Re: docker version doubt

[Julio Saura]

ok

one week up and running

no problem at all, so it seems is not so unsupported :(

best regards


> El 20 sept 2016, a las 22:39, Hiberus  escribió:
> 
> Ummm weird
> 
> I am still puzzled then with the unsupported word
> 
> I will deploy my apps on that cluster tomorrow. Hope it works without 
> problems :-/
> 
> 
> El 20 sept 2016, a las 22:29, Alex Wauck  > escribió:
> 
>> Oh, I didn't notice the "unsupported" part.  Mine says that, too, though.  
>> Interestingly enough, I *don't* see it on my laptop or a Debian server here 
>> at work.  On the Debian server, it's 1.12, and it comes straight from Docker 
>> themselves.  On my laptop, it comes from the Arch Linux community package, 
>> which compiles the docker binary instead of downloading a pre-built binary 
>> from Docker.  So, I guess my initial theory that binaries that *don't* come 
>> straight from Docker themselves have that "unsupported" bit is false.  I 
>> also don't see it on my personal Debian server, where I installed Docker 
>> 1.6.2 from the Debian repository, so it's not phoning home and asking if 
>> it's still supported.
>> 
>> So, no idea why it says that.  Sorry.
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Julio Saura > > wrote:
>> nice to hear
>> 
>> is a weird version name although xD
>> 
>> thanks alex.
>> 
>> best regards
>> 
>>> El 20 sept 2016, a las 17:16, Alex Wauck >> > escribió:
>>> 
>>> I've seen the same thing myself.  It seems to cause some bad interactions 
>>> with image stream tags (i.e. sha256-based references result in pull 
>>> failures), but on the plus side, you can use all those images on Docker Hub 
>>> that were pushed with 1.10 or later.  On balance, I'd say it solves more 
>>> problems than it creates.  We're running our production OpenShift cluster 
>>> with 1.10, and it's worked out pretty well for us.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Julio Saura >> > wrote:
>>> Hello
>>> 
>>> i am installing a new brand open shift origin cluster with centos 7.
>>> 
>>> after installing docker engine ( from centos repo ) i check the version and 
>>> i am concerned about the result
>>> 
>>> docker --version
>>> Docker version 1.10.3, build cb079f6-unsupported
>>> 
>>> unsupported¿?
>>> 
>>> is this normal?
>>> 
>>> thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com 
>>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
>>> 
>>> E X O S I T E 
>>> www.exosite.com  
>>> 
>>> Making Machines More Human.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
>> 
>> E X O S I T E 
>> www.exosite.com  
>> 
>> Making Machines More Human.
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Re: docker version doubt

[Hiberus]

Ummm weird

I am still puzzled then with the unsupported word

I will deploy my apps on that cluster tomorrow. Hope it works without problems 
:-/


> El 20 sept 2016, a las 22:29, Alex Wauck  escribió:
> 
> Oh, I didn't notice the "unsupported" part.  Mine says that, too, though.  
> Interestingly enough, I *don't* see it on my laptop or a Debian server here 
> at work.  On the Debian server, it's 1.12, and it comes straight from Docker 
> themselves.  On my laptop, it comes from the Arch Linux community package, 
> which compiles the docker binary instead of downloading a pre-built binary 
> from Docker.  So, I guess my initial theory that binaries that *don't* come 
> straight from Docker themselves have that "unsupported" bit is false.  I also 
> don't see it on my personal Debian server, where I installed Docker 1.6.2 
> from the Debian repository, so it's not phoning home and asking if it's still 
> supported.
> 
> So, no idea why it says that.  Sorry.
> 
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Julio Saura  wrote:
>> nice to hear
>> 
>> is a weird version name although xD
>> 
>> thanks alex.
>> 
>> best regards
>> 
>>> El 20 sept 2016, a las 17:16, Alex Wauck  escribió:
>>> 
>>> I've seen the same thing myself.  It seems to cause some bad interactions 
>>> with image stream tags (i.e. sha256-based references result in pull 
>>> failures), but on the plus side, you can use all those images on Docker Hub 
>>> that were pushed with 1.10 or later.  On balance, I'd say it solves more 
>>> problems than it creates.  We're running our production OpenShift cluster 
>>> with 1.10, and it's worked out pretty well for us.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Julio Saura  wrote:
 Hello
 
 i am installing a new brand open shift origin cluster with centos 7.
 
 after installing docker engine ( from centos repo ) i check the version 
 and i am concerned about the result
 
 docker --version
 Docker version 1.10.3, build cb079f6-unsupported
 
 unsupported¿?
 
 is this normal?
 
 thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 users mailing list
 users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
 http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
>>> 
>>> E X O S I T E 
>>> www.exosite.com 
>>> 
>>> Making Machines More Human.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
> 
> E X O S I T E 
> www.exosite.com 
> 
> Making Machines More Human.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Re: docker version doubt

[Alex Wauck]

Oh, I didn't notice the "unsupported" part.  Mine says that, too, though.
Interestingly enough, I *don't* see it on my laptop or a Debian server here
at work.  On the Debian server, it's 1.12, and it comes straight from
Docker themselves.  On my laptop, it comes from the Arch Linux community
package, which compiles the docker binary instead of downloading a
pre-built binary from Docker.  So, I guess my initial theory that binaries
that *don't* come straight from Docker themselves have that "unsupported"
bit is false.  I also don't see it on my personal Debian server, where I
installed Docker 1.6.2 from the Debian repository, so it's not phoning home
and asking if it's still supported.

So, no idea why it says that.  Sorry.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Julio Saura  wrote:

> nice to hear
>
> is a weird version name although xD
>
> thanks alex.
>
> best regards
>
> El 20 sept 2016, a las 17:16, Alex Wauck  escribió:
>
> I've seen the same thing myself.  It seems to cause some bad interactions
> with image stream tags (i.e. sha256-based references result in pull
> failures), but on the plus side, you can use all those images on Docker Hub
> that were pushed with 1.10 or later.  On balance, I'd say it solves more
> problems than it creates.  We're running our production OpenShift cluster
> with 1.10, and it's worked out pretty well for us.
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Julio Saura  wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> i am installing a new brand open shift origin cluster with centos 7.
>>
>> after installing docker engine ( from centos repo ) i check the version
>> and i am concerned about the result
>>
>> docker --version
>> Docker version 1.10.3, build cb079f6-unsupported
>>
>> unsupported¿?
>>
>> is this normal?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
>
> *E X O S I T E*
> *www.exosite.com *
>
> Making Machines More Human.
>
>
>


-- 

Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer

*E X O S I T E*
*www.exosite.com *

Making Machines More Human.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Re: docker version doubt

[Julio Saura]

nice to hear

is a weird version name although xD

thanks alex.

best regards

> El 20 sept 2016, a las 17:16, Alex Wauck  escribió:
> 
> I've seen the same thing myself.  It seems to cause some bad interactions 
> with image stream tags (i.e. sha256-based references result in pull 
> failures), but on the plus side, you can use all those images on Docker Hub 
> that were pushed with 1.10 or later.  On balance, I'd say it solves more 
> problems than it creates.  We're running our production OpenShift cluster 
> with 1.10, and it's worked out pretty well for us.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Julio Saura  > wrote:
> Hello
> 
> i am installing a new brand open shift origin cluster with centos 7.
> 
> after installing docker engine ( from centos repo ) i check the version and i 
> am concerned about the result
> 
> docker --version
> Docker version 1.10.3, build cb079f6-unsupported
> 
> unsupported¿?
> 
> is this normal?
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com 
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer
> 
> E X O S I T E 
> www.exosite.com  
> 
> Making Machines More Human.

___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Re: docker version doubt

[Alex Wauck]

I've seen the same thing myself.  It seems to cause some bad interactions
with image stream tags (i.e. sha256-based references result in pull
failures), but on the plus side, you can use all those images on Docker Hub
that were pushed with 1.10 or later.  On balance, I'd say it solves more
problems than it creates.  We're running our production OpenShift cluster
with 1.10, and it's worked out pretty well for us.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Julio Saura  wrote:

> Hello
>
> i am installing a new brand open shift origin cluster with centos 7.
>
> after installing docker engine ( from centos repo ) i check the version
> and i am concerned about the result
>
> docker --version
> Docker version 1.10.3, build cb079f6-unsupported
>
> unsupported¿?
>
> is this normal?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>



-- 

Alex Wauck // DevOps Engineer

*E X O S I T E*
*www.exosite.com *

Making Machines More Human.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users