Re: Device defaults -
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 06:12 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > It seems too often I struggle with the problem of dealing with a > device > that, when "reset" or new, is on a different subnet and my computer > address needs to change temporarily for the device to be > accessedwith > the Firefox browser long enough to change the device address too > something in my 192.168.1.xxx range. > > What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or > 28,NetworkManager? > > My immediate problem is that I have an Buffalo router /have been > using > as an ethernet bridge for a long time and I forgot the address I > assigned to it and I can't access it. It came with dd-wrt. I t > looks > to me like I need to reset it to gain access with the browser. > > /Bob > You can temporarily give your lan interface another class C and configure that device to give it a ip in your range. Say your device reset to 192.168.0.1 and your ethernet interface is eth0 you can ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 Config device plugged into your switch to your class C then ifconfig eth0:0 down Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K6IQE7VAKLHFUQHPNWRFCR4FZT6E4CMT/
Re: Update problem: soundtouch (F27)
> I had the same problem trying to compile rivendell. > I simlinked libSoundTouch.so.2.0.0 to LibSoundTouch.so.1 > Compiled fine and runs fine. > > Gary. > ___ > Oops jumped in a bit fast here, i'm on fedora 28. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5IYD6H4SBWJS4UHX4O5OR3SWRUZBL6IF/
Re: Update problem: soundtouch (F27)
> Thanks Ed. I had seen the original thread but didn't connect. I > think > I shall go into wait mode. Maybe some locally built packages would > need > rebuilds too. > I had the same problem trying to compile rivendell. I simlinked libSoundTouch.so.2.0.0 to LibSoundTouch.so.1 Compiled fine and runs fine. Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A3K73D7VJYFQD2REPFKZ3Y3GL4UHU67S/
rp-pppoe
Hi, currently I am using a rp-pppoe with a router/modem in bridge mode on adsl and all is working fine. We are being forced to move to nbn, in our case fibre to the node. The provider I am looking at uses vdsl, Protocol: IPoE (DHCP / Automatic IP) VLAN: None/blank. Will this work with rp-pppoe? If not is there a similar connection software that will? Thanks Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I5ZLVVWRHNHNFAFANNZWYAPXVWIMWDV7/
Re: Services Offered by Freelance Network and Infrastructure Engineer
On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 23:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/05/17 22:50, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > Worldwide Announcement 4th October 2017 > > > > This announcement addresses individuals and Small and Medium > > Businesses (SMB). > > > > Advertising for work on a user's list? > > I advocate for your being banned for life from this forum. > Yep advertizing for work to a users list is not very bright... enough said.. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: network manager freezes
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 12:14 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 26 June 2017 at 11:36, Gary Hodder <vk2...@vk2kcf.com> wrote: > > trying to install fedora 26 on a new laptop but freezes when it > > gets to > > > > the network manager. > > > > Is there a way to disable network manager when installing from a > > live > > > > cd? > > > > F26 is still unreleased. Please ask on the Fedora Test list, not > here. Note that many testers do not read the Users list (this one). > > poc > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org So is disabling network manager on a live cd install a test thing? Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
network manager freezes
Hi, trying to install fedora 26 on a new laptop but freezes when it gets to the network manager. Is there a way to disable network manager when installing from a live cd? Its the xfce spin. Thanks Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Latest systemd news
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 20:14 -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote: Just to point out how explosive the systemd issue is in the Linux community, note that Debian has been forked just beause of this: https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20141127.212941.f55acc3a.en.html Thanks for the link, not all Debian has gone to the dark side... In the mean time I will format fedora and load pclinuxos and keep a eye on Devuan. Gary. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: iptables is like alchemy
I'll try this tomorrow when I get into work. But at first look it seems awfully familiar, like it's something that I've already tried. Thanks, though. At this point I'll try whatever somebody thinks might work. -Alan Maybe I should have put it this way. This one does the redirect. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i ppp0 --dport 22 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.2:22 Because it goes through the forward chain you also need to allow it there as well with iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i ppp0 -o eth0 -d 192.168.0.2 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT You need both. Gary. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: iptables is like alchemy
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 15:54 -0800, Alan Evans wrote: This is really related to iptables, not I presume Fedora-specific. But I'm really hoping that somebody here will be able to school me on iptables, so I don't have to find and subscribe to some other list just to ask one question. I'm faced with the problem of needing to punch a hole in a firewall on our portal server so that, in our case, ssh to port 20022 on external interface of that server actually just connects to port 22 on another machine located in the network on the internal interface. I hope I'm being clear. I've tried many iterations of iptables rules to accomplish this. The closest I've come is: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -s 0/0 --dport 20022 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.35:22 And indeed connecting to port 20022 on portal just goes straight to port 22 on the other (192.168.0.35) machine. The problem is, as soon as I apply this rule, DNS queries (portal is also a DNS server) to the external interface stop working. I've googled endlessly and found about a thousand variations by people that are each supposed to solve a subtly different variation on what I'm trying to do. Nothing I've tried does what I want without bad side effects like I describe above. -Alan Hi Alan, try this ppp0=Internet connection eth0=local area network connection This will forward port 22 on the Internet to machine 192.168.0.2 port 22 on local network. iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i ppp0 -o eth0 -d 192.168.0.2 --dport 22 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i ppp0 --dport 22 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.2:22 Gary. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
usb ethernet adapter
trying to get a Davicom DM9601 USB Ethernet adapter to work with Fedora 17. The driver keeps turning the carrier off on the device. Anyone know a fix for this or am I better off getting a better one. If I need to get a better one what cheapies on Ebay are known to work? This is for a dell laptop to connect to a adsl modem and the on board network card will connect to the local network switch. The laptop will be the local server and run off solar power. Below is a cut from the messages file. Thanks Gary. Nov 28 21:33:58 groucho kernel: [ 3387.653275] usb 6-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0fe6, idProduct=9700 Nov 28 21:33:58 groucho kernel: [ 3387.653282] usb 6-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 Nov 28 21:33:58 groucho kernel: [ 3387.653287] usb 6-1: Product: USB 2.0 10/100M Ethernet Adaptor Nov 28 21:33:58 groucho kernel: [ 3387.692606] dm9601 6-1:1.0: eth0: register 'dm9601' at usb-:00:1d.0-1, Davicom DM9601 USB Ethernet, 00:e0:4c:53:44:58 Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: warn failed to allocate link cache: (-10) Operation not supported Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): carrier is OFF Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: error [1354098839.91292] [nm-device-ethernet.c:456] real_update_permanent_hw_address(): (eth0): unable to read permanent MAC address (error 0) Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): new Ethernet device (driver: 'dm9601' ifindex: 20) Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): exported as /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/18 Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): now managed Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): device state change: unmanaged - unavailable (reason 'managed') [10 20 2] Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): bringing up device. Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho kernel: [ 3387.958274] dm9601 6-1:1.0: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): carrier now ON (device state 20) Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): preparing device. Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): deactivating device (reason 'managed') [2] Nov 28 21:33:59 groucho NetworkManager[652]: info (eth0): carrier now OFF (device state 20) Nov 28 21:34:01 groucho avahi-daemon[647]: Registering new address record for fe80::2e0:4cff:fe53:4458 on eth0.*. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Motherboards
Hi all, I am wondering what motherboards users are using on there Linux box? I had a Asus m4a79t delux but in corroded under 2 years and failed. Asus blames the customer oxidation and will not give warranty even though it has 3 years warranty. Strange how a old p5 Intel machine beside it is perfectly fine. Asus warranty not worth the paper its written on. Have a Asus crosshair V formula that spent more times being repaired than been used. It still comes up with eprom errors on boot and runs like a dog and Asus will not give money back as they say they do not support Linux. So we have proved that this brand is crap, what else is there? Am looking at the Gigabyte ga-990fxa-d3, does this board play well with Linux as looking at putting it in what was the m4a79t box. Thanks Gary. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
