Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hello, The beta release for 1.10 got green light for 20th of March - still many things to do, many new exciting features to added, many fixes to be done. I really want to thanks to all the people contributing to this tremendous work - providing patches, testing, reporting, fixing bug. It is a real community effort. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 13.02.2014 18:49, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hello all , We made a new evaluation of the thinks we plan to have ready for 1.11 and time is not enough. In order to get a valuable and consistent release, the decision was to delay the 1.11 release for mid March - this will allow us to complete the ongoing tasks and have a really good set of features for 1.11 If there are any comments to this, please let us know. Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04.11.2013 19:58, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion about the next OpenSIPS major release - and in this discussion anyone is welcomed with options, ideas, critics and other. Your feedback is important to drive the project into a direction that reflects the user's needs!. So, I will list here the starting points, for both release planing and release content. Content --- What was done: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc2 What is planned: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc9 Planned items have priorities (for being addressed); it is a must to have all items done for the next release, as we need to fit into a time frame. Whatever is not done, will be left for the next release (1.12 ?) Additional thinks (not listed on web) we are considering are: - new call queuing module - new SMPP module - async operations at script level (doing async db ops, exec, rest queries) - dropping avpops module (and replacing with dbops module) - simplify scripting/logic by dropping the usage of AVPs (defined as module params) in favor of explicit func. params - better handling of UAC transactions (being able to set failure routes for them, to fire new requests from script) - Quality routing in Dynamic Routing Also we target so work in the RTPProxy area (still under heavy planing) like restart persistence, replication and statistics . Planing --- Release candidate: second half of January 2014, depending on the progress with the items to be done. Testing phase: 1 month allocated (it may be extended if critical problems show up) Stable release: second half of February (after the testing phase is done). Once again, your feedback on these matters is important to us. Best regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
sorry, I meant 1.11 beta, not 1.10 :) Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 07.03.2014 12:34, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hello, The beta release for 1.10 got green light for 20th of March - still many things to do, many new exciting features to added, many fixes to be done. I really want to thanks to all the people contributing to this tremendous work - providing patches, testing, reporting, fixing bug. It is a real community effort. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 13.02.2014 18:49, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hello all , We made a new evaluation of the thinks we plan to have ready for 1.11 and time is not enough. In order to get a valuable and consistent release, the decision was to delay the 1.11 release for mid March - this will allow us to complete the ongoing tasks and have a really good set of features for 1.11 If there are any comments to this, please let us know. Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04.11.2013 19:58, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion about the next OpenSIPS major release - and in this discussion anyone is welcomed with options, ideas, critics and other. Your feedback is important to drive the project into a direction that reflects the user's needs!. So, I will list here the starting points, for both release planing and release content. Content --- What was done: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc2 What is planned: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc9 Planned items have priorities (for being addressed); it is a must to have all items done for the next release, as we need to fit into a time frame. Whatever is not done, will be left for the next release (1.12 ?) Additional thinks (not listed on web) we are considering are: - new call queuing module - new SMPP module - async operations at script level (doing async db ops, exec, rest queries) - dropping avpops module (and replacing with dbops module) - simplify scripting/logic by dropping the usage of AVPs (defined as module params) in favor of explicit func. params - better handling of UAC transactions (being able to set failure routes for them, to fire new requests from script) - Quality routing in Dynamic Routing Also we target so work in the RTPProxy area (still under heavy planing) like restart persistence, replication and statistics . Planing --- Release candidate: second half of January 2014, depending on the progress with the items to be done. Testing phase: 1 month allocated (it may be extended if critical problems show up) Stable release: second half of February (after the testing phase is done). Once again, your feedback on these matters is important to us. Best regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Great News !! --- Jayesh On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@opensips.orgwrote: sorry, I meant 1.11 beta, not 1.10 :) Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 07.03.2014 12:34, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hello, The beta release for 1.10 got green light for 20th of March - still many things to do, many new exciting features to added, many fixes to be done. I really want to thanks to all the people contributing to this tremendous work - providing patches, testing, reporting, fixing bug. It is a real community effort. Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 13.02.2014 18:49, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hello all , We made a new evaluation of the thinks we plan to have ready for 1.11 and time is not enough. In order to get a valuable and consistent release, the decision was to delay the 1.11 release for mid March - this will allow us to complete the ongoing tasks and have a really good set of features for 1.11 If there are any comments to this, please let us know. Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04.11.2013 19:58, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion about the next OpenSIPS major release - and in this discussion anyone is welcomed with options, ideas, critics and other. Your feedback is important to drive the project into a direction that reflects the user's needs!. So, I will list here the starting points, for both release planing and release content. Content --- What was done: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc2 What is planned: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc9 Planned items have priorities (for being addressed); it is a must to have all items done for the next release, as we need to fit into a time frame. Whatever is not done, will be left for the next release (1.12 ?) Additional thinks (not listed on web) we are considering are: - new call queuing module - new SMPP module - async operations at script level (doing async db ops, exec, rest queries) - dropping avpops module (and replacing with dbops module) - simplify scripting/logic by dropping the usage of AVPs (defined as module params) in favor of explicit func. params - better handling of UAC transactions (being able to set failure routes for them, to fire new requests from script) - Quality routing in Dynamic Routing Also we target so work in the RTPProxy area (still under heavy planing) like restart persistence, replication and statistics . Planing --- Release candidate: second half of January 2014, depending on the progress with the items to be done. Testing phase: 1 month allocated (it may be extended if critical problems show up) Stable release: second half of February (after the testing phase is done). Once again, your feedback on these matters is important to us. Best regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hello Aki, And how do you use it (this is a big question mark for me) - you have opensips instance A doing compression and instance B doing decompression ? About your TCP issue - the log is quite clear :) - the party where you are trying to connect to ( 114.221.128.242:36989)does not listen for TCP.What is the context/scenario for this error ? during a call setup ? during a sequential request ? or ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 14.02.2014 04:21, Aki Kaede wrote: Hi, Bogdan Thanks for the reply, I have already add gzcompress feature to my sip server from kamailio that opensips use version 1.11.0, but when sip server run sometime, server cannot accept tcp connections. OS is CentOS 6.3 X86_64 log as below, Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:probe_max_sock_buff: using snd buffer of 255 kb Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: -- TCP keepalive enabled on socket Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 24 - 4 8 16 32 Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: failed to retrieve SO_ERROR [sever=114.221.128.242:36989] (111) Connection refused Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_send: connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:msg_send: tcp_send failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to 'sip:1001@114.221.128.242:36989;transport=TCP;ob' failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:probe_max_sock_buff: using snd buffer of 255 kb Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: -- TCP keepalive enabled on socket Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 24 - 4 8 16 32 Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: failed to retrieve SO_ERROR [sever=114.221.128.242:32467] (111) Connection refused Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_send: connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:msg_send: tcp_send failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to 'sip:1009@114.221.128.242:32467;transport=TCP;ob' failed sky037474 *From:* [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=7589596i=0 *Date:* 2014-02-14 00:53 *To:* [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=7589596i=1 *Subject:* Re: [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release Hello Aki, Such compressing of the body is not standard (AFAIK, so please correct me) - so something like this will work only between 2 OpenSIPS (one to compress, the other to decompress) .Which will tremendously limit the usability of this feature. Is there something wrong in what I'm saying ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 25.11.2013 08:19, Aki Kaede wrote: Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=7589585i=0 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=7589585i=1 http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7589585.html To unsubscribe from [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release, click here. NAML http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hello all , We made a new evaluation of the thinks we plan to have ready for 1.11 and time is not enough. In order to get a valuable and consistent release, the decision was to delay the 1.11 release for mid March - this will allow us to complete the ongoing tasks and have a really good set of features for 1.11 If there are any comments to this, please let us know. Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04.11.2013 19:58, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion about the next OpenSIPS major release - and in this discussion anyone is welcomed with options, ideas, critics and other. Your feedback is important to drive the project into a direction that reflects the user's needs!. So, I will list here the starting points, for both release planing and release content. Content --- What was done: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc2 What is planned: http://www.opensips.org/About/Version-1-11-0#toc9 Planned items have priorities (for being addressed); it is a must to have all items done for the next release, as we need to fit into a time frame. Whatever is not done, will be left for the next release (1.12 ?) Additional thinks (not listed on web) we are considering are: - new call queuing module - new SMPP module - async operations at script level (doing async db ops, exec, rest queries) - dropping avpops module (and replacing with dbops module) - simplify scripting/logic by dropping the usage of AVPs (defined as module params) in favor of explicit func. params - better handling of UAC transactions (being able to set failure routes for them, to fire new requests from script) - Quality routing in Dynamic Routing Also we target so work in the RTPProxy area (still under heavy planing) like restart persistence, replication and statistics . Planing --- Release candidate: second half of January 2014, depending on the progress with the items to be done. Testing phase: 1 month allocated (it may be extended if critical problems show up) Stable release: second half of February (after the testing phase is done). Once again, your feedback on these matters is important to us. Best regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hello Aki, Such compressing of the body is not standard (AFAIK, so please correct me) - so something like this will work only between 2 OpenSIPS (one to compress, the other to decompress) .Which will tremendously limit the usability of this feature. Is there something wrong in what I'm saying ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 25.11.2013 08:19, Aki Kaede wrote: Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hi, Bogdan Thanks for the reply, I have already add gzcompress feature to my sip server from kamailio that opensips use version 1.11.0, but when sip server run sometime, server cannot accept tcp connections. OS is CentOS 6.3 X86_64 log as below, Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:probe_max_sock_buff: using snd buffer of 255 kb Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: -- TCP keepalive enabled on socket Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 24 - 4 8 16 32 Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: failed to retrieve SO_ERROR [sever=114.221.128.242:36989] (111) Connection refused Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_send: connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:msg_send: tcp_send failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to 'sip:1001@114.221.128.242:36989;transport=TCP;ob' failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:probe_max_sock_buff: using snd buffer of 255 kb Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: -- TCP keepalive enabled on socket Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 24 - 4 8 16 32 Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: failed to retrieve SO_ERROR [sever=114.221.128.242:32467] (111) Connection refused Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:core:tcp_send: connect failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:msg_send: tcp_send failed Feb 11 14:45:32 bogon ./opensips[30985]: ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to 'sip:1009@114.221.128.242:32467;transport=TCP;ob' failed sky037474 From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu-2 [via OpenSIPS (Open SIP Server)] Date: 2014-02-14 00:53 To: Aki Kaede Subject: Re: [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release Hello Aki, Such compressing of the body is not standard (AFAIK, so please correct me) - so something like this will work only between 2 OpenSIPS (one to compress, the other to decompress) .Which will tremendously limit the usability of this feature. Is there something wrong in what I'm saying ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 25.11.2013 08:19, Aki Kaede wrote: Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7589585.html To unsubscribe from [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7589596.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hi Chris, Maybe the SIP packet is inflated because too many ICE candidates,else it should not so bigger IMO, so hide record to routes is not enough, the deflation of SDP has been used by face time of apple. There is a interesting article: http://blog.krisk.org/2013/09/learning-stupid-nat-tricks-from-apple.html And maybe sigcomp is another alternative choice. Best Regards Frank.zheng 2013/11/25 Christian Lahme christian.la...@secusmart.com Hi Aki, wouldn¹t it be better to shrink your headers? Try with hiding your infrastructure, record to routes in your infrastructure. Believe me, it¹s better than compressing and deflating a SIP packet of 2.5kb. Best regards Chris Am 25.11.13 07:19 schrieb Aki Kaede unter sky037...@gmail.com: Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-Ope nSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-OpenSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.11.0 major release
Hi Aki, wouldn¹t it be better to shrink your headers? Try with hiding your infrastructure, record to routes in your infrastructure. Believe me, it¹s better than compressing and deflating a SIP packet of 2.5kb. Best regards Chris Am 25.11.13 07:19 schrieb Aki Kaede unter sky037...@gmail.com: Hi Bogdan, Can we have GZIP deflate SIP body added to the list? Our SIP/SDP has more than 2500byte, when use TCP some MSS just 1024, will diliver 3 segment, delay seriously. I find Kamailio GZCompress http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/gzcompress.html , can we add this features. Thanks Aki Kaede -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/RELEASES-Planing-Ope nSIPS-1-11-0-major-release-tp7588380p7588670.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
