Re: Num Lock
On Sat, 2022-07-09 at 12:13 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: > I did this so long ago I forgot something kool. The numlock is > remapped to "=". In all the years I've been using PCs, I've never wanted the number pad to be anything other than a numberpad. I see no reason to duplicate the cursor keys right next to it. The only use I've ever found for the numlock key was to test if the keyboard was working (the light goes on and off as expected). -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.71.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 15:37:28 UTC 2022 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: gnome: display of battery charge as a percent
On 2022-07-07 09:12, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: On a notebook, gnome displays the state of the battery at the right end of the top bar of the screen. I find that a percentage of full charge is a clearer way to present this data. It used to be an option in the gnome Tweaks tool, under "top bar". This seems to be gone in Fedora 36. You can get use this shell command: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface show-battery-percentage true This seems like useful functionality. - why not make it the default? - why remove it from tweaks? - why make it so hard to discover? They actually made it *easier*. It's not in tweaks because it's in the power settings of the control center. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
On 7/9/22 04:02, Patrick Dupre wrote: I jumped form fc32 to fc34, and to fc36 rpm -qa kernel kernel-5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 kernel-5.17.12-100.fc34.x86_64 Hi Patrick, When you boot, just as the OS is about to start and grub asks you what kernel to run, press your down arrow key to stop the count down and write us back what the default kernel grub wanted to run is. -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
upgrade failed
Hello, On a multiboot machine, 1) on machine a) the upgrade to fc36 works, except the uname remains incorrect 2) on machine b), I made (also from fc34 to fc36) dnf upgrade --refresh dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=36 --allowerasing Every things seems OK dnf system-upgrade reboot The upgrade starts List of upgrade to do test check It says that it is going to take a while But the upgrade ends by a reboot, without upgrade. no packages fc36 installed. dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=36 --allowerasing provided: No match for group package "reiserfs-utils" No match for group package "qgnomeplatform" No match for group package "xorg-x11-drv-armsoc" .. pgrading Groups: Anaconda tools base-x Container Management Firefox Web Browser Guest Desktop Agents LibreOffice Common NetworkManager Submodules Printing Support Fedora Workstation product core x86 Baremetal Tools GNOME Desktop Environment Multimedia Core Fonts Hardware Support Transaction Summary Install 343 Packages Upgrade6734 Packages Remove 35 Packages Downgrade 3 Packages Total size: 7.6 G DNF will only download packages, install gpg keys, and check the transaction. Is this ok [y/N]: y ... Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Complete! Transaction saved to /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/system-upgrade-transaction.json. Download complete! Use 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' to start the upgrade. To remove cached metadata and transaction use 'dnf system-upgrade clean' The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Do I need to remove/downgrade the packages manually? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Num Lock
On 7/9/22 11:58, Mike Wright wrote: On 7/9/22 07:21, c. marlow wrote: Fedora 36 XFCE 4.16 Dell Optiplex 980 I am needing to know how do I get my numlock to automatically turn on when X loads and the log in screen comes up? I have Numlockx installed, but the numlock does not come on after x loads. I had it set in the DELL bios for numlock to be on at boot, but after X loads, when you go to hit a number on the 10 key all you hear is an internal beep from the computer. I have to toggle the numlock off and back on then punch the numbers in for my password. Have it set this way was fine for all the other DE's i've used... MATE and Gnome... But not for XFCE for some reason. I have never needed the cursoring functions on the 10-key so I created a file I load at boot that sets the numlock and replaces the cursor stuff with 0-9. .kbrc #!/bin/bash xmodmap -e "keycode 77 = KP_Equal KP_Equal KP_Equal" xmodmap -e "keycode 90 = KP_0 KP_0 KP_0" xmodmap -e "keycode 87 = KP_1 KP_1 KP_1" xmodmap -e "keycode 88 = KP_2 KP_2 KP_2" xmodmap -e "keycode 89 = KP_3 KP_3 KP_3" xmodmap -e "keycode 83 = KP_4 KP_4 KP_4" xmodmap -e "keycode 84 = KP_5 KP_5 KP_5" xmodmap -e "keycode 85 = KP_6 KP_6 KP_6" xmodmap -e "keycode 79 = KP_7 KP_7 KP_7" xmodmap -e "keycode 80 = KP_8 KP_8 KP_8" xmodmap -e "keycode 81 = KP_9 KP_9 KP_9" xmodmap -e "keycode 91 = KP_Decimal KP_Decimal KP_Decimal" and at the end of .bashrc #--# # replace cursor pad w/ 10key [ -f ~/.kbrc ] && . ~/.kbrc I did this so long ago I forgot something kool. The numlock is remapped to "=". If you don't want the = sign comment out the first xmodmap line. :m ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Num Lock
On 7/9/22 07:21, c. marlow wrote: Fedora 36 XFCE 4.16 Dell Optiplex 980 I am needing to know how do I get my numlock to automatically turn on when X loads and the log in screen comes up? I have Numlockx installed, but the numlock does not come on after x loads. I had it set in the DELL bios for numlock to be on at boot, but after X loads, when you go to hit a number on the 10 key all you hear is an internal beep from the computer. I have to toggle the numlock off and back on then punch the numbers in for my password. Have it set this way was fine for all the other DE's i've used... MATE and Gnome... But not for XFCE for some reason. I have never needed the cursoring functions on the 10-key so I created a file I load at boot that sets the numlock and replaces the cursor stuff with 0-9. .kbrc #!/bin/bash xmodmap -e "keycode 77 = KP_Equal KP_Equal KP_Equal" xmodmap -e "keycode 90 = KP_0 KP_0 KP_0" xmodmap -e "keycode 87 = KP_1 KP_1 KP_1" xmodmap -e "keycode 88 = KP_2 KP_2 KP_2" xmodmap -e "keycode 89 = KP_3 KP_3 KP_3" xmodmap -e "keycode 83 = KP_4 KP_4 KP_4" xmodmap -e "keycode 84 = KP_5 KP_5 KP_5" xmodmap -e "keycode 85 = KP_6 KP_6 KP_6" xmodmap -e "keycode 79 = KP_7 KP_7 KP_7" xmodmap -e "keycode 80 = KP_8 KP_8 KP_8" xmodmap -e "keycode 81 = KP_9 KP_9 KP_9" xmodmap -e "keycode 91 = KP_Decimal KP_Decimal KP_Decimal" and at the end of .bashrc #--# # replace cursor pad w/ 10key [ -f ~/.kbrc ] && . ~/.kbrc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Num Lock
On 7/9/22 08:21, c. marlow wrote: Have it set this way was fine for all the other DE's i've used... MATE and Gnome... But not for XFCE for some reason. Have you asked at the Xfce forum at http://forum.xfce.org/index.php yet? I've always found them very helpful. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Num Lock
Fedora 36 XFCE 4.16 Dell Optiplex 980 I am needing to know how do I get my numlock to automatically turn on when X loads and the log in screen comes up? I have Numlockx installed, but the numlock does not come on after x loads. I had it set in the DELL bios for numlock to be on at boot, but after X loads, when you go to hit a number on the 10 key all you hear is an internal beep from the computer. I have to toggle the numlock off and back on then punch the numbers in for my password. Have it set this way was fine for all the other DE's i've used... MATE and Gnome... But not for XFCE for some reason. -- === Thanks, Chris Please send all off list messages to: ch...@cwm030.com ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[ Solved ] Re: Fedora 36 XFCE
So I just want to reply back and let you know I found a solution to my problem Added a line to the " Session and start up > Application Auto start tab" setxkbmap -option ctrl:nocaps Run at: Log In viola... No more caps lock turning on by itself. -- === Thanks, Chris Please send all off list messages to: ch...@cwm030.com ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
On 7/9/22 09:10, Patrick Dupre wrote: Subject: Re: uname -a On Jul 9, 2022, at 08:23, Patrick Dupre wrote: Yes,it is a multiboot df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on devtmpfs 39632040 3963204 0% /dev tmpfs40079960 4007996 0% /dev/shm tmpfs400799610008 3997988 1% /run /dev/sdc3 23129256 13244128 8687172 61% / tmpfs4007996 48 4007948 1% /tmp /dev/sdc2 435228 258272149974 64% /boot tmpfs 801596 64801532 1% /run/user/1000 Is the issue with /dev/sdc2 ? I suspect that your mounted /boot partition has the kernels you are installing, but the kernel you are booting are on another partition that isn’t mounted. Since this isn’t UEFI, you will want to check where the bootloader is coming from, it might be one of the other OSs, which have a different grub.cfg. I guess that you are correct. Can I fix it? Check the /boot entry in /etc/fstab for the correct partition ID (label, uuid as used). Check the *.conf entries in /boot/loader/entries for the partition ID's. Save /etc/grub2.cfg to a .bak and rerun "grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" compare the new one with the old. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Wifi not Started at Boot and Networkmanager Wifi Last Used Stats Wrong
On 6/7/22 09:23, Roger Heflin wrote: Error -110 is timeout, meaning the device did not respond to the commands. It usually means the hardware in question is in a bad/locked up state so the kernel is unable to init it. If the issue is after a suspend/resume then try below: Other notes indicate this: Please create the file /etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi.conf with content options iwlwifi remove_when_gone=1 as some of these issues are suspend/resume issues where it does not get init'ed right on resume. In my case its not as suspend/resume process. I get this issue on a cold start of the machine where I boot into directly into Fedora/Ubuntu and the wifi device is not activated. If I boot into Windows and run Windows for a while then warm boot from Windows into Fedora the wifi device is available and wifi activates. What I've seen on the net is someone else raising the same issues with Fedora 34 and the same wifi device, but the support people the person was reporting the issue to said they couldn't help him because at the time Fedora 34 was out of life. I'll try the iwlwifi.conf method and see if it makes any difference. regards, Steve On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 5:39 PM Stephen Morris wrote: On 4/7/22 22:42, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 18:15 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: The package must have been updated as when I looked yesterday it didn't supply any of those files, unless I looked at the file list from the wrong package dnf history See what got updated when. Thanks Tim, I'll check that out. I've booted directly into Fedora this morning and the wifi is not working again, its back to the situation of getting probe error -110 without ever trying to load the adapter's firmware. I've seen another thread on the net where someone else was raising an issue with the same wifi adapter with Fedora 34, where that person was saying it seemed to work if he booted into Windows first, and it's now looking like I'm getting the same issue. I'm assuming this is a kernel issue, so what is the linux kernel not doing that windows does do to activate the hardware (its not an issue specific to Fedora as I get the same lack of wifi issue under Ubuntu as well)? regards, Steve ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
> I jumped form fc32 to fc34, and to fc36 You may also want to have a look at, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071034 -Joe ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
> Subject: Re: uname -a > > On Jul 9, 2022, at 08:23, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > > Yes,it is a multiboot > > > > df > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > devtmpfs 39632040 3963204 0% /dev > > tmpfs40079960 4007996 0% /dev/shm > > tmpfs400799610008 3997988 1% /run > > /dev/sdc3 23129256 13244128 8687172 61% / > > tmpfs4007996 48 4007948 1% /tmp > > /dev/sdc2 435228 258272149974 64% /boot > > tmpfs 801596 64801532 1% /run/user/1000 > > > > Is the issue with /dev/sdc2 ? > > I suspect that your mounted /boot partition has the kernels you are > installing, but the kernel you are booting are on another partition that > isn’t mounted. Since this isn’t UEFI, you will want to check where the > bootloader is coming from, it might be one of the other OSs, which have a > different grub.cfg. I guess that you are correct. Can I fix it? > > -- > Jonathan Billings > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
On Jul 9, 2022, at 08:23, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Yes,it is a multiboot > > df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > devtmpfs 39632040 3963204 0% /dev > tmpfs40079960 4007996 0% /dev/shm > tmpfs400799610008 3997988 1% /run > /dev/sdc3 23129256 13244128 8687172 61% / > tmpfs4007996 48 4007948 1% /tmp > /dev/sdc2 435228 258272149974 64% /boot > tmpfs 801596 64801532 1% /run/user/1000 > > Is the issue with /dev/sdc2 ? I suspect that your mounted /boot partition has the kernels you are installing, but the kernel you are booting are on another partition that isn’t mounted. Since this isn’t UEFI, you will want to check where the bootloader is coming from, it might be one of the other OSs, which have a different grub.cfg. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Searching a good code editor /a ~IDE~ for bash scripting
Hi. On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 12:20:44 - "old sixpack13" wrote: > I'm searching for an good editor or an IDE, best with spell/code checker and > such, for bash scripting. For me: emacs. -- francis ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
> > > > Hello, > > > > I get > > > > > > Linux Teucidide 5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 29 15:15:52 UTC 2020 > > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > while it is a machine > > kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 > > I suspect you’ve got an extra /boot partition or directory someplace that > GRUB2 is booting from, instead of the kernels owned by the current OS. Yes,it is a multiboot df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on devtmpfs 39632040 3963204 0% /dev tmpfs40079960 4007996 0% /dev/shm tmpfs400799610008 3997988 1% /run /dev/sdc3 23129256 13244128 8687172 61% / tmpfs4007996 48 4007948 1% /tmp /dev/sdc2 435228 258272149974 64% /boot tmpfs 801596 64801532 1% /run/user/1000 Is the issue with /dev/sdc2 ? > > -- > Jonathan Billings > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Searching a good code editor /a ~IDE~ for bash scripting
hallo I'm searching for an good editor or an IDE, best with spell/code checker and such, for bash scripting. currently using Gnome and geany. open source is a must ! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
On Jul 9, 2022, at 06:31, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > I get > > > Linux Teucidide 5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 29 15:15:52 UTC 2020 > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > while it is a machine > kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 I suspect you’ve got an extra /boot partition or directory someplace that GRUB2 is booting from, instead of the kernels owned by the current OS. -- Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
> Subject: Re: uname -a > > On 7/9/22 03:30, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I get > > > > > > Linux Teucidide 5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 29 15:15:52 UTC 2020 > > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > while it is a machine > > kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 > > Hi Patrick, > > It is normal to have more than one kernel installed. > uname is giving you the one you are currently running. > > $ rpm -qa kernel > kernel-5.17.11-200.fc35.x86_64 > kernel-5.18.8-100.fc35.x86_64 > kernel-5.18.7-200.fc36.x86_64 > > It is a bit odd that you have a fc32 one. Did > you jump from fx32 to fc36? > I jumped form fc32 to fc34, and to fc36 rpm -qa kernel kernel-5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 kernel-5.17.12-100.fc34.x86_64 kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 > -T > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: uname -a
On 7/9/22 03:30, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I get Linux Teucidide 5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 29 15:15:52 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux while it is a machine kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 Hi Patrick, It is normal to have more than one kernel installed. uname is giving you the one you are currently running. $ rpm -qa kernel kernel-5.17.11-200.fc35.x86_64 kernel-5.18.8-100.fc35.x86_64 kernel-5.18.7-200.fc36.x86_64 It is a bit odd that you have a fc32 one. Did you jump from fx32 to fc36? -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
uname -a
Hello, I get Linux Teucidide 5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 29 15:15:52 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux while it is a machine kernel-5.18.10-200.fc36.x86_64 === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Network boot fails in dracut-initqueue due to nm-online wrongly pretend that the network is connected
> On 9 Jul 2022, at 06:49, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > > > Hi. > > On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 17:16:00 +0100 Barry wrote: > >>> I wonder if there is a single case where nm-online is useful :-( > >> Yes there are use cases where this is needed. >> Some times network is need to complete boot in I tire before switching the >> the main disk. > > Of course, but to be clearer: doing that with nm-online does NOT work. > > In my case (network boot), nm-online terminates BEFORE the default gateway > is reachable. The network-online.target which nm-online is before only says that the interface has a configured ip address. It does not test connectivity. Having said that I am very surprised that the gateway is not reachable. At least in small networks the gateway is the same host that is the dhcp server and thus will be reachable. What you are doing with waiting until you can access the remote host seems like the required solution. Barry > As a consequence downloading the install image > (Server/x86_64/os//images/install.img) fails. > > My workaround is to replace nm-online by a loop waiting for the gateway to be > reachable. > > Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1894842 > > -- > francis > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
