Hi,
That behaviour is the right one, but it may not be the one you would
expect... this has been discussed recently in the list.
Check these threads:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg02782.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg02827.html
Regards
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Major Contributor
OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing
www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Koushik Annapureddy
koushik1...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello All,
Here is the virtual network template I have used
NAME = VM_LAN
TYPE = RANGED
BRIDGE = br0
NETWORK_ADDRESS = 192.168.2.25
NETWORK_SIZE= 50
GATEWAY = 192.168.2.3
I would like to have IP address allocated to VM's which starts from
192.168.2.26 But when I launch a VM using Open Nebula it is assigning the ip
192.168.2.1 to the first VM and hence forth.
In the VM I have used the same context script given along with opennebula
source.
--
Thanks
Koushik Annapureddy
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
