[one-users] Duplicate Information from onehost CLI
Guys, We use Opennebula 4.10 and we have 8 nodes. I have problem with sunstone in hosts tab, if i access hosts tab, the sunstone is always loading. if i try use command line, i get duplicate information like this : MONITORING INFORMATION ARCH=x86_64 ARCH=x86_64 CPUSPEED=2400 CPUSPEED=2400 HOSTNAME=node003 HOSTNAME=node003 HYPERVISOR=kvm HYPERVISOR=kvm MODELNAME=Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz MODELNAME=Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz NETRX= NETRX= NETTX=x NETTX=xxx RESERVED_CPU= RESERVED_MEM= I think this is problem so, the sunstone cannot show the information from hosts tabs, from 8 nodes, we have problem in 3 nodes, please help me, thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] disk not none in template
thanks for reply i'll wait it Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 29 Des 2014, at 22.41, Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org wrote: You can migrate the VM using the unsafe flag in the virsh command. Just update the migrate script for the kvm driver and onehost sync the hypervisors. We plan to add a flag in a future release to deal with this issue http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3473 Cheers On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 3:36:24 AM Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, We couldn't live migrate vm with cache not 'none', how to change this vm use cache none, without delete recreate or shutdown VM? thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] disk not none in template
Guys, We couldn't live migrate vm with cache not 'none', how to change this vm use cache none, without delete recreate or shutdown VM? thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Error Live Migrate
Hi, I got error like this when i try to live migrate: Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 pc RHEL 6.4.0 PC (alias of rhel6.4.0) Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.4.0 RHEL 6.4.0 PC (default) Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.5.0 RHEL 5.5.0 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.4.4 RHEL 5.4.4 PC Fri Nov 7 14:19:02 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 821 rhel5.4.0 RHEL 5.4.0 PC How to fix it ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Ruby 2.1.2
I use ruby 2.1.4 compile from source and everything is fine with opennebula 4.10 thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 5 Nov 2014, at 16.58, Daniel Molina dmol...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, ruby 2.1.2 is not included in our certified platforms, but it should work. Did you find any problem? Cheers On 5 November 2014 04:06, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Hi, Opennebula 4.10 support for ruby 2.1.2 ? Thanks. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Ruby 2.1.2
Hi, Opennebula 4.10 support for ruby 2.1.2 ? Thanks. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] failover datastore
I have 3 datastore, box a for datastore 0 datastore 2, box b for datastore 1 and box c for datastore 150, box b and box c with default type. could we make box b and box c (datastore1datastore 150) failover? so we can maintenance box b or box c without downtime, thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] LiveBackup
Hi, Could opennebula with qemu support for livebackup? http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/b/b6/2011-forum-LiveBackup.pdf Thanks. Rhesa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Live migrate with Snapshot
Guys, Could we migrate vm with snapshots?how to make it works?thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box
thanks for your answer, i will be test and report to you, On 09/03/2014 04:09 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: We have not tested that configuration but if you only use persistent images it may work. Make sure you don't try to do cold migrations as the checkpoint is saved to the system datastore and probably will get some time to be synchronized with the new node. On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Datastore 0 and datastore 2 will be synchronized frontend + nodes (we just use persistent image) so i think datastore 0 just synchronized symbolic link. If we have problem maybe existing storage box (datastore 1) broken, all vm used new storage box ( datastore 100) will not impact with datastore 1 because datastore 0 shared and synchronized across frontend +nodes. it possible? Rhesa On 08/26/2014 01:52 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Rhesa, the problem is datastore 0, it's the system datastore. If you move it to the local nodes, it will not be shared and synchronized across the nodes, therefore you will lose many benefits like live-migration and instant persintant image VM deployment. Why is it that you want to move datastore 0 to the frontend + nodes? On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Jaime, Thanks for your reply, now datastore 0 and datastore 2 are in existing storage box, mounted in frontend + nodes, we want to move datastore 0 and datastore 2 from existing storage box to frontend + nodes, could it be done? So in existing storage box just have datastore 1 and in new storage box just have datastore 100. Rhesa. On 08/26/2014 01:34 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Hi, I don't entirely understand the difference between both options, could you explain in more detail what you mean by distributing the datastore to all the nodes? Assuming your configuration is as follows: NFS Server exports datastores 0 and 1 - Mounted in Frontend + Nodes I recommend the following option: - Create a new Image datastore (it will have ID = 100, in this example we will assume it has ID: 100) - Create a new exports directive in your new storage box, for example /storage/datastores/100 - Mount that mountpoint in all the nodes including the frontend in the following path: /var/lib/one/datastores/100 Now you can register more images in the new datastore (ID: 100), and since they are all persistent they will not take space in the system datastore (ID: 0) Best regards, Jaime On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, please help. Original Message Subject:Add New Storage Box Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:21:13 +0700 From: Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com To: users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org mailto:jfon...@opennebula.org Guys, We have plan to add a new storage box, Our existing storage : /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system /var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file All type are from one storage box. We did internal discuss and we get result with two options: 1. We add a new storage box as an image type and define it as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2. Or 2. We will distribute /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system and /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file to all nodes (all node are synced), then we add the new storage box as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 So with this second option, the nodes only mount two path from the storage box (/var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image [from existing storage box] and /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 [from new storage box]). All the images are persistent Please give us some advise with pros and cons within this two options, thanks. Rhesa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer
Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box
Jaime, Thanks for your reply, now datastore 0 and datastore 2 are in existing storage box, mounted in frontend + nodes, we want to move datastore 0 and datastore 2 from existing storage box to frontend + nodes, could it be done? So in existing storage box just have datastore 1 and in new storage box just have datastore 100. Rhesa. On 08/26/2014 01:34 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Hi, I don't entirely understand the difference between both options, could you explain in more detail what you mean by distributing the datastore to all the nodes? Assuming your configuration is as follows: NFS Server exports datastores 0 and 1 - Mounted in Frontend + Nodes I recommend the following option: - Create a new Image datastore (it will have ID = 100, in this example we will assume it has ID: 100) - Create a new exports directive in your new storage box, for example /storage/datastores/100 - Mount that mountpoint in all the nodes including the frontend in the following path: /var/lib/one/datastores/100 Now you can register more images in the new datastore (ID: 100), and since they are all persistent they will not take space in the system datastore (ID: 0) Best regards, Jaime On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, please help. Original Message Subject:Add New Storage Box Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:21:13 +0700 From: Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com To: users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org mailto:jfon...@opennebula.org Guys, We have plan to add a new storage box, Our existing storage : /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system /var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file All type are from one storage box. We did internal discuss and we get result with two options: 1. We add a new storage box as an image type and define it as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2. Or 2. We will distribute /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system and /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file to all nodes (all node are synced), then we add the new storage box as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 So with this second option, the nodes only mount two path from the storage box (/var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image [from existing storage box] and /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 [from new storage box]). All the images are persistent Please give us some advise with pros and cons within this two options, thanks. Rhesa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org mailto:jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box
Datastore 0 and datastore 2 will be synchronized frontend + nodes (we just use persistent image) so i think datastore 0 just synchronized symbolic link. If we have problem maybe existing storage box (datastore 1) broken, all vm used new storage box ( datastore 100) will not impact with datastore 1 because datastore 0 shared and synchronized across frontend +nodes. it possible? Rhesa On 08/26/2014 01:52 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Rhesa, the problem is datastore 0, it's the system datastore. If you move it to the local nodes, it will not be shared and synchronized across the nodes, therefore you will lose many benefits like live-migration and instant persintant image VM deployment. Why is it that you want to move datastore 0 to the frontend + nodes? On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Jaime, Thanks for your reply, now datastore 0 and datastore 2 are in existing storage box, mounted in frontend + nodes, we want to move datastore 0 and datastore 2 from existing storage box to frontend + nodes, could it be done? So in existing storage box just have datastore 1 and in new storage box just have datastore 100. Rhesa. On 08/26/2014 01:34 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Hi, I don't entirely understand the difference between both options, could you explain in more detail what you mean by distributing the datastore to all the nodes? Assuming your configuration is as follows: NFS Server exports datastores 0 and 1 - Mounted in Frontend + Nodes I recommend the following option: - Create a new Image datastore (it will have ID = 100, in this example we will assume it has ID: 100) - Create a new exports directive in your new storage box, for example /storage/datastores/100 - Mount that mountpoint in all the nodes including the frontend in the following path: /var/lib/one/datastores/100 Now you can register more images in the new datastore (ID: 100), and since they are all persistent they will not take space in the system datastore (ID: 0) Best regards, Jaime On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, please help. Original Message Subject:Add New Storage Box Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:21:13 +0700 From: Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com To: users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org mailto:jfon...@opennebula.org Guys, We have plan to add a new storage box, Our existing storage : /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system /var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file All type are from one storage box. We did internal discuss and we get result with two options: 1. We add a new storage box as an image type and define it as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2. Or 2. We will distribute /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system and /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file to all nodes (all node are synced), then we add the new storage box as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 So with this second option, the nodes only mount two path from the storage box (/var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image [from existing storage box] and /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 [from new storage box]). All the images are persistent Please give us some advise with pros and cons within this two options, thanks. Rhesa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org mailto:jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org mailto:jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Add New Storage Box
Guys, We have plan to add a new storage box, Our existing storage : /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system /var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file All type are from one storage box. We did internal discuss and we get result with two options: 1. We add a new storage box as an image type and define it as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2. Or 2. We will distribute /var/lib/one/datastore/0 = system and /var/lib/one/datastore/2 = file to all nodes (all node are synced), then we add the new storage box as /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 So with this second option, the nodes only mount two path from the storage box (/var/lib/one/datastore/1 = image [from existing storage box] and /var/lib/one/datastore/3 = image2 [from new storage box]). All the images are persistent Please give us some advise with pros and cons within this two options, thanks. Rhesa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Marketplace
Hi, Could we create own marketplace, we can create in our server with local network, any guide or link? thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Marketplace
Wow nice link, thanks you Rhesa. On 08/12/2014 03:53 PM, Daniel Molina wrote: Hi, You can find the AppMarket documentation and code as an OpenNebula Addon in Github https://github.com/OpenNebula/addon-appmarket Cheers On 12 August 2014 09:02, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Hi, Could we create own marketplace, we can create in our server with local network, any guide or link? thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org mailto:dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Error Migration
Hello, I get error when i live migrate vm, this is error ini oned.log : Message received: LOG E 710 migrate: Command virsh --connect qemu:///system migrate --live one-710 qemu+ssh://node128/system failed: error: internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: Supported machines are: Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 pc RHEL 6.4.0 PC (alias of rhel6.4.0) Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel6.4.0 RHEL 6.4.0 PC (default) Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel5.5.0 RHEL 5.5.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel5.4.4 RHEL 5.4.4 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 rhel5.4.0 RHEL 5.4.0 PC Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG E 710 Could not migrate one-710 to node128 Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 ExitCode: 1 Mon Jun 30 09:22:21 2014 [VMM][D]: Message received: LOG I 710 Failed to execute virtualization driver operation: migrate. Please help, thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Error after federation working
Many thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 23 Jun 2014, at 15.43, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi, Sure, we've opened a ticket to keep track of the feature implementation. Best regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 19 June 2014 14:03, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: amazing, yes of course we need this feature, i will wait in a future release, many thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 19 Jun 2014, at 17.11, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi, Let me answer this one. Currently the only supported behaviour is that a user is logged into the zone that the Sunstone server connects. If you deem interesting, we can open a feature request to be able to set a default zone for a particular user, to implement it in future releases. Regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 19 June 2014 11:50, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Javi, It's works, we get different time zone 1 and zone 2, once again, can we set view user1 to automatic view just zone1 ( not always to master ), or maybe user2 automatic view just zone2, so if user1 don't have VM in zone2, it will be go automatically to zone1, thanks. Rhesa On 06/18/2014 05:26 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: Can you check that both one servers have correct time set? ntp should be configured in both servers. Also check if login with Keep me logged in checkbox fixes the problem. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Hi, If i change zone to other zone ( zone slave ) i get error like this: [AuM][E]: Auth Error: login token expired Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo invoked Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][E]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo result FAILURE [ZonePoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call. all tables have shared with a master zone, sometimes i can change to zone slave, but sometime we got error our user couldn't be authenticated see attached, help please thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Error after federation working
Javi, It's works, we get different time zone 1 and zone 2, once again, can we set view user1 to automatic view just zone1 ( not always to master ), or maybe user2 automatic view just zone2, so if user1 don't have VM in zone2, it will be go automatically to zone1, thanks. Rhesa On 06/18/2014 05:26 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: Can you check that both one servers have correct time set? ntp should be configured in both servers. Also check if login with Keep me logged in checkbox fixes the problem. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Hi, If i change zone to other zone ( zone slave ) i get error like this: [AuM][E]: Auth Error: login token expired Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo invoked Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][E]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo result FAILURE [ZonePoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call. all tables have shared with a master zone, sometimes i can change to zone slave, but sometime we got error our user couldn't be authenticated see attached, help please thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Error after federation working
amazing, yes of course we need this feature, i will wait in a future release, many thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 19 Jun 2014, at 17.11, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi, Let me answer this one. Currently the only supported behaviour is that a user is logged into the zone that the Sunstone server connects. If you deem interesting, we can open a feature request to be able to set a default zone for a particular user, to implement it in future releases. Regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 19 June 2014 11:50, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Javi, It's works, we get different time zone 1 and zone 2, once again, can we set view user1 to automatic view just zone1 ( not always to master ), or maybe user2 automatic view just zone2, so if user1 don't have VM in zone2, it will be go automatically to zone1, thanks. Rhesa On 06/18/2014 05:26 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: Can you check that both one servers have correct time set? ntp should be configured in both servers. Also check if login with Keep me logged in checkbox fixes the problem. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Hi, If i change zone to other zone ( zone slave ) i get error like this: [AuM][E]: Auth Error: login token expired Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][D]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo invoked Tue Jun 17 21:43:53 2014 [ReM][E]: Req:4560 UID:- ZonePoolInfo result FAILURE [ZonePoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call. all tables have shared with a master zone, sometimes i can change to zone slave, but sometime we got error our user couldn't be authenticated see attached, help please thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] New maintenance release 4.6.2
I have redesign login page, i edit login.erb and _login_standard.erb, with upgrade to 4.6.2 it will be overwrite login.erb and _login_standard.erb? or i just backup 2 file and overwrite after upgrade success? thanks. Rhesa. On 06/12/2014 06:37 PM, users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org wrote: Send Users mailing list submissions to users@lists.opennebula.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org You can reach the person managing the list at users-ow...@lists.opennebula.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Users digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: ONE repos for RHEL7 (Ruben S. Montero) 2. Re: ERROR instantiate VM from cdrom (Tino Vazquez) 3. New maintenance release 4.6.2 (Javier Fontan) 4. Re: ONE repos for RHEL7 (Alvaro Simon Garcia) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:02:25 +0200 From: Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org To: Alvaro Simon Garcia alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] ONE repos for RHEL7 Message-ID: CAGi56tekWE+3=z-26YPaa1O5dXAfaCC9P7afAT9JM=vd4jd...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Alvaro, Support for CentOS7 will be included in the next release, we'll update when the first builds are ready. Cheers Ruben On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alvaro Simon Garcia alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be wrote: Hi RHEL7 is now out but it's available a ONE repo for this version? I have tested the current ONE CentOS/RHEL repo with RHEL7+EPEL but some packages are not available from EPEL7 repository: Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: log4cpp Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-thin Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-uuidtools Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: liblog4cpp.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: ruby-mysql Error: Package: opennebula-node-kvm-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: vconfig Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sequel Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sinatra Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-rack Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby anyone has tried it? Thanks in advance! Alvaro ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architect http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/20140612/8a60c87f/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:18:30 +0200 From: Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com To: users users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] ERROR instantiate VM from cdrom Message-ID: cahfkwc0kagf2xo9esdochn3qcphnolqsloidb1xzwqstpwc...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Maria, Now virtual machine boots from cdrom .iso but the network group not creates in vmware. I don?t know why. Another times this was successfully. OpenNebula will create a port group in the vSwitch if the host and networks are correctly configured to use the dynamic network mode: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/administration/networking/vmwarenet.html Have you configured it that way? I?d like import .iso from datastore upload before from VMware. If you chose to import images giving a path, this path needs to be available from the OpenNebula front-end, which doesn't have access to the /vmfs/volumes paths of the ESX. Best, -Tino -- Forwarded message -- From: Maria Jular maria.ju...@fcsc.es Date: 12 June 2014 11:54 Subject: RE:
Re: [one-users] New maintenance release 4.6.2
Thanks Jaime. On 06/12/2014 10:04 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: Hello, it will overwrite those two files, so simply do a backup as you suggested and restore them after upgrade. Since that hasn't changed it will work without any further changes. Regards; Jaime On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: I have redesign login page, i edit login.erb and _login_standard.erb, with upgrade to 4.6.2 it will be overwrite login.erb and _login_standard.erb? or i just backup 2 file and overwrite after upgrade success? thanks. Rhesa. On 06/12/2014 06:37 PM, users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org wrote: Send Users mailing list submissions to users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users-requ...@lists.opennebula.org You can reach the person managing the list at users-ow...@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users-ow...@lists.opennebula.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Users digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: ONE repos for RHEL7 (Ruben S. Montero) 2. Re: ERROR instantiate VM from cdrom (Tino Vazquez) 3. New maintenance release 4.6.2 (Javier Fontan) 4. Re: ONE repos for RHEL7 (Alvaro Simon Garcia) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 12:02:25 +0200 From: Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org mailto:rsmont...@opennebula.org To: Alvaro Simon Garcia alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be mailto:alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] ONE repos for RHEL7 Message-ID: CAGi56tekWE+3=z-26YPaa1O5dXAfaCC9P7afAT9JM=vd4jd...@mail.gmail.com mailto:vd4jd...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Alvaro, Support for CentOS7 will be included in the next release, we'll update when the first builds are ready. Cheers Ruben On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Alvaro Simon Garcia alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be mailto:alvaro.simongar...@ugent.be wrote: Hi RHEL7 is now out but it's available a ONE repo for this version? I have tested the current ONE CentOS/RHEL repo with RHEL7+EPEL but some packages are not available from EPEL7 repository: Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: log4cpp Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-thin Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-uuidtools Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: liblog4cpp.so.4()(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: ruby-mysql Error: Package: opennebula-node-kvm-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: vconfig Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sequel Error: Package: opennebula-server-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sinatra Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-rack Error: Package: opennebula-ruby-4.6.1-1.x86_64 (opennebula) Requires: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby anyone has tried it? Thanks in advance! Alvaro ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users
[one-users] Error when onedb import-slave
I get error like this undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass after merged groups, any help? thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Error when onedb import-slave
onedb import-slave -v --username opennebula --password opennebula --server x.x.x.x --dbname opennebula --slave-username opennebula --slave-password opennebula --slave-server x.x.x.x --slave-dbname opennebula I try to import slave db to master DB for federation feature i cannot see anything in oned.log On 06/10/2014 11:42 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: Can you tell us which is the action that produces this error? Also send us the portion of oned.log for the time this problem happened. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: I get error like this undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass after merged groups, any help? thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] VNC Handshake
It's work fine. On 06/10/2014 11:51 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: Things you can check: * websocketproxy.py is running * user has enabled SSL for VNC (VNC_WSS=yes) * ssl is configured for websocket proxy in oned.conf: :vnc_proxy_support_wss: yes :vnc_proxy_cert: the cert :vnc_proxy_key: the key Also opening the javascript console in the webpage when trying to connect to VNC can give some more info about the problem. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: After upgrade to 4.6 cannot vnc (use apache with ssl) can help? Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] VNC Handshake
After upgrade to 4.6 cannot vnc (use apache with ssl) can help? Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Windows 98 Running in Opennebula
Guys, Can we try install Windows 98 in Opennebula 4.6? please help, thanks. Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Limit Storage Bandwidth
Fontan, thanks for your reply, do you mean we can avoid network outage to throttle the IO ( read write disk to datastores ) ?use blkiotune do you mean? Rhesa. On 05/13/2014 04:55 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: OpenNebula currently allows setting CPU shares and max memory for cgroups [1]. Even if block IO throttling is not directly supported I think you can also use cgroups to throttle the IO. You can find more info on libvirt support in its documentation [2] and info on cgroups in RedHat's documentation [3]. I don't have experience with cgroups but I think you can set a common throttle configuration for all the VMs, set those parameters individually using libvirt or use a custom hook on VM creation. [1] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/administration/virtualization/kvmg.html#working-with-cgroups-optional [2] http://libvirt.org/cgroups.html [3] https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Resource_Management_Guide/ch-Subsystems_and_Tunable_Parameters.html On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, Could we limit bandwidth from VM read write into Datastores per second? for avoid network outage, thanks and please help Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Limit Storage Bandwidth
Guys, Could we limit bandwidth from VM read write into Datastores per second? for avoid network outage, thanks and please help Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Opennebula with LVM
Ruben, Thanks for your answer, once again, why command ../lvm/monitor (vgdisplay) take to long to get info monitor LVM, so our frontend have many process, and make everything stuck, how to fix this? thanks, Rhesa. On 02/27/2014 05:02 AM, Ruben S. Montero wrote: Hi, Yes, given the use of clvm in OpenNebula I think we are safe without fencing. I cannot think of a split-brain condition where fencing would be needed in our case. Cheers Ruben On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Ruben, I get error in Fencing, fencing agent not working fine, so if one node cannot connect fencing this cluster will be stuck, i read from forum, this fence can connect to ipmi, i think opennebula just need clvm, so i decide to use cluster without fence, i hope everythink is fine, thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 26 Feb 2014, at 23:09, Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org mailto:rsmont...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi Rhesa I agree that the problem is related to lvm, probably clvmd cannot acquire locking through DLM. I assume that as you are running the cluster during 3-4 days it is not mis-configured, I've seen this before related to networking problems (usually filtering multicast traffic), can you double check that iptables is allowing all the required cluster traffic?. Also what is the output of clustat, during the failure? Cheers Ruben On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, I will create production use San Storage, so i think opennebula need LVM/CLVM for do, it's have been 3 month for do this, but after i create 50 VM use one template with 3 node, this lvm/clvm not working fine, status VM still Prolog after two days, please see : 0:00 bash -c if [ -x /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes ]; then /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001; else 14447 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14454 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14455 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14460 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./collectd-client_control.sh kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14467 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14474 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14475 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14498 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14525 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14526 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 14527 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 15417 ?S 0:00 [kdmflush] 15452 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15454 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15455 ?Ss 0:00 bash -s 15510 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15512 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15513 ?Ss 0:00 sh -s 15527 ?S 0:00 sudo lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 15528 ?S 0:00 lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 I use locking type 3, i have 3 node and 1 front end, i use cman and this is configuration cluster.conf ?xml version=1.0? cluster name=idccluster config_version=9 clusternodes clusternode name=idc-vcoz01 votes=1 nodeid=1fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-vcoz01//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode001 votes=1 nodeid=2fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode001//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode002 votes=1 nodeid=3fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode002//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode003 votes=1 nodeid=4fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc
Re: [one-users] Opennebula with LVM
Ruben, I get error in Fencing, fencing agent not working fine, so if one node cannot connect fencing this cluster will be stuck, i read from forum, this fence can connect to ipmi, i think opennebula just need clvm, so i decide to use cluster without fence, i hope everythink is fine, thanks. Regards, Rhesa Mahendra. On 26 Feb 2014, at 23:09, Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi Rhesa I agree that the problem is related to lvm, probably clvmd cannot acquire locking through DLM. I assume that as you are running the cluster during 3-4 days it is not mis-configured, I've seen this before related to networking problems (usually filtering multicast traffic), can you double check that iptables is allowing all the required cluster traffic?. Also what is the output of clustat, during the failure? Cheers Ruben On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, I will create production use San Storage, so i think opennebula need LVM/CLVM for do, it's have been 3 month for do this, but after i create 50 VM use one template with 3 node, this lvm/clvm not working fine, status VM still Prolog after two days, please see : 0:00 bash -c if [ -x /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes ]; then /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001; else 14447 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14454 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14455 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14460 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./collectd-client_control.sh kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14467 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14474 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14475 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14498 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14525 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14526 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 14527 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 15417 ?S 0:00 [kdmflush] 15452 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15454 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15455 ?Ss 0:00 bash -s 15510 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15512 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15513 ?Ss 0:00 sh -s 15527 ?S 0:00 sudo lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 15528 ?S 0:00 lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 I use locking type 3, i have 3 node and 1 front end, i use cman and this is configuration cluster.conf ?xml version=1.0? cluster name=idccluster config_version=9 clusternodes clusternode name=idc-vcoz01 votes=1 nodeid=1fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-vcoz01//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode001 votes=1 nodeid=2fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode001//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode002 votes=1 nodeid=3fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode002//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode003 votes=1 nodeid=4fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode003//method/fence/clusternode/clusternodes fencedevices fencedevice name=idc-vcoz01 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode001 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode002 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode003 agent=fence_ipmilan//fencedevices rm failoverdomains/ resources/ /rm /cluster i shared /etc/cluster/cluster.conf use NFS, this command use cman_tools Node Sts Inc Joined Name 1 M304 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-vcoz01 2 M288 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-conode001 3 M304 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-conode002 4 M312 2014-02-26 09:44:04 idc-conode003 i think, this vm cannot running because so take a long for waiting lvcreate or vgdisplay, see this: 30818 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30819 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30820 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix
[one-users] Opennebula with LVM
Guys, I will create production use San Storage, so i think opennebula need LVM/CLVM for do, it's have been 3 month for do this, but after i create 50 VM use one template with 3 node, this lvm/clvm not working fine, status VM still Prolog after two days, please see : 0:00 bash -c if [ -x /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes ]; then /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001; else 14447 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14454 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14455 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/run_probes kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14460 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./collectd-client_control.sh kvm /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14467 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14474 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14475 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /var/tmp/one/im/kvm.d/../run_probes kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14498 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14525 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash ./monitor_ds.sh kvm-probes /var/lib/one//datastores 4124 20 0 idc-conode001 14526 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 14527 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-0 15417 ?S 0:00 [kdmflush] 15452 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15454 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15455 ?Ss 0:00 bash -s 15510 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: oneadmin [priv] 15512 ?S 0:00 sshd: oneadmin@notty 15513 ?Ss 0:00 sh -s 15527 ?S 0:00 sudo lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 15528 ?S 0:00 lvremove -f /dev/vg-one/lv-one-179-596-0 I use locking type 3, i have 3 node and 1 front end, i use cman and this is configuration cluster.conf ?xml version=1.0? cluster name=idccluster config_version=9 clusternodes clusternode name=idc-vcoz01 votes=1 nodeid=1fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-vcoz01//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode001 votes=1 nodeid=2fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode001//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode002 votes=1 nodeid=3fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode002//method/fence/clusternodeclusternode name=idc-conode003 votes=1 nodeid=4fencemethod name=singledevice name=idc-conode003//method/fence/clusternode/clusternodes fencedevices fencedevice name=idc-vcoz01 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode001 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode002 agent=fence_ipmilan/fencedevice name=idc-conode003 agent=fence_ipmilan//fencedevices rm failoverdomains/ resources/ /rm /cluster i shared /etc/cluster/cluster.conf use NFS, this command use cman_tools Node Sts Inc Joined Name 1 M304 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-vcoz01 2 M288 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-conode001 3 M304 2014-02-20 16:08:37 idc-conode002 4 M312 2014-02-26 09:44:04 idc-conode003 i think, this vm cannot running because so take a long for waiting lvcreate or vgdisplay, see this: 30818 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30819 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30820 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30821 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30824 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30825 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30827 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30842 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30843 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30844 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30845 ?S 0:00 vgdisplay --separator : --units m -o vg_size,vg_free --nosuffix --noheadings -C vg-one-1 30846 ?S 0:00 sudo vgdisplay --separator :
[one-users] Problem Datastore with LVM
Guys, I get error like this : command execution fail: /var/lib/one/remotes/datastore/lvm/monitor PERTX0RSSVZFUl9BQ1RJT05fREFUQT48REFUQVNUT1JFPjxJRD4x MTY8L0lEPjxVSUQ+MDwvVUlEPjxHSUQ+MDwvR0lEPjxVTkFNRT5vbmVhZG1pbjwvVU5BTUU+PEdOQU1F Pm9uZWFkbWluPC9HTkFNRT48TkFNRT5zdG9yYWdlPC9OQU1FPjxQRVJNSVNTSU9OUz48T1dOR VJfVT4xPC9PV05FUl9VPjxPV05FUl9NPjE8L09XTkVSX00+PE9XTkVSX0E+MDwvT1dORVJfQT48R1JPVVBfVT4xPC9HUk9VUF9VPjxHU k9VUF9NPjA8L0dST1VQX00+PEdST1VQX0E+MDwvR1JPVVBfQT48T1RIRVJfVT4wPC9PVEhFUl9VPjxPVEhFUl9NPjA8L09USEVSX00 +PE9USEVSX0E+MDwvT1RIRVJfQT48L1BFUk1JU1NJT05TPjxEU19NQUQ+bHZtPC9EU19NQUQ+PFRNX01BRD5sdm08L1RNX01BRD48QkFTRV9QQVRIPi92YXIvbGliL29uZS8vZGF0YXN0b3Jlcy8xMTY8L0JBU0VfUEFUSD48VFlQRT4wPC9UWVBFP [oneadmin@idc-vcoz01 kvm-probes.d]$ onedatastore list ID NAMESIZE AVAIL CLUSTER IMAGES TYPE DS TM 0 system0M - - 0 sys -shared 1 default 914.9G 93% - 0 img fs shared 2 files 914.9G 93% - 0 fil fs ssh 117 idc-storage 0M - - 0 img lvm lvm [oneadmin@idc-vcoz01 kvm-probes.d]$ onedatastore show 117 DATASTORE 117 INFORMATION ID : 117 NAME : idc-storage USER : rhesa GROUP : oneadmin CLUSTER: - TYPE : IMAGE DS_MAD : lvm TM_MAD : lvm BASE PATH : /var/lib/one//datastores/117 DISK_TYPE : BLOCK DATASTORE CAPACITY TOTAL: : 0M FREE: : 0M USED: : 0M LIMIT: : - PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : u-- OTHER : --- DATASTORE TEMPLATE BRIDGE_LIST=idc-vcoz01 CLONE_TARGET=SELF DISK_TYPE=BLOCK DS_MAD=lvm LN_TARGET=NONE TM_MAD=lvm TYPE=IMAGE_DS VG_NAME=idccluster any help? Thanks. Rhesa Mahendra. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Database Version Mismatch
Guys, I have problem about update from one 4.2 to 4.4 see this: [oneadmin@node1 ~]$ onedb upgrade -v -S localhost -u oneadmin -p oneadmin -d oneadmin Version read: 4.4.0 : Database migrated from 4.2.0 to 4.4.0 (OpenNebula 4.4.0) by onedb command. Database already uses version 4.4.0 [oneadmin@node1 ~]$ one start Database version mismatch. oned failed to start any help? Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Database Version Mismatch
It's working fine now, i try to configured old oned.conf with the new oned.conf, and work fine, thanks. Rhesa. On 12/04/2013 04:29 PM, Ruben S. Montero wrote: hi, Can you double check that the opennebula DB configured in oned.conf is the same shown in the onedb upgrade command? Cheers On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Rhesa Mahendra rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com mailto:rh...@lintasmediadanawa.com wrote: Guys, I have problem about update from one 4.2 to 4.4 see this: [oneadmin@node1 ~]$ onedb upgrade -v -S localhost -u oneadmin -p oneadmin -d oneadmin Version read: 4.4.0 : Database migrated from 4.2.0 to 4.4.0 (OpenNebula 4.4.0) by onedb command. Database already uses version 4.4.0 [oneadmin@node1 ~]$ one start Database version mismatch. oned failed to start any help? Rhesa. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architect OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org mailto:rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
