Atomic and OpsWorks?
Has anyone used CentOS or Fedora Atomic with OpsWorks? My searches on the internet haven't turned anything up, so I wanted to see if there was any experience/advice on here. Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Running Starcraft?
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda < ca...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 4 June 2017 at 20:45, Dave Johansen wrote: > > Has anyone been able to get the free version of Starcraft up and > running? I > > ran into the issue where ClientSdk.dll won't initialize ( > > https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42741 ). Any ideas on how I can > get > > it working? > > Thanks, > > Dave > > Hi, > Working OK for me. I didn't do anything special (download, run > installer with wine, use icon on desktop to launch) > > [casep@casepX1 ~]$ rpm -qi wine > Name: wine > Version : 2.8 > Release : 1.fc25 > Architecture: i686 > > Kind regards > I decided to give the 2.9 version that's in testing a try and it worked. Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Running Starcraft?
Has anyone been able to get the free version of Starcraft up and running? I ran into the issue where ClientSdk.dll won't initialize ( https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42741 ). Any ideas on how I can get it working? Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Docker storage on Fedora 25?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 12/26/2016 08:39 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:37:46PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora- > centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/ > >> Does the above recommendation still hold true with Fedora 25/Docker > 1.12.5? > >> If so, is the configuration the same? > > Quick glance, yeah, looks still basically right. You have a new option, > > overlay2, which is a newer Docker driver for OverlayFS and generally > > preferred. See > > https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/storagedriver/selectadriver/ F25 now uses docker-storage-setup, so the right way to select the driver was a bit different, but this instructions showed how to do it: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-atomic-host/7/paged/managing-containers/chapter-1-managing-storage-with-docker-formatted-containers#overlay_graph_driver > *But*, I'm not sure offhand if SELinux support is complete -- I know it > > *was being worked on. > > > SELinux should work fine on F25. We are working to change the default > in F26 to the overlay2 driver. That's good to hear. Do I need to add the :z or :Z when mounting a host directory for SELinux to work? If so, will that cause any problems when running on Mac/Windows? Thanks for the help, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Docker storage on Fedora 25?
http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/ Does the above recommendation still hold true with Fedora 25/Docker 1.12.5? If so, is the configuration the same? Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
High CPU usage of kswapd0 with no swap partition?
I recently did a clean install of Fedora during the upgrade to 24. I removed the swap partition because I'm ok with everything fitting in memory, but on occasion my whole system locks up and I've started keeping a log of top and it has shown that kswapd0 is using a lot of CPU. Is something not configured correctly on my system? Or any other ideas on what the source of this issue is? Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sound not working with F22 on ThinkPad T60
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:30 PM, stan wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:06:09 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM, stan > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:03:18 -0700 > > > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > > > > > I recently did a clean install of F22 Mate Spin from F21 and > > > > sound is no longer working. I tried the recommendations from > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_sound_problems but > > > > nothing seemed to work. Is there anything else I should try? > > > > > > Run aplay -lv to see if alsa found your sound devices. > > > > > > > I don't really know what to expect, but this looks fine to me: > > $ aplay -lv > > List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices > > card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD1981 Analog [AD1981 Analog] > > Subdevices: 1/1 > > Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 > > card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: AD1981 Digital [AD1981 Digital] > > Subdevices: 1/1 > > Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 > > > > Install pavucontrol and check how pulseaudio has configured those > > sound > > > devices. You might have defaulted to an invalid default device, > > > like the hdmi on a video device. Set everything how you want it. > > > > > > > Nothing seemed out of the ordinary for this and sound still doesn't > > work. Any other suggestions? > > Bring up pavucontrol and remove device 0 from pulsaudio control. > Should be on the last tab. Then check what happens if you try to play > a .wav file with the command > aplay --device=plughw:0,0 some_wav_file.wav > If it plays, the problem is in the pulseaudio setup / interface with > alsa, because alsa is working, so the correct driver is loaded > and working. > If it seems to be working, but there is no sound, check physical > connections like speakers, because alsa thinks its sending sound to > output. > aplay doesn't error out or anything but there's no sound. It's a T60 laptop so I don't know how I can check connections. > If the command aborts, then there is a problem with the alsa driver. > That seems unlikely, since aplay showed it correctly. > > If you have audacity installed, you can confirm the failure by > importing a sound file into audacity (File->audio_import), and playing > it (space bar). If the meters move, but there is no sound, then the > driver is loaded and functioning, but there is a disconnect at output. > > If all the connections are right, it might be that the default device > is device 0,1 (digital), instead of device 0,0 (analog). > I tried device 0,1 and device 0,0 and neither worked. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Sound not working with F22 on ThinkPad T60
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM, stan wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:03:18 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > I recently did a clean install of F22 Mate Spin from F21 and sound is > > no longer working. I tried the recommendations from > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_sound_problems but nothing > > seemed to work. Is there anything else I should try? > > Run aplay -lv to see if alsa found your sound devices. > I don't really know what to expect, but this looks fine to me: $ aplay -lv List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD1981 Analog [AD1981 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 1: AD1981 Digital [AD1981 Digital] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Install pavucontrol and check how pulseaudio has configured those sound > devices. You might have defaulted to an invalid default device, like > the hdmi on a video device. Set everything how you want it. > Nothing seemed out of the ordinary for this and sound still doesn't work. Any other suggestions? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Sound not working with F22 on ThinkPad T60
I recently did a clean install of F22 Mate Spin from F21 and sound is no longer working. I tried the recommendations from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_sound_problems but nothing seemed to work. Is there anything else I should try? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
/boot and encrypted partitions?
I was luck enough to be bitten by this issue ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212907 ) when attempting to do a clean install of F22. I copied all of my data off and then tried manually setting things up as separate partitions (instead of in an LVM) but it kept telling me that /boot couldn't be on a LUKS partition. The config I had was /home was encrypted and / was encrypted but then the biosboot partition was not encrypted, and all 3 were standard partitions. Is this something that's just not supported? Or was I doing something wrong? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How can I figure out what yum/systemd is doing?
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > Over an hour ago, I started a "yum remove" in F21 and it seems to have > hung at removing the 2nd of 8 rpms. I noticed that systemd was using ~40% > of a CPU and so I left figuring it might just "work itself out", but now > over an hour later, it's still hung and system is still using a lot of CPU. > What can I do to try and diagnose what is going wrong with yum and/or > systemd? > Thanks, > Dave > I attached to the yum process with gdb and here's the backtrace: #0 0xb76debac in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7510d03 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0xb6fa4842 in rpmScriptRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #3 0xb6f83c53 in runScript () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #4 0xb6f8434f in runInstScript () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #5 0xb6f8531b in rpmpsmRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #6 0xb6f9a3cb in rpmteProcess () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #7 0xb6fa1714 in rpmtsRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #8 0xb6fd0f0a in rpmts_Run () from /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rpm/_rpm.so #9 0xb758a609 in PyCFunction_Call () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #10 0xb754a645 in PyObject_Call () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #11 0xb75e6f33 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #12 0xb75616c6 in methoddescr_call () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #13 0xb754a645 in PyObject_Call () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #14 0xb75eb187 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #15 0xb75ecfe1 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #16 0xb75ee1ea in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #17 0xb75ecf11 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #18 0xb75ee1ea in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #19 0xb75ecf11 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #20 0xb75ee1ea in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #21 0xb75ecf11 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #22 0xb75ee1ea in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #23 0xb75ecf11 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #24 0xb75ee1ea in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #25 0xb75ee344 in PyEval_EvalCode () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #26 0xb76078db in run_mod () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #27 0xb7608d70 in PyRun_FileExFlags () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #28 0xb760a163 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #29 0xb760a6c8 in PyRun_AnyFileExFlags () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #30 0xb761c911 in Py_Main () from /lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0 #31 0x08048578 in main () It looks like it's waiting on some process. Is there a way I can tell what the process is and why it hasn't returned yet? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How can I figure out what yum/systemd is doing?
Over an hour ago, I started a "yum remove" in F21 and it seems to have hung at removing the 2nd of 8 rpms. I noticed that systemd was using ~40% of a CPU and so I left figuring it might just "work itself out", but now over an hour later, it's still hung and system is still using a lot of CPU. What can I do to try and diagnose what is going wrong with yum and/or systemd? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: MATE desktop
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Les Howell wrote: > My wife doesn't like the GNOME3 desktop. She did like GNOME2, so I have > found that MATE desktop is a fork of GNOME2. I have looked at the > software menu (on x86_64 F19) and see lots of stuff related to MATE. > What is the key to getting MATE installed and run on a user? Will the > GNOME3 version of Evolution, Firefox, etc all run? > > If you have installed and used the MATE desktop, please give me your > opinion. I couldn't get GNOME3 working with dual monitors on my laptop ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/438593.html ), so I gave MATE a try and it worked just fine. It basically felt just like GNOME2 (which makes sense since is just a fork of it) and I didn't have any issues with it. This article ( http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/01/installing-the-mate-and-cinnamon-desktops-on-fedora-18/ ) recommends using the net install for "best results" and that probably is the recommended way to go, but I did it as a post install addition and it worked just fine. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Java symbolic links broken on Fedora 19?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Alchemist wrote: > > > > 2013/7/27 Dave Johansen > >> I have a system that I upgraded from Fedora 18 to 19 recently and I >> just installed eclipse, but it says that there's no JVM when I try and >> run it. I noticed that /usr/bin/java is a symbolic link to >> /etc/alternatives/java which is then a symbolic link to >> /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk/bin/java but it's actually installed at >> /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.i386/bin/java. >> >> Is this an issue from the update from Fedora 18 to 19? Or is it an >> issue with the packages in Fedora 19? >> >> Thanks, >> Dave >> > > Seems this started with java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-* > run alternatives --config java > then choose your openjdk version path > That fixed the issue. Is this something that needs to be fixed/reported? Or did I just get unlucky? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Java symbolic links broken on Fedora 19?
I have a system that I upgraded from Fedora 18 to 19 recently and I just installed eclipse, but it says that there's no JVM when I try and run it. I noticed that /usr/bin/java is a symbolic link to /etc/alternatives/java which is then a symbolic link to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk/bin/java but it's actually installed at /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.i386/bin/java. Is this an issue from the update from Fedora 18 to 19? Or is it an issue with the packages in Fedora 19? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnome-shell issue when ThinkPad T60 connected to dock with extra monitor
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > > > > I posted about this issue on the devel list and it was recommended > > that I try here. That conversation can be found at: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185305.html > > > > Here's a description of the issue: > > > > I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from > > CentOS 6. With CentOS 6, I could connect to the dock with an extra > > monitor connected to the VGA port just fine, but with Fedora 19 it has > > issues. > > > > It used to crash when I connected it to the dock with the monitor connected: > > https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/142339/ > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982442 > > > > I've updated using yum and now it doesn't crash, but I can't start any > > programs. When I click on a program icon to launch it, nothing > > happens. > > > > Based on feedback on the devel list, I tried the following: > > > > The keyboard works and I can hit Ctrl-Alt-F2 and then login and run > > commands on the console. I also tried creating a new account and it > > has the same issue. I also tried pressing the Windows Key and the > > Activities Overview doesn't pop up like it's supposed to and the only > > thing that I can get to do anything is right clicking on the desktop > > and then about a minute later the setting context menu will pop up. > > > > What can I do to help diagnose this issue and hopefully fix it? > > I took a look in /var/log/messages and saw these two outputs right > after connecting to the dock with second monitor connected: > Jul 16 19:35:15 JohansenDev /etc/gdm/Xsession[1241]: > (gnome-settings-daemon:1425): GnomeDesktop-CRITICAL **: > gnome_rr_output_info_get_geometry: assertion `GNOME_IS_RR_OUTPUT_INFO > (self)' failed > Jul 16 19:35:15 JohansenDev /etc/gdm/Xsession[1241]: > (gnome-settings-daemon:1425): GnomeDesktop-CRITICAL **: > gnome_rr_output_info_get_geometry: assertion `GNOME_IS_RR_OUTPUT_INFO > (self)' failed > > Are there any other logs I can take a look at? Or anything else I can > do to help diagnose the cause of this issue? > > Thanks, > Dave https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2013-July/msg00045.html I found out from the above conversation on the gnome mailing list that the issue is with how X/gnome_shell handles the texture allocation and it not playing nice with the limitations of Intel gen3 video hardware: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699705 I haven't been able to get any response there, so I was hoping that maybe someone on here could help. It appears that the per-crtc pixmaps have been added, but is that functionality not being used by X/gnome_shell yet? Or is there some way I have to manually turn that on? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gnome-shell issue when ThinkPad T60 connected to dock with extra monitor
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > > I posted about this issue on the devel list and it was recommended > that I try here. That conversation can be found at: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185305.html > > Here's a description of the issue: > > I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from > CentOS 6. With CentOS 6, I could connect to the dock with an extra > monitor connected to the VGA port just fine, but with Fedora 19 it has > issues. > > It used to crash when I connected it to the dock with the monitor connected: > https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/142339/ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982442 > > I've updated using yum and now it doesn't crash, but I can't start any > programs. When I click on a program icon to launch it, nothing > happens. > > Based on feedback on the devel list, I tried the following: > > The keyboard works and I can hit Ctrl-Alt-F2 and then login and run > commands on the console. I also tried creating a new account and it > has the same issue. I also tried pressing the Windows Key and the > Activities Overview doesn't pop up like it's supposed to and the only > thing that I can get to do anything is right clicking on the desktop > and then about a minute later the setting context menu will pop up. > > What can I do to help diagnose this issue and hopefully fix it? I took a look in /var/log/messages and saw these two outputs right after connecting to the dock with second monitor connected: Jul 16 19:35:15 JohansenDev /etc/gdm/Xsession[1241]: (gnome-settings-daemon:1425): GnomeDesktop-CRITICAL **: gnome_rr_output_info_get_geometry: assertion `GNOME_IS_RR_OUTPUT_INFO (self)' failed Jul 16 19:35:15 JohansenDev /etc/gdm/Xsession[1241]: (gnome-settings-daemon:1425): GnomeDesktop-CRITICAL **: gnome_rr_output_info_get_geometry: assertion `GNOME_IS_RR_OUTPUT_INFO (self)' failed Are there any other logs I can take a look at? Or anything else I can do to help diagnose the cause of this issue? Thanks, Dave -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
gnome-shell issue when ThinkPad T60 connected to dock with extra monitor
I posted about this issue on the devel list and it was recommended that I try here. That conversation can be found at: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185305.html Here's a description of the issue: I have a ThinkPad T60 that I recently upgraded to Fedora 19 from CentOS 6. With CentOS 6, I could connect to the dock with an extra monitor connected to the VGA port just fine, but with Fedora 19 it has issues. It used to crash when I connected it to the dock with the monitor connected: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/142339/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982442 I've updated using yum and now it doesn't crash, but I can't start any programs. When I click on a program icon to launch it, nothing happens. Based on feedback on the devel list, I tried the following: The keyboard works and I can hit Ctrl-Alt-F2 and then login and run commands on the console. I also tried creating a new account and it has the same issue. I also tried pressing the Windows Key and the Activities Overview doesn't pop up like it's supposed to and the only thing that I can get to do anything is right clicking on the desktop and then about a minute later the setting context menu will pop up. What can I do to help diagnose this issue and hopefully fix it? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
