Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] osipsconsole address failed

[Mimi Cafe]

Hi

I have updated osipsconsole via svn and it appears the previous issue is 
resolved, but I now see two more issues.


The mattern below does not match the dot in netmask $cmd[4] !~ 
/^[0-9]+$/. This seem to look for only one octet?


if ( $cmd[4] !~ /^[0-9]+$/ || $cmd[4] < 0 || $cmd[4] > 32 ) {
print "mask '$cmd[4]' is not valid - it 
must be between 0 and 32 (biti)\n";

return;
}


The resulting error is:

Control engine FIFO loaded
Used database is mysql
Warn fallback to local workdir ./mysql
mask '255.255.255.255' is not valid - it must be between 0 and 32 (biti)
[sbin]$ sudo ./osipsconsole address add 0 192.168.1.192 255.255.255.0 
5060 UDP

which: no md5 in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin)
Control engine FIFO loaded
Used database is mysql
Warn fallback to local workdir ./mysql
mask '255.255.255.0' is not valid - it must be between 0 and 32 (biti)


The other (trivial) issue is that osipsconsole does not use the database 
parameters specified in my osicpsconsolerc. Instead, it attempts to use 
detail values here.


[sbin]$ sudo ./osipsconsole address add 0 192.168.1.192 255.255.255.255 
5060 UDP

which: no md5 in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin)
which: no db4.4_dump in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin)
Control engine FIFO loaded
Used database is mysql
Warn fallback to local workdir ./mysql
Failed to connect the configured Database 
(database=opensips;host=localhost;user=opensips)[babs@mognoreborder 
sbin]$ sudo vim osipsconsole


Mimi


On 10/12/2012 14:38, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

Hi Mimi,

I made some fixes in osipsconsole on SVN (trunk and 1.8 branch) - 
please update and let me know if now works for you.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/08/2012 11:00 PM, Mimi Cafe wrote:
I attempted using osipsconsole to add a gateway address, but it 
failed because there is no data in the dbaliases table. How is this 
linked to the dbaliases tables? What is the prerequisite to adding a 
gateway address in addresses table?


osipsconsole address add 0 192.168.18.89 255.255.255.255 5060 UDP

Control engine FIFO loaded
Used database is mysql
Retrieving data from table failedYou have an error in your SQL 
syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server 
version for the right syntax to use near 'WHERE ip='192.168.18.89'' 
at line 1
Introducing the address rule 0 192.168.18.89 255.255.255.255 5060 UDP 
to the database failed
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that 
corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use 
near '( grp, ip, mask, port, proto , context_info ) VALUES ( 0, 
'192.168.18.89', '255.' at line 1



Mimi

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 100% CPU on MySQL connection lost

[Adrian Serafini]

I have problem with OpenSIPS taking 100% CPU while trying to
reconnect on MySQL connection lost.

I make database backups every night and then for about 15 minutes
database is locked during backup procedure to prevent data
corruption.


This is a db workaround option only.  We replicate the db because it is 
easy to setup with Mysql.  Backups have no downtime by pausing the 
backup replication, taking a snapshot of the backup, restarting the 
replication on the backup.


Adrian

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog Module and Bogus Event 8 in state 2

[Marcello Lupo]

Hi to all,
i have a lot of Dialog Module and Bogus Event 8 in state 2 in opensips logs.
I have opensips 1.6.4 and i see from the sip traces that the request causing 
the problem is an UPDATE made from the client (Cisco) during the early state of 
the call (it is still ringing).
Can I ignore them or what?
Thank you
Bye
Marcello


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Send 487 request terminbated while a cancel recieved from UAC

[M.Khaled W Chehab]

Dear Bogdan ,

 

I am not trying to do something against RFC, but I have a problem you can
see it clear  in the attached capture file,

On wire shark time line (30.877027)  the Client with IP ( 74.114.101.170)
sends  a cancel ,and the opensips version 1.8.2  server with IP
89.207.133.144   send the client 200 canceling and  in its terms forward the
cancel to the trunk provider with IP 74.114.101.190 ,but at wire shark
31.015333 time line you can see  that the trunk sends a 200 OK  ,then 487
request terminated  and the billing stops from the trunk provider   .

The problem is opensips didn't hang-up the call and go for the mediaproxy
timeout   stream_timeout = 40.

-how to let opensips cancel the call immediately  and stop it with no
billing .

 

 

Regards

Khaled

 

 

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bog...@opensips.org] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 7:31 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Cc: M.Khaled W Chehab
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Send 487 request terminbated while a cancel
recieved from UAC

 

Hi Khaled,

That is a bit against RFC - a proxy must not process the CANCEL (like
terminating the INVITE), but to send it to the callee party and let the
callee decide if the call should be canceled or not. So what you try to do
is against RFC.

Regards,



Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/06/2012 04:03 PM, M.Khaled W Chehab wrote: 

Hi,

Any idea guys ?

 

Regards

 

 

From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of M.Khaled W Chehab
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:18 PM
To: users@lists.opensips.org
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] Send 487 request terminbated while a cancel
recieved from UAC
Importance: High

 

Dears ,

 

How to send a  487 request terminated   and drop the call directly  if the
UA send a cancel ,since now I am sending 200  canceling to UA and send a
cancel for the Trunk and wait for his  reply  .

 

Regards

Khaled Chehab

Senior NGN Engineer

Description: icucall

Operations Office - Lebanon

Office: +961 1 515155 ext 300

Mobile  : +961 3 045212

E-mail: kche...@icucall.com

MSN ID :khalidche...@hotmail.com 

Skype: k_chehab 

Web Site: http://www.icucall.com

 http://www.allohi.com

 

 
 
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
<>

395dabcda5@74.114.101.170.rar
Description: Binary data
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTP Proxy problem

[Wesley Volcov]

Dear all,

I could fix the rtpproxy problem, it was a compilation problem.

But now, I'm having a audio problem.

Let me explain:

I have a Opensips with 2 IP addres, a public one (200.0.0.1) and a private
one (10.0.0.1).

The orignation endppint is in the private network (IP TEL), the PSTN
gateway is in the public network.

I receive a call from the IP TEL and send it to the gateway.

In the INVITE that the Opensips sends to the PSTN gateway, I see the Public
IP in the CIN parameter, but in the 200 OK that the Opensips sends to the
TEL IP I see the public IP to, and call goes to one way audio.
The Opensips should send the private IP in the 200OK to the IP TEL.

RTPPROXY run command: /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l 200.0.0.1 10.0.0.1 -s
udp:127.0.0.1 7890 -F -m 1 -M 2 -d DBUG

Opensips:
if (is_method("INVITE")){
rtpproxy_offer("","200.0.0.1");
}

onreply_route [ONREPLY] {

rtpproxy_answer("","10.0.0.1");
}

I've tried some parametes in the rtpproxy like FW, I, E, but I had the same
result.

I'am missing some thing?

Please, help me guys.

Thanks a lot

On 1 December 2012 03:05, SamyGo  wrote:

> Hi,
> The issue is with the command you are using to start RTPproxy. Missing a :
> between 127.0.0.1 and 7890. So now you may not see RTPproxy on netstat
> output.
> Regards,
> Sammy
> On Dec 1, 2012 12:30 AM, "Răzvan Crainea"  wrote:
>
>>  Hi, Wesley!
>>
>> Have you tried tracing the communication opensips has with rtpproxy
>> (listen with ngrep on port 7890). Are you sure rtpproxy is bound on the
>> correct IP and port (check with netstat -ulpn | grep rtpproxy). Have you
>> tried enabling rtpproxy debugging to see if something reaches the server
>> (start rtpproxy with -d DBUG).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Razvan Crainea
>> OpenSIPS Core Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 11/30/2012 08:06 PM, Wesley Volcov wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>  I've tried to downgrade the opensips version, and use the nathelper
>> module, but I still see the error.
>>
>>  RTPPROXY run command: /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l public_ip -s udp:127.0.0.1
>> 7890 -F -m 1 -M 2
>>
>> Opensips configuration: modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:
>> 127.0.0.1:7890")
>>
>>  Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10695]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: can't send command to a RTP proxy
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10699]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10707]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: can't send command to a RTP proxy
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10679]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10682]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10678]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10684]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10686]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10687]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10690]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>> Nov 30 17:05:25 localhost /usr/local/sbin/opensips[10691]:
>> ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy  does not
>> respond, disable it
>>
>>  Am I missing some thing?
>>
>>  Please, helpe me.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>>  Wesley Volcov
>>
>>  On 29 November 2012 08:28, Wesley Volcov  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Răzvan,
>>> *
>>> *
>>> Thanks you for helping me!
>>>
>>>  I changed the modparam to: modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:
>>> 127.0.0.1:7890")
>>>
>>>  And the rtpproxy run command: /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -lpublic_ip -s
>>> udp:127.0.0.1 7890 -F -m 1 -M 2
>>>
>>>  And I still see this:
>>>
>>>  Nov 29 08:25:42 opensips /usr/local/sbin/opensips[5996]:
>>> WARNING:rtpproxy:rtpp_test: support for RTP proxy 
>>> has been disabled temporarily
>>> Nov 29 08:25:42 opensips /usr/local/sbin/opensips[5994]:
>>> WARNING:rtpproxy:rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy
>>>
>>>  Any idea?
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>>
>>>  Wesley Volcov
>>>
>>> On 28 November 2012 16:02, Răzvan Crainea  wrote:
>>>
  Hi, Wesley!

 The idea is that RTPProxy is listening only on localhost, whereas
 OpenSIPS tries to connect to a different IP (rather than 127.0.0.1). You
 should either allow RTPProxy to listen on that IP (change the -s parameter,
 but this is not recommended because of security issues) or configure
 OpenSIPS to connect using 127.0.0.1.
 Are you usi

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RFC] New Release Policy for OpenSIPS project

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Ryan,

Thanks for this - to be honest it looks really interesting from my 
perspective. Personally I would love to go with something like this.


All releases to be alike from how they are built. But to have 2 types of 
releases when comes to maintaining them:

- LTS - supported like 2 years or more.
- STS - supported up to the next release or so.

Considering that most of work on packing, maintaining, etc will be done 
for LTS (as you suggested), this will reduce the work for developers, 
but giving more flexibility to the users.


Shortly, I like it and I would like to go for it. Any other comments on 
this ? Or drawbacks here ?


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/04/2012 08:41 PM, Ryan Bullock wrote:

Hey Bogdan,

Off the top of my head, Asterisk and Ubuntu use a release schedule 
similar schedule to what I described. Both have a long term support 
releases as well as a standard releases. I think it is a good fit for 
a fairly fast moving project.


You are correct that not all releases will be alike, but the user can 
choose their release track. Long term for those who want to do a 
deployment and still get bug/security fixes without having to worry 
about breakage between upgrades. Standard for those looking to get 
their hands on new features as they become available.


If it is very clear as to what is the current long term supported and 
what is the current standard release (and their differences) on the 
website I don't see it as an issue. Any potential issues can be 
lessened ever further if there is always a clear upgrade path/plan 
(same as what you do now for migration instructions between versions) 
from the current LTS to the current standard. Then users can always 
start on the LTS and move to the standard if they need to take 
advantage of a new feature.


I think something like this is important for a time release schedule, 
otherwise the number of supported branches might really start to stack 
up. The other benefit is that this may work better for packagers (e.g. 
for debian or rhel). They can just package the LTS version and it 
would make it easier on them and the users (less chance of surprise 
breakage after an update).


This release schedule on top of going to time release I think would be 
great as there is something for everyone without (hopefully) 
overloading the developers.


Regards,

Ryan

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:



On 11/30/2012 07:24 PM, Ryan Bullock wrote:

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:

Hi Ali,

Thanks for feedback - regarding the support for previous
releases, Saul raised the same point as you, and I have to
admit I didn't do the math - 2 release ~= 1 year, which
indeed is too short - I mean this will force an upgrade each
year.

So, we need to somehow get to ~ 2 year lifetime for a
release. My suggestion is to actually set a life span for 2
years.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

What about adding a long term support branch that is released
every two years and supported for 2 years, and then a release
every 6 months for 'standard' releases. Each standard release
would be supported for 1 year.

Something like this, assuming 1.10 is the first long term support:
1.10 - Long term support (2 years)
1.11 - Standard release (1 year)
1.12 - Standard release (1 year)
1.13 - Standard release (1 year)
1.14 - Long term support (2 years)

Those wanting new features can go for the standard releases, and
those looking for stability and better support can stick with the
long term support releases. It should strike a decent balance
between getting features out the door and support.

Hi Ryan,

By doing that  ^^^ it means not all releases will be alike (and
the so-far assumption is that all major release are alike) - or
I'm missing something here.

I like this approach as this will imply less maintaining work for
developers :), but I dislike it as it will more difficult to
understand and upgrade (for users).
Do you know any project using something like that ?

Thanks and regards,
Bogdan


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] parse_msg errors in the log

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Yuriy,

By default, OpenSIPS silently discards any UDP packages less than 20 bytes.

Looking at the logs you posted, I would say your opensips receives 
packages longer than 20 bytes and starting with a 0 ASCII byte (probably 
some binary stuff ?? ); because of that 0 the message is not printed at 
all (considered a EOS).


Maybe there are some STUN requests or so ? try to make a pcap capture to 
see if there is some valid but non-SIP traffic or it is garbage.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/10/2012 10:16 PM, Филиппов Юрий wrote:


Hello,

I have(opensips v.1.8) lots of errors in my opensips.log  like :

INFO:core:parse_first_line: empty or bad first line

INFO:core:parse_first_line: bad message

ERROR:core:parse_msg: message=<>
ERROR:core:receive_msg: parse_msg failed

Have searched the internet and found an answer:

>>opensips is reading garbage from the network and not even able to 
parse it a a SIP message

>>(not recognizing the first line at all), so it cannot trigger the error
>>route - the error route is trigger for malformed SIP messages.

Is there any way to eliminate that Error records in the log?

Thanks

Yuriy


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 100% CPU on MySQL connection lost

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

And what are the king of errors/warnings/logs (if any) from the db_mysql 
module when trying to do quires (while table is locked) - just to see 
how opensips "sees" the DB.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/10/2012 08:53 PM, Adam Raszynski wrote:
MySQL server is running all the time. I think that while making 
backups tables are blocked by LOCK TABLES statement



2012/12/10 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >


Hi Adam,

What exactly is the "experience" of OpenSIPs in regards to DB? DB
simply blocks, so whatever query is pushed to DB, opensips will
block in waiting ?

Or the DB disconnescts opensips's connections ?

You mentioned both, locking up and reconnect :)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/10/2012 05:00 PM, Adam Raszynski wrote:

Hi

Tried versions: 1.7.2 and 1.8

I have problem with OpenSIPS taking 100% CPU while trying to
reconnect on MySQL connection lost.

I make database backups every night and then for about 15 minutes
database is locked during backup procedure to prevent data
corruption.

I understand that OpenSIPS is trying to do it's best to reconnect
to database, but how to decrease reconnect interval or make it
less CPU intensive?

Regards


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org  
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

[Jorge Henrique Pinho]

Thank you bogdan :).

Jorge Pinho
Analyst/Developer
Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions
Multimedia Division

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [bog...@opensips.org]
Sent: 11 December 2012 10:16
To: Jorge Henrique Pinho
Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

Hi Jorge,

You cannot preserve the TO hdr, as TO is generated by the B2B (as a
element of the new dialog).

Also the UA is added by OpenSIPs automatically, to all locally generated
requests. You many try to propagate the received UA, but in this case
you need to stop opensips in generating its UA hdr, by disabling the
server_signature (see http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsCoreFcn18#toc73)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/11/2012 11:58 AM, Jorge Henrique Pinho wrote:
> Hi bogdan,
> I want to preserve the 'To' header and the 'User-Agent' header.
>
> Jorge Pinho
> Analyst/Developer
> Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions
> Multimedia Division
> 
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [bog...@opensips.org]
> Sent: 10 December 2012 18:40
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Cc: Jorge Henrique Pinho
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!
>
> Hi Jorge,
>
> What are the headers you want to preserve ? (as you cannot put there any
> kind of hdr)
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 12/05/2012 07:54 PM, Jorge Henrique Pinho wrote:
>> Hi, I am using opensips-1.7.2 with b2b.
>> When i set the custom_headers parameter with the headers that i want to 
>> preserve, this headers appear repeated with different values in the message 
>> generated by b2b.
>> Is this the correct behavior, or is there a fix for this problem?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Jorge
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jorge,

You cannot preserve the TO hdr, as TO is generated by the B2B (as a 
element of the new dialog).


Also the UA is added by OpenSIPs automatically, to all locally generated 
requests. You many try to propagate the received UA, but in this case 
you need to stop opensips in generating its UA hdr, by disabling the 
server_signature (see http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsCoreFcn18#toc73)


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/11/2012 11:58 AM, Jorge Henrique Pinho wrote:

Hi bogdan,
I want to preserve the 'To' header and the 'User-Agent' header.

Jorge Pinho
Analyst/Developer
Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions
Multimedia Division

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [bog...@opensips.org]
Sent: 10 December 2012 18:40
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Cc: Jorge Henrique Pinho
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

Hi Jorge,

What are the headers you want to preserve ? (as you cannot put there any
kind of hdr)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/05/2012 07:54 PM, Jorge Henrique Pinho wrote:

Hi, I am using opensips-1.7.2 with b2b.
When i set the custom_headers parameter with the headers that i want to 
preserve, this headers appear repeated with different values in the message 
generated by b2b.
Is this the correct behavior, or is there a fix for this problem?

Best regards

Jorge
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

[Jorge Henrique Pinho]

Hi bogdan,
I want to preserve the 'To' header and the 'User-Agent' header. 

Jorge Pinho
Analyst/Developer
Network Platforms and Multimedia Solutions
Multimedia Division

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [bog...@opensips.org]
Sent: 10 December 2012 18:40
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Cc: Jorge Henrique Pinho
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Custom headers b2b!

Hi Jorge,

What are the headers you want to preserve ? (as you cannot put there any
kind of hdr)

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 12/05/2012 07:54 PM, Jorge Henrique Pinho wrote:
> Hi, I am using opensips-1.7.2 with b2b.
> When i set the custom_headers parameter with the headers that i want to 
> preserve, this headers appear repeated with different values in the message 
> generated by b2b.
> Is this the correct behavior, or is there a fix for this problem?
>
> Best regards
>
> Jorge
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users