Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] nathelper vs nat_traversal

2015-08-12 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi Aqs,

The two modules are mainly for doing SIP NAT traversal - they both do 
offer more or less the same functionality, just pick one :)


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 11.08.2015 23:34, Aqs Younas wrote:

Hi,
I am new to opensips. Could someone please tell me the differences 
between nathelper and nat_traversal? And in what scenario which module 
or both should be used.


Thanks in Advance.



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.10 crash

2015-08-12 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi Denis,

First of all, I strongly recommend you to upgrade to 1.11 as 1.10 is no 
longer supported.


Secondly, it looks like you have a memory corruption . See this tutorial:
http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/TroubleShooting-OutOfMem

on how to enable memory debugging - it will give a more detailed report 
about the corruption.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 11.08.2015 07:20, dpa wrote:


Hello!

Is there any ideas about problem?

Thank you.

*From:*users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] *On Behalf Of *dpa

*Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:11 PM
*To:* 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
*Subject:* [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.10 crash

Hello!

Opensips1.10.1. Working with rtpproxy2.0.

Today Opensips has crashed. Core file was generated.

Information from core file is in attachment.

The question is why Opensips has crashed?

Thank you for any help.



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] CARRIERROUTE module

2015-08-12 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi Ben,

The carrierroute module is not maintained (for like 6 years).

Still, if you want to do a routing based on both caller and caller 
number, you can do it with the drouting module. Use a set of prefixes to 
translate the caller prefix into a kind of routing group , which can be 
used again with drouting as set for searching the callee prefix. 
Basically you do 2 droutings, one for caller, one for callee.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 11.08.2015 18:23, Newlin, Ben wrote:

Hi all,

We have some interest in possibly using the CARRIERROUTE module 
instead of DROUTING as it allows prefix matching of the originating 
number as well as the destination, whereas DROUTING must match the 
originating user exactly. However, we noticed that the CARRIERROUTE 
module is labeled as alpha, even though it has existed in OpenSIPS for 
many years and many releases.


Is there some reason this module is still alpha? Is it considered to 
be unstable for production use?


Ben Newlin


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


[OpenSIPS-Users] Call-id issue in Cancel message generated by tm

2015-08-12 Thread John Nash
I am not sure if its some bug or my mistake.

I am using topology hiding module (opensips 2.1 version) and I have noticed
that Call-id in Cancel message is different than Invite sent to
gateway.

Invite is sent to gateway and we get session progress but call is not
picked up, as per fr_timer opensips triggers cancel but call ID in cancel
is not same as sent in Invite

INVITE sip:11025@2.2.2.2:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:9096;branch=z9hG4bKe5d5.fca1aeb4.0
Max-Forwards: 26
From: 786786 sip:786786@1.1.1.1:9096;tag=2B6F7HZaNH02F
To: sip:11025@2.2.2.2:5060
Call-ID: DLGCH_LkhSV2VxNGNiEgQMMGRhYXxDSF9rcDN+K0QEC2Z7M2ouFFFd
CSeq: 79309702 INVITE
Contact: sip:sbc@1.1.1.1:9096;did=775.84850bf2
User-Agent: Opensips
Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER,
REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE
Supported: timer, path, replaces
Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, presence, as-feature-event, dialog,
line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo,
message-summary, refer
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Disposition: session
Content-Length: 258

v=0
o=- 22469580 22469580 IN IP4 1.1.1.1
s=Softphone
c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1
t=0 0
m=audio 32706 RTP/AVP 18 101
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=ptime:20
a=rtcp:32707


CANCEL sip:11025@2.2.2.2:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:9096;branch=z9hG4bKe5d5.fca1aeb4.0
From: 786786 sip:786786@1.1.1.1:9096;tag=2B6F7HZaNH02F
Call-ID: a87968d0-babc-1233-189c-d4ae52c9ad43
To: sip:11025@2.2.2.2:5060
CSeq: 79309702 CANCEL
Max-Forwards: 70
Reason: SIP;cause=480;text=NO_ANSWER
User-Agent: Opensips
Content-Length: 0
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users