[Pw_forum] Electronic calculations

2014-11-15 Thread Martin Kamau
I am requesting for an input file to perform first principle electronic 
calculations of silicon
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] quantum entanglement using quantum espresso

2014-11-15 Thread Martin Kamau
am an undergraduate student maasaimara university in kenya intrested in quantum 
entanglement.am requesting for your assistance onĀ  simulation of entanglement 
using quantum espresso..Aninput file will serve better
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] difference in output from dynmat.x and matdyn.x

2014-11-15 Thread Sridhar Sadasivam
Dear espresso users and developers,

I am trying to obtain the phonon dispersion of alpha-quartz (SiO2) which
has a 9 atom unit cell. I ran ph.x on a 3 x 3 x 3 q-point grid. I am seeing
some strange behavior where there seems to be a difference in the
frequencies output from dynmat.x and matdyn.x. I will explain my problem
below.

I diagonalized the dynamical matrix at the gamma point using dynmat.x with
acoustic sum rule set to crsytal. Since SiO2 is a polar material, LO-TO
splitting will need to be considered at the gamma point but I am ignoring
it currently (I did not specify any direction for LO-TO splitting in the
dynmat.x input). This gave me the following 27 frequencies (in cm^-1) at
the gamma point: (0,0,0, 152.24, 175.57, 175.57, 256.32, 256.32, 341.09,
354.41, 376.86, 376.86, 419.01, 419.01, 435.37, 455.70, 659.12, 659.12,
744.54, 754.62, 1034.38, 1034.38, 1040.20, 1051.12, 1139.60, 1139.60)

I also used q2r.x (with zasr = 'crystal') to obtain the force constants and
then used matdyn.x (with asr = 'crystal') to obtain the frequencies at the
gamma point. However with matdyn.x, I obtain the following frequencies at
the gamma point: (-29.4088,-22.2535,-22.2535,152.2412,175.8141,175.8141,
256.3373, 256.3373, 341.0892, 355.4227, 376.0495 , 376.0495, 418.6344,
418.6344, 435.3710, 453.6862, 659.7607, 659.7607, 746.4843, 754.8867,
754.8867, 1034.1751, 1034.1751, 1039.7590, 1051.1207, 1139.8191, 1139.8191)

Could someone please explain why I am getting imaginary frequencies from
matdyn.x while dynmat.x gives real frequencies at the same q-point (gamma
in this case)?

Thanks,
Sridhar
Purdue University
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] QHA

2014-11-15 Thread Masoud Avi
Hi
I've calculated the thermodynamic properties,  But in the case of
spin-orbit, column of F_vibration and E_internal are empty and NAN
written, whilst column of spesific heat is calculated.
What caused this?
masoud alavi
plz help me
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] Accelerating multiple calculations with same phase

2014-11-15 Thread Youssef Aharbil
Dear Quantum espresso users and developers,

I am working on several phases, investigating for each phase I need to

1-Determine lattice constant and atomic positions with non magnetic state
2-Determine magnetic ground states (by testing all of magnetic states
possibilities for each ions)
3-Determine lattice constant and atomic positions with  magnetic states
4-Construct several super-cells and invert ion position.

As you can see, I must do lot of calculation for each phase by modifying
it slightly.

My question is what's the best procedure to do that safely and/or  quickly,
I mean whether:

-Do it safely and delete wfc and xml data for every new calculation (I am
calculation on the same folder for each precedent step)
-Do it more quickly and keep old wfc and xml data.


Another question related with same topic: how relax subroutine success
improving convergence steps just after running the first cycle? can I
capitalize something for my case?

P.S. :
Thanks in advance.
Youssef Aharbil
PhD
Laboratory of Physics and Chemistry of Material
Morocco
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] BoltzWann for one-dimensional systems?

2014-11-15 Thread Hung Nguyen
Dear All,

I am trying to calculate Wannier90 with BoltzWann for one-dimensional
systems such as Carbon Nanotubes or Nanowires. However, BoltzWann does
not seem to support the 1-D systems. Any advice that can help me in
this problem?.

Thank you very much for your support.

Sincerely yours,

Nguyen Tuan Hung

Department of Physics, Tohoku University
add: Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Janpan
tell: +81-22-795-7754 fax 6447

___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum