Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Which queue are you referring at?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
https://www.siphub.com
On 22.04.2024 09:17, Johan De Clercq wrote:
Goed morning,
How can I then increase opensips’s internal queue size?
Best regards, Johan
Verzonden vanuit Outlook voor iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
*Van:* Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
*Verzonden:* Thursday, April 18, 2024 4:29:41 PM
*Aan:* OpenSIPS users mailling list ; Johan
De Clercq
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
The `drop_requests` statistic is incremented when:
* the request is dropped by a pre-script callback (like B2B when there
is no script execution for certain messages)
* the stateless `forward()` core function failed to send out something.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com <https://www.opensips-solutions.com>
https://www.siphub.com <https://www.siphub.com>
On 18.04.2024 17:19, Johan De Clercq wrote:
No I don't.
what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the
default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default.
Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin <mailto:ben.new...@genesys.com>>:
Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script?
https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13
<https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13>
Ben Newlin
*From: *Users mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>> on behalf of Johan De
Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>
*Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM
*To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>>
*Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
* EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments *
would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I
set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)?
Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq
mailto:jo...@democon.be>>:
would it make sense to recompile with other flags ?
Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP,
PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq
mailto:jo...@democon.be>>:
Guys,
I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children.
The worker load is very low.
UDP queues are on 50 megs.
when i query via the OS
cat /proc/net/udp
sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr
tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops
590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 :
00: 0 0 413684019 2
880074820bc0 0
591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 :
00: 0 0 413766438 2
880465e4a440 0
592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 :
00: 0 0 412035865 2
8803e5a56b80 0
934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 :
00: 0 0 26790 2 88046c054840 0
935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 :
00: 0 0 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0
935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 :
00: 0 0 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0
1972: :D92A : 07 :
00: 0 0 15506 2 88046dce5040 0
5479: :E6DD : 07 :
00: 0 0 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0
12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 :
00: 0 0 20572 2 88086d020800 0
12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 :
00: 0 0 20571 2 88086d020b80 0
13320: :857E : 07 :
00: 100 0 17515 2 8800368ac780 0
15661: :CEA3 0
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Goed morning, How can I then increase opensips’s internal queue size? Best regards, Johan Verzonden vanuit Outlook voor iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> Van: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Verzonden: Thursday, April 18, 2024 4:29:41 PM Aan: OpenSIPS users mailling list ; Johan De Clercq Onderwerp: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. The `drop_requests` statistic is incremented when: * the request is dropped by a pre-script callback (like B2B when there is no script execution for certain messages) * the stateless `forward()` core function failed to send out something. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 18.04.2024 17:19, Johan De Clercq wrote: No I don't. what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin mailto:ben.new...@genesys.com>>: Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin From: Users mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>> on behalf of Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>> Date: Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 => no drops what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I query via the mi interface opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 198107 opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 199157 opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 204116 I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. so 3 questions: - what exactly is drop_request. - do I need to worry about this - how can I make them go lower. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailt
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Bogdan, on the augmenting drop_requests, drop is not used in that script. Neither is forward. Everything is t_relay. There is no b2b. The thing is that we observed drops on udp level. We followed the recommendations of Ovidiu Sas's presentation of last year in Houston: - increase PKG mem - increase SHM mem - increase workers to 24 so that the queue empties faster. - we checked the udp queues on linux level and we saw drops there. => we augmented them to 50 megs (sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=52428800 and sysctl -w net.core.rmem_default=52428800) and the drops on OS level where gone. Also worker and memory load are max 30 %. Hence we thought that we were okay, but still drops on opensips level. Net result was that this node in the system lost all connection with the destination of the loadbalancer although it received keep alive options responses from the loadbalancer destination on its NIC (we could see that in a continuously running tcpdump). => hence it seems that it is opensips's receive buffer that is too small (as I read the description : "Returns the number of requests dropped even before entering the script routing logic.", I thought that this pointed to the receive buffer of opensips). All of this is happening on a physical machine on which two other opensips instances are running also. Interestingly enough the problem is only observed in the instance that handles registrations and invites (1600 REG/ s and 300 INV /s). Therefore we dived a bit deeper and came on this MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 (which is the default udp queue size setting on linux). Could this be related somehow ? Secondly, what would the recommendation be for scaling a system like this ? On 18/04/2024 16:29, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: The `drop_requests` statistic is incremented when: * the request is dropped by a pre-script callback (like B2B when there is no script execution for certain messages) * the stateless `forward()` core function failed to send out something. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 18.04.2024 17:19, Johan De Clercq wrote: No I don't. what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin : Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin *From: *Users on behalf of Johan De Clercq *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments * would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq : would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 0 0 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 0 0 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 0 0 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D 00
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Somehow I think there is a confusion - the drop_requests stat has nothing to do with the dropping on the socket buffers (net level). Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 19.04.2024 11:13, johan wrote: Bogdan, on the augmenting drop_requests, drop is not used in that script. Neither is forward. Everything is t_relay. There is no b2b. The thing is that we observed drops on udp level. We followed the recommendations of Ovidiu Sas's presentation of last year in Houston: - increase PKG mem - increase SHM mem - increase workers to 24 so that the queue empties faster. - we checked the udp queues on linux level and we saw drops there. => we augmented them to 50 megs (sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=52428800 and sysctl -w net.core.rmem_default=52428800) and the drops on OS level where gone. Also worker and memory load are max 30 %. Hence we thought that we were okay, but still drops on opensips level. Net result was that this node in the system lost all connection with the destination of the loadbalancer although it received keep alive options responses from the loadbalancer destination on its NIC (we could see that in a continuously running tcpdump). => hence it seems that it is opensips's receive buffer that is too small (as I read the description : "Returns the number of requests dropped even before entering the script routing logic.", I thought that this pointed to the receive buffer of opensips). All of this is happening on a physical machine on which two other opensips instances are running also. Interestingly enough the problem is only observed in the instance that handles registrations and invites (1600 REG/ s and 300 INV /s). Therefore we dived a bit deeper and came on this MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 (which is the default udp queue size setting on linux). Could this be related somehow ? Secondly, what would the recommendation be for scaling a system like this ? On 18/04/2024 16:29, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: The `drop_requests` statistic is incremented when: * the request is dropped by a pre-script callback (like B2B when there is no script execution for certain messages) * the stateless `forward()` core function failed to send out something. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 18.04.2024 17:19, Johan De Clercq wrote: No I don't. what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin : Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin *From: *Users on behalf of Johan De Clercq *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments * would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq : would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 0 0 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
The `drop_requests` statistic is incremented when: * the request is dropped by a pre-script callback (like B2B when there is no script execution for certain messages) * the stateless `forward()` core function failed to send out something. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 18.04.2024 17:19, Johan De Clercq wrote: No I don't. what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin : Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin *From: *Users on behalf of Johan De Clercq *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments * would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq : would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 0 0 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 0 0 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 0 0 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 0 0 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: 0 0 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: 0 0 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: 0 0 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: 0 0 20572 2 88086d020800 0 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: 0 0 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: 100 0 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: 0 0 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 => no drops what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I query via the mi interface opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 198107 opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 199157 opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 204116 I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. so 3 questions: - what exactly is drop_request. - do I need to worry about this - how can I make them go lower. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Wadii,
this is the beginning of route[0]
route {
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("70") && $retcode==-1)
{
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
xlog("callid [$ci] from [$fU] to [$tU] loop detected");
exit;
};
force_rport();
t_on_failure("Trunk_On_Error");
if (has_totag()) {
loose_route();
t_relay();
exit;
}
record_route();
create_dialog("B");
so I don't think that this is related ?
Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:12 schreef Wadii ELMAJDI | Evenmedia <
wa...@evenmedia.fr>:
> Calling exit() during the initial request and right before creating the
> dialog also increments the drop_requests statistic
>
>
>
> *De :* Users *De la part de* Ben Newlin
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 18 avril 2024 15:59
> *À :* OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Objet :* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
>
>
>
> Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script?
>
>
>
> https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13
>
>
>
> Ben Newlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Users on behalf of Johan De
> Clercq
> *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM
> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
>
> * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments *
>
>
> --
>
> would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them
> (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)?
>
> Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
>
>
>
> Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
>
>
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq :
>
> would it make sense to recompile with other flags ?
>
> Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535.
>
>
>
> Can somebody explain also what both flags mean.
>
>
>
>
>
> flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>
> poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select.
>
>
>
> Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq :
>
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
>
> I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children.
>
> The worker load is very low.
>
> UDP queues are on 50 megs.
>
>
>
> when i query via the OS
>
> cat /proc/net/udp
>
> sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when
> retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops
>
> 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00:
> 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0
>
> 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00:
> 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0
>
> 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00:
> 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0
>
> 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00:
> 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0
>
> 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00:
> 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0
>
> 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00:
> 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0
>
> 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00:
> 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0
>
> 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00:
> 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0
>
> 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00:
> 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0
>
> 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00:
> 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0
>
> 13320: :857E : 07 : 00:
> 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0
>
> 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00:
> 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0
>
>
>
> => no drops
>
>
>
> what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I
> query via the mi interface
>
> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 198107
>
> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 199157
>
> opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests
>
> core:drop_requests:: 204116
>
>
>
> I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low.
>
>
>
>
>
> so 3 questions:
>
> - what exactly is drop_request.
>
> - do I need to worry about this
>
> - how can I make them go lower.
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
No I don't. what I find strange is that MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 is the default value of net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 16:02 schreef Ben Newlin : > Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? > > > > https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 > > > > Ben Newlin > > > > *From: *Users on behalf of Johan De > Clercq > *Date: *Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM > *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. > > * EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments * > > > -- > > would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them > (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? > > Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. > > > > Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. > > > > Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq : > > would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? > > Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. > > > > Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. > > > > > > flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, > F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT > > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 > > poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. > > > > Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : > > > > Guys, > > > > I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. > > The worker load is very low. > > UDP queues are on 50 megs. > > > > when i query via the OS > > cat /proc/net/udp > > sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when > retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops > > 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: > 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 > > 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: > 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 > > 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: > 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 > > 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: > 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 > > 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: > 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 > > 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: > 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 > > 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: > 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 > > 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: > 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 > > 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: > 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 > > 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: > 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 > > 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: > 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 > > 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: > 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 > > > > => no drops > > > > what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I > query via the mi interface > > opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests > > core:drop_requests:: 198107 > > opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests > > core:drop_requests:: 199157 > > opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests > > core:drop_requests:: 204116 > > > > I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. > > > > > > so 3 questions: > > - what exactly is drop_request. > > - do I need to worry about this > > - how can I make them go lower. > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Calling exit() during the initial request and right before creating the dialog also increments the drop_requests statistic De : Users De la part de Ben Newlin Envoyé : jeudi 18 avril 2024 15:59 À : OpenSIPS users mailling list Objet : Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin From: Users mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org>> on behalf of Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>> Date: Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 => no drops what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I query via the mi interface opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 198107 opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 199157 opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 204116 I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. so 3 questions: - what exactly is drop_request. - do I need to worry about this - how can I make them go lower. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Are you calling drop() anywhere in your script? https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreFunctions-3-4#toc13 Ben Newlin From: Users on behalf of Johan De Clercq Date: Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 5:27 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics. EXTERNAL EMAIL - Please use caution with links and attachments would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq mailto:jo...@democon.be>>: Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 => no drops what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I query via the mi interface opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 198107 opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 199157 opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 204116 I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. so 3 questions: - what exactly is drop_request. - do I need to worry about this - how can I make them go lower. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? And how do I set them (I don't find these of menuconfig's compile options)? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 11:07 schreef Johan De Clercq : > would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? > Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. > > Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. > > > flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, > F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 > poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. > > Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : > >> >> Guys, >> >> I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. >> The worker load is very low. >> UDP queues are on 50 megs. >> >> when i query via the OS >> cat /proc/net/udp >> sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when >> retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops >> 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: >> 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 >> 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: >> 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 >> 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: >> 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 >> 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: >> 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 >> 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: >> 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 >> 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: >> 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 >> 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: >> 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 >> 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: >> 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 >> 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: >> 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 >> 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: >> 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 >> 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: >> 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 >> 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: >> 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 >> >> => no drops >> >> what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I >> query via the mi interface >> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests >> core:drop_requests:: 198107 >> opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests >> core:drop_requests:: 199157 >> opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests >> core:drop_requests:: 204116 >> >> I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. >> >> >> so 3 questions: >> - what exactly is drop_request. >> - do I need to worry about this >> - how can I make them go lower. >> > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
would it make sense to recompile with other flags ? Currently it has MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 and BUF_SIZE 65535. Can somebody explain also what both flags mean. flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. Op do 18 apr 2024 om 10:32 schreef Johan De Clercq : > > Guys, > > I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. > The worker load is very low. > UDP queues are on 50 megs. > > when i query via the OS > cat /proc/net/udp > sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when > retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops > 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: > 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 > 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: > 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 > 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: > 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 > 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: > 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 > 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: > 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 > 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: > 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 > 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: > 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 > 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: > 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 > 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: > 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 > 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: > 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 > 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: > 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 > 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: > 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 > > => no drops > > what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I > query via the mi interface > opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests > core:drop_requests:: 198107 > opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests > core:drop_requests:: 199157 > opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests > core:drop_requests:: 204116 > > I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. > > > so 3 questions: > - what exactly is drop_request. > - do I need to worry about this > - how can I make them go lower. > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
[OpenSIPS-Users] question on core statistics.
Guys, I have an opensips instance running with 24 worker children. The worker load is very low. UDP queues are on 50 megs. when i query via the OS cat /proc/net/udp sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 590: 03231D0A:13C4 : 07 : 00: 00 413684019 2 880074820bc0 0 591: 03231D0A:13C5 : 07 : 00: 00 413766438 2 880465e4a440 0 592: 03231D0A:13C6 : 07 : 00: 00 412035865 2 8803e5a56b80 0 934: 01231D0A:151C : 07 : 00: 00 26790 2 88046c054840 0 935: 0201FFEF:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26787 2 88046c054bc0 0 935: 01231D0A:151D : 07 : 00: 00 26791 2 88046c0544c0 0 1972: :D92A : 07 : 00: 00 15506 2 88046dce5040 0 5479: :E6DD : 07 : 00: 00 22811 2 880465e4ab40 0 12075: AA0914AC:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20572 2 88086d020800 0 12075: 017F:00A1 : 07 : 00: 00 20571 2 88086d020b80 0 13320: :857E : 07 : 00: 1000 17515 2 8800368ac780 0 15661: :CEA3 : 07 : 00: 00 15505 2 8800368acb00 0 => no drops what worries me is that there are drop requests and they go up when I query via the mi interface opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 198107 opensipsctl fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 199157 opensipsctl_reg fifo get_statistics drop_requests core:drop_requests:: 204116 I don't see any memory issue, also the processload is low. so 3 questions: - what exactly is drop_request. - do I need to worry about this - how can I make them go lower. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
