Re: Regex version mismatch after dnf update
Apparently, there is an long term issue in the selinux policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013642 and it will hopefully be fixed soon with the next update of the selinux-policy package. Thank you for the bugzilla report. -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat -- On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 5:37 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > On 1/16/22 11:31, Grumpey wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz > > wrote: > >> Did a dnf update this morning before updating my bios and installing > >> more memory (more on that in a separate missive) > ... > > >> > >> 2022-01-16T10:41:04-0500 INFO Regex version mismatch, expected: 10.39 > >> 2021-10-29 actual: 10.37 2021-05-26 > >> Regex version mismatch, expected: 10.39 2021-10-29 actual: 10.37 2021-05-26 > >> Regex version mismatch, expected: 10.39 2021-10-29 actual: 10.37 2021-05-26 > >> > >> > >> What should I do about this? > >> > >> thanks > > Bug Report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013642 > > > > sudo semodule -nB > > > > resolved it for me. > > Works for me. Thanks will have to look at this bug. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
kdevelop:: pycodestyle not found
Hi! I have a weird problem with kdevelop: after upgrade to f35 kdevelop no longer finds pycodestyle.. in the terminal output i get: kdevelop.plugins.python.parser: Discarding parts of the code to be parsed because of previous errors IndentationError: unexpected indent (, line 108) Parsing FAILED python code checker error: "The `pycodestyle` (previously `pep8`) module is not installed." but i have both: root@hal: ~ # rpm -qa | grep pycodestyle python3-pycodestyle-2.7.0-2.fc35.noarch and user side installation: pip3 freeze | grep pycodestyle pycodestyle==2.8.0 Does anyone have any idea what is going on? or encountered this? Thank you! Adrian smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Anyone running F11 on a Dell mini ? (Or another mini ?)
I thought GEEKOM mini PCs were higher-end equipment than Dell's. https://www.geekompc.com ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 08:42 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > The default configuration rather follows the opposite principle. The > hostname should be well defined and independent of changing IP > addresses. I sort-of go along with that. If you've set a hostname, there's sense in it not getting changed. On the other hand, if you use a DHCP server to centrally manage the allocation of addresses, you might also want it (or your DNS server) to control hostnames. I do. Some devices on my network obey naming instructions from the DHCP &/or DNS servers, others ignore it. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.49.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 30 15:51:32 UTC 2021 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 23:25 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> As a dirty hack, I created a file /etc/profile.d/hostname.sh:
> MYIP=`hostname -I`
> MYHOSTNAME=`host $MYIP | awk '{ print $NF }' | sed "s/\.$//"`
> echo $MYHOSTNAME > /etc/hostname
> hostnamectl hostname $MYHOSTNAME
> That sets the hostname correctly but it's a dirty hack in that it
> requires someone to actually log in to run the trigger the profile.d
> stuff. I am trying to find where in the dhclient stuff I should work
> to have the hostname set correctly from dhcp/dns resolution. It's
> frustrating that with F34 and F35, the systemd-hostnamed.service is
> supposed to do this but I'm not seeing where to make it do what I
> want it to. I've played with the
> /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf file setting the hostname-
> mode=default in [main] but it's not working.
Any useful clues from these pages:
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/how-to-set-the-hostname-assigned-by-dhcp-server/35569/2
https://www.linuxsecrets.com/1675-configure-linux-to-broadcast-dhcp-client-hostname-in-linux
https://askubuntu.com/questions/104918/how-to-get-the-hostname-from-a-dhcp-server
https://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+dhcp+client+accepting+hostname+from+server
What we've been discussing is something I've often meant to get around
to doing, myself. But I just persevere with manually adjusting a few
things, here. I only have a small network, so it hasn't bugged me
sufficiently, yet. And my brain is going on strike, at the moment
(migraine brain fog). But the first link I supplied suggested simply
delete /etc/hostname
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.49.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 30 15:51:32 UTC 2021 x86_64
Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted.
I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
gnome-shell-extension-window-list
Hi all, Sice a couple of days, the Gnome Shell Extension "Window List" seems broken; the icons are missing. Switching the extension off and on will make icons appear again. However, after opening a new application, the (new) icons is missing. On https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions someone is facing exactly the same problem. Is someone aware of this problem? Workaround available? I cannot find a Bugzilla on this, so I will create one... Winfried ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: gnome-shell-extension-window-list
And just created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041448 Hi all, Sice a couple of days, the Gnome Shell Extension "Window List" seems broken; the icons are missing. Switching the extension off and on will make icons appear again. However, after opening a new application, the (new) icons is missing. On https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions someone is facing exactly the same problem. Is someone aware of this problem? Workaround available? I cannot find a Bugzilla on this, so I will create one... Winfried ___ users mailing list --users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email tousers-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 - zram on auto install?
On 1/16/22 15:03, John Mellor wrote: On 2022-01-16 11:53 a.m., Grumpey wrote: Um, I did not know I set up zram? How did that happen. Is zram now part of the basic Fedora install? It has been a while my using zram. How do I disable it for now? With 16GB real memory and 16GB real swap partition, I want to see how things are working... thanks https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM Immediately: sudo systemctl stop swap-create@zram0 Permanently: sudo touch /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf or sudo dnf remove zram-generator-defaults Asking the interesting question: Why would you want to ever do this? RAM is ~10x faster than SSD and 100x faster than spinning disk. Unless your system is so ancient and CPU-constrained that you are unable to afford the relatively low compression costs, making use of all available RAM at all times seems like a better move than stopping ZRAM swap. For what it is worth Prior to my memory upgrade, when I had only 8GB memory and Firefox just growing, I was seeing the following: $ free total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 7380668 6930852 262676 1492 187140 221144 Swap: 24157176 12044096 12113080 I did not know then about zram being the default, so I don't know how much of that 12GB swap was zram and how much was SSD. But I can tell you that my system regularly 'hesitated' when I switched tasks. I had real wait time before I could do something. And at times I would be typing and the system did not respond. I had to wait a couple seconds before the screen was updated with whatever I was typing. Now this is on a Lenovo x140e with an SSD drive, using Xfce; granted an older platform but quad-core. Since the memory upgrade, there has been none of this hesitation. And I am right now seeing: free total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 15625916 10489292 598484 183664 4538140 4617552 Swap: 25165816 512 25165304 zramctl NAME ALGORITHM DISKSIZE DATA COMPR TOTAL STREAMS MOUNTPOINT /dev/zram0 lzo-rle 8G 496K 122.1K 380K 4 [SWAP] this is after being running only 21hr. We will see how the system is doing in a few days, but swap was killing me. Was it real SSD r/w or zram compression? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Making dnf install ssh:// work
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 04:57:34PM +, Michael Young wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > ># dnf install ssh://foo/tmp/bar.rpm > >Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:41 ago on Sun 16 Jan 2022 09:21:19 GMT. > >[MIRROR] bar.rpm: Curl error (1): Unsupported protocol for > >ssh://foo/tmp/bar.rpm [Protocol "ssh" not supported or disabled in libcurl] > > Have you tried sftp://foo/tmp/bar.rpm ? curl at least seems to > recognise the protocol. Oh indeed that works! Which is weird because sftp isn't in the list at all :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ssd keeps dying??
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 6:11 PM George N. White III wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 16:32, Neal Becker wrote: >> >> Well I guess I can try reseating it, good idea. >> Unfortunately this server is remote from me, so might as well collect ideas >> before driving over. > > > Have you seen: Fix your dead SSD with the power cycle method - The Silicon > Underground (dfarq.homeip.net > > I wonder if some workloads designed for rotating disks end up rewriting the > same storage > location resulting in early death of SSD's The ssd firmware plays games to make wear leveling work. Because of that it is very unlikely that 2 blocks written to the same "block" at the fs level are going to be written to the same block on the ssd. Make sure the SSD has some cache memory, I bought (and since returned) a crucial ssd that did not have ram/cache. I killed 2 of the (orig and replacement) in under 2 weeks, before I returned it. I killed them such that they would no longer even answer on the sata bus. However the firmware for these works, they seem to be a lot less reliable. And there are a lot of similar reviews that under some set of conditions these devices are unreliable.Whatever algorithm choices that a few dollars cheaper/no cache ram causes seems to be a problem. I have also been known to carefully and lightly use a pencil eraser on the contacts to clean off anything that could cause it to not have a good contact, and then wipe it with alcohol. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
Peter Boy writes: Usually you set the static hostname once using "hostnamectl set-hostname “. „fedora“ is the transient hostname. DHCP client uses the static hostname to request an IP. But maybe I didn't get what exactly you want to do. dhcpd's configuration file uses MAC addresses to assign reserved IP addresses to specific DHCP clients. It doesn't matter what hostname the client sends. I suppose that the DHCP server might keep track of hostnames and for MAC addresses that don't have fixed IP addresses it might use the client's hostname to keep leasing out the same IP address, if possible. But the same can be done with MAC address entirely, instead of hostnames, too. pgpgXnXayua_B.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
> Am 17.01.2022 um 16:22 schrieb Sam Varshavchik : > > Peter Boy writes: > >> Usually you set the static hostname once using "hostnamectl set-hostname >> “. „fedora“ is the transient hostname. DHCP client uses the static >> hostname to request an IP. >> >> But maybe I didn't get what exactly you want to do. > > dhcpd's configuration file uses MAC addresses to assign reserved IP addresses > to specific DHCP clients. It doesn't matter what hostname the client sends. Yes, my wording was way too short. It uses the static hostname to enter the IP generated for the MAC address along with the hostname into the DNS part (in dnsmasq, which is used in Fedora KVM/libwirt) that is used to retrieve the hostname. But Thomas uses a static host table, so the DNS delivered hostname is independent from any MAC address and any transient or static hostname of the client. > I suppose that the DHCP server might keep track of hostnames and for MAC > addresses that don't have fixed IP addresses it might use the client's > hostname to keep leasing out the same IP address, if possible. But the same > can be done with MAC address entirely, instead of hostnames, too. At least dnsmasq does not, but relies on the MAC address alone. Peter ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Machine won't finish booting after update
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 21:07:29 -0500 Fulko Hew wrote: > I decided to log out and log back in to my X11 based KDE session just > now, and I saw that 'Discover' was telling me I had updates available. > So I said 'go ahead'. > Eventually, it said I needed to reboot, so I did. > After 4 (or 5) reboots that the machine drove itself through, > the last reboot failed to start up to a GUI session. Suspicious that this is not deterministic. It should either fail identically every time or restart every time (in my opinion). > As a matter of fact, it dropped me down and told me it needed to > enter an emergency boot > and asked for my root password. > The message also told me to look at 'journalctl -xb' > After a few thousand lines of info, I saw nothing of significance > other than it hadn't finished. You could try journalctl -rxb so that the last messages are presented first. It is likely that that is where the error will be. > The other suggestion was 'systemctl default'. > That resulted in the following: > > Failed to mount /boot/efi > Dependency failed for Local File System > Dependency failed for Mark the need to relabel after reboot > Failed to mount RPC File System > Dependency failed for rpc-pipefs.target > Dependency failed for RPC security service for NFS client and server > Failed to start Load Kernel Modules > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > Failed to start Set Up Additional Binary Formats > > ... and then nothing. I had to cold start It seems like a hardware error to me from the symptoms. How can the kernel not mount /boot/efi unless the drive has either power issues or seek errors / bad sectors. This is really basic. > and that brings me back to the same issues. > Trying to reboot a previous kernel doesn't even result in any boot > messages. > > I now have a 'non-working' machine. > Suggestions are welcome (and needed)! Long shots. It might be software, but it could be just a coincidence that it chose this time for a hardware error to expose itself. Do you have a list of what was updated? It would be good to see if there are any updates that might have caused this to happen via software. I'm not sure what would stop /boot/efi from being mounted. Did you power down completely at any point? That will allow components to lose any retained state. You could, while completely powered down, try reseating internal components, especially drive connectors. If you can reach the BIOS menu, look at the power supply numbers. Are they at or near spec? Can you boot a livecd / usb so you can do checks of the drives to see if they are still functioning properly, maybe a smartctl (smartctl -a /dev/[drive designation])? If a live image boots and runs, it will indicate that your memory is (probably) not the issue as well. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
Peter Boy writes: > Am 17.01.2022 um 16:22 schrieb Sam Varshavchik : > > Peter Boy writes: > >> Usually you set the static hostname once using "hostnamectl set-hostname “. „fedora“ is the transient hostname. DHCP client uses the static hostname to request an IP. >> >> But maybe I didn't get what exactly you want to do. > > dhcpd's configuration file uses MAC addresses to assign reserved IP addresses to specific DHCP clients. It doesn't matter what hostname the client sends. Yes, my wording was way too short. It uses the static hostname to enter the IP generated for the MAC address along with the hostname into the DNS part (in dnsmasq, which is used in Fedora KVM/libwirt) that is used to retrieve the hostname. Ok, so this is basically trusted DDNS stacked on top of DHCP. But Thomas uses a static host table, so the DNS delivered hostname is independent from any MAC address and any transient or static hostname of the client. It should be possible to hack up a script that gets run when an IP address is assigned that does a reverse IP lookup and sets the hostname. However that should be done in a manner that does not permanently save the hostname so that it gets reverted to a static stub name on the next reboot. pgp8y8nbhsECP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: How to get Fedora 35 to use DNS name as hostname?
On 1/17/22 11:27, Tim via users wrote: > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 08:42 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: >> The default configuration rather follows the opposite principle. The >> hostname should be well defined and independent of changing IP >> addresses. > I sort-of go along with that. If you've set a hostname, there's sense > in it not getting changed. On the other hand, if you use a DHCP server > to centrally manage the allocation of addresses, you might also want it > (or your DNS server) to control hostnames. I do. Some devices on my > network obey naming instructions from the DHCP &/or DNS servers, others > ignore it. > I think it might make more sense to correctly detect hostname during installation. If you define hostname on installation from network, it should be kept. I expect it should keep the same hostname during reboots. I think only diskless terminals may want always obtaining hostname on every boot. Anything storing state on local disk should want to keep its name. I think more tight integration with libvirt names would be useful. I admit I know little of that. I usually define name AFTER installation for my VMs, which would not work with what I propose. I would like easy way to set hostname from libvirt during installation. I don't need always fixed IP, but I want fixed DNS name for given VM. I expect that is common requirement. dnsmasq from libvirt would provide hostname to machine in case it has static lease for given DUID/hwaddr. Is there tool to create static lease from machine name on VM creation? For example libvirt can detect name of distribution from ISO image. It would be nice if it could propagate it forward. I am afraid I did not help much. Regards, Petr -- Petr Menšík Software Engineer Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ email: pemen...@redhat.com PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 - zram on auto install?
On 1/16/22 15:03, John Mellor wrote: On 2022-01-16 11:53 a.m., Grumpey wrote: Um, I did not know I set up zram? How did that happen. Is zram now part of the basic Fedora install? It has been a while my using zram. How do I disable it for now? With 16GB real memory and 16GB real swap partition, I want to see how things are working... thanks https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM Immediately: sudo systemctl stop swap-create@zram0 Permanently: sudo touch /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf or sudo dnf remove zram-generator-defaults Asking the interesting question: Why would you want to ever do this? RAM is ~10x faster than SSD and 100x faster than spinning disk. Unless your system is so ancient and CPU-constrained that you are unable to afford the relatively low compression costs, making use of all available RAM at all times seems like a better move than stopping ZRAM swap. For what it is worth Prior to my memory upgrade, when I had only 8GB memory and Firefox just growing, I was seeing the following: $ free total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 7380668 6930852 262676 1492 187140 221144 Swap: 24157176 12044096 12113080 I did not know then about zram being the default, so I don't know how much of that 12GB swap was zram and how much was SSD. But I can tell you that my system regularly 'hesitated' when I switched tasks. I had real wait time before I could do something. And at times I would be typing and the system did not respond. I had to wait a couple seconds before the screen was updated with whatever I was typing. Now this is on a Lenovo x140e with an SSD drive, using Xfce; granted an older platform but quad-core. Since the memory upgrade, there has been none of this hesitation. And I am right now seeing: free total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 15625916 10489292 598484 183664 4538140 4617552 Swap: 25165816 512 25165304 zramctl NAME ALGORITHM DISKSIZE DATA COMPR TOTAL STREAMS MOUNTPOINT /dev/zram0 lzo-rle 8G 496K 122.1K 380K 4 [SWAP] this is after being running only 21hr. We will see how the system is doing in a few days, but swap was killing me. Was it real SSD r/w or zram compression? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
fttconv2
Hello, I get the following error: error: feval: function 'fftconv2' not found octave-image provide fftconv2.m can I use it? If yes, How? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Machine won't finish booting after update
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:00 PM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 21:07:29 -0500 > Fulko Hew wrote: > > > I decided to log out and log back in to my X11 based KDE session just > > now, and I saw that 'Discover' was telling me I had updates available. > > So I said 'go ahead'. > > Eventually, it said I needed to reboot, so I did. > > After 4 (or 5) reboots that the machine drove itself through, > > the last reboot failed to start up to a GUI session. > > Suspicious that this is not deterministic. It should either fail > identically every time or restart every time (in my opinion). > I don't think you understand what I was saying. The update process that 'Discover' performed was 'strange' to me. For the last 20 years, I've used rpm, yum and dnf to download and install updates, and if I wanted... I'd reboot to use any new kernel that may have been updated. This time I chose to use 'Discover', because (for a change) it actually told me there was new stuff. (I'm getting the feeling that 'discover' only runs at login time. Something I do only once every few months. ie. at every power failure.) So after 'discover' downloaded and (apparently) updated everything, it asked me to reboot. So I used discover's reboot button to proceed. During the first reboot cycle I watched the boot messages go by, and I saw words to the effect that it was doing some post reboot additional updates. It finished them and then said it was rebooting. On that next boot, I watched again, while it talked about other updates it needed to do, and... and another reboot. After the n'th reboot, I no longer saw any 'installing' activity, and it went all the way through and then ... nothing. No more boot messages, and no GUI either. So I DID do a cold reboot and then it went through the standard boot messages until those errors I mentioned and it dropped me into that emergency boot prompt. > As a matter of fact, it dropped me down and told me it needed to > > enter an emergency boot > > and asked for my root password. > > The message also told me to look at 'journalctl -xb' > > After a few thousand lines of info, I saw nothing of significance > > other than it hadn't finished. > > You could try > journalctl -rxb > so that the last messages are presented first. It is likely that that > is where the error will be. > journalctl -xb gave me those error messages I provided. So yes, the first error was that it couldn't mount /boot/efi. > The other suggestion was 'systemctl default'. > > That resulted in the following: > > > > Failed to mount /boot/efi > > Dependency failed for Local File System > > Dependency failed for Mark the need to relabel after reboot > > Failed to mount RPC File System > > Dependency failed for rpc-pipefs.target > > Dependency failed for RPC security service for NFS client and server > > Failed to start Load Kernel Modules > > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > > Failed to mount Arbitrary Executable File Formats File System > > Failed to start Set Up Additional Binary Formats > > > > ... and then nothing. I had to cold start > > It seems like a hardware error to me from the symptoms. How can the > kernel not mount /boot/efi unless the drive has either power issues or > seek errors / bad sectors. This is really basic. > I read other postings that people have had issues with missing VFAT support in their kernel, that's needed to mount that filesystem. > and that brings me back to the same issues. > > Trying to reboot a previous kernel doesn't even result in any boot > > messages. > > > > I now have a 'non-working' machine. > > Suggestions are welcome (and needed)! > > Long shots. > > It might be software, but it could be just a coincidence that it chose > this time for a hardware error to expose itself. > > Do you have a list of what was updated? It would be good to see if > there are any updates that might have caused this to happen via > software. I'm not sure what would stop /boot/efi from being mounted. > Sadly I don't have that list. There were about 60 components including the kernel that were updated. Did you power down completely at any point? That will allow components > to lose any retained state. > > You could, while completely powered down, try reseating internal > components, especially drive connectors. > > If you can reach the BIOS menu, look at the power supply numbers. Are > they at or near spec? > > Can you boot a livecd / usb so you can do checks of the drives to see > if they are still functioning properly, maybe a smartctl (smartctl -a > /dev/[drive designation])? If a live image boots and runs, it will > indicate that your memory is (probably) not the issue as well. > After a lot of experimentation, I did get
Re: kdevelop:: pycodestyle not found
On 1/17/22 01:55, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: but i have both: root@hal: ~ # rpm -qa | grep pycodestyle python3-pycodestyle-2.7.0-2.fc35.noarch and user side installation: pip3 freeze | grep pycodestyle pycodestyle==2.8.0 That's certainly a big potential for trouble. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Machine won't finish booting after update
On 1/17/22 11:59 AM, stan via users wrote: Suspicious that this is not deterministic. It should either fail identically every time or restart every time (in my opinion). If it's really nnondeterministic, it's what's called a mandelbug. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Machine won't finish booting after update
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:06 PM Joe Zeff wrote: > On 1/17/22 11:59 AM, stan via users wrote: > > Suspicious that this is not deterministic. It should either fail > > identically every time or restart every time (in my opinion). > > If it's really nnondeterministic, it's what's called a mandelbug. > When booting the new kernel, it fails the same way every time. Very deterministic. mount: /boot/efi: unknown filesystem type 'vfat'. What I don't remember is what this multi-stage install-reboot was trying to accomplish. Looking back in messages or journalctl, I don't see anything. But it was doing something explicitly. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Machine won't finish booting after update
On 1/17/22 6:31 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: What I don't remember is what this multi-stage install-reboot was trying to accomplish. Looking back in messages or journalctl, I don't see anything. But it was doing something explicitly. If you were installing something, try dnf history. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
