[OpenSIPS-Users] DLG topology_hiding with MESSAGE

[Nick Altmann]

Hello!

Is it possible to use topology_hiding() from dialog module with MESSAGE?
I receive ERROR:dialog:w_topology_hiding: Failed to create dialog.

--
Nick

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hello

 

My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.

Then It behind a NAT.

 

It's my log. How to change "c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51" to "c=IN IP4 public IP"

 

U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151

INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.

Record-Route: .

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.

From: ;tag=3554.

To: .

Call-ID: 32313.

CSeq: 20 INVITE.

Contact: .

Content-Type: application/sdp.

Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE,
INFO.

Max-Forwards: 69.

User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 (eXosip2/3.6.0).

Subject: Phone call.

Content-Length:   337.

.

v=0.

o=88698876 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

s=Talk.

c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

t=0 0.

m=audio 7078 RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.

a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.

a=fmtp:112 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.

a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:110 speex/8000.

a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.

a=fmtp:101 0-11.

 

Thanks

Nick

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:

From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM

Hello  My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.Then It behind a 
NAT.  It’s my log. How to change “c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP”  
U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151INVITE 
sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.Record-Route: 
.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.From: 
;tag=3554.To: 
.Call-ID: 32313.CSeq: 20 INVITE.Contact: 
.Content-Type: 
application/sdp.Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, 
MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO.Max-Forwards: 69.User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 
(eXosip2/3.6.0).Subject: Phone call.Content-Length:   337..v=0.o=88698876 
1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.s=Talk.c=IN
 IP4 10.1.1.51.t=0 0.m=audio 7078 RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.a=rtpmap:112 
speex/32000.a=fmtp:112 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.a=fmtp:111 
vbr=on.a=rtpmap:110 speex/8000.a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:9 
G722/8000.a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.a=fmtp:101 0-11.  ThanksNick
-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hello Binan

 

force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.

 

You can saw this page http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164

 

Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM

Hello

 

My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.

Then It behind a NAT.

 

It’s my log. How to change “c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP”

 

U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151

INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.

Record-Route: .

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.

From: ;tag=3554.

To: .

Call-ID: 32313.

CSeq: 20 INVITE.

Contact: .

Content-Type: application/sdp.

Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, 
INFO.

Max-Forwards: 69.

User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 (eXosip2/3.6.0).

Subject: Phone call.

Content-Length:   337.

.

v=0.

o=88698876 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

s=Talk.

c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

t=0 0.

m=audio 7078 RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.

a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.

a=fmtp:112 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.

a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:110 speex/8000.

a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.

a=fmtp:101 0-11.

 

Thanks

Nick


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:

From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM

Hello Binan  force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function. 
 You can saw this page http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164  
Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”  ThanksNick  From: 
users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On 
Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT  Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AMHello My RTPPRoxy and Opensips 
installed on the same server.Then It behind a NAT. It’s my log. How to change 
“c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP” U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 
10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151INVITE 
sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.Record-Route: 
.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.From: 
;tag=3554.To: 
.Call-ID: 32313.CSeq: 20 INVITE.Contact: 
.Content-Type: 
application/sdp.Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, 
MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO.Max-Forwards: 69.User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 
(eXosip2/3.6.0).Subject: Phone call.Content-Length:   337..v=0.o=88698876
 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.s=Talk.c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.t=0 0.m=audio 7078 
RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.a=fmtp:112 
vbr=on.a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:110 
speex/8000.a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.a=rtpmap:101 
telephone-event/8000.a=fmtp:101 0-11. ThanksNick
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users  
-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hi Binan

 

But, My problem still it.

It’s not work for this setting.

 

Or Do you have any suggest?

 

Thanks

Nick

 

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM

Hello Binan

 

force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.

 

You can saw this page http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164

 

Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM

Hello

 

My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.

Then It behind a NAT.

 

It’s my log. How to change “c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP”

 

U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151

INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.

Record-Route: .

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.

From: ;tag=3554.

To: .

Call-ID: 32313.

CSeq: 20 INVITE.

Contact: .

Content-Type: application/sdp.

Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, 
INFO.

Max-Forwards: 69.

User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 (eXosip2/3.6.0).

Subject: Phone call.

Content-Length:   337.

.

v=0.

o=88698876 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

s=Talk.

c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

t=0 0.

m=audio 7078 RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.

a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.

a=fmtp:112 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.

a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:110 speex/8000.

a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.

a=fmtp:101 0-11.

 

Thanks

Nick


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Nick,
and you are setting  rtpproxy_offer()  for Invite right !

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:

From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM

Hi Binan  But, My problem still it.It’s not work for this setting.  Or Do you 
have any suggest?  ThanksNick      From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT  Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AMHello Binan force_rtp_proxy do not 
support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function. You can saw this page 
http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164 Now, I setting 
“rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")” ThanksNick From: 
users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On 
Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AMHello My RTPPRoxy and Opensips 
installed on the same server.Then It behind a NAT. It’s my log. How to change 
“c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP” U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 
10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151INVITE 
sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.Record-Route: 
.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.From: 
;tag=3554.To: 
.Call-ID: 32313.CSeq: 20 INVITE.Contact: 
.Content-Type: 
application/sdp.Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, 
MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO.Max-Forwards: 69.User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 
(eXosip2/3.6.0).Subject: Phone call.Content-Length:   337..v=0.o=88698876
 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.s=Talk.c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.t=0 0.m=audio 7078 
RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.a=fmtp:112 
vbr=on.a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:110 
speex/8000.a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.a=rtpmap:101 
telephone-event/8000.a=fmtp:101 0-11. ThanksNick
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users  
-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Dear Binan

 

Yes, It’s my setting.

 

route[nat_fixups] {

# RTP Proxy handling ---#

if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {

unforce_rtp_proxy();

} else if (is_method("INVITE")){

# Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#

rtpproxy_offer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);

};

# catch and fix replies

t_on_reply("2");

}

 

onreply_route[2] {

#xlog("incoming reply\n");

 

# Handling of the SDP for the 200 or 183 reply #

# If behind nat (flags 5 or 6) start RTP Proxy #

#Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLER#

if ( is_method("INVITE") &&

(isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) &&

has_body("application/sdp") ){

rtpproxy_answer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);

}

 

# If the CALLEE is behind NAT, fix the CONTACT HF #

if (isbflagset(6)) {

fix_nated_contact();

search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes');

}

exit;

}

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:12 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
and you are setting rtpproxy_offer()  for Invite right !

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM

Hi Binan

 

But, My problem still it.

It’s not work for this setting.

 

Or Do you have any suggest?

 

Thanks

Nick

 

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM

Hello Binan

 

force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.

 

You can saw this page http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164

 

Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM

Hello

 

My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.

Then It behind a NAT.

 

It’s my log. How to change “c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP”

 

U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151

INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.

Record-Route: .

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.

From: ;tag=3554.

To: .

Call-ID: 32313.

CSeq: 20 INVITE.

Contact: .

Content-Type: application/sdp.

Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, 
INFO.

Max-Forwards: 69.

User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 (eXosip2/3.6.0).

Subject: Phone call.

Content-Length:   337.

.

v=0.

o=88698876 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

s=Talk.

c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.

t=0 0.

m=audio 7078 RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.

a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.

a=fmtp:112 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.

a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:110 speex/8000.

a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.

a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.

a=fmtp:101 0-11.

 

Thanks

Nick


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 


-Inline Attachment Follows-

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Nick,
see this link posted by Qasim,
http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/03/making-rtpproxy-work.html

I like it really, you can read it and adjust it as u need,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:

From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:16 AM

Dear Binan  Yes, It’s my setting.  route[nat_fixups] {    # RTP Proxy 
handling ---#    if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {    
unforce_rtp_proxy();    } else if (is_method("INVITE")){    
# Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#    
rtpproxy_offer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);    };    # catch and fix 
replies    t_on_reply("2");}  onreply_route[2] {    #xlog("incoming 
reply\n");  # Handling of the SDP for the 200 or 183 reply 
#    # If behind nat (flags 5 or 6) start RTP Proxy #    
#    Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLER    #    if ( 
is_method("INVITE") &&    (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) &&    
has_body("application/sdp") ){   
 rtpproxy_answer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);    }  # If the 
CALLEE is behind NAT, fix the CONTACT HF #    if (isbflagset(6)) 
{    fix_nated_contact();    
search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes');    }    
exit;}  ThanksNick  From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:12 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT  Hi Nick,
and you are setting rtpproxy_offer()  for Invite right !

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AMHi Binan But, My problem still it.It’s 
not work for this setting. Or Do you have any suggest? ThanksNick   From: 
users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On 
Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AMHello Binan force_rtp_proxy do not 
support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function. You can saw this page 
http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164 Now, I setting 
“rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")” ThanksNick From: 
users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On 
Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:
From: Nick Chang 
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AMHello My RTPPRoxy and Opensips 
installed on the same server.Then It behind a NAT. It’s my log. How to change 
“c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP” U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 
10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151INVITE 
sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.Record-Route: 
.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
10.1.1.51:5060;received=118.163.61.141;rport=40696;branch=z9hG4bK3339.From: 
;tag=3554.To: 
.Call-ID: 32313.CSeq: 20 INVITE.Contact: 
.Content-Type: 
application/sdp.Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, 
MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO.Max-Forwards: 69.User-Agent: Linphone/3.5.2 
(eXosip2/3.6.0).Subject: Phone call.Content-Length:   337..v=0.o=88698876
 1752 1752 IN IP4 10.1.1.51.s=Talk.c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51.t=0 0.m=audio 7078 
RTP/AVP 112 111 110 3 0 8 9 101.a=rtpmap:112 speex/32000.a=fmtp:112 
vbr=on.a=rtpmap:111 speex/16000.a=fmtp:111 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:110 
speex/8000.a=fmtp:110 vbr=on.a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000.a=rtpmap:101 
telephone-event/8000.a=fmtp:101 0-11. ThanksNick
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users 
-Inline Attachment 
Follows-___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users  
-Inline Attachment Follows-

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[SamyGo]

Hi,

Nick what is your NAT type? how is your network topology working !!

BR
Sammy

P.S: The blog only takes care of configurations of RTPproxy with servers on
Public IPs and clients behind NAT using Kamailio - This won't make much
sense here. Also alot of things have evolved in kamailio since I wrote that
post.


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Binan AL Halabi wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> see this link posted by Qasim,
> http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/03/making-rtpproxy-work.html
>
> I like it really, you can read it and adjust it as u need,
>
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang * wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:16 AM
>
>
> Dear Binan
>
>
>
> Yes, It’s my setting.
>
>
>
> route[nat_fixups] {
>
> # RTP Proxy handling ---#
>
> if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {
>
> unforce_rtp_proxy();
>
> } else if (is_method("INVITE")){
>
> # Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#
>
> rtpproxy_offer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);
>
> };
>
> # catch and fix replies
>
> t_on_reply("2");
>
> }
>
>
>
> onreply_route[2] {
>
> #xlog("incoming reply\n");
>
>
>
> # Handling of the SDP for the 200 or 183 reply #
>
> # If behind nat (flags 5 or 6) start RTP Proxy #
>
> #Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLER#
>
> if ( is_method("INVITE") &&
>
> (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) &&
>
> has_body("application/sdp") ){
>
> rtpproxy_answer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);
>
> }
>
>
>
> # If the CALLEE is behind NAT, fix the CONTACT HF #
>
> if (isbflagset(6)) {
>
> fix_nated_contact();
>
> search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes');
>
> }
>
> exit;
>
> }
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Binan AL Halabi
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 5:12 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>
>
> Hi Nick,
> and you are setting *rtpproxy_offer()*  for Invite right !
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> http://mc/compose?to=users@lists.opensips.org>
> >
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM
>
> Hi Binan
>
>
>
> But, My problem still it.
>
> It’s not work for this setting.
>
>
>
> Or Do you have any suggest?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org[
> mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Binan AL Halabi
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>
>
> Hi Nick,
> thank you too,
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang * wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM
>
> Hello Binan
>
>
>
> force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.
>
>
>
> You can saw this page
> http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164
>
>
>
> Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [
> mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Binan AL Halabi
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>
>
> Hi Nick,
> use force_rtp_proxy
> here is the link:
>
> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >
> Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> http://mc/compose?to=users@lists.opensips.org>
> >
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.
>
> Then It behind a NAT.
>
>
>
> It’s my log. How to change “c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51” to “c=IN IP4 public IP”
>
>
>
> U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151
>
> INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.
>
> Record-Route: .
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.55.233.194;branch=z9hG4bK6aff.e20d892.0.
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.51:5060
> ;received=118.

[OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting with evaluated AVP values

[Dragomir Haralambiev]

Hello,

I need to change accounted AVPs values on onreply_route.
How to do that?
Here is example:

modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
modparam("acc", "cdr_flag", 2)
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 1)

modparam("acc", "aaa_url", "radius:/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("acc", "aaa_extra",   "...
Billing-Info=$avp(bill_info);
...")
modparam("acc", "aaa_flag", 2)
modparam("acc", "aaa_missed_flag", 2)


$avp(bill_info)="set init value";
setflag(1); setflag(2);
t_relay();

.
onreply_route {
 .
 $avp(bill_info)="new bill value";
 ...
}

Best regards,
PlayMen
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Diego Barberio]

Hi All,

I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and
I've discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP
connections (I have 10 TCP connections)
I've upgraded to version:
Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))

And the issue is still there.


Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)

Thanks
Diego


>
>
>
> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> I can't think of anything else.
>
>
>
> Dear opensips team,
>
>
>
> Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)
>
> Can you take a look at this please?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> Thanks again for rour feedbak.
>
> Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same
> Via that works perfectly.
>
>
>
> Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs
> during peak hour.
>
>
>
> Do you have any other idea?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.
>
>
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:
>
> BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT
>
>
>
> Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores
> the
> via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.
>
>
>
> Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,
> and I sill have the same issue.
>
> Is there any other thing I can try?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog
> slows down opensips.
>
>
>
> Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it
> asynchronous.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio
>  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using opensips to forward incoming INVITEs to a set of 8 applications.
> I'm using dispatcher module to achieve this.
> During peak hour, opensips receives about 350 INVITEs per second, during
> this period about 30 OK responses per second my application sends correctly
> aren't forwarded by opensips.
>
> I've recompiled opensips so it can use more memory by modifing the config.h
> file:
>
> #define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 10*1024*1024  /*!< Used only if
> PKG_MALLOC
> is defined*/
> #define SHM_MEM_SIZE 320/*!< Used if SH_MEM is
> defined*/
>
>
> The incoming INVITEs come from UDP and TCP.
>
>
> For each of the OK responses that aren't forwarded this entry appears in
> the
> messages file:
>
> usr/local/sbin/opensips[24554]: ERROR:core:forward_reply: no 2nd via found
> in reply
>
> According to my research on the web this message means that the OK only has
> one Via header, however this is not the case and the capture attached (made
> on server which runs opensips) shows it.
>
> I've also tried to increase the log level, but it made opensips to work
> slow
> even in low traffic hours.
>
>
> I run some test in my lab and opensips worked perfectly even under more
> than
> 350 INVITES per second, this problem only occurs in production
>
> I really don't know what else to do.
> Could you help me to fix this issue or at least move on with the
> investigation?
>
> Thanks
> Diego
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting with evaluated AVP values

[Muhammad Shahzad]

Set following modparam, and all AVPs will be visible in reply route as well,

modparam("tm", "onreply_avp_mode", 1)

Thank you.


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I need to change accounted AVPs values on onreply_route.
> How to do that?
> Here is example:
>
> modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
> modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
> modparam("acc", "cdr_flag", 2)
> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
> modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
> modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 1)
>
> modparam("acc", "aaa_url", "radius:/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf")
> modparam("acc", "aaa_extra",   "...
> Billing-Info=$avp(bill_info);
> ...")
> modparam("acc", "aaa_flag", 2)
> modparam("acc", "aaa_missed_flag", 2)
>
> 
> $avp(bill_info)="set init value";
> setflag(1); setflag(2);
> t_relay();
>
> .
> onreply_route {
>  .
>  $avp(bill_info)="new bill value";
>  ...
> }
>
> Best regards,
> PlayMen
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>


-- 
Muhammad Shahzad
---
CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
Cell: +92 334 422 40 88
MSN: shari_78...@hotmail.com
Email: shaherya...@googlemail.com
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] b2b module!

[Jorge Henrique Pinho]

Hi,
 
Can anyone clarify if the back to back logic module allows (or is configurable 
to allow) initial requests to be routed base on the Route header? From the 
tests I ran I see that it always forwards the request based on the RURI.
 
Kind Regards,


Jorge Pinho
Analyst/Developer
Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions 
Multimedia Division 
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] b2b module!

[Nick Altmann]

No, it doesn't accept Route header.

--
Nick

2012/9/10 Jorge Henrique Pinho :
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone clarify if the back to back logic module allows (or is 
> configurable to allow) initial requests to be routed base on the Route 
> header? From the tests I ran I see that it always forwards the request based 
> on the RURI.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
> Jorge Pinho
> Analyst/Developer
> Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions
> Multimedia Division
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Diego,
play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.

one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if something 
expired.

//Binan


--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio  wrote:

From: Diego Barberio 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 6:39 AM

Hi All,

I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and I've 
discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP connections (I 
have 10 TCP connections)
I've upgraded to version:

Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))

And the issue is still there.


Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)

Thanks
Diego










From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







I can't think of anything else.







Dear opensips team,







Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)



Can you take a look at this please?







Thanks,



Ali Pey











On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







Thanks again for rour feedbak.



Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same

Via that works perfectly.







Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs

during peak hour.







Do you have any other idea?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.





To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:



BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT







Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores the

via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.







Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.







Regards,



Ali Pey



On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,

and I sill have the same issue.



Is there any other thing I can try?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog

slows down opensips.







Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it

asynchronous.







Regards,



Ali Pey







On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hello,



I'm using opensips to forward incoming INVITEs to a set of 8 applications.

I'm using dispatcher module to achieve this.

During peak hour, opensips receives about 350 INVITEs per second, during

this period about 30 OK responses per second my application sends correctly

aren't forwarded by opensips.



I've recompiled opensips so it can use more memory by modifing the config.h

file:



#define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 10*1024*1024          /*!< Used only if PKG_MALLOC

is defined*/

#define SHM_MEM_SIZE 320                        /*!< Used if SH_MEM is

defined*/





The incoming INVITEs come from UDP and TCP.





For each of the OK responses that aren't forwarded this entry appears in the

messages file:



usr/local/sbin/opensips[24554]: ERROR:core:forward_reply: no 2nd via found

in reply



According to my research on the web this message means that the OK only has

one Via header, however this is not the case and the capture attached (made

on server which runs opensips) shows it.



I've also tried to increase the log level, but it made opensips to work slow

even in low traffic hours.





I run some test in my lab and opensips worked perfectly even under more than

350 INVITES per second, this problem only occurs in production



I really don't know what else to do.

Could you help me to fix this issue or at least move on with the

investigation?



Thanks

Diego



___

Users mailing list

Users@lists.opensips.org

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users









___

Users mailing list

Users@lists.opensips.org

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users









___

Users mailing list

Users@lists.opensips.org

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Diego Barberio]

Hi Binan,

I understand what do you say with "play around TCP connection lifetime"
however I don't get the part you say "check the database". I don't have any
database, opensips is working without any DB.
Which database are you talking about?

Thanks
Diego

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Binan AL Halabi wrote:

> Hi Diego,
> play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.
>
> one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if
> something expired.
>
> //Binan
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio 
> *wrote:
>
>
> From: Diego Barberio 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK
> response under high load
> To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 6:39 AM
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and
> I've discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP
> connections (I have 10 TCP connections)
> I've upgraded to version:
> Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))
>
> And the issue is still there.
>
>
> Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)
>
> Thanks
> Diego
>
>
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> I can't think of anything else.
>
>
>
> Dear opensips team,
>
>
>
> Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)
>
> Can you take a look at this please?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio
> http://mc/compose?to=diego.barbe...@redmondsoftware.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> Thanks again for rour feedbak.
>
> Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same
> Via that works perfectly.
>
>
>
> Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs
> during peak hour.
>
>
>
> Do you have any other idea?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.
>
>
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:
>
> BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT
>
>
>
> Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores
> the
> via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.
>
>
>
> Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio
> http://mc/compose?to=diego.barbe...@redmondsoftware.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,
> and I sill have the same issue.
>
> Is there any other thing I can try?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog
> slows down opensips.
>
>
>
> Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it
> asynchronous.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio
> http://mc/compose?to=diego.barbe...@redmondsoftware.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using opensips to forward incoming INVITEs to a set of 8 applications.
> I'm using dispatcher module to achieve this.
> During peak hour, opensips receives about 350 INVITEs per second, during
> this period about 30 OK responses per second my application sends correctly
> aren't forwarded by opensips.
>
> I've recompiled opensips so it can use more memory by modifing the config.h
> file:
>
> #define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 10*1024*1024  /*!< Used only if
> PKG_MALLOC
> is defined*/
> #define SHM_MEM_SIZE 320/*!< Used if SH_MEM is
> defined*/
>
>
> The incoming INVITEs come from UDP and TCP.
>
>
> For each of the OK responses that aren't forwarded this entry appears in
> the
> messages file:
>
> usr/local/sbin/opensips[24554]: ERROR:core:forward_reply: no 2nd via found
> in reply
>
> According to my research on the web this message means that the OK only has
> one Via header, however

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Accounting with evaluated AVP values

[Dragomir Haralambiev]

Thanks!

It's working.

2012/9/10 Muhammad Shahzad 

> Set following modparam, and all AVPs will be visible in reply route as
> well,
>
> modparam("tm", "onreply_avp_mode", 1)
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need to change accounted AVPs values on onreply_route.
>> How to do that?
>> Here is example:
>>
>> modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
>> modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
>> modparam("acc", "cdr_flag", 2)
>> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
>> modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
>> modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 1)
>>
>> modparam("acc", "aaa_url",
>> "radius:/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf")
>> modparam("acc", "aaa_extra",   "...
>> Billing-Info=$avp(bill_info);
>> ...")
>> modparam("acc", "aaa_flag", 2)
>> modparam("acc", "aaa_missed_flag", 2)
>>
>> 
>> $avp(bill_info)="set init value";
>> setflag(1); setflag(2);
>> t_relay();
>>
>> .
>> onreply_route {
>>  .
>>  $avp(bill_info)="new bill value";
>>  ...
>> }
>>
>> Best regards,
>> PlayMen
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Shahzad
> ---
> CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
> CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
> Cell: +92 334 422 40 88
> MSN: shari_78...@hotmail.com
> Email: shaherya...@googlemail.com
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Binan AL Halabi]

If you have

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio  wrote:

From: Diego Barberio 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 10:51 AM

Hi Binan,

I understand what do you say with "play around TCP connection lifetime" however 
I don't get the part you say "check the database". I don't have any database, 
opensips is working without any DB.

Which database are you talking about?

Thanks
Diego

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Binan AL Halabi  
wrote:

Hi Diego,
play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.


one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if something 
expired.

//Binan


--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio  wrote:


From: Diego Barberio 

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 

Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 6:39 AM

Hi All,

I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and I've 
discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP connections
 (I have 10 TCP connections)
I've upgraded to version:

Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))

And the issue is still there.


Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)

Thanks
Diego











From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







I can't think of anything else.







Dear opensips team,







Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)



Can you take a look at this please?







Thanks,



Ali Pey











On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







Thanks again for rour feedbak.



Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same

Via that works perfectly.







Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs

during peak hour.







Do you have any other idea?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.





To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:



BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT







Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores the

via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.







Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.







Regards,



Ali Pey



On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,

and I sill have the same issue.



Is there any other thing I can try?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog

slows down opensips.







Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it

asynchronous.







Regards,



Ali Pey







On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hello,



I'm using opensips to forward incoming INVITEs to a set of 8 applications.

I'm using dispatcher module to achieve this.

During peak hour, opensips receives about 350 INVITEs per second, during

this period about 30 OK responses per second my application sends correctly

aren't forwarded by opensips.



I've recompiled opensips so it can use more memory by modifing the config.h

file:



#define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 10*1024*1024          /*!< Used only if PKG_MALLOC

is defined*/

#define SHM_MEM_SIZE 320                        /*!< Used if SH_MEM is

defined*/





The incoming INVITEs come from UDP and TCP.





For each of the OK responses that aren't forwarded this entry appears in the

messages file:



usr/local/sbin/opensips[24554]: ERROR:core:forward_reply: no 2nd via found

in reply



According to my research on the web this message means that the OK only has

one Via header, however this is not the case and the capture attached (made

on server which runs opensips) shows it.



I've also tried to increase the log level, but it made opensips to work slow

even in low traffic hours.





I run some test in my lab and opensips worked perfectly even under more than

350 INVITES per second, this problem only occurs in production



I really don't know what else to do.

Could you 

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Binan AL Halabi]

hi Diego,

1- As you dont have state in database so you dont need to check that.
2- Why you dont upgrade to opensips 1.8.1 ? since it contains TCP fix.

Regards.
//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Binan AL Halabi  wrote:

From: Binan AL Halabi 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 12:19 PM

If you have

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio  wrote:

From: Diego Barberio 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 10:51 AM

Hi Binan,

I understand what do you say with "play around TCP connection lifetime" however 
I don't get the part you say "check the database". I don't have any database, 
opensips is working without any DB.

Which database are you talking about?

Thanks
Diego

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Binan AL Halabi  
wrote:

Hi Diego,
play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.


one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if something 
expired.

//Binan


--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio  wrote:


From: Diego Barberio 

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response 
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 

Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 6:39 AM

Hi All,

I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and I've 
discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP connections
 (I have 10 TCP connections)
I've upgraded to version:

Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))

And the issue is still there.


Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)

Thanks
Diego











From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







I can't think of anything else.







Dear opensips team,







Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)



Can you take a look at this please?







Thanks,



Ali Pey











On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







Thanks again for rour feedbak.



Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same

Via that works perfectly.







Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs

during peak hour.







Do you have any other idea?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.





To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:



BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT







Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores the

via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.







Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.







Regards,



Ali Pey



On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hi Ali,







I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,

and I sill have the same issue.



Is there any other thing I can try?







Thanks



Diego







From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey

Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.

To: OpenSIPS users mailling list

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response

under high load







Hi Diego,







Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog

slows down opensips.







Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it

asynchronous.







Regards,



Ali Pey







On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio

 wrote:



Hello,



I'm using opensips to forward incoming INVITEs to a set of 8 applications.

I'm using dispatcher module to achieve this.

During peak hour, opensips receives about 350 INVITEs per second, during

this period about 30 OK responses per second my application sends correctly

aren't forwarded by opensips.



I've recompiled opensips so it can use more memory by modifing the config.h

file:



#define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 10*1024*1024          /*!< Used only if PKG_MALLOC

is defined*/

#define SHM_MEM_SIZE 320                        /*!< Used if SH_MEM is

defined*/





The incoming INVITEs come from UDP and TCP.





For each of the OK responses that aren't forwarded this entry appears in the

messages file:



usr/local/sbin/opensips[24554]: ERROR:core:forward_reply: no 2nd via found

in reply



According to my research on the web this message means that the OK only has

one Via h

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response under high load

[Diego Barberio]

Hi Binan,

I tried upgrading to 1.8.1 but I'm having some issues I'm duscussin with
Bogdan on the following thread:

http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2012-August/022764.html

Thanks
Diego

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Binan AL Halabi wrote:

> hi Diego,
>
> 1- As you dont have state in database so you dont need to check that.
> 2- Why you dont upgrade to opensips 1.8.1 ? since it contains TCP fix.
>
> Regards.
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Binan AL Halabi * wrote:
>
>
> From: Binan AL Halabi 
>
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK
> response under high load
> To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 12:19 PM
>
>
> If you have
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio 
> *wrote:
>
>
> From: Diego Barberio 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK
> response under high load
> To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 10:51 AM
>
> Hi Binan,
>
> I understand what do you say with "play around TCP connection lifetime"
> however I don't get the part you say "check the database". I don't have any
> database, opensips is working without any DB.
> Which database are you talking about?
>
> Thanks
> Diego
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Binan AL Halabi 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Diego,
> play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.
>
> one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if
> something expired.
>
> //Binan
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio 
> *wrote:
>
>
> From: Diego Barberio 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK
> response under high load
> To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 6:39 AM
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and
> I've discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP
> connections (I have 10 TCP connections)
> I've upgraded to version:
> Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))
>
> And the issue is still there.
>
>
> Do you have any other ideas? (Disabling TCP is not an option)
>
> Thanks
> Diego
>
>
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 01:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> I can't think of anything else.
>
>
>
> Dear opensips team,
>
>
>
> Hope you had a good flight-terminator :)
>
> Can you take a look at this please?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Diego Barberio
> http://mc/compose?to=diego.barbe...@redmondsoftware.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> Thanks again for rour feedbak.
>
> Unfortunately that's not the case. I'm attaching an example with the same
> Via that works perfectly.
>
>
>
> Also, opensips works perfectly all day and only stops sending some OKs
> during peak hour.
>
>
>
> Do you have any other idea?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: viernes, 10 de agosto de 2012 11:00 a.m.
>
>
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> I looked at your pcap file and I see that your second via has this:
>
> BC01.MBCSCR4.MSS.IMS.TIGO.COM.GT
>
>
>
> Is this a valid address? Maybe opensips can not resolve it so it ignores
> the
> via. Have you tried adding it to /etc/hosts.
>
>
>
> Compare a good 200OK with one of these and see if there is any difference.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Diego Barberio
> http://mc/compose?to=diego.barbe...@redmondsoftware.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ali,
>
>
>
> I removed set the debug flag to 0 and added the "-" before the file path,
> and I sill have the same issue.
>
> Is there any other thing I can try?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Diego
>
>
>
> From: 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> On Behalf Of Ali Pey
> Sent: jueves, 09 de agosto de 2012 03:30 p.m.
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
> under high load
>
>
>
> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> Have you tried disabling the logging? That's usually the problem. Syslog
> slows down opensips.
>
>
>
> Also in /etc/syslog.conf as '-' before the file path to make it
> asynchronous.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali Pey
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Diego Barberio
> http:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hello Sammy

 

My NAT type is Full cone NAT.

 

In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.

 

Example:

 

Firewall  ---  Opensips Server

111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:32 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 

Hi,

 

Nick what is your NAT type? how is your network topology working !!

 

BR
Sammy 

 

P.S: The blog only takes care of configurations of RTPproxy with servers on
Public IPs and clients behind NAT using Kamailio - This won't make much
sense here. Also alot of things have evolved in kamailio since I wrote that
post.

 

 

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Binan AL Halabi 
wrote:


Hi Nick,
see this link posted by Qasim,
http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/03/making-rtpproxy-work.html

I like it really, you can read it and adjust it as u need,



//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 

Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:16 AM

 

Dear Binan

 

Yes, It's my setting.

 

route[nat_fixups] {

# RTP Proxy handling ---#

if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {

unforce_rtp_proxy();

} else if (is_method("INVITE")){

# Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#

rtpproxy_offer("cowf","202.55.233.194");

};

# catch and fix replies

t_on_reply("2");

}

 

onreply_route[2] {

#xlog("incoming reply\n");

 

# Handling of the SDP for the 200 or 183 reply #

# If behind nat (flags 5 or 6) start RTP Proxy #

#Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLER#

if ( is_method("INVITE") &&

(isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) &&

has_body("application/sdp") ){

rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194");

}

 

# If the CALLEE is behind NAT, fix the CONTACT HF #

if (isbflagset(6)) {

fix_nated_contact();

search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes');

}

exit;

}

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:12 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
and you are setting rtpproxy_offer()  for Invite right !

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw> > wrote:


From: Nick Chang http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw> >
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" http://mc/compose?to=users@lists.opensips.org> >
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM

Hi Binan

 

But, My problem still it.

It's not work for this setting.

 

Or Do you have any suggest?

 

Thanks

Nick

 

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
 ] On Behalf Of Binan
AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
thank you too,

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang  wrote:


From: Nick Chang 
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM

Hello Binan

 

force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.

 

You can saw this page
http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164

 

Now, I setting "rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")"

 

Thanks

Nick

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 


Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy 
here is the link: 

http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191

//Binan

--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw> > wrote:


From: Nick Chang http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw> >
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" http://mc/compose?to=users@lists.opensips.org> >
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:01 AM

Hello

 

My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.

Then It behind a NAT.

 

It's my log. How to change "c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51" to "c=IN IP4 public IP"

 

U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151

INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52 SIP/2.0.

Record-Route:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[SamyGo]

Hi Nick,
So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ?
Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
Then see what happens with audio.
Also what is your total voip diagram with their network addresses.

Thanks,
Sammy
 On Sep 11, 2012 6:46 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

> Hello Sammy
>
> ** **
>
> My NAT type is Full cone NAT.
>
> ** **
>
> In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.
>
> ** **
>
> Example:
>
> ** **
>
> Firewall  ---  Opensips Server
>
> 111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *SamyGo
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 7:32 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
> ** **
>
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> Nick what is your NAT type? how is your network topology working !!
>
> ** **
>
> BR
> Sammy 
>
> ** **
>
> P.S: The blog only takes care of configurations of RTPproxy with servers
> on Public IPs and clients behind NAT using Kamailio - This won't make much
> sense here. Also alot of things have evolved in kamailio since I wrote that
> post.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Binan AL Halabi 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
> see this link posted by Qasim,
> http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/03/making-rtpproxy-work.html
>
> I like it really, you can read it and adjust it as u need,
>
>
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang * wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
>
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:16 AM
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Binan
>
>  
>
> Yes, It’s my setting.
>
>  
>
> route[nat_fixups] {
>
> # RTP Proxy handling ---#
>
> if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {
>
> unforce_rtp_proxy();
>
> } else if (is_method("INVITE")){
>
> # Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#
>
> rtpproxy_offer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);
>
> };
>
> # catch and fix replies
>
> t_on_reply("2");
>
> }
>
>  
>
> onreply_route[2] {
>
> #xlog("incoming reply\n");
>
>  
>
> # Handling of the SDP for the 200 or 183 reply #
>
> # If behind nat (flags 5 or 6) start RTP Proxy #
>
> #Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLER#
>
> if ( is_method("INVITE") &&
>
> (isflagset(5) || isbflagset(6)) &&
>
> has_body("application/sdp") ){
>
> rtpproxy_answer(“cowf”,”202.55.233.194”);
>
> }
>
>  
>
> # If the CALLEE is behind NAT, fix the CONTACT HF #
>
> if (isbflagset(6)) {
>
> fix_nated_contact();
>
> search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes');
> 
>
> }
>
> exit;
>
> }
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>  
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *Binan AL Halabi
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 5:12 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>  
>
> Hi Nick,
> and you are setting *rtpproxy_offer()*  for Invite right !
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> http://mc/compose?to=nick.ch...@kland.com.tw>
> >
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> http://mc/compose?to=users@lists.opensips.org>
> >
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM
>
> Hi Binan
>
>  
>
> But, My problem still it.
>
> It’s not work for this setting.
>
>  
>
> Or Do you have any suggest?
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* 
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org[
> mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Binan AL Halabi
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>  
>
> Hi Nick,
> thank you too,
>
> //Binan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang * wrote:
>
>
> From: Nick Chang 
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
> To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'" 
> Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM
>
> Hello Binan
>
>  
>
> force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hello Sammy

 

No, I don't forget.

 

My rtpproxy's  startup script is "/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 36010 -d
DBUG"

I have forwarded the 36000~36010 port to rtpproxy server.

 

Firewall  ---  Opensips/rtpproxy Server

111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050

111.22.33.44:36000/36010 10.1.2.103:36000/36010

But, Now sometime no audio.  

Do you have any suggest

Thanks

Nick

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:28 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 

Hi Nick,
So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ? 
Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
Then see what happens with audio.
Also what is your total voip diagram with their network addresses. 

Thanks,
Sammy

On Sep 11, 2012 6:46 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

Hello Sammy

 

My NAT type is Full cone NAT.

 

In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.

 

Example:

 

Firewall  ---  Opensips Server

111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050

 

Thanks

Nick

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[SamyGo]

Sometimes no audio!! What about rest of the times ?
On Sep 11, 2012 7:54 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

> Hello Sammy
>
> ** **
>
> No, I don’t forget.
>
> ** **
>
> My rtpproxy’s  startup script is “/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
> 111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 36010 -d
> DBUG”
>
> I have forwarded the 36000~36010 port to rtpproxy server.
>
> ** **
>
> Firewall  ---  Opensips/rtpproxy Server
>
> 111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050
>
> 111.22.33.44:36000/36010 10.1.2.103:36000/36010
>
> But, Now sometime no audio.  
>
> Do you have any suggest
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *SamyGo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:28 AM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Nick,
> So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
> to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ?
> Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
> Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
> Then see what happens with audio.
> Also what is your total voip diagram with their network addresses. 
>
> Thanks,
> Sammy
>
> On Sep 11, 2012 6:46 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:
>
> Hello Sammy
>
>  
>
> My NAT type is Full cone NAT.
>
>  
>
> In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.
>
>  
>
> Example:
>
>  
>
> Firewall  ---  Opensips Server
>
> 111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[Nick Chang]

Hello Sammy

 

I found this problem, firewall.

 

Now, My firewall is vigor 2930. It's not good. So It have a lot of problem.

 

I changed to Cisco ASA. It's solved.

 

Thanks for your support.

 

Thanks

Nick

 

 

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:13 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 

Sometimes no audio!! What about rest of the times ? 

On Sep 11, 2012 7:54 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

Hello Sammy

 

No, I don't forget.

 

My rtpproxy's  startup script is "/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 36010 -d
DBUG"

I have forwarded the 36000~36010 port to rtpproxy server.

 

Firewall  ---  Opensips/rtpproxy Server

111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050

111.22.33.44:36000/36010 10.1.2.103:36000/36010

But, Now sometime no audio.  

Do you have any suggest

Thanks

Nick

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of SamyGo
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:28 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

 

Hi Nick,
So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ? 
Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
Then see what happens with audio.
Also what is your total voip diagram with their network addresses. 

Thanks,
Sammy

On Sep 11, 2012 6:46 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

Hello Sammy

 

My NAT type is Full cone NAT.

 

In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.

 

Example:

 

Firewall  ---  Opensips Server

111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050

 

Thanks

Nick


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT

[SamyGo]

Thats perfect :)

So do brief others about what things to specially care for while setting
this type of server/network.
Like you got help from users, some users will get help from your reply too.

Thanks,
Sammy
On Sep 11, 2012 8:25 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:

> Hello Sammy
>
> ** **
>
> I found this problem, firewall.
>
> ** **
>
> Now, My firewall is vigor 2930. It’s not good. So It have a lot of problem.
> 
>
> ** **
>
> I changed to Cisco ASA. It’s solved.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your support.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *SamyGo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:13 AM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
> ** **
>
> Sometimes no audio!! What about rest of the times ? 
>
> On Sep 11, 2012 7:54 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:
>
> Hello Sammy
>
>  
>
> No, I don’t forget.
>
>  
>
> My rtpproxy’s  startup script is “/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
> 111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 36010 -d
> DBUG”
>
> I have forwarded the 36000~36010 port to rtpproxy server.
>
>  
>
> Firewall  ---  Opensips/rtpproxy Server
>
> 111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050
>
> 111.22.33.44:36000/36010 10.1.2.103:36000/36010
>
> But, Now sometime no audio.  
>
> Do you have any suggest
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:
> users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *SamyGo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:28 AM
> *To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
>
>  
>
> Hi Nick,
> So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
> to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ?
> Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
> Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
> Then see what happens with audio.
> Also what is your total voip diagram with their network addresses. 
>
> Thanks,
> Sammy
>
> On Sep 11, 2012 6:46 AM, "Nick Chang"  wrote:
>
> Hello Sammy
>
>  
>
> My NAT type is Full cone NAT.
>
>  
>
> In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.
>
>  
>
> Example:
>
>  
>
> Firewall  ---  Opensips Server
>
> 111.22.33.44:5060   10.1.2.103:5050
>
>  
>
> Thanks
>
> Nick
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users