Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: RFC3261 transaction matching failed error for the second 401 Unauthorized - Challenging the UE

2014-10-30 Thread Kaan Dandin 
Hi Bogdan,

With the below workaround,  I have managed to make load balancing with Opensips 
dispather module . I am using record_route for INVITE message. 
Thanks a lot for your support.
Kind regards,
Kaan


Related part of Opensips script

...

else if (is_method("INVITE")) {
#load_balance("1","pstn");
xlog("xlog_initialinvite");
if($si=="192.168.2.11") {

ds_select_dst("1","1");
}
record_route();
if(!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
xlog("xlog_invitereplyerror");
}
exit;


...

if (loose_route()) {
xlog("xlog_loose_route");
if($si=="192.168.2.11") {
t_relay();
exit;
}
else if($si=="192.168.2.3" or $si=="192.168.2.5" ) {
$du = "sip:192.168.2.11:4060";
append_branch();
t_relay();
exit;
}
.
ims_bench output

 1-   ims_uac-0-   Scenario Screen- [1-9]: Change Screen - 6663
  Call-rate(length) Port   Total-time  Total-calls  Remote-host
   0.0(0 ms)/1.000s   5060  65.32 s   65  192.168.2.141:4060(UDP)
 
  0 new calls during 0.287 s period  1 ms scheduler resolution
  0 calls (limit 0)  Peak was 32 calls, after 45 s
  0 Running, 1 Paused, 1 Woken up, 0 Sync
  0 out-of-call msg (discarded)
  0 open sockets
 
 Messages  Retrans   Timeout   Unexpected-Msg
 0[ NOP ]   
 1[ SENDRMT ] 11   
 2[ RECVRMT ] 11  0
 3[ SYNC ]11   
 
 4 INVITE --> B1,2,4  110 0
 5100 <-- 110   0
 6180 <-- 110   0
 7183 <-- 0 0   0
 8200 <-- 110   0
 9ACK --> 110
10180 <-- 0 0   0
11  Pause [Exp(2:00)] 110
12BYE --> B3  110 0
13180 <-- 0 0   0
14200 <-- E3,4110   0
 
15[ RECVRMT ] 11  0
-- Test Terminated 
 
 1-   ims_uac-0-  Statistics Screen   - [1-9]: Change Screen - 6663
  Start Time | 2014-10-20 11:17:42  
  Last Reset Time| 2014-10-20 11:18:34  
  Current Time   | 2014-10-20 11:18:34  
-+---+--
  Counter Name   | Periodic value| Cumulative value
-+---+--
  Elapsed Time   | 00:00:00:290  | 00:00:51:987 
  Call Rate  |0.000 cps  |0.212 cps 
-+---+--
  Incoming call created  |0  |0 
  OutGoing call created  |0  |   11 
  Total Call created |   |   11 
  Current Call   |0  |  
-+---+--
  Successful call|3  |   11 
  Failed call|0  |0 
-+---+--
  Response Time 1| 00:00:00:000  | 00:00:00:000 
  Response Time 2| 00:00:44:121  | 00:00:55:011 
  Response Time 3| 00:00:00:000  | 00:01:07:341 
  Response Time 4| 00:00:00:000  | 04:08:44:054 
  Response Time 5| 01:14:06:022  | 01:09:59:415 
  Response Time 7| 00:01:01:869  | 00:01:10:633 
  Response Time 8| 00:00:00:000  | 00:01:35:927 
  Response Time 9| 00:00:00:000  | 04:31:24:539 
  Response Time 10   | 01:16:07:446  | 01:15:34:687 
  Response Time 12   | 00:00:00:000

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: RFC3261 transaction matching failed error for the second 401 Unauthorized - Challenging the UE

2014-10-21 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 

Hi Kaan,

I'm glad you managed to fix all your issues and now you have a 
successfully working configuration.


Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 20.10.2014 22:09, Kaan Dandin wrote:

Hi Bogdan,

With the below workaround,  I have managed to make load balancing with 
Opensips dispather module . I am using record_route for INVITE message.

Thanks a lot for your support.
Kind regards,
Kaan


Related part of Opensips script

...

else if (is_method("INVITE")) {
#load_balance("1","pstn");
xlog("xlog_initialinvite");
if($si=="192.168.2.11") {
ds_select_dst("1","1");
}
record_route();
if(!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
xlog("xlog_invitereplyerror");
}
exit;


...

if (loose_route()) {
xlog("xlog_loose_route");
if($si=="192.168.2.11") {
t_relay();
exit;
}
else if($si=="192.168.2.3" or $si=="192.168.2.5" ) {
$du = "sip:192.168.2.11:4060";
append_branch();
t_relay();
exit;
}
.
*ims_bench output*

 1-   ims_uac-0-   Scenario Screen- [1-9]: Change Screen - 6663
  Call-rate(length) Port   Total-time  Total-calls Remote-host
   0.0(0 ms)/1.000s   5060  65.32 s   65 
192.168.2.141:4060(UDP)

  0 new calls during 0.287 s period 1 ms scheduler resolution
  0 calls (limit 0)  Peak was 32 calls, after 45 s
  0 Running, 1 Paused, 1 Woken up, 0 Sync
  0 out-of-call msg (discarded)
  0 open sockets
Messages  Retrans   Timeout   Unexpected-Msg
 0[ NOP ]
 1[ SENDRMT ] 11
 2[ RECVRMT ] 11  0
 3[ SYNC ]11
 4 INVITE --> B1,2,4 110 0
 5100 <-- 11 0   0
 6180 <-- 11 0   0
 7183 <-- 0 0   0
 8200 <-- 11 0   0
 9ACK --> 11 0
10180 <-- 0 0   0
11  Pause [Exp(2:00)] 110
12BYE --> B3  110 0
13180 <-- 0 0   0
14200 <-- E3,411 0   0
15[ RECVRMT ] 11  0
-- Test Terminated 





___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSIPS-Users] YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: RFC3261 transaction matching failed error for the second 401 Unauthorized - Challenging the UE

2014-10-20 Thread Kaan Dandin 
Hi Bogdan, 

Thanks for your support. I am also trying dialog support as an option. 

But I found one workaround for the previous option. I have changed the pcscf 
name of second openims instance which is .5 as pcscf2. 

And added this hostname in /etc/hosts of opensips. 

Now opensips is able to send the messages to correct openims pcscf after dns 
lookup. 

But in the last message of Ok and Ack coming from openims nodes to ims bench I 
am making the routing with t_relay (udp:192.168.2.11:4060) instead of t_relay. 

But this response is not accepted at ims bench it keeps sending Ok and ack 
messages. 

What's the difference between t_relay() and t_relay (udp:192.168.2.11:4060) 
other than defining the destination. 

What's may be reason at ims bench keeps sending the messages. 

Kind regards, 
Kaan



Samsung Mobile tarafından gönderildi

 Orjinal mesaj Kimden: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
 Tarih:17 10 2014  10:31  (GMT+02:00) 
Alıcı: Kaan Dandin ,OpenSIPS users mailling 
list  Cc: Gunes Kurt 
,"Ibrahim Hokelek, (BİLGEM-UEKAE)" 
 Konu: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: Re: YNT: 
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RFC3261 transaction matching failed error for the second 
401 Unauthorized - Challenging the UE 
Kaan, as per my previous email, the problem is in sipp, not in openims.

To get rid of the large set of Route header, I suggest you to use dialog 
support on opensips with topologyhiding.
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/dialog.html#id296413

Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 16.10.2014 21:43, Kaan Dandin wrote:
Hi Bogdan,

I have changed the ims_uac.xml of IMS Bench. Now it includes 
record_route header. But via header in ACK is not having all of the passed 
nodes.

The reason looks, although Open IMS receives all of the passed nodes in  via 
header of 200 OK it received from Open SIPS, it does not include all of them in 
via header  of 200 Ok response sent to OpenSIPS. Therefore ACK from UAC is 
ended now at Open SIPS instead of  Open IMS.

Now I need to troubleshoot OpenIMS configuration.

BR,



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users