Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACC_RADIUS makes opensips crash

2010-07-16 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello Denis,

Is the cisco specific dictionary included in the dictionary of the
RADIUS server too?

Also, to be able to extract a certain AVP from a RADIUS reply, you
need to make sure you have configured the server to return the
attributes you want. You can find a brief tutorial on this here [1].


Regards,
Irina Stanescu


[1] http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutRadius#toc4


On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Denis Putyato denis7...@mail.ru wrote:
 Hello, Irina

 Now it works, thank you. But, if you don't mind,  one more question about 
 RADIUS.
 I want to use Cisco dictionary for auth. subscribers.
 Dictionary is a main file used for radius in my opensips. I insert into this 
 file such string  $INCLUDE /etc/radiusclient-ng/dictionary.cisco  where 
 dictionary.cisco is a cisco specific dictionary.

 a little part of opensips.cfg
 {...
 ...
 modparam(aaa_radius, sets, set1 = (User-Name = $avp(i:20), 
 User-Password=$avp(i:50)))
 modparam(aaa_radius, sets, set2 = (Cisco-AVPair = $var(duration)))
 ...
 ...
 radius_send_auth(set1,set2);
 ...
 ...
 }

 After made a call I can see such string in syslog
  /usr/local/opensips/sbin/opensips[7435]: ERROR:aaa_radius:send_auth_func: 
 attribute was not found in received radius message 

 # cat /etc/radiusclient-ng/dictionary.cisco | grep Cisco
 ...
 VENDOR          Cisco                           9
 BEGIN-VENDOR    Cisco
 ATTRIBUTE       Cisco-AVPair                            1       string  
 vendor=Cisco
 ...

 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
 [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Irina Stanescu
 Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:11 PM
 To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
 Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACC_RADIUS makes opensips crash

 Hello Denis,

 I think the problem in you case is that the radius dictionary does not 
 contain an entry for SIP-AVP, and that is why attr is null, causing the 
 crash.

 I added a fix on the trunk and i also attached the patch to this email in 
 case you don't use the trunk version. Please let me know if there are any 
 other issues.

 Regards,
 Irina Stanescu

 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Denis Putyato denis7...@mail.ru wrote:
 Bogdan, i made another call which makes opensips crash

 ...
 Core was generated by `/usr/local/opensips/sbin/opensips -P 
 /var/run/opensips.pid'.
 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
 [New process 8833]
 #0  0xb7a0adf1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c113c, s1=0x81bcd34,
 s2=0x81bcd48) at aaa_radius.c:369
 369             for(; (vp = rc_avpair_get(vp, attr-value, 0)); vp =
 vp-next)
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0xb7a0adf1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c113c, s1=0x81bcd34,
 s2=0x81bcd48) at aaa_radius.c:369
 #1  0x08056111 in do_action (a=0x81b7404, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:967
 #2  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b5e14, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #3  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81b7680, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706
 #4  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b5938, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #5  0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81aa660, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #6  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aa660, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #7  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81aa758, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706
 #8  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aa758, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #9  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81aaff4, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706 #10 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aaff4,
 msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #11 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81ac2d8, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706
 #12 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a9f24, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #13 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b428c, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #14 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b1ab0, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #15 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b1308, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #16 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b1308, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #17 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81b14cc, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706
 #18 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b0a70, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #19 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b078c, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119 #20 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81ad9e0,
 msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #21 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81ad50c, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #22 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aca9c, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #23 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81a9cb4, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #24 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a6c50, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #25 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81a9d8c, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:706
 #26 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a47e0, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:139
 #27 0x080590bf in run_top_route (a=0x81a47e0, msg=0x81c113c) at
 action.c:119
 #28 0x08098b9c in receive_msg (
    buf=0x8178200 INVITE sip:4483...@213.170.75.90:5060
 SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
 213.170.75.90:5050;branch=z9hG4bK6912c413;rport\r\nMax

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACC_RADIUS makes opensips crash

2010-07-15 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello Denis,

I think the problem in you case is that the radius dictionary does not
contain an entry for SIP-AVP, and that is why attr is null, causing
the crash.

I added a fix on the trunk and i also attached the patch to this email
in case you don't use the trunk version. Please let me know if there
are any other issues.

Regards,
Irina Stanescu

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Denis Putyato denis7...@mail.ru wrote:
 Bogdan, i made another call which makes opensips crash

 ...
 Core was generated by `/usr/local/opensips/sbin/opensips -P 
 /var/run/opensips.pid'.
 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
 [New process 8833]
 #0  0xb7a0adf1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c113c, s1=0x81bcd34, s2=0x81bcd48) 
 at aaa_radius.c:369
 369             for(; (vp = rc_avpair_get(vp, attr-value, 0)); vp = vp-next)
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0xb7a0adf1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c113c, s1=0x81bcd34, s2=0x81bcd48) 
 at aaa_radius.c:369
 #1  0x08056111 in do_action (a=0x81b7404, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:967
 #2  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b5e14, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #3  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81b7680, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #4  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b5938, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #5  0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81aa660, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #6  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aa660, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #7  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81aa758, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #8  0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aa758, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #9  0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81aaff4, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #10 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aaff4, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #11 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81ac2d8, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #12 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a9f24, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #13 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b428c, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #14 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b1ab0, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #15 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b1308, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #16 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b1308, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #17 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81b14cc, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #18 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81b0a70, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #19 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81b078c, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #20 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81ad9e0, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #21 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81ad50c, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #22 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81aca9c, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #23 0x08057946 in do_action (a=0x81a9cb4, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #24 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a6c50, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #25 0x08057f97 in do_action (a=0x81a9d8c, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:706
 #26 0x08054f9e in run_action_list (a=0x81a47e0, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:139
 #27 0x080590bf in run_top_route (a=0x81a47e0, msg=0x81c113c) at action.c:119
 #28 0x08098b9c in receive_msg (
    buf=0x8178200 INVITE sip:4483...@213.170.75.90:5060 SIP/2.0\r\nVia: 
 SIP/2.0/UDP 213.170.75.90:5050;branch=z9hG4bK6912c413;rport\r\nMax-Forwards: 
 70\r\nFrom: \3364079\ 
 sip:3364...@213.170.75.90:5050;tag=as477593c3\r\nTo: ..., len=826,
    rcv_info=0xbfeaed48) at receive.c:162
 #29 0x080da834 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:492
 #30 0x0806ee80 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbfeaeee4) at main.c:818
 (gdb) print vp
 $1 = (VALUE_PAIR *) 0x854c8f8
 (gdb) print attr
 $2 = (DICT_ATTR *) 0x0
 (gdb)

 -Original Message-
 From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org 
 [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
 Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:48 PM
 To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
 Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACC_RADIUS makes opensips crash

 Hi Denis,

 That's perfect - thank you.

 Could you print in GDB the following values : vp , attr.

 Regards,
 Bogdan

 Denis Putyato wrote:
 Hello, Bogdan

 Is this information you asked?

 gdb /usr/local/opensips/sbin/opensips /core
 GNU gdb 6.8-debian
 Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
 This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
 There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
 and show warranty for details.
 This GDB was configured as i486-linux-gnu...

 warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
 ...
 ...
 Core was generated by `/usr/local/opensips/sbin/opensips -P 
 /var/run/opensips.pid'.
 Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
 [New process 24328]
 #0  0xb79b7df1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c0fd4, s1=0x81bcbcc, s2=0x81bcbe0) 
 at aaa_radius.c:369
 369           for(; (vp = rc_avpair_get(vp, attr-value, 0)); vp = vp-next)
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0xb79b7df1 in send_auth_func (msg=0x81c0fd4, s1=0x81bcbcc, s2=0x81bcbe0) 
 at aaa_radius.c:369
 #1  0x08056111 in do_action

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Issue with permission module in opensip 1.6

2009-12-11 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Jai,

As you suggested, i added the id of the entry to the debug info for 
ignored entries .

Also, i committed a fix for the other problem you had with 
check_source_address. Please update from SVN and let me know if you find 
any other issues.


Regards,
Irina Stanescu


Jai Rangi wrote:
 Excellent, I owe you one.

 As always users always want more and more ;)
 I got this in the logs when I try to 
 Dec 10 13:55:02 [11176] DBG:permissions:reload_address_table: invalid 
 ip field in address table, ignoring entry 0
 Dec 10 13:55:02 [11176] DBG:permissions:reload_address_table: invalid 
 ip field in address table, ignoring entry 1

 Here ID or IPAddress will be more useful for debugging purpose.

 Here is the trace for the failing call form same IP.

 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:parse_via: end of header reached, state=5
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=200
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=235
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:rr:find_first_route: No Route headers found
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:rr:loose_route: There is no Route HF
  source ip is 65.211.120.237 and protocol is udp avp is null
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:permissions:check_src_addr_3: Looking for 
 : 0, 65.211.120.237, 5060, 1 in tables
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:permissions:hash_match: no match in the 
 hash table
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:permissions:match_subnet_table: subnet 
 table is empty
 Monitor Request not from trusted source from 
 sip:+19496794...@199.173.94.144:5060;user=phone to 
 sip:+19493334...@209.216.2.213:5060;user=phone;transport=UDP from IP 
 65.211.120.237 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:parse_headers: 
 flags=
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:check_ip_address: params 
 65.211.120.237, 65.211.120.237, 0
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11772] DBG:core:receive_msg: cleaning up
 Dec 10 14:03:09 [11771] DBG:core:parse_msg: SIP Request:

 Dump from address cache
  ../../sbin/opensipsctl fifo address_dump | grep 65.211.120.237
   12 65.211.120.237,0, 0, 0, ^sip:.*$, NULL

 Code in cfg file
  xlog( source ip is $si and protocol is $proto avp is $avp(i:9));
  if (check_source_address(0,$avp(i:9))) {

 Same Call from other IP works juts IP

 Dec 10 14:08:16 [11776] DBG:rr:loose_route: There is no Route HF
  source ip is 65.217.40.210 and protocol is udp avp is null
 Dec 10 14:08:16 [11776] DBG:permissions:check_src_addr_3: Looking for 
 : 0, 65.217.40.210, 5060, 1 in tables
 Dec 10 14:08:16 [11776] DBG:permissions:hash_match: match found in the 
 hash table

 ../../sbin/opensipsctl fifo address_dump | grep 65.217.40.210
9 65.217.40.210,0, 0, 0, ^sip:.*$, NULL

 Best,

 -Jai

 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Irina Stanescu 
 istane...@opensips.org mailto:istane...@opensips.org wrote:

 Hi Jai,

 I modified the permissions module so that now any invalid db entry
 from
 the address table is skipped.
 I committed the change on trunk and also on the 1.6 branch.

 About the other issue you have found, what does the log say?



 Regards,
 Irina Stanescu


 Jai Rangi wrote:
  Bogda,
  Wow that was quick. Thank you,
 
  I found one more issue,
  I have this entry in address table
  944   0   65.211.120.237  32  0   any ^sip:.*$  
  /NULL/  0   some
  descriptiond
 
 
  Here is a check in my route block
   if (check_source_address(0,$avp(i:9))) {
 t_rely();
  } else {
xlog(Monitor Request not from trusted source from $fu to $ru from
  IP $si );
 sl_send_reply(403, Forbidden, we dont trust you);
  }
 
  ../../sbin/opensipsctl fifo address_dump | grep 65.211.120.237
 
  12 65.211.120.237,0, 0, 0, ^sip:.*$, NULL
 
  I always get 403.
  Is there a limit in address table.
 
  -Jai
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
  bog...@voice-system.ro mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro
 mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro
 wrote:
 
  Hi Jai,
 
  I think you are correct - the permission table should also
 be more
  permissive when comes to the errors and skip bogus entries.
 I will ask
  the maintainer (Irina) to fix this problem.
 
  Thanks for the report,
  Bogdan
 
  Jai Rangi wrote:
   Not sure if this this the right place for this post. May
 be I should
   post it on developers mailing list.  Please suggest.
  
   Just installed opensip1.6 with Mysql, drouting and permissions
  module.
   Did not take long to get it configure and get it going.
  Documentations

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Issue with permission module in opensip 1.6

2009-12-10 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Jai,

I modified the permissions module so that now any invalid db entry from 
the address table is skipped.
I committed the change on trunk and also on the 1.6 branch.

About the other issue you have found, what does the log say?



Regards,
Irina Stanescu


Jai Rangi wrote:
 Bogda,
 Wow that was quick. Thank you,

 I found one more issue,
 I have this entry in address table
 944   0   65.211.120.237  32  0   any ^sip:.*$/NULL/  
 0   some 
 descriptiond


 Here is a check in my route block
  if (check_source_address(0,$avp(i:9))) {
t_rely();
 } else {
   xlog(Monitor Request not from trusted source from $fu to $ru from 
 IP $si );
sl_send_reply(403, Forbidden, we dont trust you);
 }

 ../../sbin/opensipsctl fifo address_dump | grep 65.211.120.237

 12 65.211.120.237,0, 0, 0, ^sip:.*$, NULL

 I always get 403.
 Is there a limit in address table.

 -Jai


 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
 bog...@voice-system.ro mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro wrote:

 Hi Jai,

 I think you are correct - the permission table should also be more
 permissive when comes to the errors and skip bogus entries. I will ask
 the maintainer (Irina) to fix this problem.

 Thanks for the report,
 Bogdan

 Jai Rangi wrote:
  Not sure if this this the right place for this post. May be I should
  post it on developers mailing list.  Please suggest.
 
  Just installed opensip1.6 with Mysql, drouting and permissions
 module.
  Did not take long to get it configure and get it going.
 Documentations
  is wonderful.
  While testing I noticed that,
 
  1. If there is any invalid entry in dr_routing tables, and I reload
  the dr_routing it spit the error for the mistyped/wrong entry and
  loads rest of the valid entries. Same thing with startup.
 Opensip will
  start up just fine even if there are some invalid rules in the table
  and throws the error with ruleid.
 
  2. On the other hand address table does not work that way. If
 there is
  any space (Typo) in the IP address, opensip wont start and wont
 reload
  the address table.
  I have to put the valid IP address, there is not option for dynamic
  domain names. (For people who does not have static IP). Not only
 that
  it does not even tell which IP has a problem that makes it even
 harder
  to debug when you have thousands of IPs in the trusted tables.
 
  I was wondering if there is a work around for this. I would like
  opensip to startup (or successful address_reload) with all the valid
  entries and throw an error for invalid entries. Also having the
  ability to add an domain would be nice.
 
  Any thoughts??
 
  -Jai
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Users mailing list
  Users@lists.opensips.org mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org
  http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 


 --
 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
 www.voice-system.ro http://www.voice-system.ro


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


 

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
   


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Help with group radius errors please

2009-12-09 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Brian,

When the group_radius module was integrated into group, a debug 
print message accidentally became an error print message .
So your hunch was correct, the Failure was actually the result for the 
query, not an actual error.
I committed the fix on trunk and also the 1.6 branch. Please update and 
let me know if there are any other problems.


Regards,

Irina Stanescu

opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote:
 Hello List,

 On tues., dec 08, 2009, opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote:
   
 In my config file I have (a few times):

# check if user is suspended
if (aaa_is_user_in(From, suspended)) {
send_reply(403, Forbidden);
exit;
}

 ...and I see in the log:

Dec 08 23:03:47 name.host.tld error opensips[14400]: 
 ERROR:group:aaa_is_user_in: Failure

 I'm using:

  Radiusclient-ng 0.5.6
  Freeradius 2.1.3
  OpenSIPS 1.6.0 with TLS

 
 ...on Solaris 11 x86 (nv-b91).

   
 I'm trying to migrate from 1.3.X to 1.6.0, but don't see what I'm
 doing wrong. Any ideas?

 
 Can it be that 'ERROR' and 'Failure' in the log file describe the
 result of the aaa_is_user_in query instead of its exit status? I
 can't imagine it, but maybe the module writer decided that this
 function reports errors when it simply finds no user in the group?

 Thanks,
 Brian

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

   


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS with FreeRadius

2009-11-25 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Saeed,

Did you load the aaa_radius module?

Regards,
Irina Stanescu

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Saeed Akhtar saeedakhtar@gmail.comwrote:


 hi all,

 i'm trying to connect OpenSIPS with FreeRadius on Ubuntu Server 9.04. I've
 installed radius client and free radius server and then opensips. and I've
 following error lines when i run opensips.

 DBG:core:find_*mod_*export: aaa_*bind_*api in module aaa_radius not
 found

 ERROR:core:aaa_prot: aaa_radius has no bind api function

 ERROR:acc:init*acc*aaa: AAA protocol bind failure

 ERROR:acc:mod_init:failed to init radius

 ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module acc

 ERROR:core:main: error while initializeing modules
 Can someone please help me to resolve this issue


 Regards,

 Saeed Akhtar


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS with FreeRadius

2009-11-25 Thread Irina Stanescu
You have to load the aaa_radius module because it provides an implementation
for the aaa api used by several other modules.
You did not find the aaa_radius.so because the aaa_radius module is not
compiled by default.
You have to compile it yourself ( using make modules
modules=modules/aaa_radius ).


Regards,

Irina Stanescu

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Saeed Akhtar saeedakhtar@gmail.comwrote:


 Hi,

 Thanks for your reply. First time I tried to load aaa_radius module. I used
 following command:
 loadmodule aaa_radius.so
 and it gave me error:
 ERROR:core:yyparse: module 'aaa_radius.so' not found in
 '/usr/local/lib/opensips/modules/'

 So i thought that may be aaa_radius module is not exactly a module to
 load seperatly in opensips. because i couldn't find aaa_radius.so file in my
 modules folder.
 Now i think i've done some terribly wrong in installing OpenSIPS with
 radius access. Can you please help me out to correct it.

 Regards,

 Saeed Akhtar




 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Irina Stanescu ironmi...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Saeed,

 Did you load the aaa_radius module?

 Regards,
 Irina Stanescu

 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Saeed Akhtar 
 saeedakhtar@gmail.comwrote:


 hi all,

 i'm trying to connect OpenSIPS with FreeRadius on Ubuntu Server 9.04.
 I've installed radius client and free radius server and then opensips. and
 I've following error lines when i run opensips.

 DBG:core:find_*mod_*export: aaa_*bind_*api in module aaa_radius not
 found

 ERROR:core:aaa_prot: aaa_radius has no bind api function

 ERROR:acc:init*acc*aaa: AAA protocol bind failure

 ERROR:acc:mod_init:failed to init radius

 ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module acc

 ERROR:core:main: error while initializeing modules
 Can someone please help me to resolve this issue


 Regards,

 Saeed Akhtar


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS with FreeRadius

2009-11-25 Thread Irina Stanescu
I recommend you to read the documentation of the auth_aaa module
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/auth_aaa.html because you
are not using the aaa_www_authorize function correctly (the realm parameter
is usually the domain of the host the server is running on).

To find the cause of the seg fault, i need to have a full backtrace from the
core dump.

Regards,
Irina Stanescu

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Saeed Akhtar saeedakhtar@gmail.comwrote:


 Thank you. Now aaa_radius module is there and I've added it in
 configuration file. But now I have a new error.  It says:
 Nov 25 17:41:06 [30313] ERROR:aaa_radius:mod_init: radius configuration
 file not set
 Nov 25 17:41:06 [30313] ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module
 aaa_radius
 Nov 25 17:41:06 [30313] ERROR:core:main: error while initializing modules

 So I added:
 modparam(aaa_radius, radius_config,
 /etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf)
 (ref: http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutRadius)

 and it removed the error.


 But another problem now:
 I added
 if (!aaa_www_authorize(opensips.org)) {
 www_challenge(opensips.org, 1);
 };
 in my configuration files.  Then I ran freeradius and opensips and used
 xlite sip phone to connect to my test server.
 I can see my freeradius that it authenticated my request but my opensips
 just closed with this messages in end:

 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: to body [testdig
 sip:test...@192.168.2.18 sip%3atest...@192.168.2.18
 ]
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:uri:has_totag: no totag
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=4000
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: cseq CSeq: 1 REGISTER
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=0
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:auth:pre_auth: credentials with given realm not
 found
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:auth:reserve_nonce_index: second= 22,
 sec_monit= -1, index= 6
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:auth:build_auth_hf: nonce index= 6
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:auth:build_auth_hf: 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest
 realm=opensips.org,
 nonce=4b0d33090006867ba8b2cfc8135a697ac20566d6e7e6, qop=auth
 '
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:check_ip_address: params 192.168.2.12,
 192.168.2.12, 0
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:receive_msg: cleaning up
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_msg: SIP Request:
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_msg: method: REGISTER
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_msg: uri: sip:192.168.2.18
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_msg: version: SIP/2.0
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 232,
 branch = z9hG4bK-d8754z-08647909f42cfa04-1---d8754z-; state=6
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 235,
 rport = n/a; state=17
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_via: end of header reached, state=5
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:receive_msg: After parse_msg...
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:receive_msg: preparing to run routing
 scripts...
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=100
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=8
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_to: end of header reached, state=10
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_to: display={testdig}, ruri={
 sip:test...@192.168.2.18 sip%3atest...@192.168.2.18}
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: To [37]; uri=[
 sip:test...@192.168.2.18 sip%3atest...@192.168.2.18]
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: to body [testdig
 sip:test...@192.168.2.18 sip%3atest...@192.168.2.18
 ]
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:uri:has_totag: no totag
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=4000
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:core:get_hdr_field: cseq CSeq: 2 REGISTER
 Nov 25 18:36:43 [6494] DBG:auth:check_nonce: comparing
 [4b0d33090006867ba8b2cfc8135a697ac20566d6e7e6] and
 [4b0d33090006867ba8b2cfc8135a697ac20566d6e7e6]
 Segmentation fault (core dumped)


 1 thing i didn't include in my freeradius users file is:

 SIP-AVP = sems:ann-account_locked,

 and i didn't include following lines in opensips config file too.

 if (!aaa_proxy_authorize()) { # Realm and URI user will be
 auto-generated
 proxy_challenge(, 1);
 };

 if (!aaa_proxy_authorize($pd, $pU)) { # Realm and URI user are taken
 proxy_challenge($pd, 1); # from P-Preferred-Identity
 };

 because it generated some error. (I can't exactly remember it now).

 Please someone tell me what i did wrong.

 Regards,

 Saeed Akhtar




 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Irina Stanescu ironmi...@gmail.comwrote

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] AAA sets with radius_send_acct()

2009-10-28 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Jeff,

Actually, you are getting that error because the brackets are not properly
closed. You missed one ')' for sets1.
I see nothing wrong other than that.

The radius_send_acct function makes acc_aaa_request used with aaa_extra some
how redundant.

Regards,
Irina Stanescu


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Alex Massover a...@jajah.com wrote:

 Hi!

 You're mixing 2 different functions from 2 different modules:

 aaa_radius::radius_send_acct() which takes parameters from
 modparam(aaa_radius,sets
 and
 acc::acc_aaa_request() which takes parameters from modparam(acc,
 aaa_extra,

 Probably you need to use acc_aaa_request() (and not radius_send_acct())
 inside a local route and it will take a parameters from aaa_extra.

 --
 Best Regards,
 Alex Massover
 VoIP RD TL
 Jajah Inc.
  -Original Message-
  From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-
  boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pyle
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:05 AM
  To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
  Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] AAA sets with radius_send_acct()
 
  Hello,
 
  I am attempting to make use of radius_send_acct() inside local_route to
  account for BYEs generated by the dialog module.  I have a question
  about
  the set it references.
 
  The documentation does a good job explaining how to create a set.  It
  doesn't say whether radius_send_acct() uses the existing aaa_extra
  module
  parameter definitions.
 
  I already have the following defined:
 
  modparam(acc, aaa_extra, User-Name=$Au; \
Calling-Station-Id=$fu; \
Called-Station-Id=$tu; \
Sip-Translated-Request-URI=$ru; \
Sip-RPid=$avp(s:rpid); \
Source-IP=$si; \
Source-Port=$sp; \
SIP-Proxy-IP=$Ri; \
Canonical-URI=$avp(s:can_uri); \
Billing-Party=$avp(s:billing_party); \
Divert-Reason=$avp(s:divert_reason); \
User-Agent=$hdr(user-agent); \
Contact=$hdr(contact); \
Event=$hdr(event); \
ENUM-TLD=$avp(s:enum_tld))
 
  Would I need to reference this all again for the new set to be used
  with
  radius_send_acct()?  Or, do I create a mostly empty set and all this
  aaa_extra will be there already?
 
 
  - Jeff
 
 
  ___
  Users mailing list
  Users@lists.opensips.org
  http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
  This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
 


 This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] aaa_radius and ipaddr type

2009-10-26 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Alex,

The type for the Login-IP-Host attribute is ipaddr, which means 4 octets in
network byte order.
I hope this helps.

Regards,

Irina Stanescu

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Alex Massover a...@jajah.com wrote:

  Hi!



 I wonder is it possible to send IP address with
 radius_send_auth(set1,set2). For example I want to send Login-IP-Host inside
 set1.

 Login-IP-Host is ipaddr type, configured in the dictionary like this:

 ATTRIBUTE   Login-IP-Host   14  ipaddr

 Let’s say I have the desired value in $avp(s:ip) like a string. If I put
 inside set1 like this: Login-IP-Host=$avp(s:ip), I get a wrong value in the
 radius message. If I convert it to int I also get a wrong value.



 Is there a way to correctly pass ipaddr radius attribute with aaa_radius?



 --

 Best Regards,

 Alex Massover

 VoIP RD TL

 Jajah Inc.


 This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] check_address() causes crash

2009-10-15 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello Jeff,
I managed to get a core dump only when the second parameter of the
check_address is empty.
I added a check for that (rev. 6272), so it shouldn't crash anymore.

Also, you can use $rd as the second parameter only if the domain name is
an ip address, otherwise it won't work.

Thanks!

Irina Stanescu

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jeff Pyle jp...@fidelityvoice.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I have the following:

if (check_address(10, $rd, 0, $proto)) {
   setflag(7);
}

 In many cases, and I can't seem to determine what those cases are, this
 causes the system to run very slowly for about 30 seconds, and then
 Opensips
 exits.

 I need to know if the source or destination IP addresses fall into one of
 the blocks included in group 10 of the address table.
 check_source_address() works great with Irina's fix; this is the
 destination
 half.  It tanks the system.

 On the doc page it says:
  Transport protocol is either ANY or any valid transport protocol value:
 UDP, TCP, TLS, and SCTP.

 Is case relevant?  Is lowercase just as valid as the uppercase examples?



 - Jeff


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] check_source_address() failures

2009-10-14 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi Jeff,
There was a problem with the check_address_source function. It has been
fixed starting with rev 6262. Please update and let me know if you find any
other problems.

Thank you!

Irina Stanescu

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Brad Bendy brad.be...@benganetworks.comwrote:

 I know on mine I had to set port to 5060 (5068 in your case) or whatever
 you want, otherwise it would not work for me.

 Im sure you can use a * for any port number as well, but I have not
 tried that.

 Jeff Pyle wrote:
  Hello,
 
  A request arrives at Opensips 1.6 from address 175.88.228.19:5068 on
 UDP.
  The address table contains:
 
 
 ++-+--+--+--+---+--+--+
  | id | grp | ip   | mask | port | proto | pattern  | context_info
 |
 
 ++-+--+--+--+---+--+--+
  | 38 |  10 | 175.88.228.0 |   24 |0 | udp   | ^sip:.*$ | src_test
 |
 
 ++-+--+--+--+---+--+--+
 
  I would expect if(check_source_address(10)) to succeed, yet it does
 not.
  Any thoughts?
 
  I'm using check_source_address() elsewhere in my config to emulate the
 old
  allow_trusted, and that works just fine.
 
 
  Thanks,
  Jeff
 
 
  ___
  Users mailing list
  Users@lists.opensips.org
  http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] permissions module since [6150]

2009-09-22 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello Konstantin,

Try:
if (!check_source_address()) {
if (!proxy_authorize(, subscriber)) {

}
}

Don't forget to update your database to use the new schema for the address
table.
More information:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/permissions.html



Irina Stanescu


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Konstantin Cherkasov c...@imarto.netwrote:

 Hi All!

 http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensips?view=revrevision=6150

 Since revision 6150 in permissions module there is not allow_trusted()
 function.

 How can I change my config to save functionality of allow_trusted?

 if(!allow_trusted()) {
 if (!proxy_authorize(, subscriber)) {
 



 --
  Konstantin Cherkasov


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Access to Radius AVP's and radius_extra parameter

2009-09-08 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello John,

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:43 PM, John Quick john.qu...@smartvox.co.ukwrote:

 I have been experimenting with Radius authentication on an older version of
 OpenSIPS (actually my test
 unit has OpenSER v1.3.2, but I don't think it will be much different to
 1.5.x for this). I want to be
 able to read several values returned from the Radius server. Is this what
 the modparam radius_extra
 is for? Or is it to allow extra values to be passed to the Radius server
 for accounting?


The radius_extra parameter only allows you to send extra values to the
Radius server, to be logged for accounting. You cannot fetch any value from
an accounting reply.



 My Radius server is configured to return three AVP's like this:
 Reply-Message = Opensips rules!,
 Sip-RPId = sip:123...@mysip.com sip%3a123...@mysip.com,
 SIP-AVP = #14:012...@mynumber.biz 14%3a012...@mynumber.biz

 Using Wireshark, I can see that the values are all being sent back to the
 OpenSIPS server, but I have
 only had success in accessing the value in SIP-AVP. Is there a trick to
 this or are those other values
 unavailable in the OpenSIPS script?

 Is the functionality I'm looking for only available in the new AAA modules?


The functionality you are looking for is provided by the new AAA_RADIUS
module. Using the functions exported by this module you can yield directly
from the script any type of Radius query and also inspect replies for
certain attributes.
For more information, check out the
tutorialhttp://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutRadiusand the
documentationhttp://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/aaa_radius.html
 .
If you have any other uncertainties, please let me know. Any other
suggestions are welcome as well.



 John Quick
 Smartvox Limited
 Web: www.smartvox.co.uk

 Smartvox is a limited company, registered in England and Wales, number
 5005263.
 Registered office: Spectrum House, Dunstable Road, Redbourn, St.Albans,
 Herts AL3 7PR

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



Best regards,
Irina Stanescu
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [NEW] AAA API and Radius enhancement

2009-09-03 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hi,

A new tutorial is available to explain how to install and configure RADIUS
server and client and how to use the ported modules and the new AAA_RADIUS
module.
The tutorial can be found
herehttp://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTutRadius .
I hope you will find it useful.

Regards,
Irina Stanescu

Irina Stanescu wrote:

 The following new features have been added to OpenSIPS:


 1. Generic AAA API


 The AAA API represents a set of generic callbacks and structures needed

 for AAA operations.


 The purpose of the API is to move all the AAA specific (Radius)
 implementations

 in a single module. The AAA API will hide the implementations details from
 the

 modules that want to use AAA support, making it easier to use.


 Currently, only one module implements the AAA API - aaa_radius, offering
 Radius

 support.


 Because both standardized AAA protocols, Radius and Diameter, use lists of

 attribute-value pairs, the API is designed based on attribute-value pairs,
 as well.


 One of the advantages of using the API is that any module that wishes to do

 AAA operations does not depend on a certain protocol implementation,
 therefore

 it is not linked with a certain AAA library.


 Hence, any module that was previously using Radius, for example, is not

 linked with the radiusclient library any more, which is obviously an
 advantage,

 especially when the module uses more than one API (DB, AAA, etc).


 The AAA protocol to be used by a module is specified from the script using
 a

 so called aaa_url that encodes the protocol used and other useful
 information

 depending on the protocol.


 The way the generic AAA API is used makes it very similar to the generic

 database API.


 2. The ability to make custom Radius requests directly from the script


 This feature is very useful because of its flexibility. Basically, any type

 of Radius queries can be yielded directly from the script, and also,
 Radius

 replies can be inspected for certain attributes.


 3. Radius implementation for the generic AAA API


 The handling of Radius AVP SIP-AVP (used for fetching variables from the

 Radius server) was integrated in this module. All SIP-AVPs are
 automatically

 and transparently handled by the module, so that this functionality is by
 default

 available for all the modules that use Radius.



 Due to the fact that the modules that were previously using Radius were
 ported

 to the generic AAA API, the following changes have been made:

 - auth_radius became auth_aaa

 - group_radius was merged with group

 - uri_radius was merged with uri
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] error regarding group

2009-09-02 Thread Irina Stanescu
Hello Ashwini,
When have you last updated your trunk version? There were a problem with
db_is_user_in but it was fixed starting with revision 6034.

Regards,

Irina

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, ASHWINI NAIDU ashwini.na...@gmail.comwrote:

 hi all,

 I am trying to use the db_is_user_in function for checking whether the
 user is in the group. but i see the following error

 * ERROR:group:is_user_in: Invalid parameter grp*

 The opensips installed is from the trunk.
 --
 Thanking You,
 Ashwini BR Naidu

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


[OpenSIPS-Users] [NEW] AAA API and Radius enhancement

2009-08-18 Thread Irina Stanescu
The following new features have been added to OpenSIPS:

1. Generic AAA API

The AAA API represents a set of generic callbacks and structures needed
for AAA operations.

The purpose of the API is to move all the AAA specific (Radius)
implementations
in a single module. The AAA API will hide the implementations details from
the
modules that want to use AAA support, making it easier to use.

Currently, only one module implements the AAA API - aaa_radius, offering
Radius
support.

Because both standardized AAA protocols, Radius and Diameter, use lists of
attribute-value pairs, the API is designed based on attribute-value pairs,
as well.

One of the advantages of using the API is that any module that wishes to do
AAA operations does not depend on a certain protocol implementation,
therefore
it is not linked with a certain AAA library.

Hence, any module that was previously using Radius, for example, is not
linked with the radiusclient library any more, which is obviously an
advantage,
especially when the module uses more than one API (DB, AAA, etc).

The AAA protocol to be used by a module is specified from the script using a

so called aaa_url that encodes the protocol used and other useful
information
depending on the protocol.

The way the generic AAA API is used makes it very similar to the generic
database API.

2. The ability to make custom Radius requests directly from the script

This feature is very useful because of its flexibility. Basically, any type
of Radius queries can be yielded directly from the script, and also, Radius
replies can be inspected for certain attributes.

3. Radius implementation for the generic AAA API

The handling of Radius AVP SIP-AVP (used for fetching variables from the
Radius server) was integrated in this module. All SIP-AVPs are automatically
and transparently handled by the module, so that this functionality is by
default
available for all the modules that use Radius.


Due to the fact that the modules that were previously using Radius were
ported
to the generic AAA API, the following changes have been made:
- auth_radius became auth_aaa
- group_radius was merged with group
- uri_radius was merged with uri
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users