Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 11/04/2015 11:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: Some folks having difficulties may be better served by making sure they have both dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 and python2-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 installed. This doesn't change much in my case. The sad truth is the f23 repos currently are inconsistent. Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On Wednesday 04 Nov 2015 18:43:23 Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/04/15 18:32, Christopher Ross wrote: > > On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: > >> A boring update > Also, KDE users may have some problems with upgrades until > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-084749eee7 That probably answers my question about finding this after the upgrade... 'dnf upgrade' Skipping packages with broken dependencies: kf5-kdesu x86_64 5.15.0-2.fc23 updates I did this to upgrade from F22... dnf --releasever=23 --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync --nogpgcheck Which worked for me. Mostly... -- Richard Sheffield UK https://twitter.com/SleepyPenguin1 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 11/04/15 18:32, Christopher Ross wrote: > On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: >> A boring update >> > > Not for me it wasn't! > > root@nellie 10:27:06 ~ # dnf --best --allowerasing --refresh system-upgrade > download > --releasever=23 > Fedora 23 - i386 655 kB/s | 39 MB 01:01 > PostInstallerF-updates 2.7 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:01 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Updates 399 kB/s | 103 > kB 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree - Updates 9.8 kB/s | > 1.3 kB > 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free 1.0 MB/s | 408 kB > 00:00 > Adobe Systems Incorporated 6.3 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 > PostInstallerF 137 kB/s | 533 kB 00:03 > Fedora 23 - i386 - Updates 564 kB/s | 3.8 MB 00:06 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree 514 kB/s | 129 kB > 00:00 > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Nov 4 10:30:15 > 2015. > Error: package kf5-kdesu-5.15.0-2.fc23.i686 requires kf5-filesystem >= > 5.15.0, but none > of the providers can be installed Some folks having difficulties may be better served by making sure they have both dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 and python2-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1 installed. Not sure if these have been moved to stable yet so you may have to get them from "updates-testing". Also, KDE users may have some problems with upgrades until https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-084749eee7 gets ironed out. It was noted on the KDE list that "probably broken dependencies, due to botched kf5-5.15.0 push to stable updates not working properly (2 days ago), it's being worked on." -- In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from computers altogether. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 03/11/15 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: A boring update Not for me it wasn't! root@nellie 10:27:06 ~ # dnf --best --allowerasing --refresh system-upgrade download --releasever=23 Fedora 23 - i386 655 kB/s | 39 MB 01:01 PostInstallerF-updates 2.7 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Updates 399 kB/s | 103 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree - Updates 9.8 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free 1.0 MB/s | 408 kB 00:00 Adobe Systems Incorporated 6.3 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 PostInstallerF 137 kB/s | 533 kB 00:03 Fedora 23 - i386 - Updates 564 kB/s | 3.8 MB 00:06 RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree 514 kB/s | 129 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Nov 4 10:30:15 2015. Error: package kf5-kdesu-5.15.0-2.fc23.i686 requires kf5-filesystem >= 5.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed -- Chris R. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 2015-11-03 at 09:42:59 Neal Becker wrote: > A boring update > Just did F21->F22, equally boring. -- Erik -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 3 November 2015 at 21:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs' > > I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a > storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in > F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference. > Just confirmed that /home does still mount correctly under F22. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 3 November 2015 at 20:25, Paul Cartwright wrote: > 2 things.. > 1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > mine shows this at the end: > [ 1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0 71.00 1280 1328 > 1360 1440 800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP) > > I see errors both with Nvidia and Nouveau. "/dev/fb0: no such file or directory" Aside from that, I've noticed an additional problem: /home is not being mounted. It's a btrfs filesystem and when trying to mount it manually I get: mount: unknown filesystem type 'btrfs' I have btrfs-progs. This worked correctly on F22. A dnf search shows a storaged-btrfs package which seems to be new (or at least not required in F22) but installing it and rebooting makes no difference. How can btrfs not work? Seriously? poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 11/03/2015 03:19 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 1) Did the dnf update of 3055 packages 2) Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors 3) On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE). Investigation showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still there, so installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted. 4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with: [ OK] Reached target Switch Root. Starting Switch Root... 2 things.. 1, tail /var/log/Xorg.0.log mine shows this at the end: [ 1478.000] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x800"x0.0 71.00 1280 1328 1360 1440 800 802 808 823 -hsync -vsync (49.3 kHz eP) maybe change to lightdm? do you have another DM ( WM?) besides KDE?? maybe xfce e19... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 3 November 2015 at 17:12, Dave Cross wrote: > On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: > > A boring update > > Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-) > I wish. The update as such was uneventful, but now I can't get a login screen. 1) Did the dnf update of 3055 packages 2) Rebooted and installed F23 with no errors 3) On booting the new system, got a low-res login (for KDE). Investigation showed that the akmod-nvidia race condition bug is still there, so installed kmod-nvidia by hand and rebooted. 4) Now I get a text-mode log of update progress, ending with: [ OK] Reached target Switch Root. Starting Switch Root... After which nothing happens. I tried removing the proprietary Nvidia stuff but it didn't help. I also tried switching to GDM On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: > A boring update Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-) and SDDM (my usual DM is KDM) and no difference. There is nothing obviously wrong in journalctl. I'm out of ideas. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 3 November 2015 at 14:42, Neal Becker wrote: > A boring update Yep. Completely uneventful here too. Which is good :-) -- Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk http://dave.org.uk/ @davorg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
On 11/03/2015 03:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote: A boring update Not for me: # dnf system-upgrade --releasever 23 download ... Skipping packages with broken dependencies: python-pexpect What's interesting about python-pexpect is its state in the repos: dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/23/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-4.0.1-4.fc23.src.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/source/SRPMS/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.src.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/i386/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/23/x86_64/os/Packages/p/python-pexpect-3.1-4.fc23.noarch.rpm In other words, the 23 update repos in inconsistent shape. Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
Isn't that what you would want? A non-event? On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > A boring update > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
updated f22->f23 using dnf system-upgrade, no significant issues
A boring update -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
