Re: Alternatives link broken after package upgrade
Terry Polzin 于2020年7月23日 周四上午1:34写道： > I've been dealing with this issue on a couple of my Fedora 32 machines. > It appears that the upgrade of icedtea-web > from icedtea-web-1.8.2-3.fc31.x86_64 to > icedtea-web-2.0.0-pre.0.3.alpha13.patched1.fc32.x86_64 breaks the > alternatives link to javaws.x86_64. > > I have to downgrade icedtea-web to be able to run JNLPs > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859090 ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bootable USB and a Windows ISO-file
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 07:37 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 2:01 PM Robin Lee > wrote: > > I'm trying to do a very simple task on my Fedora 32 desktop but > > somehow > > I can't make it happen. > > > > I've downloaded a Windows installer ISO-file from microsoft.com > > that I > > put on a USB-stick and tried to install Windows on physical > > machine, > > but it won't boot from the USB. It shows up in the BIOS boot menu, > > but > > it won't boot. > > I've used Fedora Media Writer to write a windows iso to USB stick > without issue. That's not my experience. Perhaps it has lost that ability due to some bug. With a fully updated Fedora 23 and the latest Windows 10 installer iso both Disk Image Writer and Brasero failed and WoeUSB succeeded in creating a bootable Windows usb. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bootable USB and a Windows ISO-file
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 15:15 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Ha! I finally get to answer one instead of always asking > all the questions. > > :-) > > > Install WoeUSB (as root): Thanks Todd, with WoeUSB everything just worked. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bootable USB and a Windows ISO-file
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 12:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/5/20 12:48 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 12:21 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 7/5/20 12:01 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > I've downloaded a Windows installer ISO-file from microsoft.com > > > > that I > > > > put on a USB-stick and tried to install Windows on physical > > > > machine, > > > > but it won't boot from the USB. It shows up in the BIOS boot > > > > menu, > > > > but > > > > it won't boot. > > > > > > > > I've tried to install the same ISO-file in Boxes and that went > > > > fine. > > > > I've tried both Brasero and Disk Image Writer, I've tried two > > > > different > > > > USB-sticks and two different physical target machines. > > > > > > Boxes will make it a DVD drive, not USB. > > > > > > Isn't Brasero only for writing to optical media? Anyway, I would > > > just > > > use dd to write it to the flash drive. > > > > > > In a terminal (change sdc to whatever your flash drive is): > > > sudo dd if=windows.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=1M status=progress > > > > Same result. > > > > Also tested creating a bootable USB-stick with a Centos ISO-file. > > No > > problem. > > Maybe that file can't be booted from usb. Are there any > instructions > from Microsoft about how to do it? I know I have done it a couple > of > times in the past. Installer iso-files that couldn't be put on a usb-stick doesn't seem to make sense. The file is called Win10_2004_English_x64.iso After the iso-file is on the stick Gnome Disks gives the contents as UDF version 1.02 and it can be mounted. I have to see if I can find any special instructions from microsoft.com, although they would probably not cover how to do it on Fedora ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bootable USB and a Windows ISO-file
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 12:21 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 7/5/20 12:01 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > I've downloaded a Windows installer ISO-file from microsoft.com > > that I > > put on a USB-stick and tried to install Windows on physical > > machine, > > but it won't boot from the USB. It shows up in the BIOS boot menu, > > but > > it won't boot. > > > > I've tried to install the same ISO-file in Boxes and that went > > fine. > > I've tried both Brasero and Disk Image Writer, I've tried two > > different > > USB-sticks and two different physical target machines. > > Boxes will make it a DVD drive, not USB. > > Isn't Brasero only for writing to optical media? Anyway, I would > just > use dd to write it to the flash drive. > > In a terminal (change sdc to whatever your flash drive is): > sudo dd if=windows.iso of=/dev/sdc bs=1M status=progress Same result. Also tested creating a bootable USB-stick with a Centos ISO-file. No problem. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Bootable USB and a Windows ISO-file
I'm trying to do a very simple task on my Fedora 32 desktop but somehow I can't make it happen. I've downloaded a Windows installer ISO-file from microsoft.com that I put on a USB-stick and tried to install Windows on physical machine, but it won't boot from the USB. It shows up in the BIOS boot menu, but it won't boot. I've tried to install the same ISO-file in Boxes and that went fine. I've tried both Brasero and Disk Image Writer, I've tried two different USB-sticks and two different physical target machines. What am I doing wrong? Or is this nefarious scheming by Linux to stop people from experimenting with alternative operating systems? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and screen saver
On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 11:33 +0200, Mayavimmer wrote: > Robin Lee wrote: > > > Thanks for letting me know I'm not the only one. > > > > Also been launching VLC from a terminal lately and sometimes it > > also > > doesn't terminate cleanly that way. I close the VLC window, it > > disappears from system panel, but in the terminal window the prompt > > is > > not returned. Ctrl-c returns the prompt and VLC doesn't show up > > anymore > > in system monitor. > > I also experienced the same and more recent Vlc weirdness. > > I fixed it by removing the config file with: > > $ mv ~/.config/vlc ~/.config/vlc--00--maybe-broken > > If you don't need the old config, try it. Thanks for the suggestion, but it didn't change anything for me. I guess it just some combination of content and slightly buggy codecs that sometimes causes VLC not to exit cleanly. And the screen saver can't tell the difference between that a running vlc that you don't want to blank the screen on. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and screen saver
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 18:20 +0800, Ian Chapman wrote: > Hi, > > > > The thing is that sometimes when I close vlc after I've watched > > some > > video it doesn't terminate cleanly. That is there is still a vlc > > process running in the background and it prevents the screen saver > > from > > blanking the screen. So sometimes when I wake up or come home after > > being out I notice that the screen has been on all the time. Not so > > good. I have to go to system monitor and find the vlc process and > > kill > > it, then the screen saver can again do its thing. > > > > Can anything be done about it, except always checking manually that > > vlc > > has terminated completely? > > For what it's worth I see this exact same issue, on F31 and F32. Not > sure exactly when it started but I see it even when I start vlc from > the > command line. I "close" the vlc window but often still have to CTRL-C > on > the terminal. Thanks for letting me know I'm not the only one. Also been launching VLC from a terminal lately and sometimes it also doesn't terminate cleanly that way. I close the VLC window, it disappears from system panel, but in the terminal window the prompt is not returned. Ctrl-c returns the prompt and VLC doesn't show up anymore in system monitor. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and screen saver
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 05:54 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-15 20:02, Robin Lee wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm on Fedora 32, but this problem I have had for a while. > > > > The thing is that sometimes when I close vlc after I've watched > > some > > video it doesn't terminate cleanly. That is there is still a vlc > > process running in the background and it prevents the screen saver > > from > > blanking the screen. So sometimes when I wake up or come home after > > being out I notice that the screen has been on all the time. Not so > > good. I have to go to system monitor and find the vlc process and > > kill > > it, then the screen saver can again do its thing. > > > > Can anything be done about it, except always checking manually that > > vlc > > has terminated completely? > > > > > > What desktop are you running and how are you starting vlc? Gnome. The most frequent (I think) way I start VLC is from Files and right-click to get to 'Open with other application' ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VLC and screen saver
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 08:25 -0700, stan via users wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2020 14:02:17 +0200 > Robin Lee wrote: > > > The thing is that sometimes when I close vlc after I've watched > > some > > video it doesn't terminate cleanly. That is there is still a vlc > > process running in the background and it prevents the screen saver > > from blanking the screen. So sometimes when I wake up or come home > > after being out I notice that the screen has been on all the time. > > Not so good. I have to go to system monitor and find the vlc > > process > > and kill it, then the screen saver can again do its thing. > > > > Can anything be done about it, except always checking manually that > > vlc has terminated completely? > > You definitely need to open a bugzilla against vlc. If it doesn't > terminate when asked to, that is a bug. Now, whether it is vlc at > fault, or the system, is hard to say. But a bugzilla will at least > get > things rolling. > > What happens if instead of using vlc to quit, you hit Alt-F4 when it > is > in focus to close it? That sends a terminate signal, and its > internal > logic then cleans up and closes. The difference is that this is > external rather than internal. I had a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com but didn't find a VLC component there. Mine vlc rpm package comes from RPM Fusion. Is there some other way to get it? Tested the Alt-F4 method, but I found that it also could leave a vlc process running in the background. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
VLC and screen saver
Hi I'm on Fedora 32, but this problem I have had for a while. The thing is that sometimes when I close vlc after I've watched some video it doesn't terminate cleanly. That is there is still a vlc process running in the background and it prevents the screen saver from blanking the screen. So sometimes when I wake up or come home after being out I notice that the screen has been on all the time. Not so good. I have to go to system monitor and find the vlc process and kill it, then the screen saver can again do its thing. Can anything be done about it, except always checking manually that vlc has terminated completely? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with Brother scanner
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 21:17 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > I don't know how the OP installed the Brother drivers, but there are > two ways: one is detailed with lots of tweaks you need to make, and > the other is relatively trivial. > > You can either: > 1. download the individual driver files and hack your system > according > to the instructions on the site, or > 2. download a single installer file that asks you questions then > downloads and installs the driver files for you. After that you can > use whatever app you use on that system to set up a printer. On > Centos I usually use the print settings tool (though you should be > able to use CUPs on port 631 instead.) Thanks for the input. I had originally tried to install with the installer script, but for some reason it wanted to install .deb packages on my Fedora system, so I abandoned it and installed the rpms directly. Now I went back to the script and hacked it a bit to always go with rpms and then ran it. And now the scanner works :) /Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with Brother scanner
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 09:49 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> I would comment out the SYSFS lines and see if that fixes
> anything. I
> would also remove the executable bit {chmod -x filename).
>
> It seems they have put both SYSFS (used in RHEL5, so really old) and
> ATTRS (new name RHEL6(say f12) and newer), but both point to the same
> place, so as long as the bad one is not causing it to abort the
> entire rule execution it should still work.
I commented out the SYSFS line and the error message is gone. But the
scanner is still not working.
Forgot to mention in my first e-mail, the device is connected over USB
to the desktop.
/Robin
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Problem with Brother scanner
Hi list
I recently got a Brother scanner/printer for my Fedora 31 desktop. I've
installed all the drivers from Brother and the printing part works
fine, but not scanning.
When I launch simple-scan, either as root or normal user it can't find
any scanner. Although it will show up in Settings -> Devices -> Colour
on two lines, both as a scanner and a printer. lsusb also shows two
devices.
What's interesting is that at each boot the following shows up in the
logs
systemd-udevd[1103]: Configuration file /etc/udev/rules.d/65-brother-
brscan4-libsane-type1.rules is marked executable. Please remove
executable permission bits. Proceeding anyway.
systemd-udevd[1103]: /etc/udev/rules.d/65-brother-brscan4-libsane-
type1.rules:9 Invalid key 'SYSFS'
systemd-udevd[1103]: /etc/udev/rules.d/65-brother-libsane-type1-
inst.rules:14 Invalid key 'SYSFS'
The content of 65-brother-brscan4-libsane-type1.rules is as follows
ACTION!="add", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_1"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
LABEL="brother_mfp_udev_1"
SYSFS{idVendor}=="04f9", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_2"
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_2"
GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
LABEL="brother_mfp_udev_2"
ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
ATTRS{bInterfaceSubClass}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
ATTRS{bInterfaceProtocol}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
#MODE="0666"
#GROUP="scanner"
ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
#SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
LABEL="brother_mfp_end"
Any ideas, what to do?
/Robin
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome-keyring-daemon keeps logging every second
Thanks Kevin, that was it. There's also already a bugzilla issue about it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776751 Hopefully it will get fixed soon. Cheers Robin On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:47 -0500, Kevin Becker wrote: > Are you running nextcloud by any chance? > > https://askubuntu.com/questions/1188683/gnome-keyring-daemon-spams-system-journal > > > > > On Dec 4, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Robin Lee > > wrote: > > > > > asked to register item > > > /org/freedesktop/secrets/collection/login/86, > > > but it's already registered > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome-keyring-daemon keeps logging every second
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 10:37 +0100, Robin Lee wrote: > Hi > > On my newly upgraded Fedora 31 desktop there is annoying issue. Every > second gnome-keyring-daemon logs the following message > "asked to register item /org/freedesktop/secrets/collection/login/86, > but it's already registered". Rebooting doesn't help. > > It totally fills up the log, anything I can do about it? No ideas? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome-keyring-daemon keeps logging every second
Hi On my newly upgraded Fedora 31 desktop there is annoying issue. Every second gnome-keyring-daemon logs the following message "asked to register item /org/freedesktop/secrets/collection/login/86, but it's already registered". Rebooting doesn't help. It totally fills up the log, anything I can do about it? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could not upgrade from F29
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 05:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2019-12-01 20:57, Robin Lee wrote: > > Ok, but will the Electrum wallet still be able to communicate with > > my > > Ledger device? > > I can't be certain. But I think it will. > Thanks for advices. I did a successful upgrade to F31 and my Ledger device is working fine with Electrum Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could not upgrade from F29
On Sun, 2019-12-01 at 20:32 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2019-12-01 19:41, Robin Lee wrote: > > I've got a Fedora 29 desktop that I thought it was time to upgrade. > > But > > there was a problem. When I ran > > dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 > > > > I get the following error > > > > Problem: package python2-btchip-0.1.28-1.fc29.noarch requires > > python2- > > hidapi, but none of the providers can be installed > > - python2-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-10.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to > > a > > distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package python2-btchip-0.1.28- > > 1.fc29.noarch > > > > What to do? > > > > I seems that python2-btchip is needed by Ledger hardward wallet > > that I > > use. > > It seems that python-hidapi in F30 no longer supplies the python2 > package. > > You may get by with adding --skip-broken to the system-upgrade > options. Ok, but will the Electrum wallet still be able to communicate with my Ledger device? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Could not upgrade from F29
Hi I've got a Fedora 29 desktop that I thought it was time to upgrade. But there was a problem. When I ran dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 I get the following error Problem: package python2-btchip-0.1.28-1.fc29.noarch requires python2- hidapi, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-10.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-btchip-0.1.28-1.fc29.noarch What to do? I seems that python2-btchip is needed by Ledger hardward wallet that I use. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 22:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 9:10 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > But, what about the error message I pointed out earlier > > TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable > > The part of error you quoted earlier was > > dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf- > plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 404, in configure_upgrade > dnf[1168]: repo.gpgcheck = repo.id in self.state.gpgcheck_repos > dnf[1168]: TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable > systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Main process exited, > > That file doesn't exist on my system since I don't have dnf-plugin- > system-upgrade installed on that VM. > > It is unclear to me why that is used when just updating packages. > > Since you're not doing a system upgrade I'd consider erasing that > package to see if it helps. You can always reinstall. Yes, I removed the upgrade plugin and then Gnome Software was again able to update software packages. Thanks Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 21:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 8:52 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a > > > > failed > > > > try to > > > > use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And > > > > it > > > > seems > > > > to give me the log from the failed software update. I found the > > > > following in the log that looks quite suspicious > > > > > > > > python3[1168]: detected unhandled Python exception in > > > > '/usr/bin/dnf' > > > > python3[1168]: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it > > > > running? > > > > [Errno 2] No such file or directory python3[1168]: error > > > > sending > > > > data > > > > to ABRT daemon: > > > That does seem to be the issue. > > > > > > I created an F29 VM. When I booted I logged in and found the > > > process > > > /usr/sbin/abrtd -d -s running. > > > > > > I killed it and tried to do an update with the gnome-software > > > tool > > > and got the same result as you did. > > > > > > What is the output of > > > > > > systemctl --no-pager -l status abrtd > > It is active and running, but that of course is after a normal boot > > up. > > Should ABRT also be running in the special boot process when Gnome > > Software tries to update the software packages? > > > > I don't know. But, I'm guessing that it my be dying at some point > after you hit the button to start the update. > > Assuming you're now rebooted after a previous failed attempt what is > the output of > > journalctl -b -1 --unit=abrtd > It says "No entries" But, what about the error message I pointed out earlier TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed > > try to > > use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And it > > seems > > to give me the log from the failed software update. I found the > > following in the log that looks quite suspicious > > > > python3[1168]: detected unhandled Python exception in > > '/usr/bin/dnf' > > python3[1168]: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running? > > [Errno 2] No such file or directory python3[1168]: error sending > > data > > to ABRT daemon: > > That does seem to be the issue. > > I created an F29 VM. When I booted I logged in and found the process > /usr/sbin/abrtd -d -s running. > > I killed it and tried to do an update with the gnome-software tool > and got the same result as you did. > > What is the output of > > systemctl --no-pager -l status abrtd It is active and running, but that of course is after a normal boot up. Should ABRT also be running in the special boot process when Gnome Software tries to update the software packages? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working
On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:10 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> If that didn't work, then run "journalctl --list-boots" and find the
> one for the right time. Then run "journalctl -b -1" (again replace
> with the right number).
Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed try to
use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And it seems
to give me the log from the failed software update. I found the
following in the log that looks quite suspicious
python3[1168]: detected unhandled Python exception in '/usr/bin/dnf'
python3[1168]: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is it running?
[Errno 2] No such file or directory python3[1168]: error sending data
to ABRT daemon:
dnf[1168]: Traceback (most recent call last):
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 58, in
dnf[1168]: main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py",
line 192, in user_main
dnf[1168]: errcode = main(args)
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py",
line 64, in main
dnf[1168]: return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py",
line 95, in _main
dnf[1168]: cli.configure(list(map(ucd, args)), option_parser())
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py",
line 954, in configure
dnf[1168]: self.command.configure()
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf-
plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 329, in configure
dnf[1168]: self._call_sub("configure")
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf-
plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 341, in _call_sub
dnf[1168]: subfunc()
dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf-
plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 404, in configure_upgrade
dnf[1168]: repo.gpgcheck = repo.id in self.state.gpgcheck_repos
dnf[1168]: TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Main process exited,
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=dnf-system-upgrade
comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=?
terminal=? res=failed'
systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
systemd[1]: Failed to start System Upgrade using DNF.
systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Triggering OnFailure=
dependencies.
systemd[1]: Starting System Upgrade using DNF failed...
This error could be the main culprit, but not sure what to do about it
TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
Cheers
Robin
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working
On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 10:51 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: > I'm running Fedora 29 and some time ago the Gnome Software Updater > stopped working. > > It informs me that there are new updates available and I press the > Download button. After a while the button changes to Restart and > Update > and I press it, so the computer reboots and after that it briefly > displays Installing new updates; this could take a while. But then it > just reboots right away and when the system comes up but no updates > have been installed. Gnome Software Updater displays the same > software > packages as available for updating. If I run yum update, then the > software packages are updated just fine. > > Any idea what's wrong here? > > Could this problem block me from doing an upgrade to Fedora 30? No ideas what could be wrong here? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome Software Updater no longer working
Hi I'm running Fedora 29 and some time ago the Gnome Software Updater stopped working. It informs me that there are new updates available and I press the Download button. After a while the button changes to Restart and Update and I press it, so the computer reboots and after that it briefly displays Installing new updates; this could take a while. But then it just reboots right away and when the system comes up but no updates have been installed. Gnome Software Updater displays the same software packages as available for updating. If I run yum update, then the software packages are updated just fine. Any idea what's wrong here? Could this problem block me from doing an upgrade to Fedora 30? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Evolution crashing
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 08:48 -0400, John Mellor wrote: > Replies inline: > > On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 09:35 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: > > Hi > > > > I wonder if just for me that Evolution crashes most of the time I > > try > > to close it? > > Nope, its not just you. This has been an unfixed and critical > problem > for 3 Fedora releases. Ok, thanks, good to know. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Evolution crashing
Hi I wonder if just for me that Evolution crashes most of the time I try to close it? I usually start Evolution right away after logging in and then have it running until it is time to apply software updates. I usually do that twice a week. More than half of time closing Evolution crashes the whole Gnome desktop. Quite annoying. Sometimes it closes gracefully. Is it just me? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with Gnome remaining offline
On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 18:52 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 6/9/19 6:32 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 6/9/19 4:14 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 19:28 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > I have a laptop with Fedora 30 and on it I use VPN. Now after I > > > > upgraded from Fedora 29 I've got the problem that Gnome > > > > applications > > > > like Evolution and Gnome Software don't work anymore because > > > > they > > > > think the computer is offline when VPN is activated. Also the > > > > wifi > > > > icon in the upper right hand side corner has a question mark > > > > over it. > > > > But in actuality the computer is online, I can use applications > > > > like > > > > Firefox normally. Also in Gnome Settings -> Wifi it tells me it > > > > is > > > > connected. > > > > > > > > First questions - can I some how tell applications like > > > > Evolution and > > > > Gnome Software to just ignore whether it thinks it is online or > > > > offline? > > > > > > > > Second question - how could I find out why Gnome thinks it is > > > > offline? > > > No suggestions? > > I'm going to be vague since I can't find what I'm looking for, > > but. I recall that there > > is a process which, if enabled, will periodically connect to a > > fedoraproject server to > > verify it is connected to the internet. > > > > I'm guessing you have that running and when on the VPN those checks > > are being blocked. > > > > Sorry, I can't be more specific but I recall either disabling or > > erasing the package that > > provided that. > > The package I was thinking of is > > [root@meimei ~]# dnf info NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora Thanks! I removed it and the problems gone :) Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with Gnome remaining offline
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 19:28 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: > I have a laptop with Fedora 30 and on it I use VPN. Now after I > upgraded from Fedora 29 I've got the problem that Gnome applications > like Evolution and Gnome Software don't work anymore because they > think the computer is offline when VPN is activated. Also the wifi > icon in the upper right hand side corner has a question mark over it. > But in actuality the computer is online, I can use applications like > Firefox normally. Also in Gnome Settings -> Wifi it tells me it is > connected. > > First questions - can I some how tell applications like Evolution and > Gnome Software to just ignore whether it thinks it is online or > offline? > > Second question - how could I find out why Gnome thinks it is > offline? No suggestions? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Problem with Gnome remaining offline
Hi I have a laptop with Fedora 30 and on it I use VPN. Now after I upgraded from Fedora 29 I've got the problem that Gnome applications like Evolution and Gnome Software don't work anymore because they think the computer is offline when VPN is activated. Also the wifi icon in the upper right hand side corner has a question mark over it. But in actuality there is the computer is online, I can use applications like Firefox normally. Also in Gnome Settings -> Wifi it tells me it is connected. First questions - can I some how tell applications like Evolution and Gnome Software to just ignore whether it thinks it is online or offline? Second question - how could I find out why Gnome thinks it is offline? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Grub fails with unrecognized number
I just upgraded one of my computers from Fedora 29 to 30 and after that grub doesn't work any more as it should. Now when I boot up I get briefly the following message Booting from Hard Disk... . error: ../../grub-core/kern/misc.c:465:unrecognized number. then it boots the default kernel. I was expecting the grub menu. Anybody knows what's going on? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What's up with Firefox
On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 17:23 -0700, Richard England wrote: > On 3/25/19 1:22 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 15:07 +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: > > > > > On 3/25/19 3:03 PM, Robin Lee > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I just updated my Fedora 29 desktop and now the > > > > title bar in Firefox > > > > is gone. How is one to minimize a Firefox window > > > > nowadays? How can I > > > > make Firefox behave like all the other Gnome app > > > > windows? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You need to go to Customize by right-clicking on the > > > toolbar and > > > tick the "Title bar" option at the left bottom corner of > > > your > > > Firefox window. Then everything will go back as before :- > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > I just hope that Fedora project wouldn't sneak up changes > > like that on the users. It disturbed my morning coffee ;) > > > > Cheers > > Robin > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this was a change > in Firefox, not Fedora. Yes, of course, but I got Firefox through Fedora and thus I was expecting (perhaps wrongly) that it would be modified so that how to minimize it for example would be consistent with other desktop applications. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What's up with Firefox
On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 15:07 +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: > On 3/25/19 3:03 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > > So I just updated my Fedora 29 desktop and now the title bar > > in Firefoxis gone. How is one to minimize a Firefox window > > nowadays? How can Imake Firefox behave like all the other Gnome app > > windows? > > > > You need to go to Customize by right-clicking on the toolbar and > tick the "Title bar" option at the left bottom corner of your > Firefox window. Then everything will go back as before :-) Thanks! I just hope that Fedora project wouldn't sneak up changes like that on the users. It disturbed my morning coffee ;) CheersRobin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
What's up with Firefox
So I just updated my Fedora 29 desktop and now the title bar in Firefox is gone. How is one to minimize a Firefox window nowadays? How can I make Firefox behave like all the other Gnome app windows? /Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 15:32 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2/24/19 1:10 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 17:31 +0100, Robin Lee wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:48 -0500, John Harris wrote: > > > > The only way that I personally know how to do with is by > > > > setting a > > > > system wide > > > > proxy. If you could find the process GNOME uses to sync CalDAV > > > > and > > > > CardDAV, > > > > you could `torify` it. There is no built-in way to do this in > > > > GNOME, > > > > at least > > > > as far as I'm aware. > > > > > > Had a look at gnome-online-accounts, but my hacking skills aren't > > > good > > > enough to figure out if one could modify it that way. > > > > > > I wish Fedora had a special proxy configuration for .onion- > > > addresses > > > > BTW, what is the proper channel to make a feature request like > > this? > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME What would the correct project be? I did find the gnome-online-accounts project. But I wanted to find a project that would correspond to the Network Proxy Settings Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 17:31 +0100, Robin Lee wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:48 -0500, John Harris wrote: > > The only way that I personally know how to do with is by setting a > > system wide > > proxy. If you could find the process GNOME uses to sync CalDAV and > > CardDAV, > > you could `torify` it. There is no built-in way to do this in > > GNOME, > > at least > > as far as I'm aware. > > Had a look at gnome-online-accounts, but my hacking skills aren't > good > enough to figure out if one could modify it that way. > > I wish Fedora had a special proxy configuration for .onion-addresses BTW, what is the proper channel to make a feature request like this? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:48 -0500, John Harris wrote: > The only way that I personally know how to do with is by setting a > system wide > proxy. If you could find the process GNOME uses to sync CalDAV and > CardDAV, > you could `torify` it. There is no built-in way to do this in GNOME, > at least > as far as I'm aware. Had a look at gnome-online-accounts, but my hacking skills aren't good enough to figure out if one could modify it that way. I wish Fedora had a special proxy configuration for .onion-addresses Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 08:55 -0500, John Harris wrote: > On Friday, February 15, 2019 4:13:19 AM EST Robin Lee wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 20:59 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > On 2/14/19 11:12 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > > > > I wonder if there's away to configure a Nextcloud account in > > > > Online > > > > Accounts or otherwise that would connect to a Nextcloud server > > > > that > > > > resides on a tor hidden service, i.e. it would need to connect > > > > to > > > > an > > > > onion address. > > > > > > Have you tried putting the address in to see what happens? > > > > Yes, it says 'Cannot resolve hostname' > > > > Cheers > > Robin > > I would imagine that you would need to have Tor running, and would > also need > to set the system proxy such that everything is proxied over Tor. > > That is not necessary if you only want a NextCloud account to use Tor > (See the > Network tab of its own configuration). Yes, I've got tor running at localhost:9050 on my laptop. But I don't want a system wide proxy setting, then everything would be running over tor. I've got the 'Nextcloud desktop sync client' configured so that it connects to my Nextcloud server on a hidden service. As it has its own proxy configuration. So I got files synced. But what I really would like to have is Contacts and Calendar from my Nextcloud server connected into Evolution. That's what I'm struggling with Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 20:59 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2/14/19 11:12 AM, Robin Lee wrote: > > I wonder if there's away to configure a Nextcloud account in Online > > Accounts or otherwise that would connect to a Nextcloud server that > > resides on a tor hidden service, i.e. it would need to connect to > > an > > onion address. > > Have you tried putting the address in to see what happens? Yes, it says 'Cannot resolve hostname' Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
Hi I wonder if there's away to configure a Nextcloud account in Online Accounts or otherwise that would connect to a Nextcloud server that resides on a tor hidden service, i.e. it would need to connect to an onion address. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Extremely slow Josm
On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 11:29 +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: > Do you have some josm plugins installed? Thank you. That was it. My desktop josm had more than a dozen plugins that had aggregated over the years. I threw them out and reinstalled the ones I knew I wanted. After that my desktop josm was as responsive as ever. Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Extremely slow Josm
Hi I have a desktop and a laptop, both with fully updated Fedora 29. The laptop is a fresh installation while the desktop has been upgraded from previous versions of Fedora. And I have Josm installed on both. Now the problem is that on the desktop Josm has become really slow. You need some serious patience to use it. On the laptop it works fine as it did on the desktop before. I've tried to reinstall Josm, but that didn't help. Josm is a Java application. Any idea what could be wrong? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora + Electron Cash + Trezor
Hi I've got a fully updated Fedora 28 with electron-cash-3.3.1- 1.fc28.noarch and a Trezor One hardware wallet. The problem is that I just realized that I can't sign bitcoin cash transactions from my Trezor. What I get when I try to sign is: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '_fill_missing' What I was expecting was a confirmation request in Trezor Anybody else got a Electron Cash and Trezor working together? Is there any other software on Fedora I could use instead? Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any way to disable debugsource generation on fedora >= 27
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Robin Lee wrote:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Robin Lee wrote:
>>>> I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible
>>>> with old behavior,
>>>> I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpackage and
>>>> Source Debuginfo'[1].
>>>> That means let rpm not generate debugsource and subpackage debuginfo.
>>>> Simply adding '%_debugsource_packages 0' to ~/.rpmmacros does not work.
> [...]
>> It doest not work with _debugsource_packages set to 0.
>
> Indeed. I played around for a bit last night, to no avail.
>
> It's not clear to me from the rpm documentation, source
> comments, or git history whether this is intentional or not.
> It may be a case that wasn't tested. Or it could be
> intended that it's turned on at the distro level and can
> only be disabled in individual packages. That would help
> improve reproducibility.
>
> I think you'd have to ask the rpm maintainers about this to
> be sure.
>
> I'm still not clear on why you want to do this. I know I
> don't need to know that. I'm curious mostly and knowing
> why this is a problem might help someone here see another
> way to solve it. :)
I am using the planex[1] tool to do massive rpm rebuild.
It use something like 'rpm -q --specfile' to predict the result
rpms, and generate a dependency tree. And then use this info to
build rpms in el7 mock one by one.
I then use the ''%_debugsource_template %{nil}' trick, which can
satisfy planex by now.
[1] https://github.com/xenserver/planex
>
> Is the goal to build binary, non-noaarch packages on f28
> that you can use on older releases -- including the
> debuginfo? That seems unlikely to be ideal, but I'm
> guessing at your use-case.
>
> If it's just curiosity, then I understand. Sorry I can't
> help with a better answer in that case. I can at least
> confirm that it doesn't appear to be a macro you can
> override short of changing the setting in the system-wide
> macros file or individual spec file. :)
>
> --
> Todd
> ~~
> If age imparted wisdom, there wouldn't be any old fools.
> -- Claudia Young
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Any way to disable debugsource generation on fedora >= 27
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Robin Lee wrote:
>> I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible
>> with old behavior,
>> I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpackage and
>> Source Debuginfo'[1].
>> That means let rpm not generate debugsource and subpackage debuginfo.
>> Simply adding '%_debugsource_packages 0' to ~/.rpmmacros does not work.
>
> That should be the macro which controls the debugsource
> packages. What's your build setup look like? In other
> words, what tools are you using and what releases are you
> targeting?
>
> I would suggest building with mock, as that should get you
> the proper defaults for each release target (among other
> benefits).
>
> Perhaps if you provide more details on what your doing and
> how it fails someone here will be able to spot the issue and
> suggest a solution or work-around.
>
> --
> Todd
> ~~
> Intaxication (n.) Euphoria at getting a tax refund, which lasts until
> you realize it was your money to start with.
>
It doest not work with _debugsource_packages set to 0.
$ rpm --define '_debugsource_packages 0' --eval
'%{?_debugsource_packages:%_debugsource_template}'
%package debugsource
Summary: Debug sources for package %{name}
Group: Development/Debug
AutoReqProv: 0
%description debugsource
This package provides debug sources for package %{name}.
Debug sources are useful when developing applications that use this
package or when debugging this package.
%files debugsource -f debugsourcefiles.list
Undefining it would actually get the latter macro silent:
rpm --undefine '_debugsource_packages' --eval
'%{?_debugsource_packages:%_debugsource_template}'
But even using the undefining method, debugsource subpakcage will
still be generated.
This is the most strange case:
$ rpm --undefine '_debugsource_packages' -q --specfile check.spec
check-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
check-devel-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
check-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
check-debugsource-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
Redefining _debugsource_template will make debugsource disappear, but
that's too tricky.
$ rpm --define '_debugsource_template %{nil}' -q --specfile check.spec
check-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
check-devel-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
check-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc28.x86_64
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Any way to disable debugsource generation on fedora >= 27
Hi, I recently upgrade my host from f26 to f28. But to keep compatible with old behavior, I am figuring out a way to revert the change 'Separate Subpackage and Source Debuginfo'[1]. That means let rpm not generate debugsource and subpackage debuginfo. Simply adding '%_debugsource_packages 0' to ~/.rpmmacros does not work. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SubpackageAndSourceDebuginfo -robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
