uess, there is not control
> over the CPU fan. It is being used heavily and all the time. It makes noise.
>
> Can someone help me with this? How should I go about this?
>
> Thanks
>
> -Yogesh
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Stephen Gallagher
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:11:19 -0400
> Subject: Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released?
> On 06/02/2010 08:31 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
>> Here is a sampling of the recent updates that have been pushed to
>> stable. There are more, I didn't look at every update.
>>
>> Released straight to stable:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.0.1-47.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ClanLib-2.1.1-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.5-1.fc12
>>
>> Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma.
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12
>>
>> Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable
>> without people other than the packager testing it?
>>
>
> I can't speak for the specific packages above, but I will sometimes push a
> package stable to Fedora N-1 that is identical to a package in Fedora N if
> the package in Fedora N got sufficient Karma. Maybe that's what happened
> here?
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Gallagher
> RHCE 804006346421761
>
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sam Varshavchik
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:17:20 -0400
> Subject: Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released?
> Mike Fedyk writes:
>
> Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma.
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12
>>
>> Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable
>> without people other than the packager testing it?
>>
>
> Maybe because nobody is aware that something's waiting for some karma out
> there?
>
> I see that openssh was pushed to stable recently. I might've been willing
> to grab it from testing and give it whirl, but I'm not sure how I would've
> known about it. Whatever this errata fixed, it obviously didn't affect me,
> so I was not aware of the open bug, and a pending errata.
>
> It's just a hunch, but here's what I think happens most of the time:
> someone files a bug, the maintainer picks it up, fixes the bug, pushes the
> package to testing.
>
> So, you've really got just the bug reporter who's interested in the errata,
> and is even aware of a package. And most of the time it's an ordinary user
> who is not even aware of the underlying infrastructure. A canned message
> gets appended to the Bugzilla entry, saying something to the effect that a
> package was "pushed" somewhere. The bug reporter may not be aware of the
> fact that there's some kind of a mechanism to rate the pending update. The
> bug reporter is most likely waiting until he gets a popup from Packagekit,
> telling him that an update is ready.
>
> I had someone file a bug against my small, obscure package. It was an
> enhancement. I finally got around to coding it, tarring it up (I'm my own
> upstream), then grabbing it with my maintainer hat, building it, and pushing
> it to testing.
>
> So, how long should I wait for some karma? In the past, I've waited two
> weeks before requesting a push to stable. Is there a policy document
> somewhere that lays down the law, on this?
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Craig White
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:42:57 -0700
> Subject: Re: screen res problem
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:54 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> >
> >
> > Uh, dude. I'm an amateur astronomer and truly enjoy "exploring the
> > stars". .
> >
> > No need to insult us stargazers :)
> >
> >
> >
>
> you know what they say... 99% of the lawyers give the rest of them a bad
>
