Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] gflags module script and MI command difference

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Arto,

No, there should be no offset at all. The is_gflag function takes as 
parameter the index of the bit to be checked, while the MI functions 
(like set_gflag) take as parameter a bitmask with all the bits to be 
operated with.


So, if you setting the bitmask 2 -> you set bit index 1 (2<<1) . With 
bitmask 1 you set the bit index 0 (2<<0).


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/09/2018 01:43 PM, Arto Kuiri wrote:


Hi,


I noticed that in opensips script gflags and MI commands gflags is off 
by 1.



if i have this kind of check:


if(is_gflag("1")) {
   xlog("** MAINTANCE MODE \n");
}


and I try to set it on with MI command:

opensipsctl fifo set_gflag 1

it wont work, but this works:

opensipsctl fifo set_gflag 2

is this intended? If it is, I think documentation should mention it?

Tested this with 2.4.x

Regards,
Arto Kuiri



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Error

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Brian,

The idea is the function needs a dialog context in order to work - as 
this function is to be used for sequential requests, you have to be sure 
your request matched its dialog before using this function.
The dialog matching (for sequential) is done via loose_route() (if you 
do not use topo hidding) , via dialog_match() or via 
topology_hiding_match() if using topo hiding.


Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/09/2018 06:45 PM, Brian Southworth wrote:


dlg_validate_dialog: Script error - validate function before having a 
dialog


I am trying to fix contact header on the called, ive fixed the 
register users used to register with a private ip and not local.


Now when inbound calls happen they don’t get them due to the call 
being send to a local ip that isn’t local.


So ive used the validate dialog code chunk and I get back the above

Regards,

Brian Southworth

Communications Developer

cid:image001.png@01D22CAC.1DCB8580

111 Wilmslow Road

Handforth

Wilmslow

SK9 3ER

T: 0 446677

W: www.clocom.uk __









cid:image002.png@01CDDC62.D8483910 



Like us on Facebook



cid:image003.png@01CDDC62.D8483910



Follow us on Twitter



cid:image004.png@01CDDC62.D8483910 









Clocom is a *green* company. Think, do you need to print this email?

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify 
the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by 
mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission 
cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could 
be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, 
or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for 
any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise 
as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please 
request a hard-copy version. Clocom UK Ltd, 111 Wilmslow Road, 
Handforth, Cheshire, SK9 3ER www.clocom.uk __




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefered Media Proxy or RTP Proxy

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi,

All three engines are stable and properly work:
rtpproxy
mediaproxy
rtpengine

it is up to you to pick the one that does the job for you (in terms of 
fulfilling your needs).


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/13/2018 08:51 AM, abisai matangira wrote:

Hi

Which is the preferred or stable Media proxy for Opensips from below

RTP Proxy

Media Proxy



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Port changes

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Schneur,

The ACK is routed back via the Route set (the Record Route headers from 
the initial Invite) and the Contact received in the final reply (in the 
200 OK in your case). This is called in-dialog routing and is 
exclusively based on Route set (RR headers + Contact).


The rport as part of via is used only for routing back the replies for a 
requests (in transaction routing) and has no impact on the in-dialog 
routing.


So, if the RURI in ACK (which should be the Contact in the received 200 
OK) is broken, maybe you should do a fix_nated_contact() for the Contact 
when handling the 200 OK reply.


Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/12/2018 05:05 PM, Schneur Rosenberg wrote:

I have this interesting scenario, caller sends call to our OpenSIPS
who actsd as a loadbalancer which sends the call to a gateway for
termination and the gateway sets Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uas,
the caller sends call the call through port 1090 and the rport in the
Via shows rport=1090 and so far everything is ok, but after 15 minutes
the gateway sends a reinvite,  OpenSIPS sends it to the client and the
client sends a OK and OpenSIPS properly sends the OK to the gateway,
the gateway sends a ACK to OpenSIPS, but here the problem starts
OpenSIPS sends the ACK to the port in the Contact header which is not
the same port as the rport, the clients router does not recognize the
packet and blocks it, the client sends multiple OK's to OpenSIPS who
ignores it because he has already moved on, as far as OpenSIPS is
concerned the ACK has already been sent to the next hop, and after
approx 30 seconds the client does not receive the ACK and sends a BYE
and the call terminates.

Why is OpenSIPS changing the port to the Contact port? and what can I
do to fix it?


 http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail";
target="_blank">https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png";
alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
/>
Virus-free. http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail";
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS Organization @ GSoC 2018

[Răzvan Crainea]

Hello, everyone!

We are very excited to announce you that we've just been accepted as an 
organization for this year's Google Summer of Code program[1]! We are 
looking forward to getting students involved in our community and work 
together with them on our projects.


You can find the ideas we have proposed for them here[2].

If you're a student and you want to get involved into the GSoC project, 
don't hesitate to contact us over email, or on IRC and make a proposal 
for one of the projects!


[1] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/5634263836262400/
[2] http://www.opensips.org/Development/IdeasList

Cheers,
--
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Core Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Port changes

[Schneur Rosenberg]

Bogdan its only happening when the clients SIP ALG fixes the contact,
when the contact is broken I'm already using fix_nated_contact, do you
think I should use fix_nated_contact even when the contact was already
fixed by the SIP ALG?

The clients router does not support disabling SIP ALG, I can try using
a non standard port, I've sen some routers ALG ignoring the packets
when sent to alternative port.

I feel like its a bug in OpenSIPS, because the reinvite is routed to
the proper port, the issue starts with the ACK for the reinvite, I
will email the trace  directly to you.

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
 wrote:
> Hi Schneur,
>
> The ACK is routed back via the Route set (the Record Route headers from the
> initial Invite) and the Contact received in the final reply (in the 200 OK
> in your case). This is called in-dialog routing and is exclusively based on
> Route set (RR headers + Contact).
>
> The rport as part of via is used only for routing back the replies for a
> requests (in transaction routing) and has no impact on the in-dialog
> routing.
>
> So, if the RURI in ACK (which should be the Contact in the received 200 OK)
> is broken, maybe you should do a fix_nated_contact() for the Contact when
> handling the 200 OK reply.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
> OpenSIPS Summit 2018
>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam
>
>
> On 02/12/2018 05:05 PM, Schneur Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> I have this interesting scenario, caller sends call to our OpenSIPS
>> who actsd as a loadbalancer which sends the call to a gateway for
>> termination and the gateway sets Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uas,
>> the caller sends call the call through port 1090 and the rport in the
>> Via shows rport=1090 and so far everything is ok, but after 15 minutes
>> the gateway sends a reinvite,  OpenSIPS sends it to the client and the
>> client sends a OK and OpenSIPS properly sends the OK to the gateway,
>> the gateway sends a ACK to OpenSIPS, but here the problem starts
>> OpenSIPS sends the ACK to the port in the Contact header which is not
>> the same port as the rport, the clients router does not recognize the
>> packet and blocks it, the client sends multiple OK's to OpenSIPS who
>> ignores it because he has already moved on, as far as OpenSIPS is
>> concerned the ACK has already been sent to the next hop, and after
>> approx 30 seconds the client does not receive the ACK and sends a BYE
>> and the call terminates.
>>
>> Why is OpenSIPS changing the port to the Contact port? and what can I
>> do to fix it?
>> 
>> 
>>  >
>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail";
>> target="_blank">>
>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png";
>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
>> />
>> Virus-free. >
>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail";
>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com
>> 
>> 
>> > height="1">
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] acc extra_fields param

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Pasan,

The "extra" support in ACC is always producing output as strings (when 
performing the DB query). Nevertheless this should not prevent you 
pushing integer or string values into the $acc_extra() variable.


But, it seems you discovered a BUG here :D...if the pushed value is a 
static int (from the script), it is not properly converted :(. I just 
pushed a fix on GIT repo (master and 2.3) - so please update you 
checkout or if using packages, use the nightly build (of course, wait 
for the night :) first )


Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/13/2018 03:39 AM, Pasan Meemaduma via Users wrote:

Hi List,

I'm working on getting my opensips 1.10 -> 2.3.3 :)

As db_extra param is not there anymore I tried to use extra_fields 
param in acc module and it appears it can hold string values only. Is 
it the case ?


I tried to use it to hold an integer value and it comes up as empty 
string ''.


Is it a bug or purpose set only to accept string data only ? cause my 
db column has integer type for it.


following is my config

modparam("acc", "extra_fields", "db: fu->from_uri; ru->to_uri; 
islocal->islocal; callid->\"exe-callid\"; direction->direction")




$acc_extra(islocal) = 1;


When call hangups it failed to insert the cdr record to acc table as 
islocal comes up as ''.


Ex:-
ERROR:db_postgres:db_postgres_submit_query: 0x7fd07fb45d18 PQsendQuery 
Error: ERROR:  invalid input syntax for integer: ""#012LINE 1: 
...sip:xx@xx;transport=UDP','','376ab2...#012 ^#012 Query: insert into 
acc 
(method,from_tag,to_tag,callid,sip_code,sip_reason,time,from_uri,to_uri,islocal,"exe-callid",direction,setuptime,created,duration,ms_duration 
) values 
('INVITE','101c267c','464b920d','6m1aTeUcif5ctoXI7ZSq9A..','200','OK','2018-02-09 
17:55:41','sip:xx@xx;transport=UDP','sip:xx@xxx;transport=UDP','','376ab2da-0d66-11e8-9410-bb1806756cbd','in',11,'2018-02-09 
17:55:30',4,4298)




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] migrating to opensips 2.3 from 2.2

[Brian Southworth]

Hi All,

 
I seem to be getting an error when running the migration. It is also saying the 
 following when I run the following command: opensipsdbctl migrate opensips_2_2 
opensips_2_3

 
INFO: MySQL DB migration tool for OpenSIPS 2.1.x databases

--

WARNING: We recommend using this tool ONLY in order to upgrade an existing

OpenSIPS 2.1.x MySQL database to the 2.2 schema. Behaviour when automatically

migrating earlier DB versions (1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11) to 2.2 is undefined


 
my version is 2.2.3

 
also when I enter my password for mysql (this is an external DB not internal) I 
get this 

 
ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 
'opensips'@'local_ip.lightspeed.jcsnms.sbcglobal.net' (using password: YES)

ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 
'opensips'@'local_ip.lightspeed.jcsnms.sbcglobal.net' (using password: YES)

 
Any idea how I fix this ? I want to start trying to use the EBR module which 
was made available in opensips 2.3

 
Regards,

 
Brian Southworth

Communications Developer

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefered Media Proxy or RTP Proxy

[Mundkowsky, Robert]

I am curious about this too.

I am guessing from this webpage 
(https://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/MediaProxy+Comparison) and some others web 
pages that:
- rtpproxy is the oldest
- mediaproxy and rtpengine (formerly named mediaproxy-ng ) likely are newer and 
have more features and rtpengine seems to have the most documentation (that I 
can find)



Robert

-Original Message-
From: Users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:56 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list ; abisai matangira 

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefered Media Proxy or RTP Proxy

Hi,

All three engines are stable and properly work:
 rtpproxy
 mediaproxy
 rtpengine

it is up to you to pick the one that does the job for you (in terms of 
fulfilling your needs).

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips-solutions.com&data=02%7C01%7Crmundkowsky%40ets.org%7C3e67609ec71a453c4bf908d572c83017%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636541126500103944&sdata=Zt%2FAD0tfCYRra7POnZUKdDtzlE8EMvXP%2F5BFaTNjetA%3D&reserved=0
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
   
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opensips.org%2Fevents%2FSummit-2018Amsterdam&data=02%7C01%7Crmundkowsky%40ets.org%7C3e67609ec71a453c4bf908d572c83017%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636541126500103944&sdata=L15jQmVGf0%2FbLOlE604N7kvjeP99VNM0S6Q9OmGcEHY%3D&reserved=0

On 02/13/2018 08:51 AM, abisai matangira wrote:
> Hi
>
> Which is the preferred or stable Media proxy for Opensips from below
>
> RTP Proxy
>
> Media Proxy
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.
> opensips.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&data=02%7C01%7Crmu
> ndkowsky%40ets.org%7C3e67609ec71a453c4bf908d572c83017%7C0ba6e9b760b34f
> ae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636541126500103944&sdata=55y1%2BpK%2B0Ku1
> hmghUTEQI4vfN32lpk4WSjig3Y9AT3U%3D&reserved=0


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.opensips.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&data=02%7C01%7Crmundkowsky%40ets.org%7C3e67609ec71a453c4bf908d572c83017%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636541126500103944&sdata=55y1%2BpK%2B0Ku1hmghUTEQI4vfN32lpk4WSjig3Y9AT3U%3D&reserved=0



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or 
confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is 
intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your 
system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefered Media Proxy or RTP Proxy

[Abisai Matangira]

Thanks ,

There seems to be limited documentation on setting

If possible can you share one which has good documentation for Centos 
environment

Sent from Nine

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
Sent: Tuesday, 13 February 2018 11:57 am
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list; Abisai Matangira
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Prefered Media Proxy or RTP Proxy

Hi,

All three engines are stable and properly work:
 rtpproxy
 mediaproxy
 rtpengine

it is up to you to pick the one that does the job for you (in terms of
fulfilling your needs).

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam

On 02/13/2018 08:51 AM, abisai matangira wrote:
> Hi
>
> Which is the preferred or stable Media proxy for Opensips from below
>
> RTP Proxy
>
> Media Proxy
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] acc extra_fields param

[Pasan Meemaduma via Users]

Hi Bogdan,
Thanks for the response. I'll get my opensips rebuild , can you let me know the 
commit id so I know I got it correctly ?
 

On Tuesday, 13 February 2018, 17:38, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
 wrote:
 

  Hi Pasan,
 
 The "extra" support in ACC is always producing output as strings (when 
performing the DB query). Nevertheless this should not prevent you pushing 
integer or string values into the $acc_extra() variable. 
 
 But, it seems you discovered a BUG here :D...if the pushed value is a static 
int (from the script), it is not properly converted :(. I just pushed a fix on 
GIT repo (master and 2.3) - so please update you checkout or if using packages, 
use the nightly build (of course, wait for the night :) first )
 
 Best regards,
  Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2018
  http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam
 On 02/13/2018 03:39 AM, Pasan Meemaduma via Users wrote:
  
Hi List, 
  I'm working on getting my opensips 1.10 -> 2.3.3 :) 
  As db_extra param is not there anymore I tried to use extra_fields param in 
acc module and it appears it can hold string values only. Is it the case ? 
  I tried to use it to hold an integer value and it comes up as empty string 
''. 
  
  Is it a bug or purpose set only to accept string data only ? cause my db 
column has integer type for it. 
  
  following is my config 
  modparam("acc", "extra_fields", "db: fu->from_uri; ru->to_uri; 
islocal->islocal; callid->\"exe-callid\"; direction->direction")
  
  
  
  $acc_extra(islocal) = 1; 
  
  When call hangups it failed to insert the cdr record to acc table as islocal 
comes up as ''. 
  Ex:- ERROR:db_postgres:db_postgres_submit_query: 0x7fd07fb45d18 PQsendQuery 
Error: ERROR:  invalid input syntax for integer: ""#012LINE 
1:...sip:xx@xx;transport=UDP','','376ab2...#012 
    ^#012 Query: insert into 
acc(method,from_tag,to_tag,callid,sip_code,sip_reason,time,from_uri,to_uri,islocal,"exe-callid",direction,setuptime,created,duration,ms_duration
 ) 
values('INVITE','101c267c','464b920d','6m1aTeUcif5ctoXI7ZSq9A..','200','OK','2018-02-0917:55:41','sip:xx@xx;transport=UDP','sip:xx@xxx;transport=UDP','','376ab2da-0d66-11e8-9410-bb1806756cbd','in',11,'2018-02-09
 17:55:30',4,4298)
   
  
 ___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 

   ___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] warning on postgres data type

[Pasan Meemaduma via Users]

Hi List,

I got another issue where opensips issue a warning I'm trying to load a uuid 
from a postgres database as opensips doesn't have a built-in function to 
generate a uuid. How do I get rid of this warning ?

WARNING:db_postgres:db_postgres_get_columns: unhandled data type column 
(uuid_generate_v1mc) type id (2950), use DB_STRING as default

Its caused by following line in my config
avp_db_query("SELECT uuid_generate_v1mc()","$avp(callid)");

does this mean I need to convert it to string before returning from postgres 
via the sql I use ?
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users