Re: Preupgrade fc14 to fc15 failed, kernel is not installed
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 10:31 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings > > mailto:cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>> > wrote: > > OK, so while looking at the live system chrooted to your system, what > is > > the response to: > > > > rpm -q kernel > > > > Let's find out if the proper kernel got installed. If so, then we'll > > have a look at your /etc/grub.conf (which is just a symlink to: > > /boot/grub/grub.conf). And then we'll try and figure out how to > install > > it by running grubby by hand > > > > There is no fc15 kernel, only > > kernel-2.6.35.12-88.fc14.i686 > > kernel-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 > > kernel-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 > > OK, so the f15 kernel never got installed. That would bring into > question a whole raft of other potential problems that you will probably > need to clean uop from as well > > > Are you 100% sure that preupgrade didn't stop prematurely with some > sort > > of error message? > > > > It halted halfway because of installing openjpeg-devel. I renamed > > related files and preupgrade continued without other problem. > > Except that it seemed to miss installing the kernel > > > If it did not get installed, it should be easy enough to install one > by > > hand (with RPM) and see if it installs without any errors (and > correctly > > modifies your /etc/grub.conf file). If it requires dependencies to > > install, then you will have other problems. > > > > When I tried "rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.38.6-fc15.i686.rpm", it failed with > > "grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template". But it created > > some files(eg. vmlinuz-xxx-fc15, initramfs-xxx.img) in /boot and > > /lib/modules. However, grub-install didn't recognize these files. > > We can always add the proper lines to /etc/grub.conf by hand if we have > to > > What is the contents of your current /etc/grub.conf file? > What and where are the f15 kernel files? >(you are looking for at least a vmlinuz- file and possibly > an initramfs- file and possibly a System.map- file as well) > > I have the following on my botched f15 upgrade: > > /boot > config-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 efi > initramfs-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686.img initrd-plymouth.img > System.map-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 vmlinuz-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 > config-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 elf-memtest86+-4.10 > initramfs-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686.img memtest86+-4.10 > System.map-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 vmlinuz-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 > config-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 grub > initramfs-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.img System.map-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 > upgradevmlinuz-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 > > and my grub.conf contains this entry for f15 (which boots for me): > > title Fedora (2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686) >root (hd0,0) >kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 ro > root=UUID=f3299b81-9fc4-46eb-9189-a79591e894a1 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM > rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM vga=0x123 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 > KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us noiswmd >initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.img > > You will need to change the UUID to match your disk, and whether or not > you need all of the boot options that I have, you can compare to your > f14 kernel entries in your grub.conf file. All of the options on my f15 > kernel line appear verbatim on my f14 kernel lines. And my test system > is currently booted in f15 (or some subset of it. B^) > > I have these files in /boot, and I tried to revise entry in grub.conf. Unfortunately, It complains cannot find /proc/cmdline when booting... > -- > Kevin J. Cummings > kjch...@rcn.com > cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net > cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Preupgrade fc14 to fc15 failed, kernel is not installed
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 09:00 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > Hello, Kevin > > > > I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using > > livecd. > > After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by checking "rpm -qa |grep > > fc15 ", I am sure that many fc15 packages have installed. > > And all the 3 steps you mentioned have passed, which takes a couple of > > hours. So at least most fc15 packages have installed. > > OK, so while looking at the live system chrooted to your system, what is > the response to: > > rpm -q kernel > > Let's find out if the proper kernel got installed. If so, then we'll > have a look at your /etc/grub.conf (which is just a symlink to: > /boot/grub/grub.conf). And then we'll try and figure out how to install > it by running grubby by hand > > There is no fc15 kernel, only kernel-2.6.35.12-88.fc14.i686 kernel-2.6.35.12-90.fc14.i686 kernel-2.6.35.13-91.fc14.i686 > I just found a empty upgrade directory in /boot, and nothing related to > > fc15 there. I guess preupgrade must forget to install kernel. > > Not likely, though its possible in some bizarre set of circumstances. > > Are you 100% sure that preupgrade didn't stop prematurely with some sort > of error message? > > It halted halfway because of installing openjpeg-devel. I renamed related files and preupgrade continued without other problem. > So what I should do to rescue it is to upgrade/install kernel in chroot > > environment. But I don't know how to upgrade kernel with a kernel RPM > > file. Any advice? > > Let's find out if it got installed first. If it did, and it didn't > install an entry in the grub menu, then it was a script-let of the > kernel RPM which errored. > > If it did not get installed, it should be easy enough to install one by > hand (with RPM) and see if it installs without any errors (and correctly > modifies your /etc/grub.conf file). If it requires dependencies to > install, then you will have other problems. > > When I tried "rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.38.6-fc15.i686.rpm", it failed with "grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template". But it created some files(eg. vmlinuz-xxx-fc15, initramfs-xxx.img) in /boot and /lib/modules. However, grub-install didn't recognize these files. > What I've ended up doing in circumstances like these is to plow ahead > and continue the upgrade in pieces, by hand after ensuring that: > > 0) I have read the Fedora release notes for the version I am > installing, looking for gotcha's that I may have tripped over! > > 1) I have a proper kernel installed and working (bootable), and the > fedora-release RPM is the proper version and architecture. > > 2) yum and rpm (and all of their dependants) are up-to-date. > > 3) my network is up and running so I can do (yum) updates over the > network. > > 4) essentially finish the upgrade by updating all of the remaining > out-of-date RPMs on the system. Yes, you could try and continue from > that point with "yum -y update", but you would most likely need to do it > in pieces (to get around all of the broken packages) and also use the > --skip-broken option to yum. I like to try it alphabetically (ie yum -y > update a*), but usually end up breaking down each leading letter looking > for packages that update nicely, and then figure out what's wrong with > the packages that don't. This is not a quick and easy process. I've > sometimes spent weeks cleaning up my server or my laptop from a failed > upgrade in this fashion, but, in the end, my system has been upgraded, > and not re-installed (for some reason, an updated system seems to me to > be less likely to have some necessary local configuration lost than an > installed update, but, I could be wrong). In the end, I learn a *lot* > about Fedora, how it works (and how it sometimes doesn't work B^), and > how to fix it. > > What doesn't work in this process is if some new set of packages > obsoletes an installed set of packages, this method may not properly > install the new set of packages. That's ultimately because Anaconda > failed during preupgrade, but didn't leave a sufficient amount of > information to properly fix the upgrade. > > If you are not able to install/boot a proper f15 kernel, let us know, > there are ways (even more nefarious that a "yum upgrade") to update your > system piecemeal, even from an f14 kernel > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings > > mailto:cummi...@kjcho
Re: Preupgrade fc14 to fc15 failed, kernel is not installed
When I tried "rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686" in chroot environment, it complains " grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template". I guess preupgrade get the same problem and just skip the kernel install. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > Hello, Kevin > > I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using > livecd. > After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by checking "rpm -qa |grep > fc15 ", I am sure that many fc15 packages have installed. > And all the 3 steps you mentioned have passed, which takes a couple of > hours. So at least most fc15 packages have installed. > > I just found a empty upgrade directory in /boot, and nothing related to > fc15 there. I guess preupgrade must forget to install kernel. > So what I should do to rescue it is to upgrade/install kernel in chroot > environment. But I don't know how to upgrade kernel with a kernel RPM file. > Any advice? > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings < > cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > >> On 06/02/2011 10:13 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote: >> > Hello, guys, >> > I used preupgrade to upgrade fc14 to fc15, and everything seemed >> > fine. But when I reboot, I just find that kernel-fc15 is not installed. >> >> I can't tell from what you written above, but, pre-upgrade is a multi >> step process. Here are the steps in a nut-shell: >> >> 1) run preupgrade and have it download packages to a local repository on >> your machine. It should also modify your /etc/grub.conf file to add an >> entry which will continue the upgrade in step 2. When this step >> completes, it should ask you to reboot your computer. >> >> 2) when you reboot, it should automatically select the F15 upgrade entry >> and boot into the second stage installer and start installing the >> downloaded packages on to your system. This is the step that fails for >> many people. Places to look for problems are in /etc/grub.conf and in >> /boot/upgrade/. In the latter you should have at least 3 files: >> initrd.img, ks.cfg, and vmlinuz. If not, something else has gone wrong >> for you to look into. If everything goes right, when the packages are >> finished installing (and yet another change is made to your >> /etc/grub.conf file), the system will reboot yet again >> >> 3) The final reboot will run a script called firstboot which should >> clean up from the upgrade process, and remove the old kernel versions >> from your system. It will also check to make sure that any new packages >> are configured properly (or prompt you for their configuration) >> so that F15 will run correctly for you upon subsequent reboots. If you >> get this far, preupgrade has done its job correctly and you should be >> all set. >> >> > There are no vmlinuz-xxx.fc15.i686 and initramfs--fc15.i686.img in >> > /boot, no entry about fc-15 written in grub.conf, and nothing related to >> > fc15 is found in /lib/modules. >> > >> > I just try to download kernel and install it manually. But I don't know >> > whether there are any other packages forgotten. >> >> What does "rpm -qa | grep fc15" tell you? (there should be *lots* of >> hits). >> >> If it can't find any fc15 packages installed, you haven't upgraded yet. >> >> > -- >> > Bob >> >> -- >> Kevin J. Cummings >> kjch...@rcn.com >> cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net >> cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us >> Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> > > > > -- > Bob > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Preupgrade fc14 to fc15 failed, kernel is not installed
Hello, Kevin I can't enter my system now, however, I check the upgraded system using livecd. After login in my system by chroot in livecd, by checking "rpm -qa |grep fc15 ", I am sure that many fc15 packages have installed. And all the 3 steps you mentioned have passed, which takes a couple of hours. So at least most fc15 packages have installed. I just found a empty upgrade directory in /boot, and nothing related to fc15 there. I guess preupgrade must forget to install kernel. So what I should do to rescue it is to upgrade/install kernel in chroot environment. But I don't know how to upgrade kernel with a kernel RPM file. Any advice? On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kevin J. Cummings < cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 10:13 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > Hello, guys, > > I used preupgrade to upgrade fc14 to fc15, and everything seemed > > fine. But when I reboot, I just find that kernel-fc15 is not installed. > > I can't tell from what you written above, but, pre-upgrade is a multi > step process. Here are the steps in a nut-shell: > > 1) run preupgrade and have it download packages to a local repository on > your machine. It should also modify your /etc/grub.conf file to add an > entry which will continue the upgrade in step 2. When this step > completes, it should ask you to reboot your computer. > > 2) when you reboot, it should automatically select the F15 upgrade entry > and boot into the second stage installer and start installing the > downloaded packages on to your system. This is the step that fails for > many people. Places to look for problems are in /etc/grub.conf and in > /boot/upgrade/. In the latter you should have at least 3 files: > initrd.img, ks.cfg, and vmlinuz. If not, something else has gone wrong > for you to look into. If everything goes right, when the packages are > finished installing (and yet another change is made to your > /etc/grub.conf file), the system will reboot yet again > > 3) The final reboot will run a script called firstboot which should > clean up from the upgrade process, and remove the old kernel versions > from your system. It will also check to make sure that any new packages > are configured properly (or prompt you for their configuration) > so that F15 will run correctly for you upon subsequent reboots. If you > get this far, preupgrade has done its job correctly and you should be > all set. > > > There are no vmlinuz-xxx.fc15.i686 and initramfs--fc15.i686.img in > > /boot, no entry about fc-15 written in grub.conf, and nothing related to > > fc15 is found in /lib/modules. > > > > I just try to download kernel and install it manually. But I don't know > > whether there are any other packages forgotten. > > What does "rpm -qa | grep fc15" tell you? (there should be *lots* of > hits). > > If it can't find any fc15 packages installed, you haven't upgraded yet. > > > -- > > Bob > > -- > Kevin J. Cummings > kjch...@rcn.com > cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net > cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Where is the initramfs?
Hello guys, After preupgrading from fc14 to fc15, the kernel-fc15 was not installed. So I fail to boot my upgraded fedora. When I extract kernel-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.rpm manually, I found that there is no initramfs-2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686.img in the RPM archieve. I tried to create an initramfs file by dracut using livecd: *mount /media/FEDORA /dev/sda6 # the disk where I installed fedora ln -s /media/FEDORA/lib/modules/2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686/ /lib/modules/2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 dracut initramfs.img 2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686 * When I used the manully created initramfs.img to boot my system, it complained "modprobe FATAL could not load /lib/modules/2.6.38.6-27.fc15.i686/modules.dep". Actually, modules.dep file doesn't exist in kernel RPM archieve. So how can I install kernel manually? How to create a initramfs properly? Thanks, any advices will be appreciated! -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Preupgrade fc14 to fc15 failed, kernel is not installed
Hello, guys, I used preupgrade to upgrade fc14 to fc15, and everything seemed fine. But when I reboot, I just find that kernel-fc15 is not installed. There are no vmlinuz-xxx.fc15.i686 and initramfs--fc15.i686.img in /boot, no entry about fc-15 written in grub.conf, and nothing related to fc15 is found in /lib/modules. I just try to download kernel and install it manually. But I don't know whether there are any other packages forgotten. -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
I have install redhat-rpm-config, and I didn't see separate pkg. Separating debuginfo will make it run much faster? On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > GeeKer Wang wrote: > > > Hi, guys > > I tried to compile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.rpm software, and got > a > > low efficient and large version of it. But the version from fedora-repo > > works well. > > eg. my version with frame rate < 10, while fedora-repo version with frame > > rate ~=40. > > > > I have tried three ways: > > 1. configure && make > > 2. ccmake && make > > 3. rpmbuild --recompile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.src.rpm > > They resulted the same anyway. Especially, the rpmbuld way took 3G+ disk > > space, each .so file is much larger and each application is slower. It's > > realy strange to me. I use the gcc/g++ 4.5.1 under fedora 14. > > > > So where the differences come from? Or where are the special places in > > fedora's compiling environment? Any advice will be appreciated, thx. > > 3 is the way to go, I'd venture you didn't have redhat-rpm-config > installed, > so it used slightly different compiler flags and didn't generate a separate > -debuginfo pkg (ie, why it was so much bigger). > > -- Rex > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
Of course I have Inventor-2.1.5-39.fc14 OpenThreads-2.8.3-3.fc14 OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-3.fc14 OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:13 AM, JD wrote: > On 03/20/2011 03:57 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > So, there must be other reasons. > > > > My version gets a XLIB problem. When I run "osgview cow.osg", the > > window is transparent. > > I must execute "export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1" before it becoms normal. > > > > However, it runs really slow comparing to fedora-repo version. > OpenSceneGraph.i686 0:2.8.2-7.fc13 > depends on: > OpenThreads-2.8.2-7.fc13.i6861/4 > Inventor-2.1.5-38.fc13.i686 2/4 > OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.2-7.fc13.i6863/4 > OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-7.fc13.i686 > > Do you have all these dependencies installed and are they all of the > required version? > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
I believe there must be something related to the compiling procesure. Because two versions works different on the same platform. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, JD wrote: > On 03/20/2011 03:57 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > So, there must be other reasons. > > > > My version gets a XLIB problem. When I run "osgview cow.osg", the > > window is transparent. > > I must execute "export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1" before it becoms normal. > > > > However, it runs really slow comparing to fedora-repo version. > I will try to build it. > Will let you know. > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
So, there must be other reasons. My version gets a XLIB problem. When I run "osgview cow.osg", the window is transparent. I must execute "export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1" before it becoms normal. However, it runs really slow comparing to fedora-repo version. On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/20/2011 11:09 AM, GeeKer Wang wrote: > > Thanks, > > I tried it as you said, > >cd rpmbuild/SPEC > >rpmbuild -bb OpenSceneGraph.spec > > > > the total size of this version is 2.7G, a little smaller than > previous-built > > version but much larger than fedora-repo version. > > Maybe it's -g option that matters, > No. > > > but does -g affect the efficiency? > It has a very light impact, usually hardly measurable. > > > The > > frame rate is still 10-, while the fedora-repo version has a frame rate > of > > 40. > > > > And my version has some problem with XLIB, while the fedora-repo doesn't. > No idea what you are talking about. > > Ralf > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
Thanks, I tried it as you said, cd rpmbuild/SPEC rpmbuild -bb OpenSceneGraph.spec the total size of this version is 2.7G, a little smaller than previous-built version but much larger than fedora-repo version. Maybe it's -g option that matters, but does -g affect the efficiency? The frame rate is still 10-, while the fedora-repo version has a frame rate of 40. And my version has some problem with XLIB, while the fedora-repo doesn't. On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:20 AM, stan wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:10 -0700 > stan wrote: > > > rpmbuild -bp OpenScreneGraph.spec > > Oops! This should be > rpmbuild -bb OpenScreneGraph.spec > > The -bp flag just unpacks the source so it can be examined or patches > can be created. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
How to compile a soft same as the version realeased by fedora?
Hi, guys I tried to compile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.rpm software, and got a low efficient and large version of it. But the version from fedora-repo works well. eg. my version with frame rate < 10, while fedora-repo version with frame rate ~=40. I have tried three ways: 1. configure && make 2. ccmake && make 3. rpmbuild --recompile OpenSceneGraph-2.8.3-3.fc14.src.rpm They resulted the same anyway. Especially, the rpmbuld way took 3G+ disk space, each .so file is much larger and each application is slower. It's realy strange to me. I use the gcc/g++ 4.5.1 under fedora 14. So where the differences come from? Or where are the special places in fedora's compiling environment? Any advice will be appreciated, thx. -- Bob -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
