Samba AD - KDC listening only on IPv6 localhost [::1]:464

2024-05-11 Thread pavel . lisy
Hello

I want to configure Samba AD on Fedora 39. 

I have 2 DC replicating correctly. When I try to connect another
computer as samba member with:

sudo realm join OFFICE.COMPANY.COM

it fails with this error

* Trying to set computer password with Kerberos
kvě 03 14:15:14 smbmem41.office.company.com realmd[315828]:  ! Couldn't set 
password for computer account: SMBMEM41$: Cannot contact any KDC for requested 
realm
kvě 03 14:15:14 smbmem41.office.company.com realmd[315828]: adcli: joining 
domain office.company.com failed: Couldn't set password for computer account: 
SMBMEM41$: Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm
kvě 03 14:15:14 smbmem41.office.company.com realmd[315828]: process exited: 
315924
kvě 03 14:15:14 smbmem41.office.company.com realmd[315828]:  ! Failed to join 
the domain

after investigation I've found there is problem with krb5kdc not
listening on public IP on port 464 
https://forums.opensuse.org/t/access-denied-between-windows-member-samba-adc-mit-krb5/144742

listening on IPv6 localhost [::1]:464  only

sudo ss -tupln | grep 464
udp   UNCONN 0  0[::1]:464   [::]:*
users:(("kdc[master]",pid=209134,fd=38))
 
tcp   LISTEN 0  10   [::1]:464   [::]:*
users:(("kdc[master]",pid=209134,fd=37)) 

I've tried to change configuration in file:

/var/lib/samba/private/kdc.conf

[kdcdefaults]
   kdc_listen = 0.0.0.0
   kdc_tcp_listen = 0.0.0.0
   kpasswd_listen = 127.0.0.1:464 192.168.95.111:464
   kadmind_listen = 127.0.0.1 192.168.95.111
   kdc_ports = 88
   kdc_tcp_ports = 88
   #kadmind_port = 464 
   restrict_anonymous_to_tgt = true


when I change "kdc_tcp_listen" or "kadmind_listen" listening IPs are
changing

but change of "kpasswd_listen" directive make no difference. 

Is it bug in fedora samba package or I'm doing something wrong?

Pavel


--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.

2024-05-11 Thread John Pilkington

On 10/05/2024 15:51, John Pilkington wrote:

On 10/05/2024 15:00, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:13 PM John Pilkington > wrote:


    On 08/05/2024 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
 > On 5/8/24 10:50 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
 >> The harware was working well, before my recent upgrades from f38,
 >> briefly to f39 and now to f40.  Then I was using the rpmfusion
    470xx
 >> builds of the nvidia legacy drivers.   Now the dual-boot box 
has no

 >> nvidia or nouveau rpms installed  (rpm -qa) although I suppose
    bits of
 >> config might remain;  inxi still finds nvidia traces:
 >
 > Nouveau is included with the kernel, it doesn't have its own 
package.


    xorg-x11-drv-nouveau is supplied by fedora, but I was told that the
    kernel driver was more up to date, so I removed the fformer.


I have a late 2012 iMac with Nvidia that was using 470xx.  I mostly 
use nouveau

with wayland, but do have xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.

There were issues with 470xx failing to build in F40 with the akmods 
install from
rpmfusion, but now there is a testing version that does install.  Some 
users have
success with the Nvidia installer. I have the rpmfusion-testing 
package installed

but haven't had time to test it.  I don't think it supports Wayland.



Thanks for your comment.  I posted later, in this thread but with a 
subject-line change. It does show in HyperKitty and I've put a link to 
it on the rpmfusion list.


I have just updated that, re the dual-boot box.  See below:

I have removed all nouveau packages and installed all *470xx" packages, 
which installed the new versions.  That gave HDMI and vga screens with 
their expected resolutions but essentially no user interactivity because 
active kwin_wayland runs all cpus at full throttle. Perhaps that's 'not 
supported'.


Ctrl/Alt/F3 still works, and I have 6.8.9 now.  That complained that 
there was "no space on /boot/efi/EFI/Linux/Fedora " (200 MB) but seems 
to run (with the same cpu runaway) after I deleted several f39 files.


I hope this doesn't offend any 'religious' beliefs.  Installing

plasma-workspace-x11

(in the updates repo but NOT supported by the Fedora KDE SIG)

and selecting "Desktop Session: Plasma (X11)" in the login screen, has 
apparently restored this system to a usable state.  At present password 
entry still has a sluggish keyboard.



The single-boot box is still running nouveau.



Cheers,

John


--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage

2024-05-11 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

Hi All,

Anyone know of a source that gives the number of
users of Fedora vs CentOS vs RHEL?

-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.

2024-05-11 Thread Robert McBroom via users

On 5/11/24 08:36, John Pilkington wrote:

On 10/05/2024 15:51, John Pilkington wrote:

On 10/05/2024 15:00, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:13 PM John Pilkington 
mailto:johnpilk...@gmail.com>> wrote:


    On 08/05/2024 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
 > On 5/8/24 10:50 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
 >> The harware was working well, before my recent upgrades from 
f38,

 >> briefly to f39 and now to f40.  Then I was using the rpmfusion
    470xx
 >> builds of the nvidia legacy drivers.   Now the dual-boot box 
has no

 >> nvidia or nouveau rpms installed  (rpm -qa) although I suppose
    bits of
 >> config might remain;  inxi still finds nvidia traces:
 >
 > Nouveau is included with the kernel, it doesn't have its own 
package.


    xorg-x11-drv-nouveau is supplied by fedora, but I was told that the
    kernel driver was more up to date, so I removed the fformer.


I have a late 2012 iMac with Nvidia that was using 470xx.  I mostly 
use nouveau

with wayland, but do have xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.

There were issues with 470xx failing to build in F40 with the akmods 
install from
rpmfusion, but now there is a testing version that does install.  
Some users have
success with the Nvidia installer. I have the rpmfusion-testing 
package installed

but haven't had time to test it.  I don't think it supports Wayland.



Thanks for your comment.  I posted later, in this thread but with a 
subject-line change. It does show in HyperKitty and I've put a link 
to it on the rpmfusion list.


I have just updated that, re the dual-boot box.  See below:

I have removed all nouveau packages and installed all *470xx" 
packages, which installed the new versions.  That gave HDMI and vga 
screens with their expected resolutions but essentially no user 
interactivity because active kwin_wayland runs all cpus at full 
throttle. Perhaps that's 'not supported'.


Ctrl/Alt/F3 still works, and I have 6.8.9 now.  That complained that 
there was "no space on /boot/efi/EFI/Linux/Fedora " (200 MB) but 
seems to run (with the same cpu runaway) after I deleted several f39 
files.


I hope this doesn't offend any 'religious' beliefs.  Installing

plasma-workspace-x11

(in the updates repo but NOT supported by the Fedora KDE SIG)

and selecting "Desktop Session: Plasma (X11)" in the login screen, has 
apparently restored this system to a usable state.  At present 
password entry still has a sluggish keyboard.



The single-boot box is still running nouveau.


Same experience here with a gt710. Mouse action in wayland is very 
hesitant. Still on X11.


--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage

2024-05-11 Thread George N. White III
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:58 AM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Anyone know of a source that gives the number of
> users of Fedora vs CentOS vs RHEL?
>

Anyone can make up numbers.  There may be good numbers for RHEL
installations, but not numbers of users (at my former work lots of people
had RHEL logins that were rarely used, e.g. updates to a database).  For
CentOS and Fedora there can be large numbers of "managed" workstations
in a cubicle farm with very little visibility into the OS being used
outside the
enterprise.

-- 
George N. White III
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora 40 Disappearing sound

2024-05-11 Thread Tom Horsley
Just got completely switched over to Fedora 40 and was dismayed to
discover gnome-control-center reporting no sound devices at all.
Not the onboard built in sound, and not the HDMI sound I wanted.

After much googling, I found this web page:

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-regression-internal-audio-output-device-not-found/109495

And the suggestion in there worked.

rm -rf ~/.local/state/wireplumber

reboot

So I don't have to switch back to fedora 39 :-).
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage

2024-05-11 Thread ToddAndMargo via users

On 5/11/24 11:26, George N. White III wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:58 AM ToddAndMargo via users 
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> 
wrote:


Hi All,

Anyone know of a source that gives the number of
users of Fedora vs CentOS vs RHEL?


Anyone can make up numbers.  There may be good numbers for RHEL
installations, but not numbers of users (at my former work lots of people
had RHEL logins that were rarely used, e.g. updates to a database).  For
CentOS and Fedora there can be large numbers of "managed" workstations
in a cubicle farm with very little visibility into the OS being used 
outside the

enterprise.

--
George N. White III


Hi George,

I am looking for evidence as to why AnyDesk should
start officially supporting Fedora.  They already
support RHEL and CentOS (I use RHEL's RPM), so it
would not be much of a leap.

-T
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue