Re: stdio.h
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: > I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and > the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and > glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does > anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include. I'm really at a loss here with this one. B -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham wrote: > I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and > the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and > glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does > anyone have any idea what is going on? I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get: $ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h [sudo] password for [deleted]: Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST. glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-s390-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: updates Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: @System Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: updates Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Additional internal header files for glibc-devel. Do you also have glibc-devel installed? -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On 1/30/24 01:40, Bill Cunningham wrote: On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include. I'm really at a loss here with this one. rpm -V glibc-headers -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: > > zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h > glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch > -- On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers... : [1] root $ cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 39 (Thirty Nine) : 09:27:56 armf39 ~ : [1] root $ rpm -qf /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64 Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 09:28, Barry Scott wrote: > > > >> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: >> >> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h >> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch >> -- > > On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers... > > : [1] root $ cat /etc/fedora-release > Fedora release 39 (Thirty Nine) > > : 09:27:56 armf39 ~ > : [1] root $ rpm -qf /usr/include/stdio.h > glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64 > And if I try to install glibc-headers I see this... $ dnf install glibc-headers Last metadata expiration check: 4:18:49 ago on Tue 30 Jan 2024 05:10:50 GMT. Package glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64 is already installed. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Additional internal header files for glibc-devel. Do you also have glibc-devel installed? Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides /use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers B -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On 1/29/2024 9:15 PM, Go Canes wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get: $ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h [sudo] password for [deleted]: Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST. glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-s390-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: updates Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: @System Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for : glibc-devel. Repo: updates Matched from: Filename: /usr/include/stdio.h The repos reported were fedora, updates, and rpmfusion's tainted-free -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote: On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Additional internal header files for glibc-devel. Do you also have glibc-devel installed? Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides /use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers Have you tried the "--verify" option of rpm to check if stdio.h is an isolated problem? $ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86 $ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64 After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing. Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot) -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
Hi. On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote: > $ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86 > $ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64 > After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing. > Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 > whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot) The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact glibc-headers-x86 rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86 Name: glibc-headers-x86 Version : 2.38 Release : 14.fc39 Description : The glibc-headers-x86 package contains the architecture-specific header files which cannot be included in glibc-devel package. -- francis -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote: Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot) The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact glibc-headers-x86 rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86 Name: glibc-headers-x86 Version : 2.38 Release : 14.fc39 Description : The glibc-headers-x86 package contains the architecture-specific header files which cannot be included in glibc-devel package. Ahh, and the x86 (actually x86_64) following the "dot" are architecture. Thanks. -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: stdio.h
On 1/31/2024 12:21 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote: On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500 Bill Cunningham wrote: I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers: zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \ Additional internal header files for glibc-devel. Do you also have glibc-devel installed? Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides /use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers Have you tried the "--verify" option of rpm to check if stdio.h is an isolated problem? $ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86 $ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64 After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing. Yes I used --verify as an rpm switch and all the files including stdio.h were in the rpm. So I tried 'dnf reinstall glibc-headers[-x86-2.38-14.fc49]. And all installed. what is in brackets I have left off before; thinking that the installation setup (anaconda) was smart enough to know what rpm to install and what arch my system is. So that is fixed now, but, I am still wondering why the installation of the system didn't install these rpms. I chose the option "C Development Tools" at install. hm. Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86 whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot) -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
