Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 05/27/2015 10:47 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > Is the hub powered from it's own wall wart, even if it is the > wireless-radio equipment together with anything else may be over > taxing the source. Dlink hub is AC powered.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 27/05/15 10:38, Paul Cartwright wrote: now I know it is. They have gone dead 3 times already today, and it isn't even lunch time. All I do is unplug the hub, then plug it back in. unplugging the separate USB ports ( Mouse..) doesn't help. . Is the hub powered from it's own wall wart, even if it is the wireless-radio equipment together with anything else may be over taxing the source. -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 05/27/2015 09:49 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > Hmm, I have never used or even needed a usb hub, have one that was > given to me. My computers seem to have more USB ports than anyone > could use and wherever possible I choose stuff that connects to my > Ethernet switch. There's room for improvement there, only 8 ports and > I run short sometimes. my computer has 2 USB ports on the back, and 2 in front. I ALWAYS have 4 things plugged in, sometimes 5 or 6.. > > From this list I conclude that wireless keyboards and mice are often > troublesome ... I had to replace my bluetooth mouse ( mouse keyboard combo). Kept the keyboard, added a USB mouse. they would BOTH go dead, I should have thought it was the USB hub they were plugged into, now I know it is. They have gone dead 3 times already today, and it isn't even lunch time. All I do is unplug the hub, then plug it back in. unplugging the separate USB ports ( Mouse..) doesn't help. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 27/05/15 09:03, Paul Cartwright wrote: one of the reasons I went to F22 was because my bluetooth keyboard & USB mouse kept stopping. I would have to reboot to reactivate them. It is doing it again in F22.. They are both plugged into my Dlink USB 2.0 4 port hub. When I unplugged the hub & plugged it back in , all started working again. Looks like I need a new hub... I am looking at a Sabrent 7 port hub as a replacement.. -- Paul Cartwright . Hmm, I have never used or even needed a usb hub, have one that was given to me. My computers seem to have more USB ports than anyone could use and wherever possible I choose stuff that connects to my Ethernet switch. There's room for improvement there, only 8 ports and I run short sometimes. From this list I conclude that wireless keyboards and mice are often troublesome ... -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 05/27/2015 08:53 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > [root@box10 bobg]# uname -a > Linux box10 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64+debug #1 SMP Thu May 21 12:56:19 UTC > 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > It thinks it's version 22 ... 22 ... looks like you are now on F22 :) enjoy!!! one of the reasons I went to F22 was because my bluetooth keyboard & USB mouse kept stopping. I would have to reboot to reactivate them. It is doing it again in F22.. They are both plugged into my Dlink USB 2.0 4 port hub. When I unplugged the hub & plugged it back in , all started working again. Looks like I need a new hub... I am looking at a Sabrent 7 port hub as a replacement.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 27/05/15 08:13, Paul Cartwright wrote: what does #cat /etc/os-* show? #uname -a # uname -a Linux pauls-server 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 21 13:10:33 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux . [root@box10 bobg]# cat /etc/os-* NAME=Fedora VERSION="22 (Twenty Two)" ID=fedora VERSION_ID=22 PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 22 (Twenty Two)" ANSI_COLOR="0;34" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:22" HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/"; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/"; REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=22 REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=22 PRIVACY_POLICY_URL=https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy VARIANT="Workstation Edition" VARIANT_ID=workstation [root@box10 bobg]# uname -a Linux box10 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64+debug #1 SMP Thu May 21 12:56:19 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux It thinks it's version 22 ... 22 ... -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 05/27/2015 04:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > [root@box10 bobg]# dnf check-update > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:48:44 ago on Wed May 27 > 03:30:41 2015. > > It appears that was done when I booted the compute this morning. It > looks like I am good to go. what does #cat /etc/os-* show? #uname -a # uname -a Linux pauls-server 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 21 13:10:33 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 27/05/15 04:13, Jan Zelený wrote: On 27. 5. 2015 at 03:56:11, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system? # dnf update Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27 03:30:41 2015. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! That seems to indicate not. This indication might not be completely correct. Unfortunately dnf does not report packages that can't be upgraded due to broken dependencies by default (there is an RFE for that somewhere). You can try running dnf check-update to verify there is really nothing to do and if there is, you can run run dnf with --best to see what the problem is. In my case, upgrade of half of the system to F21 was blocked by chromium-v8. If you need any further assistance, let me know. Thanks Jan . Doing: # dnf distro-syncas ED suggested resulted in: Downgrade 27 Packages Total download size: 15 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/27): And: [root@box10 bobg]# dnf check-update Last metadata expiration check performed 0:48:44 ago on Wed May 27 03:30:41 2015. It appears that was done when I booted the compute this morning. It looks like I am good to go. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22b/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 27. 5. 2015 at 03:56:11, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system? > > # dnf update > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27 > 03:30:41 2015. > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > > That seems to indicate not. This indication might not be completely correct. Unfortunately dnf does not report packages that can't be upgraded due to broken dependencies by default (there is an RFE for that somewhere). You can try running dnf check-update to verify there is really nothing to do and if there is, you can run run dnf with --best to see what the problem is. In my case, upgrade of half of the system to F21 was blocked by chromium-v8. If you need any further assistance, let me know. Thanks Jan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22 beta -
On 05/27/15 15:56, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system? > > # dnf update > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27 03:30:41 > 2015. > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > > That seems to indicate not. It depends on your preferences. Some folks like to do a "distro-sync" and accept packages being downgraded to match. -- If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 22 beta -
Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system? # dnf update Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27 03:30:41 2015. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! That seems to indicate not. Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22b/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
