 12/7/20 2:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

$ rpm -qd lutris
/usr/share/man/lutris.1
[poc@Bree ~]$ man lutris
No manual entry for lutris
[poc@Bree ~]$ ls -l /usr/share/man/lutris.1
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1433 Jul 19 00:02 /usr/share/man/lutris.1

I also ran 'mandb' just in case. No difference.


No surprise. This man page is installed into a bogus directory, i.e. 
this is a packaging bug.


File a bug against this package to have it fixed.

Ralf
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: merging two ext4 partitions

2020-12-07 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 12/6/20 11:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Slightly off topic and also hypothetical. Assume the same physical
> setup, but what if both were Btrfs?

Thanks Chris for that.  Always enjoy the BTRFS inslights you provide.

-- 
Jorge
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Roger Heflin
Typically man pages are under subdirectores in that dir ie
man1/man2/ So it may be ignoring the top level directory by
design.

I don't have any man "files" in that top directory, there are just
directories below it that have the actual man pages in it.

It sounds like a rpm spec file is putting in the wrong place.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:15 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
 wrote:
>
> $ rpm -qd lutris
> /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> [poc@Bree ~]$ man lutris
> No manual entry for lutris
> [poc@Bree ~]$ ls -l /usr/share/man/lutris.1
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1433 Jul 19 00:02 /usr/share/man/lutris.1
>
> I also ran 'mandb' just in case. No difference.
>
> poc
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 12/6/20 10:21 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> For example, if I am using gedit and select File > Open I will have
> to wait approximately 45 to 90 seconds before Nautilus launch so that
> I can select the file.

Hi.  I agree with the other folks; this is way too abnormal.  Do you
have a network share (CIFS/NFS etc) configured as a shortcut/bookmark in
Nautilus?  Could it be DNS resolution timing out?  I've seen such
latency issue issues when unreachable DNS servers are configured.   Of
course, if it's an app that has nothing to do with the network, like
"calculator", then it won't applyI'm not sure if what you describe
is with *every* application or not.

HTH,
Jorge
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Strange error with 'man'

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
$ rpm -qd lutris
/usr/share/man/lutris.1
[poc@Bree ~]$ man lutris
No manual entry for lutris
[poc@Bree ~]$ ls -l /usr/share/man/lutris.1
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1433 Jul 19 00:02 /usr/share/man/lutris.1

I also ran 'mandb' just in case. No difference.

poc

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 14:08 +0200, Iosif Fettich wrote:
> although this is as off-topic already as it could be, without being marked as 
> such in the subject. Go for
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_La_Mancha_(film)
> 
> See the film, if you can find it. You won't regret.

I know of at least one Cervantes authority who thinks it's not bad, but
in the end it's a film of a stage musical, so not really the same
thing.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 33 latency

2020-12-07 Thread John Mellor


On 2020-12-06 9:21 p.m., Earl Ramirez wrote:

After performing a few clean install I continue to experience poor read
. Initially I installed with BTRFS with RAID1 and after a few minutes I
started experiencing delays when I use any application and try to open
an existing file. For example, if I am using gedit and select File >
Open I will have to wait approximately 45 to 90 seconds before Nautilus
launch so that I can select the file. The same goes for any application
. I thought that it was because of BTRFS COW but that theory was out of
the window after I replaced BTRFS with XFS, the only noticeable
difference is with XFS it takes a few hours before I experience the
same behaviour with slightly shorter delays for Nautilus opens.


Something is seriously wrong with that machine!  I also use Fedora 33 
with 32G RAM but with a single Kingston SSD on BTRFS, with an old gen-2 
i7 processor as my main desktop.  Its very fast, booting in 5sec, and 
apps come up in <1/2sec.


Assuming that your logs are clean and you're not showing disk or memory 
errors or have rediculously-high CPU utilization, I would suspect the 
RAID controller is either misconfigured or broken. Is the RAID battery ok?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Iosif Fettich

Hi there,

although this is as off-topic already as it could be, without being marked as 
such in the subject. Go for


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_La_Mancha_(film)

See the film, if you can find it. You won't regret.

Best regards,

Iosif Fettich

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:


 On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 22:06 -0700, home user wrote:

 Is Don Quixote available as an English-language movie?


 Not really. There are several Spanish versions (see IMDB) but the book
 is so expansive that it's hard to imagine a successful movie
 adaptation. It would probably have to be a mini-series at least. It's
 an incredibly modern creation given that it was written 4 centuries ago
 (e.g. in the second volume the two heroes come across people who claim
 to know all about Don Quixote because they've read the first volume,
 but they're wrong). There's a recent film by Terry Gilliam, "The Man
 Who Killed Don Quixote", which is a kind of meta-story about trying to
 film it. I didn't much are for it to be honest.

 I highly recommend the Audible version if you're into that. A good
 translation and well-told.

 Anyway, this is getting really off-topic :-)

 poc
 ___
 users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Fedora Code of Conduct:
 https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
 List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 List Archives:
 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 22:06 -0700, home user wrote:
> Is Don Quixote available as an English-language movie?

Not really. There are several Spanish versions (see IMDB) but the book
is so expansive that it's hard to imagine a successful movie
adaptation. It would probably have to be a mini-series at least. It's
an incredibly modern creation given that it was written 4 centuries ago
(e.g. in the second volume the two heroes come across people who claim
to know all about Don Quixote because they've read the first volume,
but they're wrong). There's a recent film by Terry Gilliam, "The Man
Who Killed Don Quixote", which is a kind of meta-story about trying to
film it. I didn't much are for it to be honest.

I highly recommend the Audible version if you're into that. A good
translation and well-told.

Anyway, this is getting really off-topic :-)

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:43 PM Chris Murphy  wrote:

> What happens if you manually swapon? What does cat /proc/cmdline show?
>
>
Output of manual swapon:

$ swapon -v -f /fedora.swap
swapon: /fedora.swap: found signature [pagesize=4096, signature=swap]
swapon: /fedora.swap: pagesize=4096, swapsize=10737418240,
devsize=10737418240
swapon /fedora.swap

Output of 'cat /proc/cmdline':

$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.8.15-301.fc33.x86_64
root=UUID=7d9dbe1b-dea6-4141-807b-026325123ad8 ro rootflags=subvol=root
rd.luks.uuid=luks-1136a62b-955b-4391-b9a4-b48ab11a862d
resume=/dev/disk/by-uuid/7d9dbe1b-dea6-4141-807b-026325123ad8
resume_offset=14745509888


This isn't a great location for a swapfile on btrfs because you can't ever
> snapshot /. And it takes extra steps to make hibernation possible.
>

Why can't I snapshot / ?


> The more predictable arrangement is a swap partition.
>
>
How can I have an encrypted swap partition ?

I need Full Disk Encryption, even for my swap, that's why I went with one
large encrypted partition with root,home and swap all in one.


-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


f33::x11::plasma wrong colors/palette on external monitor(hdmi2dp converter)

2020-12-07 Thread Adrian Sevcenco

Hi! So, i have the situation described here:
https://superuser.com/questions/1607806/fedora-33-external-monitorhdmi2dp-adaptor-wrong-palette-colors

Is there a way to force X11 to use a color type/range on a monitor?
The hardware is a laptop with "AMD Ryzen 7 3700U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx"
I do not know even where to look, so any pointers are appreciated..

Thank you!!
Adrian
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation

2020-12-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020, 1:48 AM Sreyan Chakravarty  wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:
>


>> >
>> > [  269.976652] PM: Cannot find swap device, try swapon -a
>>
>> This is the important line.
>>
>>
> What could be causing this ? I am not even getting error messages.
>
>
>> Do you have the swap file in the fstab?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> This is my /etc/fstab:
>
> UUID=7d9dbe1b-dea6-4141-807b-026325123ad8 /   btrfs
> subvol=root,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 0 0
> UUID=0e9cf655-eaef-44d6-8b5d-3f84e7449c0e /boot   ext4
>  defaults1 2
> UUID=CACC-9508  /boot/efi   vfat
>  umask=0077,shortname=winnt 0 2
> /fedora.swap none swap defaults 0 2
>


What happens if you manually swapon? What does cat /proc/cmdline show?

This isn't a great location for a swapfile on btrfs because you can't ever
snapshot /. And it takes extra steps to make hibernation possible.

The more predictable arrangement is a swap partition.

--
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity.

2020-12-07 Thread Ed Greshko

On 07/12/2020 11:11, Tim via users wrote:

On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 15:43 -0400, George N. White III wrote:

As more systems use IPv6,  bad actors will have to collect
active IPv6 addresses.  You may be one of the first to see that
start.

I have to wonder how that's going to go.  With IPv4 most people were
behind NAT (which isn't a firewall but does get in the way of external
traffic).  IPv6 is supposed to aid us in not needing to do NAT anymore,
so more things could be directly addressable from the outside world.  A
nd understanding IPv6 addresses is more complicated.
  


On the subject of "collect active IPv6 addresses", that is rather a complicated 
issue.

Unlike IPv4 and DHCP deployment by ISPs which tend to result in the same IP 
address being
assigned to users.  I've noticed that ISPs tend to use IPv6 Stateless Address 
Autoconfiguration (rfc4862).
If you check the email headers from home_user you'd see that he has a different 
IPv6 address
on different days.

His ISP is Comcast and the IPv6 address space they have is 2001:558:6040::/48.  
That address space
has 1208925819614629174706176 addresses.  Of course the ISPs will segment this 
address space
so the address space in a user's area will be less, but not insignificant.

I happen to have contracted with my ISP for fixed IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.  The 
address space
assigned to me for IPv6 is 2001:b030:112f:::/56 or 4722366482869645213696 
addresses.
I've segmented this into 256 networks of /64 where each subnet has 
18,446,744,073,709,551,616
addresses.

---
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Samuel Sieb  wrote:

> On 12/7/20 12:13 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > Hibernation is not successful.
> >
> > This is what I get from 'dmesg':
> >
> > [  269.976652] PM: Cannot find swap device, try swapon -a
>
> This is the important line.
>
>
What could be causing this ? I am not even getting error messages.


> Do you have the swap file in the fstab?
>

Yes.

This is my /etc/fstab:

UUID=7d9dbe1b-dea6-4141-807b-026325123ad8 /   btrfs
subvol=root,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 0 0
UUID=0e9cf655-eaef-44d6-8b5d-3f84e7449c0e /boot   ext4
 defaults1 2
UUID=CACC-9508  /boot/efi   vfat
 umask=0077,shortname=winnt 0 2
/fedora.swap none swap defaults 0 2



> Is there any more info in the journal?  The dmesg shows very little of
> what is going on.
>
>
I get the same thing that I have already shared, along with a few extra
lines from 'journalctl' :

systemd-sleep[3966]: Failed to suspend system. System resumed again: No
such device
systemd[1]: systemd-hibernate.service: Main process exited, code=exited,
status=1/FAILURE
systemd[1]: systemd-hibernate.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
systemd[1]: Failed to start Hibernate.
systemd[1]: Dependency failed for Hibernate.
systemd[1]: hibernate.target: Job hibernate.target/start failed with result
'dependency'.
systemd-logind[1248]: Operation 'sleep' finished.
systemd[1]: Stopped target Sleep.



> I remember another very long thread helping you get a hibernation swap
> file working quite a while back.  Can you go over that again and see if
> there's something you've missed here?
>

That was for configuring hibernate on ext4 with LVM.

I did go through that. The only thing I missed was putting the correct
offset in the kernel cmd line. Which I have done now.

This problem is more serious as the hibernate job fails.

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: mysterious/suspicious internet activity. [solved]

2020-12-07 Thread Ed Greshko

On 07/12/2020 13:06, home user wrote:

 I'm going back to thinking of a firewall as that part of my ol' jalopy that 
separates me (in the driver's seat) from the engine compartment!  :)


Well, that is the origin of the term.


(Don Quixote)

Is Don Quixote available as an English-language movie?


I have not watched any of these.  But, you can go to https://www.imdb.com/ and 
search for
Quixote.  I would consider watching the movie with John Lithgow in the title 
role.  Only because
I've enjoyed some of Lithgow's work.  Sadly, the work by Orson Welles is 
unfinished and probably
wold have done the book justice.

---
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation

2020-12-07 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 12/7/20 12:13 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:

Hibernation is not successful.

This is what I get from 'dmesg':

[  269.976652] PM: Cannot find swap device, try swapon -a


This is the important line.


What does 'Cannot get swap writer' mean ?


It means that the previous thing failed.


This is my output from 'swapon':

$ swapon
NAME         TYPE      SIZE USED PRIO
/fedora.swap file       10G   0B   -2
/dev/zram0   partition 3.8G  27M  100


Do you have the swap file in the fstab?

Is there any more info in the journal?  The dmesg shows very little of 
what is going on.


I remember another very long thread helping you get a hibernation swap 
file working quite a while back.  Can you go over that again and see if 
there's something you've missed here?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: extensions install method in fedora 33

2020-12-07 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 12/6/20 10:32 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote:

Prior to Fedora 33 I would install gnome shell extensions from the stock
software manager. Under Categories -> Add-ons, there was an Extensions
tab, but there doesn't seem to be one anymore in F33.


Possibly that has been split out now.  Search for an application called 
"Extensions".



Is the web browser the only way to install extensions now? And why do
gnome extensions get installed via a web browser anyway?


It's not the only way, see above.  But the browser install method 
worked, so why not?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F33 BTRFS - Not enough swap space for hibernation

2020-12-07 Thread Sreyan Chakravarty
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:55 AM Samuel Sieb  wrote:

>
> So this is why you aren't noticing any improvement from zram.  You
> aren't using any swap at all at this point.  But more importantly, this
> is why hibernation isn't working.  You don't have any disk swap.  What
> happened to your swap file?
>

Alright, I am now out of ideas.

I have tried the btrfs_map_physical.c script to get the physical offset.

I now even have the 'Hibernate' option in the 'KDE Leave' menu.

BUT

When I do a hibernate either via the KDE menu or 'systemctl hibernate', the
screen goes blank for 2 seconds and comes back.

Hibernation is not successful.

This is what I get from 'dmesg':

[  269.976652] PM: Cannot find swap device, try swapon -a
[  269.976655] PM: Cannot get swap writer
[  270.069993] PM: hibernation: Basic memory bitmaps freed
[  270.069997] OOM killer enabled.
[  270.06] Restarting tasks ... done.
[  270.076223] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: examining hci_ver=06 hci_rev=000b
lmp_ver=06 lmp_subver=8723
[  270.076867] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: rom_version status=0 version=1
[  270.076870] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8723b_fw.bin
[  270.076880] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: loading rtl_bt/rtl8723b_config.bin
[  270.076945] bluetooth hci0: Direct firmware load for
rtl_bt/rtl8723b_config.bin failed with error -2
[  270.076951] Bluetooth: hci0: RTL: cfg_sz -2, total sz 22496
[  270.097216] PM: hibernation: hibernation exit

What does 'Cannot get swap writer' mean ?

This is my output from 'swapon':

$ swapon
NAME TYPE  SIZE USED PRIO
/fedora.swap file   10G   0B   -2
/dev/zram0   partition 3.8G  27M  100


Patrick said BTRFS have been set up by people here, but I could not find
any relevant threads that showed that.

So what is going wrong ?

Is this a bug ?

-- 
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org