Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
ToddAndMargo: >> Anyone know of a source that gives the number of users of >> Fedora vs CentOS vs RHEL? George N. White III: > Anyone can make up numbers. There may be good numbers for RHEL > installations, but not numbers of users (at my former work lots of people > had RHEL logins that were rarely used, e.g. updates to a database). For > CentOS and Fedora there can be large numbers of "managed" workstations > in a cubicle farm with very little visibility into the OS being used outside > the > enterprise. I think you'd need statistics from something that's very commonly used by (nearly) everybody all over the world. Such as, everyone who makes a google search. Just looking at some of the stats from my website, which isn't going to be very representative of anything, you can see what OS *some* users use from the web agent strings. But, at times, you can also see that many user agents have obscurred data. I see that a lot of spiders crawled the site last week, it seems there's more of them than real people. Top 15 of 785 Total User Agents # Hits User Agent 1 1652 5.12% Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/72.0 2 1153 3.57% Go-http-client/1.1 3 1133 3.51% Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; AhrefsBot/7.0; http://ahrefs.com/robot/) 4 896 2.78% Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) Chrome/116.0.19 5 865 2.68% Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claude...@anthropic.com) 6 588 1.82% Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko 7 522 1.62% python-requests/2.31.0 8 502 1.55% facebookexternalhit/1.1 (+http://www.facebook.com/externalhit_uatext.php) 9 482 1.49% FriendlyCrawler/Nutch-1.20-SNAPSHOT 10 455 1.41% Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Bytespider; spider-feedb...@bytedance.com) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.0.0 Sa 11 364 1.13% Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/74.0.3729.169 Safari/537.36 12 317 0.98% Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) 13 306 0.95% Googlebot-Image/1.0 14 305 0.94% Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Barkrowler/0.9; +https://babbar.tech/crawler) 15 296 0.92% Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 11; vivo 1906; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/87.0.4280.141 Mobile Another stats analysis program comes up with these visitor results, with some amusing zeros in places but non-zero further along the line: Operating Systems (HTTP accesses) == Versions Pages Percent Hits Percent = Macintosh 31515.6 % 85613.5 % - OS X 10.9 Mavericks1 0 % 2 0 % OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion1 0 % 10 0.1 % Mac OS X 10.7 Lion 0 0 % 7 0.1 % Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard 0 0 % 8 0.1 % Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard 1 0 % 1 0 % macOS 10.15 Catalina 23211.5 % 69010.9 % macOS 10.14 Mojave 6 0.2 %6 0 % macOS 10.13 High Sierra27 1.3 %80 1.2 % macOS 10.12 Sierra 18 0.8 %19 0.3 % OS X 10.11 El Capitan 8 0.3 %8 0.1 % OS X 10.10 Yosemite3 0.1 %3 0 % Mac OS X others18 0.8 %22 0.3 % Linux 1296.4 %2,058 32.5 % Ubuntu 11 0.5 %1,667 26.3 % GNU Linux (Unknown)1185.8 %3916.1 % iOS1195.9 %3465.4 % --- iOS (iPhone) 1195.9 %3425.4 % iOS (iPad) 0 0 % 4 0 % Windows 1,061 52.7 % 1,638 25.9 % Windows XP28 1.3 %85 1.3 % Windows Vista (LongHorn) 10 0.4 %18 0.2 % Windows 8.1 15 0.7 %15 0.2 % Windows 8 6 0.2 %33 0.5 % Windows 7 117 5.8 %1872.9 % Windows 2003 1 0 % 1 0 % Windows 2000 1 0 % 1 0 % Windows 10883 43.8 % 1,298 20.5 % Android 143 7.1 %4817.6 % --- Google Android 8.x5 0.2 %25 0.3 % Google Android 7.x15 0.7 %27 0.4 % Google Android 6.x70 3.4 %73 1.1 % Google Android 5.x0 0 % 1 0 % Google Android 4.41 0 % 1 0 % Google
Re: Question on $FileCreateMode for imjournal
Mark C. Allman via users wrote: > I'm seeing this line in /var/log/messages: > > imjournal: filecreatemode is not set, using default 0644 [v8.2312.0-1.fc40 > try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2186 ] > > From the page > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/configuration/action/rsconf1_filecreatemode.html, > I see that I need to set $FileCreateMode. OK. Where? That is for Legacy Configuration Directives. You're best to avoid those anytime you can. (But to be fair, I do think the rsyslog docs are generally a bit of a pain to use.) > * I created a conf file in /etc/rsyslog.d/ with "$FileCreateMode 0600." No > impact. > * I edited (temporarily) /etc/rsyslog.conf and inserted the above line both > before, after and (as a last resort) both before and after the imjournal > module load. No impact. That variable doesn't apply to the imjournal plugin (as far as I know). Additionally, setting a var in /etc/rsyslog.d/ likely will not apply to all the previous configuration before it (with plenty of caveats depending on the setting, of course). There's an old RHEL bug regarding this and it was fixed in CentOS Stream 9 not too long ago. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2181552 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-949 https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/rsyslog/-/commit/129bf49 > Where should this variable be set and what's the correct syntax? I also sent > this to the rsyslog list but I thought I'd throw it out here as well. It's best to not post to multiple lists simultaneously, IMO. You then have to decide which information is the best if you get replies from both lists. A reply here _may_ be better as a Fedora-specific solution while a reply from the rsyslog list _may_ be better as applied to the stock rsyslog. :) That said, adding FileCreateMode="0644" to the imjournal parameters should resolve this harmless log entry, e.g.: diff --git i/rsyslog.conf w/rsyslog.conf index f6d3f6a..1396c37 100644 --- i/rsyslog.conf +++ w/rsyslog.conf @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ module(load="imuxsock"# provides support for local system logging (e.g. via SysSock.Use="off") # Turn off message reception via local log socket; # local messages are retrieved through imjournal now. module(load="imjournal" # provides access to the systemd journal + FileCreateMode="0644"# Set access permissions for the state file StateFile="imjournal.state") # File to store the position in the journal # Include all config files in /etc/rsyslog.d/ This change was made in CentOS Stream and RHEL but has not be pushed to Fedora, unfortunately. It would be ideal if RHEL followed the "upstream first" mantra. -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to list Apache (httpd) virtual servers
On 5/12/24 14:56, Ian Pilcher wrote: I am trying to list the virtual servers in my Apache httpd configuration on Fedora 38. My internet searches keep turning up references to using either apachectl or apache2ctl with the -S option, but neither one seems to work on Fedora. # apachectl -S apachectl: The "-S" option is not supported. # dnf provides '*/apache2ctl' Last metadata expiration check: 3:35:44 ago on Sun 12 May 2024 01:13:05 PM CDT. bash-completion-1:2.11-9.fc38.noarch : Programmable completion for Bash Repo : fedora Matched from: Filename : /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/apache2ctl So how is one supposed to do this on Fedora? Not specific to Fedora but the apache2 method is apache2ctl -t -D DUMP_VHOSTS -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
How to list Apache (httpd) virtual servers
I am trying to list the virtual servers in my Apache httpd configuration on Fedora 38. My internet searches keep turning up references to using either apachectl or apache2ctl with the -S option, but neither one seems to work on Fedora. # apachectl -S apachectl: The "-S" option is not supported. # dnf provides '*/apache2ctl' Last metadata expiration check: 3:35:44 ago on Sun 12 May 2024 01:13:05 PM CDT. bash-completion-1:2.11-9.fc38.noarch : Programmable completion for Bash Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/apache2ctl So how is one supposed to do this on Fedora? -- If your user interface is intuitive in retrospect ... it isn't intuitive -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to change fail2ban timeout during reboot in F40?
On 2024-05-12 16:11, Anthony Messina wrote: Of course, you'll want to set something suitable for your system's needs ~]# cat /etc/systemd/system/fail2ban.service.d/timeout.conf [Service] TimeoutStopSec=5min Thanks Frank -- -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Question on $FileCreateMode for imjournal
I'm seeing this line in /var/log/messages: imjournal: filecreatemode is not set, using default 0644 [v8.2312.0-1.fc40 try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2186 ] From the page https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/configuration/action/rsconf1_filecreatemode.html, I see that I need to set $FileCreateMode. OK. Where? * I created a conf file in /etc/rsyslog.d/ with "$FileCreateMode 0600." No impact. * I edited (temporarily) /etc/rsyslog.conf and inserted the above line both before, after and (as a last resort) both before and after the imjournal module load. No impact. Where should this variable be set and what's the correct syntax? I also sent this to the rsyslog list but I thought I'd throw it out here as well. Thanks, -- *Mark C. Allman, PMP, CSM, SSM* -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to change fail2ban timeout during reboot in F40?
Of course, you'll want to set something suitable for your system's needs ~]# cat /etc/systemd/system/fail2ban.service.d/timeout.conf [Service] TimeoutStopSec=5min -- Anthony - https://messinet.com On Sunday, May 12, 2024 3:02:29 PM CDT Frank Bures wrote: > Hi, > > I was a target of an attack resulting in 1600 banned IP address by > fail2ban. > When I reboot, f2b tries to unban those IPs but it ultimately times out and > a large number of IPs becomes orphaned. They stay in firewalld, but f2b > does not know about them anymore. > > And indeed > > root@ryzen:/etc/systemd/system# systemctl show fail2ban.service -p > TimeoutStopUSec > > TimeoutStopUSec=45s > > How do I increase the 45s timeout to something more suitable? I was not > able to find where in the system is that value set. > > Thanks > Frank -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
How to change fail2ban timeout during reboot in F40?
Hi, I was a target of an attack resulting in 1600 banned IP address by fail2ban. When I reboot, f2b tries to unban those IPs but it ultimately times out and a large number of IPs becomes orphaned. They stay in firewalld, but f2b does not know about them anymore. And indeed root@ryzen:/etc/systemd/system# systemctl show fail2ban.service -p TimeoutStopUSec TimeoutStopUSec=45s How do I increase the 45s timeout to something more suitable? I was not able to find where in the system is that value set. Thanks Frank -- -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
My fedora 40 experiences
Things I noticed after installing fedora 40. Nothing too bad, got everything working OK after a few fixes. No sound at all, not even any sound devices listed. Poking around in google I eventually found the advice to do this: rm -rf ~/.local/state/wireplumber reboot That worked. I can watch videos now and hear the soundtrack. No working printer. Apparently the stuff I've been copying from release to release no longer works. Had to remove the printer definition completely and let it notice it and reinstall from scratch. It now works but the annoying new ipp-usb stuff causes a delay of about 10 seconds between clicking "print" and hearing the printer power up (it was previously instantaneous before this "improvement"). Various systemd config files I used to edit to change settings are now apparently installed as %ghost files, so they don't actually exist. Eventually created directories /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ /etc/systemd/system.conf.d and /etc/systemd/user.conf.d and created some local .conf files in those directories to just override the handful of settings I normally changed. The gcc compiler now defaults to the same fanatical insistence on proper forward references and such that used to be so sloppy in old C code, so various C programs I always rebuild didn't compile till I fixed the source ( I figure there is probably an option to make gcc as dumb as it used to be, but I might as well fix the code). My custom sddm theme didn't work. Had to copy new format theme directory and make similar customizations. The bogofilter tool changed format databases. Had to discover the bogomigrate-berkeley tool in the list of files in the bogofilter rpm to fix that and salvage years worth of spam filter training. Haven't noticed any other problems yet, I seem to be able to use fedora 40 now just like I used fedora 39. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 10:31 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > > On May 12, 2024, at 09:39, Michael D. Setzer II via users > > wrote: > > > > https://truelist.co/blog/linux-statistics/ > > Has some info. #18 topic has Ubuntu listed at just under 34%. > > Debian at 16%, CentOS at 9.3%, RedHat at 0.8%, Gentoo at 0.5%, > > and then Fedora at 0.2%. But no real clue on how they came up > > with those numbers, or what kind of users those are. > > Those numbers are based on public web servers running those distros, > and there are a lot of caveats to even that breakdown, see the > methodology of the research: > > https://w3techs.com/technologies > > While Fedora can and is used for web services (and is much more > common in the cattle-not-pets style of container web services), a lot > of the more traditional server practices requires a stable, > unchanging web service platform which you see in RHEL and other LTS > distros. > > It’s unlikely you’ll ever get good stats on desktop distro usage > breakdown, if you consider how angry the community got when Fedora > simply *proposed* tracking. The only thing I can think of: Ubuntu can > track their snap store because it’s their own proprietary product and > so there aren’t mirrors or alternate stores to obfuscate results, so > I imagine they’ll always have ways to track users and post numbers. I guess Fedora repo accesses would be one way, though it wouldn't account for varying IP addresses or VPNs. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
> On May 12, 2024, at 09:39, Michael D. Setzer II via users > wrote: > > https://truelist.co/blog/linux-statistics/ > Has some info. #18 topic has Ubuntu listed at just under 34%. > Debian at 16%, CentOS at 9.3%, RedHat at 0.8%, Gentoo at 0.5%, > and then Fedora at 0.2%. But no real clue on how they came up > with those numbers, or what kind of users those are. Those numbers are based on public web servers running those distros, and there are a lot of caveats to even that breakdown, see the methodology of the research: https://w3techs.com/technologies While Fedora can and is used for web services (and is much more common in the cattle-not-pets style of container web services), a lot of the more traditional server practices requires a stable, unchanging web service platform which you see in RHEL and other LTS distros. It’s unlikely you’ll ever get good stats on desktop distro usage breakdown, if you consider how angry the community got when Fedora simply *proposed* tracking. The only thing I can think of: Ubuntu can track their snap store because it’s their own proprietary product and so there aren’t mirrors or alternate stores to obfuscate results, so I imagine they’ll always have ways to track users and post numbers. -- Jonathan Billings-- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
On 12 May 2024 at 4:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Date sent: Sun, 12 May 2024 04:51:11 -0700 Subject:Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users From: ToddAndMargo via users Copies to: ToddAndMargo > On 5/12/24 03:36, George N. White III wrote: > > Fedora has a higher percentage of > > new to linux users > > Do you know what those numbers are? https://truelist.co/blog/linux-statistics/ Has some info. #18 topic has Ubuntu listed at just under 34%. Debian at 16%, CentOS at 9.3%, RedHat at 0.8%, Gentoo at 0.5%, and then Fedora at 0.2%. But no real clue on how they came up with those numbers, or what kind of users those are. > > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ++ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mi...@guam.net mailto:msetze...@gmail.com mailto:msetze...@gmx.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ ++ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
On 5/12/24 03:36, George N. White III wrote: Fedora has a higher percentage of new to linux users Do you know what those numbers are? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 6:19 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2024-05-11 at 22:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > I am looking for evidence as to why AnyDesk should > > start officially supporting Fedora. They already > > support RHEL and CentOS (I use RHEL's RPM), so it > > would not be much of a leap. > > They might argue that Fedora is much more of a moving target than RHEL > or Centos, and possibly less likely to be used in corporate settings (I > don't know if the latter is true of course). > I think that is very likely the reason, and would add that a) software that runs on CentOS or RHEL needs minimal or zero changes to run on the other OS while Fedora would often need changes, and b) Fedora has a higher percentage of new to linux users so tech support requires more "hand-holding". -- George N. White III -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.
Op Sat, 04 May 2024 18:27:48 +0200 schreef Roger Heflin : castor is someplace on your machine defined as the linux node's hostname. dhcp-client does deliver the defined hostname in the dhcp requests/responses to the router when it asks for the IP address. What does 'hostname' report? and 'hostnamectl' report as the hostname? Hostname gives castor and hostnamectl gives castor static and a lot of information like bios version , type laptop , OS version etc. etc. On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 10:17 AM Ger van Dijck wrote: Hi, A bit late Jonathan but here is my answer. After upgrade to Fedora 40 all runs perfect , but the login prompt looks as follows : [root@castor GervanDijck] # Suddenly the router a Fritz-Box 7490 detects the Name Castor with IP192.168.178.29 (not connectebel) with a MAC number and the connection is WLAN. I just do not understand it : What does it represent ? Ger van Dijck. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: statistics on Fedora and RHEL usage
On Sat, 2024-05-11 at 22:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > I am looking for evidence as to why AnyDesk should > start officially supporting Fedora. They already > support RHEL and CentOS (I use RHEL's RPM), so it > would not be much of a leap. They might argue that Fedora is much more of a moving target than RHEL or Centos, and possibly less likely to be used in corporate settings (I don't know if the latter is true of course). poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedore CoreOS and secondary disk
Good day, all, I have been trying to add a second disk to CoreOS and can't seem to figure this out. The secondary disk is specified in the butane config but the part that I need guidance with is how do I bring up the server with two disks. Sample disk config from butane disks: - device: /dev/disk/by-id/coreos-boot-disk wipe_table: false partitions: - number: 4 label: root size_mib: 8192 resize: true - device: /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x50014e2eb507fcdf wipe_table: true partitions: - number: 1 label: var size_mib: 0 start_mib: 0 type_guid: 0657fd6d-a4ab-43c4-84e5-0933c84b4f4f filesystems: - path: /var device: /dev/disk/by-partlabel/var format: xfs wipe_filesystem: false with_mount_unit: true ## ## Any suggestions or directions you can point me to be able to get the secondary disk going for Fedora CoreOS? Thanks in advance -- Kind Regards, Earl A. Ramirez 2024-05-12T10:02:02 (CEST +0200) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
