Re: Fedora 26 - Alternate User Perspective
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:52 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote: > Gentle People: > >I hate to interrupt your Fedora 26 party, but well here goes a > dose of reality from the > USER's PROSPECTIVE! Yours is not *the* user's perspective. Yours is *a* user's perspective. Here is *my* user's perspective. > 1) First of all F26's performance is very poor. its a CPU hog and > DRAM ! I installed F26 in a Virtual Box (VBox) > on a two processor machine and it is so slow that it is barely > usable. In the same environment CentOS performs > with quite excellent performance. You have a massive performance > problem here! I have F26 installed on the metal and don't see any performance issues. I have it running on a dual core 4GB laptop. > 2) Your new menu system is a joke. I use the system for application > code development so I want Text Editor > windows and shells. Why did you hide these in the basement and the > very bottom of the menu system? > Also your menus are slow and cumbersome. What was wrong with the > previous menu system? Is this simply > change for the sake of change? Have your group been taken over by > Marketing? I have not noticed any kind of new menu system. I, too, use Linux for application development. I continue to find all of the tools at the same location in the menus. The ones I really use a lot, I put in the Favorites that show up when you bump the upper left corner. > 3) Look and feel. Why in the name of hell did you want this look and > feel? I use Linux for application code > development. I want Text Editors, shell Windows, gcc, gdb , and ddd. > Why are all the engineering tools hidden? > If I wanted the look and feel of Windows I would buy windows! If you are using GNOME, it has historically had a slightly Windows-ish kind of feel. The only change in look and feel that I have noticed is the new background image. Each version of Fedora as a new default background image. The default F26 background image is not to my liking, so I just go pick another one. > 4) Text Editor: Go back to the old one it works way better! If you are using Linux for application development, I am surprised that you are using any kind of default text editor. Most developers will use VI, some variation of EMACS, or one of the IDE's with its own built in editor. Personally, I use XEmacs. > 5) Your new Services configuration is a blithering disaster! Please > bring back the configuration GUIs for > Services and Users. You can install system-config-users and system-config-services. > Keep in mind here I am not a Linux System administrator! I am a > user! I perform > a complex configuration of user and group numbers to maintain NFS > compatibility with Solaris. If the Solaris systems are using Sun's NIS, you should be able to link your Linux system in to use the same system and not have to manually configure all of the user and group ID's. > This configuration is difficult even with the GUIs, without them > forget it. I know that at one time there was the beginning of a GUI for interacting with the systemd stuff. It needed some work, but never seemed to get any better. Now it seems to be gone completely. > 6) Cut and paste: I don't know what you did to that! (Well it use to > work)! P.S. Solaris has a great User I/F > GUI for cut and paste. Haven't noticed any problems with Cut and Paste. > 6) Yum and rpm: Please print to the screen the directories where S/W > is installed. So that I don't have to > waste time going looking for it. > > 7) Convenience: STOP CHANGING THE CONFIGURATION INTERFACES. Every > time you change the configuration > methodology we the users have to waste hours and even days learning > the new configuration methodology. > > 8) Are you on drugs? What in the hell gave you the insane idea that a > command line interface for configuration > was some how better that a GUI? Actually, the CLI for configuration allows for scripting it. Since your configuration is so complex, you might look into using scripts to help you with your configuration. > Please consider carefully the possibility that you are going in > the wrong direction! > > Overall I continue to be disappointed in Fedora and thank heavens > for CentOS. Remember that from the beginning, it was stated that Fedora was the development ground for things that would eventually be part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. If you want a stable version of Linux then either buy RHEL or use CentOS. Fedora is known to be unstable and rapidly changing. If you are so keen on Solaris, you might look into getting Open Solaris for your machine. About the only problem I have run into with F26 is that the screensaver activates when it shouldn't. It's like the timer for the screensaver is not bein
Screensaver Anomaly in F25
I did an upgrade from F24 to F25. Everything seems to be working fine. I use xscreensaver instead of gnome-screensaver with a Gnome desktop. I have noticed that the timer for the screensaver is not being reset when I type or use the mouse. I can be using the machine and the screensaver will activate and then deactivate (since I'm typing or using the mouse). Has anyone else noticed this kind of behavior? Is this something with xscreensaver or is the timer reset somewhere else? Craig ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Problem with USB device
I'm running Fedora 24 fully updated. I have a USB device that I want to connect to my computer. When I connect it, lsusb does not show that it is connected, but lshw does show it and says that the rtsx_usb driver is attached to it. The question is, Why did lsusb not show the device? And, is there a way that I can specify that the usbhid driver should be used instead of the rtsx_usb driver? I looked around on the web and found a few articles that talked about unbinding the driver and binding a different driver, but when I followed the directions it didn't work. Craig ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: NFS v2 Server
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 14:02 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On Dec 2, 2016 04:45, "Craig Lanning" > wrote: > > > > Has there been a change to the NFS server? > > > > I am running: > > Fedora 24 > > nfs-utils 1.3.4 > > > > All of this has worked in earlier versions of Fedora so I'm a > little > > confused. > > > > I am trying to setup the NFS server and I need it to serve NFS v2. > That > > is the only protocol version that the client machine understands. > It's > > OS was written before v3 existed. > > > > I followed the instructions for setting it up. > > > > The client can get the list of exported filesystems from the > server, > > but fails when it tries to access one of them. > > > > The error says something about a "Remote module version mismatch." > I > > was thinking that the server was only using NFS v3. Is there > something > > else that the client might access that could have a version > mismatch > > besides the NFS protocol? > > > > Have I missed something in setting up the NFS Server? > I have not setup an NFS server in quite a while. > However, my memory is telling me that the default is to not enable V2 > support. I believe you can edit /etc/sysconfig/nfs and edit the > RPCNFSDARGS parameter to specify V2 support. That was what I needed. Thanks. I added -V 2 to the RPCNFSDARGS string and it worked just fine. I didn't have to do that the last time I setup the NFS server. Probably been a few years, though. Oh well. . . It works now! Thanks for the help. Craig ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: NFS v2 Server
The client is a Symbolics XL1201 Lisp Machine. It's operating system is called Genera. For completeness: Genera 8.3 NFS Client 436.0 IP-TCP 446.1 I have talked to various servers running NFS. I have even talked to NFS servers on machines running Fedora, just not Fedora 24. The critical item is that the Lisp Machine only understands NFS v2 and cannot talk to NFS v3 or v4. Would it be helpful for me to attempt the connection while running Wireshark to monitor the network traffic? Craig On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:52 -0500, Terry Polzin wrote: > What OS is the client? > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Craig Lanning com> wrote: > > Has there been a change to the NFS server? > > > > I am running: > > Fedora 24 > > nfs-utils 1.3.4 > > > > All of this has worked in earlier versions of Fedora so I'm a > > little > > confused. > > > > I am trying to setup the NFS server and I need it to serve NFS v2. > > That > > is the only protocol version that the client machine understands. > > It's > > OS was written before v3 existed. > > > > I followed the instructions for setting it up. > > > > The client can get the list of exported filesystems from the > > server, > > but fails when it tries to access one of them. > > > > The error says something about a "Remote module version mismatch." > > I > > was thinking that the server was only using NFS v3. Is there > > something > > else that the client might access that could have a version > > mismatch > > besides the NFS protocol? > > > > Have I missed something in setting up the NFS Server? > > > > Craig > > ___ > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
NFS v2 Server
Has there been a change to the NFS server? I am running: Fedora 24 nfs-utils 1.3.4 All of this has worked in earlier versions of Fedora so I'm a little confused. I am trying to setup the NFS server and I need it to serve NFS v2. That is the only protocol version that the client machine understands. It's OS was written before v3 existed. I followed the instructions for setting it up. The client can get the list of exported filesystems from the server, but fails when it tries to access one of them. The error says something about a "Remote module version mismatch." I was thinking that the server was only using NFS v3. Is there something else that the client might access that could have a version mismatch besides the NFS protocol? Have I missed something in setting up the NFS Server? Craig ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Audacity Won't Start
Thanks for your answers. Martin, there was no output. I would type 'audacity file.wav' and it would just return to the command prompt. Andrew, Your suggestion worked fine. I deleted the '.audacity-data' directory and it then worked just fine. Thanks to both of you for your help. Craig On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 22:45 +, Martin Cigorraga wrote: > Lol, 'with a hammer' - so true xD > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 19:40 Andrew R Paterson < > andy.pater...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > On Sunday 16 August 2015 21:14:38 Martin Cigorraga wrote: > > > Hello Craig, > > > > > > Could you please copy the output it produces when you launch the > > > application from the command line? > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 17:17 Craig Lanning < > > craig.t.lann...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Something has happened in the last couple of months that causes > > > > audacity to not want to start. > > > > > > > > If I type 'audacity audio-file.wav' in an attempt to get it to > > start > > > > with an existing audio file. It just exits. > > > > > > > > Is there some way that I can start it that will show me what it > > is > > > > trying to do so I can see where it fails? Any help figuring > > out what > > > > is causing problems and how to fix it would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > Craig Lanning > > > > > > > > -- > > > > users mailing list > > > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > > > Guidelines: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > Hi Craig, > > I found this problem as well. > > I cured it with a hammer - rm -rf ~/.audacity-data > > But you may not want to do that! > > Regards > > Andy > > -- > > users mailing list > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Audacity Won't Start
Something has happened in the last couple of months that causes audacity to not want to start. If I type 'audacity audio-file.wav' in an attempt to get it to start with an existing audio file. It just exits. Is there some way that I can start it that will show me what it is trying to do so I can see where it fails? Any help figuring out what is causing problems and how to fix it would be appreciated. Craig Lanning -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Blank Screen after login on Fedora 19
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 01:25 +0200, poma wrote: > On 01.10.2013 00:32, Craig Lanning wrote: > … > > Is there a way I can reactivate the laptop screen without using the > > Display applet in the gnome-control-center? > > > > $ mv $HOME/.config/monitors.xml $HOME/.config/monitors.xml-backup Thanks. I was hoping that restoring it to dual monitor might correct the problem. Unfortunately, it did not. > man 1 xrandr > http://www.x.org/wiki/Projects/XRandR/ > Enjoy reading. Thanks. Very interesting. Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Blank Screen after login on Fedora 19
I have a laptop in a dock with an external monitor. In Fedora 18, I configured it use the external monitor as the primary display and to turn the laptop screen off. The machine in question has the following configuration: HP EliteBook 8560p Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz 8GB RAM ATI Radeon 6400M Docking Station with 1920x1080 monitor (connected via DVI) and wired network. Fedora 19 64-bit If I create a new user, I can log into the new user just fine. I see both monitors with the laptop screen being primary. If I change it so that the external monitor is primary and the laptop screen is off, I can reboot and login just fine. After I customize the desktop a bit, when I reboot and login, I get a blank screen with a mouse pointer, but it never goes any further. I've seen comments about changing the display manager to either kdm or lightdm, but neither of those helped. It still behaved the same. I even found a comment about logging in to a text system (no display manager) and using 'startx' to start the desktop. I tried that, but it still behaved the same. Is there some way I can regain control of the user? Is there a way I can reactivate the laptop screen without using the Display applet in the gnome-control-center? Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F14 Uses Wrong Resolution on Dell C600 Laptop
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:01 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Craig Lanning wrote: > > I have a Dell Latitude C600 which will only display at 800x600. > > > > $ lspci -s 01:00.0 > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 > > AGP 2x (rev 02) > > > > $ xrandr > > Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 > > default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm > >800x60060.0*56.0 > >640x48060.0 > > > > I tried adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel boot line, but that had no > > effect. > > > > I tried adding 'video=aty128fb:1400x1050' to the kernel boot line, but > > that, also, had no effect. > > > > Is there a way to get this machine to use the 1400x1050 natural > > resolution of the LDC? > > > > Craig > > > > > Hi Craig, > > You could try replacing the monitor/screen part in your xorg.conf file > with what I will add here. It worked for my Fujitsu/Siemens. > If your hardware is.. > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > Try it anyway it may just work?? > > Make copy of your xorg.conf. > Replace the part mentioned. > Reboot. > Should it not work it will boot in console then replace with origanal. > > Here follows the lines... > Johan > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > > ModelName"Monitor Model" > > HorizSync30-107 > > VertRefresh 50-185 > > EndSection > > > > Section "Device" > > ### Available Driver options are:- > > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > > ### [arg]: arg optional > > Option "ShadowFB" "false" # [] > > #Option "DefaultRefresh"# [] > > #Option "ModeSetClearScreen"# [] > > Identifier "Card0" > > Driver "vesa" > > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]" > > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" > > EndSection I can get the vesa driver to run at 1024x768, but what I want is the r128 driver running at 1400x1050. Part of why I want the r128 driver is to get the hardware acceleration. Anytime I had the r128 driver running at a resolution above 800x600, the display exhibited some strange folding effects. I think that means that some of the timing values were wrong. Thanks for your help. I think my next step is to try installing Fedora 13 and see if I can get that to work. If it works, maybe I can collect timing values from it. Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 Uses Wrong Resolution on Dell C600 Laptop
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:01 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Craig Lanning wrote: > > I have a Dell Latitude C600 which will only display at 800x600. > > > > $ lspci -s 01:00.0 > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 > > AGP 2x (rev 02) > > > > $ xrandr > > Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 > > default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm > >800x60060.0*56.0 > >640x48060.0 > > > > I tried adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel boot line, but that had no > > effect. > > > > I tried adding 'video=aty128fb:1400x1050' to the kernel boot line, but > > that, also, had no effect. > > > > Is there a way to get this machine to use the 1400x1050 natural > > resolution of the LDC? > > > > Craig > > > > > Hi Craig, > > You could try replacing the monitor/screen part in your xorg.conf file > with what I will add here. It worked for my Fujitsu/Siemens. > If your hardware is.. > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > Try it anyway it may just work?? It will probably be this evening before I get a chance to try this. Thanks for the info. Craig > Make copy of your xorg.conf. > Replace the part mentioned. > Reboot. > Should it not work it will boot in console then replace with origanal. > > Here follows the lines... > Johan > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > > ModelName"Monitor Model" > > HorizSync30-107 > > VertRefresh 50-185 > > EndSection > > > > Section "Device" > > ### Available Driver options are:- > > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > > ### [arg]: arg optional > > Option "ShadowFB" "false" # [] > > #Option "DefaultRefresh"# [] > > #Option "ModeSetClearScreen"# [] > > Identifier "Card0" > > Driver "vesa" > > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]" > > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" > > EndSection > > > > Section "Screen" > > Identifier "Screen0" > > Device "Card0" > > Monitor"Monitor0" > > DefaultDepth 24 > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 1 > > EndSubSection > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 4 > > EndSubSection > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 8 > > EndSubSection > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 15 > > EndSubSection > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 16 > > EndSubSection > > SubSection "Display" > > Viewport 0 0 > > Depth 24 > > EndSubSection > > EndSection > > > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 Uses Wrong Resolution on Dell C600 Laptop
I have a Dell Latitude C600 which will only display at 800x600. $ lspci -s 01:00.0 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 AGP 2x (rev 02) $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm 800x60060.0*56.0 640x48060.0 I tried adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel boot line, but that had no effect. I tried adding 'video=aty128fb:1400x1050' to the kernel boot line, but that, also, had no effect. Is there a way to get this machine to use the 1400x1050 natural resolution of the LDC? Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: AVI and gxine
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:41 -0700, JD wrote: > On 10/07/2010 01:02 PN, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: > > Hello, > > > >I wanted to watch a video in AVI format. Since xine supposedly can > > play AVI, I installed gxine from the Fedora repository. When I tried > > to play the AVI movie, I get the message: > > > >"Error loading library: msvidc32.dll" > > > >Besides being surprised that a required library is missing, I find > > the name odd for a Linux library. What is going on? Thanks! > > > > Take care > > Oliver > > > > I used to download the necessary codecs directly from http://xinehq.de > but that site seems to be dead. I cannot get any response from it. > xinehq.com is some other advertising web site. > Then there is a sourceforge site: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine > but it has no links to download codecs. > > I wonder if xine development/support has reached an EOL ? > Will it re-incarnate soon at a dedicated site? Try http://www.xine-project.org/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora updates getting more like Windows every day
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/23/2010 02:36 PM, David wrote: > > On 8/23/2010 2:17 AM, Tim wrote: > >> Tim: > At least, with us, you generally only have to reboot to use the > update. You can stay on the prior one, in the meantime. Unlike > Windows, which often has to reboot, you can't keep on using the > computer, or other things won't install until you reboot. > >> David: > >>> This is mostly FUD by the way. A Windows update does not require a > >>> reboot to 'work' only to complete the install and to restart what was > >>> updated. A reboot is the simplest way to complete the process as well > >>> as the easiest path for the user. > >> Mostly, as in not actually... > >> > >> I have experienced this. You'll start doing updates, and be forced to > >> reboot part way through, before you can download and install further > >> updates. And then, on the occasions that you can defer rebooting, it's > >> unwise to try installing anything else, e.g. software that you want to > >> manually add, until the reboot. > > > > More FUD. Windows updates will 'complete' before a reboot it necessary. > > A reboot is the easy, fast way to update the installed programs and the > > 'in memory' data. > > > > I appears that you have no *recent* experience with modern Windows > > versions or with modern hardware. > > > > Rebooting The horror!!! Linux zealot FUD. but what about my > > up-time? Who care? > > OK... Then please explain to me why when I install a fresh copy of > Windows Vista it downloads a bunch of updates...asks me to > rebootdownloads some more updatesasks me to reboot...downloads > some more I think the last time I went through the process I had to > go through 4 cycles. > > Or, is it only Windows 7 that now eliminates the need to go through the > process? Nope, Windows 7 does the same thing. I just recently installed Windows 7 and had to do the same install, reboot, install, reboot dance. Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Installing jre plugin in Fedora 13
That's the old interface. For Firefox 3.6 use /usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so Craig On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 11:10 -0400, binary...@comcast.net wrote: > FC13 i686 > > Doesn't doing a ln -s > /usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin.oji.so work anymore, > the link is showing in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins > > About:plugins in firefox does not show a jre plugin. > > Boy these changes every week can STRESS a guy out. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
