Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS 1.6.x: Route and Flags with text labels

[Saúl Ibarra Corretgé]

Hi,

On 6/1/10 8:40 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I'm having trouble finding the documentation which confirms that
> OpenSIPS 1.6.x support using a text label instead of numbers for routes
> and flags.
>
> I have a working system so I did not want to play until I was sure that
> I had fully understood the implementation.
>
> A pointer to the documentation would be a of great help (as I just can
> not find it) :(
>

Here you'll find all new stuff in version 1.6: 
http://www.opensips.org/Main/Ver160

Named routes are there BTW :)


Regards,

-- 
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS 1.6.x: Route and Flags with text labels

[Mike O'Connor]

Hi Guys

I'm having trouble finding the documentation which confirms that
OpenSIPS 1.6.x support using a text label instead of numbers for routes
and flags.

I have a working system so I did not want to play until I was sure that
I had fully understood the implementation.

A pointer to the documentation would be a of great help (as I just can
not find it) :(

Thanks
Mike

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] nathelper+rtpproxy between IPv6 client and IPv4 client

[agung nugroho]

I want to ask you all about nathelper modules. Is it can be using with
rtpproxy??
i reasearch about how to connect IPv6 client with IPv4 client using IMS. And
they can communicate with tripleplay.
what is client software that i can use?? coz i use monster as a client but
it cannnot connect to the server.

can anyone help me???

sorry for my bad english. Thanks before.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Can OpenSips support SBC?

[Brett Nemeroff]

Actually, what may be good is some methodologies on *how* to benchmark. It's
outside of the scope of opensips itself. But I understand Yin's point
regarding needing some stats to decide if opensips is the right product.

Because of the various things you can do with Opensips, and the various
programming styles and various hardware and network configurations any
amount of statistical information that doesn't explicitly reference a
particular setup, configuration, architecture is useless.

"How good is this box of tools"?
-Brett


On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
wrote:

> Hi Yin,
>
> Something like you ask is not possible - again, when you do a
> benchmarking, you do for a specific configuration - and configurations
> can be billions (so far I haven't seen 2 alike :) ).
>
> Different kind of measurements can be found here:
> http://www.opensips.org/Resources/PerformanceTests
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> 尹林 wrote:
> > Hi Bogdan,
> >
> > I found that opensips 1.6.1 has been released on 21st Sep. 2009.
> > I wonder if you have done some testing on it before release to the
> public.
> > If yes, then the result will show some tips of the performance, right?
> >
> > Acutally, the "cps" is also an important performance reference.
> > So, I think there maybe a table describes the max-concurrent-session
> > when the cps is set to a given value.
> > The table will be something like the following: (the server
> > environment is ignored)
> >
> > cps | max-concurrent-session
> > 5 1000
> > 10 900
> > 50 5000
> > **.. ..
> >
> > I think this kind of table is very helpful and important to the users
> > when they decide to use opensips or other candidates.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yin Linu
> > 
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
> --
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> www.voice-system.ro
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Feature request: additional authorization conditions in auth_db

[Alexander]

  Thank you very much, Bogdan! I've forgot about load_credentials :(

> Hi Alexander,

> auth_ module simply does only the digest authentication. Whatever 
> additional check you may need can be done from the script, if auth is 
> passed. if you need some extra info from the subscriber table, you can 
> use the "load_credentials" param to fetch it in script.

> Regards,
> Bogdan

> Alexander wrote:
>>   Hello all!
>>
>>   I  have a question about authorization: is there ability to specify 
>> additional
>> conditions? For example, like it's done in postfix?
>>   We  check  only username and password in OpenSIPS, but there may be 
>> additional
>> info,  like  "status" (active, suspended, blocked, etc...). So, if 
>> name/password
>> match, but status is not "active" - authorization fails.
>>
>>   It may look like this in config file:
>>
>>   modparam("auth_db", "additional_conditions", "fiStatus = 200").
>>
>>   As   I   see,   now   this   feature  is not supported. If it's not 
>> planned to
>> develop, I can try to  implement this feature  and  provide  patch  or  
>> modified
>> source  files. Will it be useful for someone else but me? :)
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>   





-- 
С уважением,
 Alexander  mailto:goa...@gmail.com


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Media-dispatcher

[Dan Pascu]

On 4 Jan 2010, at 21:00, Richard Revels wrote:

> Interesting.  I think you may have mentioned this before Dan but I  
> didn't catch it for some reason.  That makes installing media proxy  
> on CentOS / RHEL 5.x easier.  I've found that creating an RPM to  
> install python 2.5 (along with the 2.4 rather than upgrading it) and  
> then using the virtualenv package to use it in a sandbox for non- 
> distribution applications made things a lot easier too.
>
> So, looking at the INSTALL file it seems that the two changes needed  
> would be
>
> easy_install python-application<1.2.0
> and
> easy_install sqlobject==0.9
>
> I'll try that out this afternoon.  Will that <1.2.0 work for  
> easy_install or do I need to go find a specific version that I want  
> to use?

I'm not sure if easy_install can pick an earlier version. If it can,  
just specify 1.1.5. Otherwise you can find it here:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=display&name=python-application&version=1.1.5

And you can install it with python setup.py install

--
Dan




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Feature request: additional authorization conditions in auth_db

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Alexander,

auth_ module simply does only the digest authentication. Whatever 
additional check you may need can be done from the script, if auth is 
passed. if you need some extra info from the subscriber table, you can 
use the "load_credentials" param to fetch it in script.

Regards,
Bogdan

Alexander wrote:
>   Hello all!
>
>   I  have a question about authorization: is there ability to specify 
> additional
> conditions? For example, like it's done in postfix?
>   We  check  only username and password in OpenSIPS, but there may be 
> additional
> info,  like  "status" (active, suspended, blocked, etc...). So, if 
> name/password
> match, but status is not "active" - authorization fails.
>
>   It may look like this in config file:
>
>   modparam("auth_db", "additional_conditions", "fiStatus = 200").
>
>   As   I   see,   now   this   feature  is not supported. If it's not planned 
> to
> develop, I can try to  implement this feature  and  provide  patch  or  
> modified
> source  files. Will it be useful for someone else but me? :)
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Need help on flag in usrloc

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ha,

the NAT branch flag you use is 7 (nat_bflag) and in usrloc you find the 
branch flags in the cflags (contact flags) field. The cflags is a mask 
with all the branch flags: 192 = 128 (2^7) + 64 (2^6)

Regards,
Bogdan


ha do wrote:
> Hi all
>
> i am successfull to check the UA behind NAT but i dont know what value 
> of the flag will be stored in the usrloc
>
> Could someone please let me know the value of Nated UA flag, that is 
> stored in usrloc
>
>
> my config :
> modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval",180)
> modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
> modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", 7)
> modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:cu...@kamailio.org")
> modparam("registrar|nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(i:80)")
> modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", 7)
>
>
> route{
>
> 
> route("4");
> if (method=="REGISTER")
> {
> if (isflagset(5)) {
> setbflag(6);
> setbflag(7);
> }
> if (!save("location"))
> sl_reply_error();
> exit;
> }
> }
> route[4]{
> force_rport();
> if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
> if (method=="REGISTER") {
> fix_nated_register();
> } else {
> fix_nated_contact();
> }
> setflag(5);
> }
> return;
> }
>
> mysql> select * from location\G
> *** 1. row ***
>id: 12
>  username: 1000
>domain: NULL
>   contact: sip:1...@192.168.1.2:12280;rinstance=a4752f45bdc3ddd3
>  received: sip:210.245.35.150:12280
>  path: NULL
>   expires: 2010-01-05 17:48:56
> q: -1.00
>callid: YjE1NWJmYWYyYWMzZDg2ZDc5MjY0NDQyMGE5NDEwM2E.
>  cseq: 2
> last_modified: 2010-01-05 16:48:56
>  flags: 0
> cflags: 192
> user_agent: eyeBeam release 1004p stamp 31962
>   socket: udp:118.69.193.198:5060
>   methods: 5951
>
>
> Thank you
> Ha`
>
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Can OpenSips support SBC?

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Yin,

Something like you ask is not possible - again, when you do a 
benchmarking, you do for a specific configuration - and configurations 
can be billions (so far I haven't seen 2 alike :) ).

Different kind of measurements can be found here:
http://www.opensips.org/Resources/PerformanceTests

Regards,
Bogdan

尹林 wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I found that opensips 1.6.1 has been released on 21st Sep. 2009.
> I wonder if you have done some testing on it before release to the public.
> If yes, then the result will show some tips of the performance, right?
>
> Acutally, the "cps" is also an important performance reference.
> So, I think there maybe a table describes the max-concurrent-session 
> when the cps is set to a given value.
> The table will be something like the following: (the server 
> environment is ignored)
>
> cps | max-concurrent-session
> 5 1000
> 10 900
> 50 5000
> **.. ..
>
> I think this kind of table is very helpful and important to the users 
> when they decide to use opensips or other candidates.
>
> Regards,
> Yin Linu
> 
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to implement access control list on opensips

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ahmed,

check the admin tutorial:
http://www.voice-sistem.ro/downloads/2007.08.29-Admin-Course/

It has some good examples about how to do ACLs.

Regards,
Bogdan

Ahmed Munir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to implement ACL on OpenSIPs to accept the call on behalf of 
> source URI + IP address. Can anyone tell me which modules and 
> functions are required for it?
>
> Also kindly share some example template with it.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Ahmed Munir
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] something on stun documment

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ha,

Got it - the example for the alternate_ip param was indeed wrong. I 
fixed the issue on SVN and the online docs will be automatically updated 
during next night.

Best regards,
Bogdan

ha do wrote:
> Hi Bogdan
>
> it is strange because the doc say:
> *Set |alternate_ip| parameter , but it is the port ;(*
> so you can check the 1.3.3.|alternate_ip| (str), 1.3.4.a|lternate_port| (str)
> they have the same value:
> modparam("stun","alternate_port","3479")
>  
> Thank you
> Ha`
> 
>
> --- On *Mon, 1/4/10, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu //* 
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] something on stun documment
> To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
> Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 6:59 AM
>
> Hi Ha,
>
> the alternate port is whatever port you want to use as secondary
> port by
> the STUN server. 3479 is the default alternate port in STUN, so it
> is ok.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> ha do wrote:
> > Hi admin
> >
> > http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/stun.html#id227269
> >
> >
> >   1.3.3.  |alternate_ip| (str)
> >
> > Another ip from another interface.
> >
> > *Example 1.3. Set |alternate_ip| parameter *
> >
> > ...
> >
> > modparam("stun","alternate_port","3479") --> this is right?
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> > Ha`
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@lists.opensips.org 
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >   
>
>
> -- 
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> www.voice-system.ro
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org 
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Feature request: additional authorization conditions in auth_db

[Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana]

On Tuesday 05 January 2010 12:59:31 Alexander wrote:
>   Hello all!
>
>   I  have a question about authorization: is there ability to specify
> additional conditions? For example, like it's done in postfix?
>   We  check  only username and password in OpenSIPS, but there may be
> additional info,  like  "status" (active, suspended, blocked, etc...). So,
> if name/password match, but status is not "active" - authorization fails.
>
>   It may look like this in config file:
>
>   modparam("auth_db", "additional_conditions", "fiStatus = 200").
>
>   As   I   see,   now   this   feature  is not supported. If it's not
> planned to develop, I can try to  implement this feature  and  provide 
> patch  or  modified source  files. Will it be useful for someone else but
> me? :)

I think that everyone off us use the group module for that task of ACL's, also 
you could use a view as the table for auth.


-- 
Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
Dimensión Virtual

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] Feature request: additional authorization conditions in auth_db

[Alexander]

  Hello all!

  I  have a question about authorization: is there ability to specify additional
conditions? For example, like it's done in postfix?
  We  check  only username and password in OpenSIPS, but there may be additional
info,  like  "status" (active, suspended, blocked, etc...). So, if name/password
match, but status is not "active" - authorization fails.

  It may look like this in config file:

  modparam("auth_db", "additional_conditions", "fiStatus = 200").

  As   I   see,   now   this   feature  is not supported. If it's not planned to
develop, I can try to  implement this feature  and  provide  patch  or  modified
source  files. Will it be useful for someone else but me? :)


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] re-REGISTER with To tag gets 404

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

El Jueves, 31 de Diciembre de 2009, Olle E. Johansson escribió:
> 31 dec 2009 kl. 12.12 skrev Victor Pascual Avila:
> > Please, see RFC 3261 - Section 10.2: "A REGISTER request does not
> > establish a dialog"
> 
> Right, but there are many servers that request that you reuse the same
>  dialog identifiers as the challenged transaction when you authenticate.

As there is no way a server can request that to the client, perhaps you mean 
"many servers that require"? :)

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Bug in STUN module? And something about version 1.6.1

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Alexander - at luck with memory debugger ?

Regards,
Bogdan

Alexander wrote:
>   No, it still crashes without STUN :( I'll try mem debug later.
>
> Core was generated by `./opensips -u opensips'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> [New process 17406]
> #0  0x080ec3d9 in fm_malloc (qm=0x81b3c00, size=) 
> at mem/f_malloc.c:172
> 172 *pf=n->u.nxt_free;
> (gdb) where
> #0  0x080ec3d9 in fm_malloc (qm=0x81b3c00, size=) 
> at mem/f_malloc.c:172
> #1  0x00f20d04 in build_rr (_l=0x81d52e8, _l2=0x81d5a38, 
> user=0xbff01190, tag=0x81d79d0, params=0x0, _inbound=1) at record.c:163
> #2  0x00f2171f in record_route (_m=0x81d1bec, params=0x0) at record.c:320
> #3  0x00f23031 in w_record_route (msg=0x81d1bec, key=0x0, bar=0x0) at 
> rr_mod.c:272
> #4  0x080545dd in do_action (a=0x81bdb2c, msg=0x81d1bec) at action.c:967
> #5  0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81bdb2c, msg=0x81d1bec) at 
> action.c:139
> #6  0x080554dd in do_action (a=0x81bdb98, msg=0x81d1bec) at action.c:706
> #7  0x08057308 in run_action_list (a=0x81bd578, msg=0x81d1bec) at 
> action.c:139
> #8  0x080576a3 in run_top_route (a=0x81bd578, msg=0x81d1bec) at 
> action.c:119
> #9  0x0809ddf2 in receive_msg (
> buf=0x8192380 "OPTIONS sip:Sip.comtube.ru  
> SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 93.185.192.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK30bf0ee2;rport\r\nFrom: \"Unknown\" 
>  >;tag=as16669a6b\r\nTo: 
> http://Sip.comtube.ru>>\r\nContact: <"..., 
> len=495, rcv_info=0xbff01894) at receive.c:162
> #10 0x080e5056 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:492
> #11 0x08070adf in main (argc=5, argv=0xbff01aa4) at main.c:821
>
> 2009/12/27 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu  >
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I fixed the second one :). Before trying the mem debugger, try
> running 1.6.1 without the stun module - maybe the crashes you see
> are side effects of the bug in the stun module.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Alexander wrote:
>
>  Hello.
>
>  Regarding  STUN  -  it  seems  that  there is the same bug on
> line 870. Again,
> iterator b2 is created before memory allocation.
>
>  I'll  try  memory debug, but don't know, when - our OpenSIPS
> works under load,
> people make calls and so on :) I use version 1.6.0 for now, it
> seems to be quite
> stable.
>
>
>  
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
>
>
>  
>
> Indeed, the stun issue looks like a silly bug - I fixed it
> on SVN  - Thanks a lot for the report and fix.
>
>
>
>  
>
> Regarding the other bugs you reported, could you please
> compile in the memory debug support
> (http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTsMem) and set
>memlog=8
>memdump=2
>
>
>
>  
>
> maybe the debugger will be able to get out more info.
>
>
>
>  
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
>
>
>  
>
> Alexander wrote:
>
>
>  I've encountered a problem - sometimes OpenSIPS 1.6.0
> crashes. GDB says that crash was in stun.c, line 836.
> Going to this line, we see:
>
> case UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTES:
>/* iterator */
>b2 = (T16 *)
> msg->unknownAttributes->buffer;
>/* allocate unknownAttributes buffer */
>msg->unknownAttributes = (Buffer*)
> pkg_malloc(sizeof(Buffer));
>if(!msg->unknownAttributes){
>LM_DBG("out of mem\n");
>return -1;
>}
>memset(msg->unknownAttributes, 0,
> sizeof(Buffer));
>
> Is it OK, that we create iterator, and then allocate
> buffer? uknownAttributes is not allocated when
> iterator is created. I've changed it to:
>
> case UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTES:
>/* allocate unknownAttributes buffer */
>msg->unknownAttributes = (Buffer*)
> pkg_malloc(sizeof(Buffer));
>if(!msg->unknownAttributes){
>LM_DBG("out of mem\n");
>return -1;
>}
>memset(msg->unknownAttributes, 0,
> sizeof(Buffer));
>
>/* iterator */
>b2 = (T16 *)
> msg->unknownAttributes->buffer;
>
>  Now it seems to work properly.
>
>   

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prepaid_lock problem in CDRTool

[ASHWINI NAIDU]

Thanks for the reply Adrian

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:19 PM, GA Georgescu  wrote:

> The use of prepaid_lock has been deprecated, you can use the
> prepaid.max_sessions field to set the maximum number of concurrent calls for
> each account.
>
> Adrian
>
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 10:08 AM, ASHWINI NAIDU wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed CDRtool version 6.9.9. *I have set the Prepaid_lock
> to 1* to disable multiple calls from a single prepaid account. But the
> parallel call gets established. How can I solve this problem
>
>
> $RatingEngine=array("socketIP"   => "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx",
> "socketPort" => "9024",
> "cdr_source" => "opensips_radius",
> "allow"  => array
> ('10.','xxx.xxx.xxx.'),
> "prepaid_lock"   => 1,
> "priceDenominator"=> 1, // Rates units (global
> setting)
>
> --
> Thanking You,
> Ashwini BR Naidu
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>


-- 
Thanking You,
Ashwini BR Naidu
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] Need help on flag in usrloc

[ha do]

Hi all

i am successfull to check the UA behind NAT but i dont know what value of the 
flag will be stored in the usrloc 

Could someone please let me know the value of Nated UA flag, that is stored in 
usrloc 


my config :
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval",180)
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", 7)
modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:cu...@kamailio.org")
modparam("registrar|nathelper", "received_avp", "$avp(i:80)")
modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", 7)


route{


route("4");
if (method=="REGISTER")
    {
    if (isflagset(5)) {
    setbflag(6);
    setbflag(7);
    }
    if (!save("location"))
    sl_reply_error();
    exit;
    }
}
route[4]{
    force_rport();
    if (nat_uac_test("19")) {
    if (method=="REGISTER") {
    fix_nated_register();
    } else {
    fix_nated_contact();
    }
    setflag(5);
    }
    return;
}

mysql> select * from location\G
*** 1. row ***
   id: 12
 username: 1000
   domain: NULL
  contact: sip:1...@192.168.1.2:12280;rinstance=a4752f45bdc3ddd3
 received: sip:210.245.35.150:12280
 path: NULL
  expires: 2010-01-05 17:48:56
    q: -1.00
   callid: YjE1NWJmYWYyYWMzZDg2ZDc5MjY0NDQyMGE5NDEwM2E.
 cseq: 2
last_modified: 2010-01-05 16:48:56
     flags: 0
    cflags: 192
user_agent: eyeBeam release 1004p stamp 31962
  socket: udp:118.69.193.198:5060
  methods: 5951


Thank you
Ha`





  ___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] Re:Can OpenSips support SBC?

[尹林]

Hi Bogdan,

I found that opensips 1.6.1 has been released on 21st Sep. 2009. 
I wonder if you have done some testing on it before release to the public.
If yes, then the result will show some tips of the performance, right?

Acutally, the "cps" is also an important performance reference.
So, I think there maybe a table describes the max-concurrent-session when the 
cps is set to a given value.
The table will be something like the following: (the server environment is 
ignored)

cps   |    max-concurrent-session
5  
 1000
10 

 900
50 

 5000
..  
 ..


I think this kind of table is very helpful and important to the users when they 
decide to use opensips or other candidates.



Regards,

Yin Linu
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to implement access control list on opensips

[Ahmed Munir]

Hi,
I want to implement ACL on OpenSIPs to accept the call on behalf of source
URI + IP address. Can anyone tell me which modules and functions are
required for it also which tables will involve in it?

Also kindly share some example template with it.

-- 
Regards,

Ahmed Munir
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users