Re: [one-users] blktap xen 4.2 and opennebula 4.2

2014-04-05 Thread kenny . kenny
i didt find anything wrong , just something about driver.. 
thanks.
Sun Mar 30 23:58:55 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:1280 UID:0 VirtualMachineAllocate invoked, "CPU="0.1"...", falseSun Mar 30 23:58:56 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:1280 UID:0 VirtualMachineAllocate result SUCCESS, 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:01 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5632 UID:2 HostPoolInfo invokedSun Mar 30 23:59:01 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5632 UID:2 HostPoolInfo result SUCCESS, "HOST_POOLHOSTID..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:02 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:8016 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:02 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:8016 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:02 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:9776 UID:0 VirtualMachineInfo invoked, 1624Sun Mar 30 23:59:02 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:9776 UID:0 VirtualMachineInfo result SUCCESS, "VMID1624/IDUI..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5056 UID:0 VirtualMachineInfo invoked, 1624Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5056 UID:0 VirtualMachineInfo result SUCCESS, "VMID1624/IDUI..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:03 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:496 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:2640 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:2640 UID:0 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:9120 UID:0 HostPoolInfo invokedSun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:9120 UID:0 HostPoolInfo result SUCCESS, "HOST_POOLHOSTID..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:6560 UID:0 ClusterPoolInfo invokedSun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:7520 UID:0 VirtualMachineDeploy invoked, 1687, 3, falseSun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [DiM][D]: Deploying VM 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:7520 UID:0 VirtualMachineDeploy result SUCCESS, 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:05 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5696 UID:2 UserPoolInfo invokedSun Mar 30 23:59:05 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5696 UID:2 UserPoolInfo result SUCCESS, "USER_POOLUSERID..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:06 2014 [VMM][I]: --Mark--Sun Mar 30 23:59:08 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:272 UID:2 AclInfo invokedSun Mar 30 23:59:08 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:272 UID:2 AclInfo result SUCCESS, "ACL_POOLACLID0..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:13 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5120 UID:0 VirtualMachineAction invoked, "delete", 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:13 2014 [DiM][D]: Finalizing VM 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:13 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:5120 UID:0 VirtualMachineAction result SUCCESS, 1687Sun Mar 30 23:59:14 2014 [TM][D]: Message received: LOG I 1687 Driver command for 1687 cancelledSun Mar 30 23:59:15 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:2192 UID:2 VirtualMachinePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:15 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:2192 UID:2 VirtualMachinePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "VM_POOLVMID162..."Sun Mar 30 23:59:19 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:3520 UID:2 ImagePoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1Sun Mar 30 23:59:19 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:3520 UID:2 ImagePoolInfo result SUCCESS, "IMAGE_POOLIMAGE..."

De: cmar...@opennebula.orgEnviada: Quinta-feira, 3 de Abril de 2014 10:48Para: kenny.ke...@bol.com.brAssunto: [one-users] blktap xen 4.2 and opennebula 4.2

Hi,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:07 PM, kenny.ke...@bol.com.br wrote:

no i didn't do that. after a few seconds, the vm name disapear from onevm list. it doesnt stay with prolog, boot etc.

 

Can you check in oned.log if there is any call to onevm delete? Maybe there is a script somewhere causing this...--
Carlos Martín, MScProject Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula



 
 

De: jfon...@opennebula.orgEnviada: Terça-feira, 1 de Abril de 2014 09:40Para: kenny.ke...@bol.com.br,users@lists.opennebula.org

Assunto: [one-users] blktap xen 4.2 and opennebula 4.2That message is only seen when you cancel actions like when youexecute onevm delete. Have you done that? Maybe you didn't wait until the image transfer was done.On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:08 AM, kenny.ke...@bol.com.br wrote: Hello, i try to force the driver in the image but i got this error in  var/log/one/.log Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE. Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG. Sun Mar 30 23:59:04 2014 [VM][I]: Virtual Machine has no context  Sun Mar 30 23:59:13 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is CLEANUP. Sun Mar 30 23:59:14 2014 [DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE Sun Mar 30 23:59:14 2014 [TM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 1687 Driver command for 1687 cancelled  Sun Mar 30 23:59:42 2014 [TM][W]: Ignored: TRANSFER SUCCESS 1687 - And vm didnt start . do you know what is 

Re: [one-users] Opennebula and openvswitch problem.

2014-04-05 Thread Valentin Bud
Shankhadeep are you referring to Open vSwitch 2.0? I am currently running
OvS 2.0 with Libvirt 0.9.12 on Debian Wheezy. I ran into the same problem
as the OP and noticed that installation order matters. First OvS, second
libvirt. Running OpenNebula 4.4.


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Shankhadeep Shome shank15...@gmail.comwrote:

 Well, 2.0 will break libvirt in a couple of ways and opennebula uses
 libvirt so I don't think its gonna work out so well for early adopters. As
 for Linux 3.14, LTS gets regular kernel updates so it will have it
 eventually. I don't think its a good idea to stick to LTS for hypervisors,
 you will miss too much. KVM based hypervisors should get updated yearly to
 the latest stable build. VM infrastructures are easy when it comes to in
 place upgrades, especially opennebula. You can always add new nodes and
 retire older ones gracefully.


 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Stefan Kooman ste...@bit.nl wrote:

 Quoting Leszek Master (keks...@gmail.com):
  I'm waiting for official relese of next LTS version, i can use only LTS
 in
  my production, so i was testing it on the 12.04. If there isn't any
  official manual how ot solve this problem i'll upgrade my distro and try
  then :) Thanks for your help.

 Precise/quantal suffers from this bug:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084028

 Fixed in newer releases: saucy / trusty (tested by me). This is apart
 from the legacy bridging stuff. With virtualization development
 happening so quickly I would recommend going for newer instead of older.
 Hopefully linux 3.14 and Qemu 2.0 will make it into Trusty ...

 Gr. Stefan

 --
 | BIT BV  http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
 | GPG: 0xD14839C6   +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opennebula.org
 http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opennebula.org
 http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org




-- 
Valentin Bud
http://databus.pro | valen...@databus.pro
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org