Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
So far I have found: https://milkv.io/pioneer but it isn't cheap -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 04:33:46 - Ryan Bach via users wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:44:18 - > > Ryan Bach via users > > > > > It's not clear which "this" you're referring to, but, FWIW, > > Framework has announced a development-level risc-v mainboard from > > DeepComputing. As Fedora40 is one of their supported environments, > > I would expect that it will be available there, in due course. > > > > https://frame.work/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard > Any idea on the cost? > -- Not announced. Frameworks marketplace section has a number of conventional boards. Should give an indication. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
Waiting for a Desktop equivalent, good info. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:44:18 - > Ryan Bach via users > > It's not clear which "this" you're referring to, but, FWIW, Framework > has announced a development-level risc-v mainboard from DeepComputing. > As Fedora40 is one of their supported environments, I would expect that > it will be available there, in due course. > > https://frame.work/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard Any idea on the cost? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
Geoffrey, On 2024-06-23 14:02, Geoffrey Leach wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:44:18 - Ryan Bach via users wrote: I can't wait until this is real. -- It's not clear which "this" you're referring to, but, FWIW, Framework has announced a development-level risc-v mainboard from DeepComputing. As Fedora40 is one of their supported environments, I would expect that it will be available there, in due course. https://frame.work/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard Yes, I think this will replace my old ZenBook (which has always been used for Fedora anyway). P. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:44:18 - Ryan Bach via users wrote: > I can't wait until this is real. > -- It's not clear which "this" you're referring to, but, FWIW, Framework has announced a development-level risc-v mainboard from DeepComputing. As Fedora40 is one of their supported environments, I would expect that it will be available there, in due course. https://frame.work/products/deep-computing-risc-v-mainboard -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
On 6/22/24 9:57 AM, home user wrote: On 6/22/24 9:16 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: Is anyone else having problems with Firefox on FC39 with XFCE recently? After rock solid operation for a long time, in the last 2 or 3 weeks the UI has been fouling up every day or two when I do some seemingly mundane operation in Firefox. A couple of times Firefox has crashed after a few seconds. The foul ups sometimes only affect the Firefox windows, and other windows still work OK. Sometimes the whole desktop fouls up, and I have to switch to a text only screen and kill Firefox. That restores normal desktop operation for all the other windows. Steve I don't know if it's related or not, but yesterday evening on my workstation (f39, gnome) Firefox was maxing out one cpu for minutes. I exited Firefox. The maxing out of a cpu continued. ksysguard showed a Firefox process at the top of the process list (sorted by cpu usage), even long after exiting Firefox. I had to kill that process manually. This all repeated a second time. Also curious, I saw a several processes with names containing "akonadi" and strings relating to e-mail/calendar. After exiting Firefox again and exiting Thunderbird, the maxing out of a cpu stopped and has not since recurred, though I see 19 different akonadi processes now in a "ps" output. Firefox is the only browser I use, and Thunderbird is the only e-mail client and calendar that I use. I do not access e-mail via browser. Are my problems and Steve's related and/or connected? -- Thank-you Roger, Richard, George, and Richard for your responses. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Kernel 6.9.5-200.fc40 throws me into grub prompt on reboot
On 2024-06-22 20:59, Frank Bures wrote: Hi, I just did a kernel update and after reboot I ended up in a grub prompt. I booted from USB F40 and followed instructions at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/grub2-bootloader/#_restoring_the_bootloader_using_the_live_disk However, whatever I did I was not able to successfully boot. I spent hours trying to figure it out before trying to boot to the old 6.9.4-200 kernel from the dreaded grub prompt and voila, the system happily came on. My question now is: How to restore my grub2 reliably so that I would not have to go through all these hoops again after next reboot. This is what my efibootmgr returns: root@ryzen:/# efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0002 Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: 0002,,0001 Boot Fedora HD(1,GPT,e8838c34-c364-4347-afb7-1c516782b114,0x800,0x12c000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIMX64.EFI Boot0001 Fedora HD(1,GPT,e8838c34-c364-4347-afb7-1c516782b114,0x800,0x12c000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIM.EFI424f Boot0002* Fedora HD(1,GPT,e8838c34-c364-4347-afb7-1c516782b114,0x800,0x1f4000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIM.EFI424f I have no idea where the *424f files came from or why one of them has the highest priority. Frank -- -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
Ryan, On 2024-06-23 11:44, Ryan Bach via users wrote: I can't wait until this is real. Me too! P. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Risc-v computer with Fedora on it?
I can't wait until this is real. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Kernel 6.9.5-200.fc40 throws me into grub prompt on reboot
Hi, I just did a kernel update and after reboot I ended up in a grub prompt. I booted from USB F40 and followed instructions at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/grub2-bootloader/#_restoring_the_bootloader_using_the_live_disk However, whatever I did I was not able to successfully boot. I spent hours trying to figure it out before trying to boot to the old 6.9.4-200 kernel from the dreaded grub prompt and voila, the system happily came on. My question now is: How to restore my grub2 reliably so that I would not have to go through all these hoops again after next reboot. Any pointer would be gratefully appreciated :-) Cheers Frank -- -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
Once upon a time, Tim said: > On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 23:02 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > Even if I remove the x right ? > > That kind of thing will always depend on how a script is handled. They do need to be executable for run-parts to run them. There are a handful of filenames that are skipped though: *~ *, *.cfsaved *.rpmsave *.rpmorig *.rpmnew *.swp *,v If you want to make a backup but not have extra runs, use something like "foo.save~". -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
Starting about 2 or 3 months ago, I started to 1) uses multiple Firefox profiles and 2) after using one of the profiles, exiting Firefox. I have one profile where I do all my non-anonymous interactions (sites were I do not want to clear particular cookies after each interactions) and the a couple other profiles (news sites; quick lookup/one or two tabs/single purpose; information (web sites I've not finished looking at)). For "non-anonymous" profile, I every day or so remove all data associated with all but a few selected sites. For all the "anonymous" profiles I do a shift-ctl-delete prior to exiting and remove all data. For the past year? or so I had issues with (KDE) Wayland (new Wayland user): freezing, high cpu usages, etc. It turned out that all the issues went away if I used Firefox sparingly: never let it run when I was not using it and clearing it all the time. I also do a: ps auxwww | grep firefox maybe once a day just to make sure there is no Firefox process running in the background. Richard On 6/22/24 8:16 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: Is anyone else having problems with Firefox on FC39 with XFCE recently? After rock solid operation for a long time, in the last 2 or 3 weeks the UI has been fouling up every day or two when I do some seemingly mundane operation in Firefox. A couple of times Firefox has crashed after a few seconds. The foul ups sometimes only affect the Firefox windows, and other windows still work OK. Sometimes the whole desktop fouls up, and I have to switch to a text only screen and kill Firefox. That restores normal desktop operation for all the other windows. Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 15:57 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > I generally keep the number external sites connected at one time to a single > digit. > I use No Script, and notice that, for many sites, the list of 3rd party sites > I have to > "temporarily trust" to make the site usable has grown to the point where I > need to > scroll down to see the full list. We need to a list "resource hog" sites to > steer > people away from sites that are causing memory issues. Unfortunately, it's the way people create websites, these days. They don't code them themselves, they incorporate scripts from a dozen other websites. Things they have no idea about, and no control over. Trying to research something to buy, say a desklamp (i.e. nothing special, at all), entails browsing dozens of sites that don't work if you don't allow this jumble. There's gallery scripts, comparison scripts, shopping cart scripts, advertising scripts, tracking scripts... I get peeved at banking sites that do that crap. Firstly, they should just stick to one job (such as letting you manage your personal finances), steering completely away from advertising crap at you. Secondly, every third-party thing they add to their website is a potential vector for a security breach. You would think that banks, of all services, might recognise that. Also, it's *my* money that they're using to fund everything they do (and every other account holder). We should be being paid interest, not milked. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.118.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 24 16:01:50 UTC 2024 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 23:02 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Even if I remove the x right ? That kind of thing will always depend on how a script is handled. If it's run directly by a shell, then the shell *may* care about eXecute bit. Likewise, if its *run* by a handler. But if it's essentially a *configuration* for some handler, it's probably ignored. You can always test this. Put a test script into cron.hourly without the X bit set, and see if it runs. I'd always prefer to test things like this than take someone else's word for it. Sometimes even man files may lead you up the garden path. If you have configuration scripts you want to keep, but want disabled, it's safer (more predictable) to store them somewhere else than where they're normally accessed. You could move them into a /etc/cron.weekly.disabled/ directory. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.118.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 24 16:01:50 UTC 2024 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
> Subject: Re: crond > > On Jun 22, 2024, at 10:34, Patrick Dupre via users > wrote: > > > > ls -la /etc/cron.weekly/ > > > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 22 16:14 . > > drwxr-xr-x. 248 root root 20480 Jun 22 16:04 .. > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1685 Jun 8 16:17 backup3 > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3563 Jun 8 16:36 backup.cron > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3561 Jun 6 22:55 backup.cron.saved > > > > > > Good, it seems that (during the update?), a backup.cron.saved has been > > created. > > I guess that I can just moved to backup.cron_saved > > The Cron daemon will not modify those files, and that’s not the naming suffix > that RPM updates will create, which would only happen if the file was a > package anyway. You had to have created that file. Perhaps you forgot? > > Also, renaming it to yet another suffix will not stop it from running along > side the backup.cron. You need to remove it from the directory to get it to > stop executing a second cron job. Even if I remove the x right ? > > -- > Jonathan Billings > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
On Jun 22, 2024, at 10:34, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > ls -la /etc/cron.weekly/ > > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 22 16:14 . > drwxr-xr-x. 248 root root 20480 Jun 22 16:04 .. > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1685 Jun 8 16:17 backup3 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3563 Jun 8 16:36 backup.cron > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3561 Jun 6 22:55 backup.cron.saved > > > Good, it seems that (during the update?), a backup.cron.saved has been > created. > I guess that I can just moved to backup.cron_saved The Cron daemon will not modify those files, and that’s not the naming suffix that RPM updates will create, which would only happen if the file was a package anyway. You had to have created that file. Perhaps you forgot? Also, renaming it to yet another suffix will not stop it from running along side the backup.cron. You need to remove it from the directory to get it to stop executing a second cron job. -- Jonathan Billings -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:44 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > [...] > The websites causing the ram issue were the same on both Windows and > Linux. > I generally keep the number external sites connected at one time to a single digit. I use No Script, and notice that, for many sites, the list of 3rd party sites I have to "temporarily trust" to make the site usable has grown to the point where I need to scroll down to see the full list. We need to a list "resource hog" sites to steer people away from sites that are causing memory issues. -- George N. White III -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
Steve's problem sounds like a Xorg/Wayland graphics issue/bug that firefox somehow triggers. My firefox has acted off for a while. Typically is it seems to get bogged down using a lot of ram (2-10GB for at least one firefox process), but more recently I don't see the big memory usage but it seems to go cpu bound and non-responsive in some tabs (reddit usually).On the high ram usage killing the specific process in about:performance fixes that, but the only fix for the cpu bound/nonresponding seems to be to exit all of firefox and restart. Firefox needs to stop working on new features and simply get it stable. And I had most of the exact same issues on windows 11, so this is not a code issue specific to Linux. I have multiple web sites that seem to be able to make one or more tabs consume GB's of ram. The websites causing the ram issue were the same on both Windows and Linux. On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 10:58 AM home user wrote: > > On 6/22/24 9:16 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with Firefox on FC39 with XFCE recently? > > After rock solid operation for a long time, in the last 2 or 3 weeks the UI > > has been fouling up every day or two when I do some seemingly mundane > > operation in Firefox. A couple of times Firefox has crashed after a few > > seconds. The foul ups sometimes only affect the Firefox windows, and other > > windows still work OK. Sometimes the whole desktop fouls up, and I have to > > switch to a text only screen and kill Firefox. That restores normal desktop > > operation for all the other windows. > > > > Steve > > I don't know if it's related or not, but yesterday evening on my workstation > (f39, gnome) Firefox was maxing out one cpu for minutes. I exited Firefox. > The maxing out of a cpu continued. ksysguard showed a Firefox process at the > top of the process list (sorted by cpu usage), even long after exiting > Firefox. I had to kill that process manually. This all repeated a second > time. Also curious, I saw a several processes with names containing > "akonadi" and strings relating to e-mail/calendar. After exiting Firefox > again and exiting Thunderbird, the maxing out of a cpu stopped and has not > since recurred, though I see 19 different akonadi processes now in a "ps" > output. Firefox is the only browser I use, and Thunderbird is the only > e-mail client and calendar that I use. I do not access e-mail via browser. > > Are my problems and Steve's related and/or connected? > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox foul ups
On 6/22/24 9:16 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: Is anyone else having problems with Firefox on FC39 with XFCE recently? After rock solid operation for a long time, in the last 2 or 3 weeks the UI has been fouling up every day or two when I do some seemingly mundane operation in Firefox. A couple of times Firefox has crashed after a few seconds. The foul ups sometimes only affect the Firefox windows, and other windows still work OK. Sometimes the whole desktop fouls up, and I have to switch to a text only screen and kill Firefox. That restores normal desktop operation for all the other windows. Steve I don't know if it's related or not, but yesterday evening on my workstation (f39, gnome) Firefox was maxing out one cpu for minutes. I exited Firefox. The maxing out of a cpu continued. ksysguard showed a Firefox process at the top of the process list (sorted by cpu usage), even long after exiting Firefox. I had to kill that process manually. This all repeated a second time. Also curious, I saw a several processes with names containing "akonadi" and strings relating to e-mail/calendar. After exiting Firefox again and exiting Thunderbird, the maxing out of a cpu stopped and has not since recurred, though I see 19 different akonadi processes now in a "ps" output. Firefox is the only browser I use, and Thunderbird is the only e-mail client and calendar that I use. I do not access e-mail via browser. Are my problems and Steve's related and/or connected? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Firefox foul ups
Is anyone else having problems with Firefox on FC39 with XFCE recently? After rock solid operation for a long time, in the last 2 or 3 weeks the UI has been fouling up every day or two when I do some seemingly mundane operation in Firefox. A couple of times Firefox has crashed after a few seconds. The foul ups sometimes only affect the Firefox windows, and other windows still work OK. Sometimes the whole desktop fouls up, and I have to switch to a text only screen and kill Firefox. That restores normal desktop operation for all the other windows. Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
ls -la /etc/cron.weekly/ drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Jun 22 16:14 . drwxr-xr-x. 248 root root 20480 Jun 22 16:04 .. -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1685 Jun 8 16:17 backup3 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3563 Jun 8 16:36 backup.cron -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3561 Jun 6 22:55 backup.cron.saved Good, it seems that (during the update?), a backup.cron.saved has been created. I guess that I can just moved to backup.cron_saved > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2024 at 4:25 PM > From: "Doug Herr" > To: "Fedora Users" > Cc: "Patrick Dupre" > Subject: Re: crond > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2024, at 7:17 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a backup launched by cron.weekly > > However, since F40, after it has run a first time and ended, another backup > > is started. This messed up the backup. > > > > When starting, the first crond > > sent > > (ps -aux | grep -i backup | mail -s Backup root@localhost.localdomain) > > root 19672 0.0 0.0 228476 3136 ?S12:29 0:00 > > /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron > [snip] > > and the second one > > > > root 29787 0.0 0.0 228476 3260 ?S14:55 0:00 > > /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron.saved > > > If you run: > > ls -la /etc/cron.weekly/ > > I think you will find a "regular" and a ".saved" copy of your cron script. > > -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: crond
On Sat, Jun 22, 2024, at 7:17 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Hello, > > I have a backup launched by cron.weekly > However, since F40, after it has run a first time and ended, another backup > is started. This messed up the backup. > > When starting, the first crond > sent > (ps -aux | grep -i backup | mail -s Backup root@localhost.localdomain) > root 19672 0.0 0.0 228476 3136 ?S12:29 0:00 > /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron [snip] > and the second one > > root 29787 0.0 0.0 228476 3260 ?S14:55 0:00 > /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron.saved If you run: ls -la /etc/cron.weekly/ I think you will find a "regular" and a ".saved" copy of your cron script. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
crond
Hello, I have a backup launched by cron.weekly However, since F40, after it has run a first time and ended, another backup is started. This messed up the backup. When starting, the first crond sent (ps -aux | grep -i backup | mail -s Backup root@localhost.localdomain) root 19672 0.0 0.0 228476 3136 ?S12:29 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron root 19673 0.0 0.0 227904 2248 ?S12:29 0:00 sed 1i\ /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron:\ root 19683 0.0 0.0 227752 2276 ?S12:30 0:00 grep -i backup root 19684 0.0 0.0 238028 5352 ?S12:30 0:00 mail -s Backup root@localhost.localdomain and at thz end backup ended at Sat Jun 22 02:55:58 PM CEST 2024 /dev/sda10, /dev/sdb8 and /dev/sdc6 OK and the second one root 29787 0.0 0.0 228476 3260 ?S14:55 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron.saved root 29788 0.0 0.0 227904 2176 ?S14:55 0:00 sed 1i\ /etc/cron.weekly/backup.cron.saved:\ root 29798 0.0 0.0 227752 2208 ?S14:55 0:00 grep -i backup root 29799 0.0 0.0 238028 5428 ?S14:55 0:00 mail -s Backup root@localhost.localdomain Here is the /etc/crontab SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAILTO=root # For details see man 4 crontabs # Example of job definition: # . minute (0 - 59) # | .- hour (0 - 23) # | | .-- day of month (1 - 31) # | | | .--- month (1 - 12) OR jan,feb,mar,apr ... # | | | | . day of week (0 - 6) (Sunday=0 or 7) OR sun,mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat # | | | | | # * * * * * user-name command to be executed #22 23 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily #30 12 * * 3,6 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly 30 12 * * 6 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly # cron.weekly is actually run by anacron #*/12 * * * * /home/root/bin/periodic.sh and the /etc/anacrontab # See anacron(8) and anacrontab(5) for details. SHELL=/bin/sh PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAILTO=root # the maximal random delay added to the base delay of the jobs RANDOM_DELAY=35 # the jobs will be started during the following hours only START_HOURS_RANGE=3-22 #period in days delay in minutes job-identifier command 1 5 cron.daily nice run-parts /etc/cron.daily #7 25 cron.weekly nice run-parts /etc/cron.weekly @monthly 45 cron.monthlynice run-parts /etc/cron.monthly Is there a conflict between cron and anacron ? This machine is turned on and off usually on a daily basis, but not necessary. Thank for your lights === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com === -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora F40 Won't Power Off
On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 11:06 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote: > > I use Evolution rather than Tbird, but sending in HTML with a plain > > text alternative is fine. > Thanks Patrick, I thought that was what the auto setting was supposed > to > be doing, were you not seeing that? > It seemed to be off in a couple of messages, which is why I commented, but I am seeing most of them. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
