Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread H Yavari
Hi,
This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS is 
high? What about RTPproxy?
For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for 
media handling?

Best Regards,
H.Yavari



 

Wait wait wait

Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?

Certainly this means two?



On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

Adrian


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread ag
You would need a much better sense of humour to be able to scale up :-)

Adrian

On 06 Mar 2014, at 08:50, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS 
 is high? What about RTPproxy?
 For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for 
 media handling?
 
 Best Regards,
 H.Yavari
 
 
 Wait wait wait
 
 Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?
 
 Certainly this means two?
 
 
 On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:
 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability
 
 Adrian
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread H Yavari
So what is this means Adrian???



 


You would need a much better sense of humour to be able to scale up :-)

Adrian


On 06 Mar 2014, at 08:50, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

Hi,
This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS is 
high? What about RTPproxy?
For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for 
media handling?


Best Regards,
H.Yavari




 

Wait wait wait


Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?


Certainly this means two?



On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

Adrian


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread Dani Popa
Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced  even till today that it can handle at
least one call! Still waiting!


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that
 CPS is high? What about RTPproxy?
 For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best
 for media handling?

 Best Regards,
 H.Yavari

   --

 Wait wait wait

 Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or
 two?

 Certainly this means two?


 On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

 Adrian


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




-- 
Dani Popa
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread H Yavari
Please clarify handle at least one call ? what is this means? 



 


Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced  even till today that it can handle at least 
one call! Still waiting!



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

Hi,
This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS is 
high? What about RTPproxy?
For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for 
media handling?


Best Regards,
H.Yavari




 

Wait wait wait


Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?


Certainly this means two?



On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

Adrian


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




-- 
Dani Popa ___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread ag
Hi H.

The FAQ is suppose to be humorous as there is no good absolute answer for what 
is the exact scalability of MediaProxy.

If it is not fun to you please accept my apologies, it is not meant to offend 
anybody.

Adrian

On 06 Mar 2014, at 17:34, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

 Please clarify handle at least one call ? what is this means? 
 
 
 Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced  even till today that it can handle at least 
 one call! Still waiting!
 
 
 On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS 
 is high? What about RTPproxy?
 For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for 
 media handling?
 
 Best Regards,
 H.Yavari
 
 
 Wait wait wait
 
 Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?
 
 Certainly this means two?
 
 
 On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:
 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability
 
 Adrian
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Dani Popa
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-06 Thread Brett Nemeroff
H,
I'm sure the FAQ was a joke.. The reason for all the joking around is that
there is no way to answer this question. It's the reason for the ridiculous
answer to begin with.

In old-school hardware based telephony, you had these expensive DSPs. Each
DSP gave you a specific number of channels that you could support. No more
than that. With software based DSP, your maximum capacity has to do with
the specific performance of your server. Because of the wide variety of
hardware configurations available out there, there is no way to predict how
many channels can be supported. The number of processors, the kind of
processors, the amount of memory and speed of the memory, the kind of
motherboard and it's speed, the kernel you are running, other processes on
the same server, potential virtualization, etc, etc, etc,.. All of these
factors will heavily influence the max number of ports you can run.

The real answer here is. it can likely handle one port. It can probably
handle two.. If you want it to do more than that, you'll need to fire it up
and hit it hard and see where it breaks.

All that being said, it'd be great for people to publish their pushing it
to it's limits stories, but I doubt anyone will share that. :)

Good luck!
-Brett



On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:34 PM, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

 Please clarify handle at least one call ? what is this means?

   --

 Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced  even till today that it can handle at
 least one call! Still waiting!


 On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari hyav...@rocketmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
 This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that
 CPS is high? What about RTPproxy?
 For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best
 for media handling?

 Best Regards,
 H.Yavari

   --

 Wait wait wait

 Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or
 two?

 Certainly this means two?


 On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

 Adrian


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




 --
 Dani Popa



 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-05 Thread Adrian Georgescu
Some people reportedly saw at least two calls, but they had a different sense 
of humor.

--
Adrian

 On 04 Mar 2014, at 14:27, david da...@styleflare.com wrote:
 
 Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call, regardless of the 
 hardware resources available providing no other program competes with the 
 same resources on that machine. Bigger scalability can be achieved by adding 
 more hardware.
 
 ???
 
 Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call?
 
 On 3/4/14 11:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:
 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability
 
 Adrian
 
 
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-05 Thread Dani Popa
truly, i saw it, it can handle it least one call!


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Adrian Georgescu a...@ag-projects.comwrote:

 Some people reportedly saw at least two calls, but they had a different
 sense of humor.

 --
 Adrian

 On 04 Mar 2014, at 14:27, david da...@styleflare.com wrote:

 Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call, regardless of the
 hardware resources available providing no other program competes with the
 same resources on that machine. Bigger scalability can be achieved by
 adding more hardware.

 ???

 Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call?

 On 3/4/14 11:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

 Adrian




 ___
 Users mailing 
 listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




-- 
Dani Popa
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-05 Thread Brett Nemeroff
Wait wait wait

Can you please clarify.. does one simultaneous call mean one call, or two?

Certainly this means two?


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

 http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

 Adrian


 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opensips.org
 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


[OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-04 Thread ag
http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

Adrian



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-04 Thread david
Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call, regardless of the 
hardware resources available providing no other program competes with 
the same resources on that machine. Bigger scalability can be achieved 
by adding more hardware.


???

Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call?

On 3/4/14 11:15 AM, a...@ag-projects.com wrote:

http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability

Adrian



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users