Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balancer Probing Question

2024-04-18 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
Not really. The LB module uses internal unique ids for all the LB 
destinations it manages. So the probing replies will search back the LB 
destination based on this ID -> no chance to mismatch.


Regards.

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  https://www.opensips-solutions.com
  https://www.siphub.com

On 16.04.2024 10:45, Callum Guy via Users wrote:
If the backend servers are both the same instance then this seems to 
be the correct behaviour?


I believe the probing is supposed to be a simple SIP response 
healthcheck which applies to the destination globally (i.e. 1.2.3.4 is 
offline), the groups are just a way of splitting up resources 
logically for load balancing purposes.


On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 08:31, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
 wrote:


Hi,

What OpenSIPS version you have? And as I understand, as
configuration, you do permanent probing to the destinations and
the disabling happens because of this probing ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
   https://www.siphub.com

On 12.04.2024 05:41, Alexander Perkins wrote:

Hi.  I have an interesting issue.  We have two OpenSIPS servers
with load balancer (with two different group IDs in the lb table)
and we have probing set correctly and we are using the
event, E_LOAD_BALANCER_STATUS, to capture changes to servers that
were probed.  But we noticed that we have the same server URI
listed in the lb table, but with two different group IDs, if one
of the OpenSIPS servers probes that URI and it does not return,
then lb disables both groups.  I'd expect it to only disable one
group.

My question is how can we tell the LB module to disable the IP,
but also look for the groupID.  For example, I have a printout of
lb_list below.

"uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060 ", "id": 27,
"group": 12,"enabled": "no", "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources":
[ { "name": "vz12", "max": 600, "load": 0 } ], "attrs": "0"

AND
{ "uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060 ", "id": 29,
"group": 13,"enabled": "no", "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources":
[ { "name": "vz13", "max": 600, "load": 0 } ], "attrs": "0" },

Thank you,
Alex

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




*^0333 332   | x-on.co.uk   | **^  | 
**^Practice Index Reviews  *


*Our new office address: 22 Riduna Park, Melton IP12 1QT.*

X-on is a trading name of X-on Health Ltd a limited company registered 
in England and Wales.
Registered Office : Glebe Farm, Down Street, Dummer, Basingstoke, 
Hampshire, England RG25 2AD. Company Registration No. 2578478.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the 
addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify X-on immediately on +44(0)333 332  and delete the
message from your computer. If you are not a named addressee you must 
not use, disclose, disseminate, distribute, copy, print or reply to 
this email. Views or opinions expressed by an individual
within this email may not necessarily reflect the views of X-on or its 
associated companies. Although X-on routinely screens for viruses, 
addressees should scan this email and any attachments
for viruses. X-on makes no representation or warranty as to the 
absence of viruses in this email or any attachments.



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balancer Probing Question

2024-04-16 Thread Callum Guy via Users 
If the backend servers are both the same instance then this seems to be the
correct behaviour?

I believe the probing is supposed to be a simple SIP response healthcheck
which applies to the destination globally (i.e. 1.2.3.4 is offline), the
groups are just a way of splitting up resources logically for load
balancing purposes.

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 08:31, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What OpenSIPS version you have? And as I understand, as configuration, you
> do permanent probing to the destinations and the disabling happens because
> of this probing ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>   https://www.siphub.com
>
> On 12.04.2024 05:41, Alexander Perkins wrote:
>
> Hi.  I have an interesting issue.  We have two OpenSIPS servers with load
> balancer (with two different group IDs in the lb table) and we have probing
> set correctly and we are using the event, E_LOAD_BALANCER_STATUS, to
> capture changes to servers that were probed.  But we noticed that we have
> the same server URI listed in the lb table, but with two different group
> IDs, if one of the OpenSIPS servers probes that URI and it does not return,
> then lb disables both groups.  I'd expect it to only disable one group.
>
> My question is how can we tell the LB module to disable the IP, but also
> look for the groupID.  For example, I have a printout of lb_list below.
>
> "uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060", "id": 27, "group": 12, "enabled": "no",
> "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": "vz12", "max": 600, "load":
> 0 } ], "attrs": "0"
>
> AND
> { "uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060", "id": 29, "group": 13, "enabled": "no",
> "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": "vz13", "max": 600, "load":
> 0 } ], "attrs": "0" },
>
> Thank you,
> Alex
>
> ___
> Users mailing 
> listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

-- 






*0333 332   |  x-on.co.uk   | **  |  
**Practice Index Reviews *

*Our new 
office address: 22 Riduna Park, Melton IP12 1QT.*

X-on
is a trading name 
of X-on Health Ltd a limited company registered in
England and Wales.

Registered Office : Glebe Farm, Down Street, Dummer, Basingstoke, 
Hampshire, England RG25 2AD. Company Registration No. 2578478.

The 
information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s)
only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify X-on immediately 
on +44(0)333 332  and delete the
message from your computer. If you are 
not a named addressee you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, distribute, 
copy, print or reply to this email. Views
or opinions expressed by an 
individual
within this email may not necessarily
reflect the views of X-on 
or its associated companies. Although X-on routinely
screens for viruses, 
addressees should scan this email and any attachments
for
viruses. X-on 
makes no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses
in this 
email or any attachments.








___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balancer Probing Question

2024-04-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 

Hi,

What OpenSIPS version you have? And as I understand, as configuration, 
you do permanent probing to the destinations and the disabling happens 
because of this probing ?


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  https://www.opensips-solutions.com
  https://www.siphub.com

On 12.04.2024 05:41, Alexander Perkins wrote:
Hi.  I have an interesting issue.  We have two OpenSIPS servers with 
load balancer (with two different group IDs in the lb table) and we 
have probing set correctly and we are using the 
event, E_LOAD_BALANCER_STATUS, to capture changes to servers that were 
probed.  But we noticed that we have the same server URI listed in the 
lb table, but with two different group IDs, if one of the OpenSIPS 
servers probes that URI and it does not return, then lb disables both 
groups.  I'd expect it to only disable one group.


My question is how can we tell the LB module to disable the IP, but 
also look for the groupID.  For example, I have a printout of lb_list 
below.


"uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060 ", "id": 27, "group": 
12,"enabled": "no", "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": 
"vz12", "max": 600, "load": 0 } ], "attrs": "0"


AND
{ "uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060 ", "id": 29, "group": 
13,"enabled": "no", "auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": 
"vz13", "max": 600, "load": 0 } ], "attrs": "0" },


Thank you,
Alex

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balancer Probing Question

2024-04-11 Thread Alexander Perkins 
Hi.  I have an interesting issue.  We have two OpenSIPS servers with load
balancer (with two different group IDs in the lb table) and we have probing
set correctly and we are using the event, E_LOAD_BALANCER_STATUS, to
capture changes to servers that were probed.  But we noticed that we have
the same server URI listed in the lb table, but with two different group
IDs, if one of the OpenSIPS servers probes that URI and it does not return,
then lb disables both groups.  I'd expect it to only disable one group.

My question is how can we tell the LB module to disable the IP, but also
look for the groupID.  For example, I have a printout of lb_list below.

"uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060", "id": 27, "group": 12, "enabled": "no",
"auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": "vz12", "max": 600, "load":
0 } ], "attrs": "0"

AND
{ "uri": "sip:1.2.3.4:5060", "id": 29, "group": 13, "enabled": "no",
"auto-reenable": "on", "Resources": [ { "name": "vz13", "max": 600, "load":
0 } ], "attrs": "0" },

Thank you,
Alex
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users