Re: Clamav

2010-04-18 Thread Steven W. Orr
I have this feeling that most people are missing the point of why CLAMAV is a
useful tool. If you do it to protect yourself against a virus then that's the
wrong reason. We can debate this till we're blue in the face, but AFAICT there
is no threat of a virus against anything other than Windows.

I started running my home sendmail server and all was good. Then someone
invented spam and things have escalated ever since. My sendmail installation
now runs spamassassin from spamass-milter and I reject all messages that are
tagged as spam before reception completes. I used to run a bunch of RBLs from
inside sendmail but I learned that spamassassin never got the opportunity to
*learn* from the rejected messages, so now all the RBL activity is enabled
from inside spamassassin. I added the tests to use CLAMAV from inside
spamassassin, not to protect myself from viruses, but as an adjunct to being
able to decide what is spam and what is not. If there's a virus in the message
then it simply counts as a contributory weight to my decision to reject it. In
addition, there are messages that spamassassin has not caught but I found a
dandy tool called scamp that adds another 20+K signatures to the clamav
database. The scamp stuff is not looking for viruses but it does a good job of
picking up a lot of spam that the rest of the system might miss.

I don't know why, but people love to think all computers are susceptible to
viruses, but more viruses target windows because there are more of them. There
may be a virus out there that could hurt a linux of os/x platform, but I
haven't seen one yet. At least not since the Morris Worm of '81?

Windows gets viruses because they are architecturally open to such things.
People who run Windows tend to run with full admin privs. Windows has gone out
of their way to make programs that run under DOS be compatible with running
under Windows 7. And last but not least, people who run Windows are frequently
not even aware of the concept of the difference between code and data. It's an
attachment. You just *open* it. And *opening* an attachment could be a jpg
that is displayed with something trusted or running some nasty binary that
could do literally anything.

So yes, I run clamav and it does good things for me.

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Need help with clamav-0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Steven W. Orr
On 04/11/10 23:27, quoth Kevin J. Cummings:
> On 04/11/2010 10:55 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
>> I'm running F10 so I can't expect much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav 
>> is
>> about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96 but now when I start it up I
>> get this message:
>>
>> [r...@saturn test]# clamscan --debug clam-v*.rar sendme
>> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar, user-searchpath: /usr/lib
>> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2 not found
>> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6 not found
>> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so not found
>> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.a not found
>> LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not found - unrar
>> support unavailable
>>
>> The funny thinng is that
>>
>> *582 > ls -l /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so ->
>> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6 ->
>> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8024 Apr  9 22:18 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
> 
> Steve,
>   What does "ldd clamscan" report wrt your libraries?
>   Do you need to change ld.so.conf to find your "new" libraries?
>   Did you run ldconfig after adding the new .so files?
> 
>> So, basically, I have no idea where to proceed. If anyone has a suggestion,
>> I'd be grateful.
> 
>   I hope this helps!

I appreciate the response but this doesn't really help:

* The file in question is in /usr/lib which happens to be a place where no
amount of misconfiguration could possibly cause the library to be not found.

* The message says that dlopen can't find it and it even lists the places that
it's looking.

* And BTW, the permissions on the file are the same as every other file in
/usr/lib.

I'm still open to more suggestions. :-(

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Need help with clamav-0.96

2010-04-11 Thread Steven W. Orr
I'm running F10 so I can't expect much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav is
about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96 but now when I start it up I
get this message:

[r...@saturn test]# clamscan --debug clam-v*.rar sendme
LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar, user-searchpath: /usr/lib
LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2 not found
LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6 not found
LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so not found
LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.a not found
LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not found - unrar
support unavailable

The funny thinng is that

*582 > ls -l /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so ->
libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6 ->
libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8024 Apr  9 22:18 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2

So, basically, I have no idea where to proceed. If anyone has a suggestion,
I'd be grateful.

TIA

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Looking for advise on a special grub setup.

2010-02-28 Thread Steven W. Orr
I have two hard drives which look like this:

FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 9.4G  1.5G  7.5G  16% /
/dev/sda11 85G   45G   36G  57% /g
/dev/sda10 30G  6.1G   23G  22% /h
/dev/sda5  30G   21G  7.6G  74% /home
/dev/sda8 1.9G   36M  1.8G   2% /tmp
/dev/sda9 9.3G  4.7G  4.1G  54% /e
/dev/sda2  31G   19G  9.9G  66% /var
/dev/sda3  31G  9.4G   20G  33% /usr
/dev/sdb1 294G  244G   36G  88% /d2
/dev/sda1 479M   52M  403M  12% /boot
tmpfs 1.5G  472K  1.5G   1% /dev/shm

I just bought a new 1T SATA drive to add to the mix, and here's what I'd like
to do (but I don't understand how to do it).

I want to add the new drive as a third disk so that the system will continue
to boot off of sda. I'm current;y running F10 in 32 bit mode.

After I add the new drive, it will be seen as sdc, and I will want to install
F12 in 64 bit mode on sdc.

Q0: Can I tell the install DVD to install on sdc and to leave sda alone?

Q1: Is it possible to have multiple bootable devices? And how do I do this?

Next, after I'm thrilled to death that sdc is how I want it to be, I want to
make a cutover so that sdc will then become the primary boot device. My
understanding is that the four SATA plugs I have on my motherboard are defined
so that one (currently sda) is considered to be the primary device.

Q2: When I do a cutover, do I have to switch the cables on the new sdc and
what is now sda? Will the new drive end up being referred as sda and the now
current sda become sdc?

Q3: Is there a grub command I need to run to make the new drive become the
bootable device? Or do I have to then reload from scratch to make it all work?

Thanks :-)

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


I just bought a new mouse. Can I use all the buttons I paid for?

2010-02-20 Thread Steven W. Orr
I just got a Logitech MX620. It has a left, right, middle scroll wheel, the
middle scroll wheel rocks left and right, there's another button to the left
of the left button, and there are two side buttons, one forward and one aft.

Here's a picture of it.
http://tinyurl.com/yfe8vgw

The output of lsusb sez:

*563 > lsusb
564 > sudo lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 003: ID 051d:0002 American Power Conversion Uninterruptible
Power Supply
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 046d:c521 Logitech, Inc. MX620 Laser Cordless Mouse
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub

Also, I have this in my lshal output:

udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_46d_c521_noserial'
  info.bus = 'usb_device'  (string)
  info.linux.driver = 'usb'  (string)
  info.parent = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_1d6b_1__00_02_0'
 (string)
  info.product = 'MX620 Laser Cordless Mouse'  (string)
  info.subsystem = 'usb_device'  (string)
  info.udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_46d_c521_noserial'  
(string)
  info.vendor = 'Logitech, Inc.'  (string)
  linux.device_file = '/dev/bus/usb/002/002'  (string)
  linux.hotplug_type = 2  (0x2)  (int)
  linux.subsystem = 'usb'  (string)
  linux.sysfs_path = '/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb2/2-1'  (string)
  usb_device.bus_number = 2  (0x2)  (int)
  usb_device.can_wake_up = true  (bool)
  usb_device.configuration = 'RR57.01_B0023'  (string)
  usb_device.configuration_value = 1  (0x1)  (int)
  usb_device.device_class = 0  (0x0)  (int)
  usb_device.device_protocol = 0  (0x0)  (int)
  usb_device.device_revision_bcd = 22273  (0x5701)  (int)
  usb_device.device_subclass = 0  (0x0)  (int)
  usb_device.is_self_powered = false  (bool)
  usb_device.linux.device_number = 2  (0x2)  (int)
  usb_device.linux.sysfs_path =
'/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb2/2-1'  (string)
  usb_device.max_power = 98  (0x62)  (int)
  usb_device.num_configurations = 1  (0x1)  (int)
  usb_device.num_interfaces = 2  (0x2)  (int)
  usb_device.num_ports = 0  (0x0)  (int)
  usb_device.product = 'MX620 Laser Cordless Mouse'  (string)
  usb_device.product_id = 50465  (0xc521)  (int)
  usb_device.speed = 1.5 (1.5) (double)
  usb_device.vendor = 'Logitech, Inc.'  (string)
  usb_device.vendor_id = 1133  (0x46d)  (int)
  usb_device.version = 2.0 (2) (double)

I'm totally confused because I used to know that the xorg.conf file was the
place to set stuff up. Now we have hal, evdev, imwheel, xbindkeys, and
probably more stuff I know even less about. AND, there's nothing in xorg.conf
that even vaguely looks like a mouse setup. I'd like the two side buttons to
play Back and Forward while in Firefox, and the button to the left of the Left
Mouse button to be a Search button in Firefox. I have no idea what a good
thing would be to do with the middle scroll wheel in left/right rocking mode.

Can someone get me jump started? Or tell me what extra info I need to share?

Thanks.

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines