[one-users] Forming Virtual clusters

[sinha shree]

Hi,

Can you please reply for my queries... I have setup private cloud and now I
want to take idle virtual machines and form into a cluster. Is it possible.
Am I on right path???. plz advice


Thanks & Regards

Sinha
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] "Re: Contents of Users digest..."

[lilianrosa]

50 Aniversario de la Cujae. Inaugurada por Fidel el 2 de diciembre de 1964  
http://cujae.edu.cu


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMM 'unknown' state not being set?

[Andy Coates]

Thanks Carlos - I thought 'd' would be marked as something else.   We're
basically trying to flag a stopped VM but with those limited STATE options
it doesn't seem possible.  How can we represent a 'stopped' VM in the poll
information?

On 18 February 2015 at 16:58, Carlos Martín Sánchez 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Andy Coates 
> wrote:
>
>> Running OpenNebula 4.6.2
>>
>> We have a custom VMM driver that is set to report 'unknown' state if we
>> can't determine the current VM state on the host.  According to the docs
>> the '-' character indicates unknown, and as shown below ON is seeing and
>> parsing the VMM data correctly:
>>
>> [VMM][D]: VM 1135 successfully monitored: USEDMEMORY=4194304 USEDCPU=800
>> NETTX=0 NETRX=0 *STATE=-* IP=10.0.0.174
>>
>> Am I missing something?  Shouldn't the VM state be set to unkn/UNKNOWN in
>> this case?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> The '-' character indicates a monitoring unexpected error, like when the
> monitoring probes could not parse the output. In this case OpenNebula does
> nothing, the current VM state is kept.
> A state='d' (disappeared) indicates that the monitoring could be done
> (hypervisor is up), but the VM was not found in the list of VMs. In this
> case OpenNebula will set the VM to unknown.
>
> See:
> http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/integration/infrastructure_integration/devel-vmm.html#poll-information
>
> Regards
> --
> Carlos Martín, MSc
> Project Engineer
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
> www.OpenNebula.org  | cmar...@opennebula.org
>  | @OpenNebula  
>
>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMM 'unknown' state not being set?

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Andy Coates  wrote:

> Running OpenNebula 4.6.2
>
> We have a custom VMM driver that is set to report 'unknown' state if we
> can't determine the current VM state on the host.  According to the docs
> the '-' character indicates unknown, and as shown below ON is seeing and
> parsing the VMM data correctly:
>
> [VMM][D]: VM 1135 successfully monitored: USEDMEMORY=4194304 USEDCPU=800
> NETTX=0 NETRX=0 *STATE=-* IP=10.0.0.174
>
> Am I missing something?  Shouldn't the VM state be set to unkn/UNKNOWN in
> this case?
>
> Thanks.
>

The '-' character indicates a monitoring unexpected error, like when the
monitoring probes could not parse the output. In this case OpenNebula does
nothing, the current VM state is kept.
A state='d' (disappeared) indicates that the monitoring could be done
(hypervisor is up), but the VM was not found in the list of VMs. In this
case OpenNebula will set the VM to unknown.

See:
http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/integration/infrastructure_integration/devel-vmm.html#poll-information

Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org  | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula  
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org