Re: [one-users] econe server and sha1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Oh... I have that 2 users. 14 alfeijoousers ldap 1 / - 1024M / - 1.0 / - 17 alfeijooec2 users core - - - I understant that user 14 never work in these scenario? but user 17 may? Thanks :) El 06/11/14 08:56, Daniel Molina escribió: Hi, LDAP authentication is not supported through ec2, at least using regular clients. If you want to use this kind of authentication you have to change the auth method to opennebla in the econe.conf file and include the Basic Auth headers in every ec2 request Cheers On 6 November 2014 08:27, Alejandro Feijóo alfei...@cesga.es wrote: Hi sorry for the delay... i was on vacation... Yes that was one of the test that i did... but with the same error. its possible any kind of problems when use ldap? any random recomendation? :D Thanks in advance. El 24/10/14 10:30, Daniel Molina escribió: ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org - -- Alejandro Feijóo Fraga Systems Technician CESGA -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUWy/6AAoJEKshAoM6XWq5XS0H/RzdbJyfx4pbXGxrtPNDBQ0M oqVmeBO5Z/Qf4YXcpvOps3/I48JS9xp4TG4J/pWJFxfTHy6CZXC0wY7x13YLzafh aqHsEq9mSmL63mYKF8oUSqFyO0DXbrkzDxB6lQ1r/CjfwbOInG0LxK7kC41GLzMR xcRySKtA3YQUinVYST6QUolbOisQ7G0d1w2RZEfxJ/KR/Xd0NyHaINTbpjOoGlsT EVpbIeBWnKytv98LlD5BG8bm03yKUgLdBzz97YHJ3BGGMcvqAGkdus9EvWRn/dLM /JhM56kJUZj3aR31NXMUDxkUxrCawuzd3dtGLFPnDvqMTsvhc6913aC7tFxtM6Y= =+wf8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] econe server and sha1
That's right, if you use alfeijooec2 through ec2 you don't have to change anything, just use the password returned by oneshow user show alfeijooec2 as AWS_SECRET_KEY On 6 November 2014 09:23, Alejandro Feijóo alfei...@cesga.es wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Oh... I have that 2 users. 14 alfeijoousers ldap 1 / - 1024M / - 1.0 / - 17 alfeijooec2 users core - - - I understant that user 14 never work in these scenario? but user 17 may? Thanks :) El 06/11/14 08:56, Daniel Molina escribió: Hi, LDAP authentication is not supported through ec2, at least using regular clients. If you want to use this kind of authentication you have to change the auth method to opennebla in the econe.conf file and include the Basic Auth headers in every ec2 request Cheers On 6 November 2014 08:27, Alejandro Feijóo alfei...@cesga.es wrote: Hi sorry for the delay... i was on vacation... Yes that was one of the test that i did... but with the same error. its possible any kind of problems when use ldap? any random recomendation? :D Thanks in advance. El 24/10/14 10:30, Daniel Molina escribió: ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org - -- Alejandro Feijóo Fraga Systems Technician CESGA -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUWy/6AAoJEKshAoM6XWq5XS0H/RzdbJyfx4pbXGxrtPNDBQ0M oqVmeBO5Z/Qf4YXcpvOps3/I48JS9xp4TG4J/pWJFxfTHy6CZXC0wY7x13YLzafh aqHsEq9mSmL63mYKF8oUSqFyO0DXbrkzDxB6lQ1r/CjfwbOInG0LxK7kC41GLzMR xcRySKtA3YQUinVYST6QUolbOisQ7G0d1w2RZEfxJ/KR/Xd0NyHaINTbpjOoGlsT EVpbIeBWnKytv98LlD5BG8bm03yKUgLdBzz97YHJ3BGGMcvqAGkdus9EvWRn/dLM /JhM56kJUZj3aR31NXMUDxkUxrCawuzd3dtGLFPnDvqMTsvhc6913aC7tFxtM6Y= =+wf8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Easy provisioning missing from newer versions of Opennebula?
Hi, On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Pentium100 pentium...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the information. It sucks a bit about the need to create templates for every single VM, but if that's how it should be then OK. Our customers currently use VMs as VDS so while MySQL server template might be useful, it will need to be cloned before the customer can use a persistent image (as it should be as hard as possible to accidentally lose data). I guess we will have to write our own GUI to Opennebula as it is missing some features that are present in the current (quite manual) system. For example: 1) the ability to extend a virtual disk (virtual server may run out of space eventually so the disk will need to be extended without losing data or long downtime) 2) the ability to create crash-consistent snapshots* or backups and create snapshots if the VM is off (as a backup) of all disks at once. 3) the ability to migrate with snapshots or keep snapshots after powering off the VM (though AFAIK migrating with snapsohts is enabled in the new version). Our snapshots do not include the VM state, they are just ZFS snapshots of the VM's dataset. Thank you for sharing your use case, and your feedback. We'll take it into account for future versions. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Pentium100 pentium...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have tried Opennebula 4.2.0 and liked the easy provisioning wizard - a user could select a template and combine it with his persistent image to create a VM without the need to create a separate template. It seems that this function is missing from Opennebula 4.8.0, requiring eveyone to create a template for each VM and making the VM creation process complicated: 1) Clone, upload or create a blank image (persistent) 2) Create a template that uses that image 3) Create a VM that uses that template. If the user need 5 identical VMs they have to create 5 separate templates that differ only in the images. Is there a way to simplify this process? One way is to create a template without an image, create a VM from it, then start the VM and attach the image. This seems easier than creating templates for each VM, however this also has problems. Since attaching the disk requires the VM to be running, the VM is deployed with zero storage requirements, so it may be deployed to a host that has insufficient storage for when the user tries to add a 1TB image leading to problems. Our users use the virtual machines as VDS, so persistent images are important (deleting a VM may not mean I want to delete the data). The easy provisioning wizard was deprecated in favor of the new cloud view model, see [1] for a complete explanation of it. So yes, you need to define a Template for each Image. It was decided that the advantages justify that extra step. Your example of the previous way of registering images makes a few assumptions that will not apply to everyone. For instance, what happens if you register 2 images with different OS architectures? You would need two Templates with different OS/ARCH, and the users wouldn't know which one applies to each Image. The same goes for a heterogeneous infrastructure. If there are Images for KVM and VMware, you need to create Templates with SCHED_REQUIREMENTS=HYPERVISOR=xx for each one. But the users can freely mix a kvm template with a vmware image. Another Template attributes coupled to a specific image: NIC_DEFAULT/MODEL. The new model also includes new features. For example, if you as an admin prepare an Image with a mysql server, now you can define a matching VM Template that asks the user the mysql password they want to set when the template is instantiated [2]. Regards [1] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/design_and_installation/building_your_cloud/understand.html [2] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/user/virtual_resource_management/vm_guide.html#ask-for-user-inputs -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Users can't create VMs with large capacity (in the cloud view)
Hi, On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Pavel Tankov pavel.tan...@strategyobject.com wrote: OK, I understand it now. Then, does Opennebula support any kind of overcommitting or something? Pavel Tankov Yes, you can use cpu/vcpu to guide overcommitment [1]. Or you can set negative values for reserved_cpu/mem in the hosts [2]. Regards [1] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/user/references/template.html#capacity-section [2] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/references/schg.html#limiting-the-resources-exposed-by-a-host -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] New vOneCloud app to build clouds on VMware vCenter
Dear community, We have just announced the release of vOneCloud ( http://opennebula.org/vonecloud-the-simplest-alternative-to-vcloud/), a CentOS Linux virtual appliance for vSphere that contains all required OpenNebula services optimized to work on existing VMware vCenter deployments. vOneCloud is for organizations that want to create a self-service cloud environment on top of their VMware infrastructure without having to abandon their investment in VMware and retool the entire stack. We recommend vOneCloud to build your cloud if you are only using vCenter as infrastructure backend. If your are planning to use KVM, Xen, VMware ESX, or VMWare vCenter combined with any of the previous hypervisors, we recommend you use the OpenNebula packages available at http://opennebula.org/software/. Looking forward to your feedback, and thanks for your valuable support! Ignacio -- Ignacio M. Llorente, PhD, MBA Project Director OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | imllore...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] 4.10 + Datastore Gluster
Hi, Have you followed the docs? On which OS is Gluster running? Vincent On 2014-11-05 16:18, Giancarlo De Filippis wrote: Hi all, i'm this error using version 4.10 of Opnenebula and image datastore Gluster. Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Generating deployment file: /var/lib/one/vms/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Command execution fail: cat EOT | /var/tmp/one/vmm/kvm/deploy '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0' 'node1.ltbl.it' 4 node1.ltbl.it Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: Failed to create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575817] E [rpc-clnt.c:369:saved_frames_unwind] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x48) [0x7f1be7646168] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0xb8) [0x7f1be7644218] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe) [0x7f1be764413e]))) 0-gfapi: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS Handshake) op(GETSPEC(2)) called at 2014-11-05 11:44:58.574997 (xid=0x1) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575836] E [glfs-mgmt.c:586:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glfs-mgmt: failed to fetch volume file (key:cloudStorage) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575864] E [glfs-mgmt.c:680:mgmt_rpc_notify] 0-glfs-mgmt: failed to connect with remote-host: 37.187.248.190 (No data available) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: qemu-kvm: -drive file=gluster://XXX:24007/cloudStorage/2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,format=qcow2,cache=none: Gluster connection failed for server= port=24007 volume=cloudStorage image=2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811 transport=tcp Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: qemu-kvm: -drive f Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine: Could not create domain from If i try this command: qemu-img info gluster://xx:24007/cloudStorage/image it give error, image: gluster://storage1:24007/cloudStorage/2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 10G (10737418240 bytes) disk size: 830M cluster_size: 65536 Format specific information: [2014-11-05 15:17:28.722805] E [afr-common.c:4168:afr_notify] 0-cloudStorage-replicate-0: All subvolumes are down. Going offline until atleast one of them comes back up. compat: 0.10 if i try this command (mounting remote fs): qemu-img info /var/lib/one/datastores/0/image everithing work fine. Someone can help me? Thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] 4.10 + Datastore Gluster
Hi, i just resolved. i Missing - on second server (replicated) - a modification to glustefs.vol. and a restart of the volume. Everything run fine now. Thanks!!! Il 06/11/2014 15:06, vinc...@vanderkussen.org ha scritto: Hi, Have you followed the docs? On which OS is Gluster running? Vincent On 2014-11-05 16:18, Giancarlo De Filippis wrote: Hi all, i'm this error using version 4.10 of Opnenebula and image datastore Gluster. Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Generating deployment file: /var/lib/one/vms/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:07 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Command execution fail: cat EOT | /var/tmp/one/vmm/kvm/deploy '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0' 'node1.ltbl.it' 4 node1.ltbl.it Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: Failed to create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575817] E [rpc-clnt.c:369:saved_frames_unwind] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_notify+0x48) [0x7f1be7646168] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpc_clnt_connection_cleanup+0xb8) [0x7f1be7644218] (--/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(saved_frames_destroy+0xe) [0x7f1be764413e]))) 0-gfapi: forced unwinding frame type(GlusterFS Handshake) op(GETSPEC(2)) called at 2014-11-05 11:44:58.574997 (xid=0x1) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575836] E [glfs-mgmt.c:586:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glfs-mgmt: failed to fetch volume file (key:cloudStorage) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: [2014-11-05 11:44:58.575864] E [glfs-mgmt.c:680:mgmt_rpc_notify] 0-glfs-mgmt: failed to connect with remote-host: 37.187.248.190 (No data available) Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: qemu-kvm: -drive file=gluster://XXX:24007/cloudStorage/2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,format=qcow2,cache=none: Gluster connection failed for server= port=24007 volume=cloudStorage image=2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811 transport=tcp Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: qemu-kvm: -drive f Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/4/deployment.0 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255 Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Nov 5 12:45:08 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine: Could not create domain from If i try this command: qemu-img info gluster://xx:24007/cloudStorage/image it give error, image: gluster://storage1:24007/cloudStorage/2ec797c8773239569395a205a0fdc811 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 10G (10737418240 bytes) disk size: 830M cluster_size: 65536 Format specific information: [2014-11-05 15:17:28.722805] E [afr-common.c:4168:afr_notify] 0-cloudStorage-replicate-0: All subvolumes are down. Going offline until atleast one of them comes back up. compat: 0.10 if i try this command (mounting remote fs): qemu-img info /var/lib/one/datastores/0/image everithing work fine. Someone can help me? Thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] vOneCloud and vCenter 5.5 won't connect
Hi, I'm trying the vOneCloud appliance 4.10beta and I'm having problem to connect with my vCenter 5.5. I used this doc: http://docs.vonecloud.today/4.10/simple_cloud_deployment/import_vcenter.html My oned.log after I create the Host with vCenter informations. http://pastebin.com/MJPLGNi5 The username and password is correct because the web interface shows me the cluster name and some templates. Thanks Rogerio ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Error Live Migrate
Hi, I got error like this when i try to live migrate: Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 pc RHEL 6.4.0 PC (alias of rhel6.4.0) Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.4.0 RHEL 6.4.0 PC (default) Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.5.0 RHEL 5.5.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.4.4 RHEL 5.4.4 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.4.0 RHEL 5.4.0 PC How to fix it ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] reg sunstone - VNC
Hi All, I am using opennebula 4.6 version. My setup has (i) ONE - Machine A ( sunstone server is also running) - two nodes z1-nc04, z1-nc03 (ii) Sunstone Sever - Machine B, (using the same credential of Machine A) the issue i am facing is that i can access the VNC of any VM using the sunstone [machine A], but when i access through machine B, it fails. Both machines are in the same subnet. (using telnet i can see its being connected) The novnc log is as follows, WebSocket server settings: - Listen on :29876 - Flash security policy server - No SSL/TLS support (no cert file) - proxying from :29876 to targets in /srv/cloud/one/var/sunstone_vnc_tokens 1: 10.1.26.51: Plain non-SSL (ws://) WebSocket connection 1: 10.1.26.51: Version hybi-13, base64: 'False' 1: 10.1.26.51: Path: '/?token=npfbnzreud4ozaiasiwq' 1: connecting to: z1-nc04:5995 1: handler exception: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] vOneCloud and vCenter 5.5 won't connect
Hi Rogerio, I take it that you imported a vCenter cluster as a vOneCloud host following the guide, and the problem shows at the time of monitoring the vOneCloud host, with the error displayed in the log file you sent through. A couple of questions to see how we can solve this: - The host that fails is the one with ID = 3. Does host 1 and 2 monitor correctly (you can see that with onehost list in the vOneCloud console, logged in as oneadmin) - The credentials of host three to access vCenter are stored in the host template, accessible with onehost show 3 (in the vOneCloud console, logged in as oneadmin). Can you check that the contents of: VCENTER_USER VCENTER_PASSWORD are correct and not mangled somehow? Best regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect | Head of Research at OpenNebula Systems (formerly C12G Labs) cvazquez@OpenNebula.Systems | @OpenNebula -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of OpenNebula.Systems S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse@opennebula.systems and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. OpenNebula's thanks you for your cooperation. On 7 November 2014 07:15, Rogerio Goncalves roge...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying the vOneCloud appliance 4.10beta and I'm having problem to connect with my vCenter 5.5. I used this doc: http://docs.vonecloud.today/4.10/simple_cloud_deployment/import_vcenter.html My oned.log after I create the Host with vCenter informations. http://pastebin.com/MJPLGNi5 The username and password is correct because the web interface shows me the cluster name and some templates. Thanks Rogerio ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
