Thanks, I tried to use "<" instead of "-in" it also didn't work.
OK,I will try to use full paths for input and output, and answer about result.
- ? -
??: Omololu Akin-Ojo
??: 7 ? 2011 ?. 9:56
: PWSCF Forum
: Re: [Pw_forum] ??: Re: problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors)
Try to see if specifying the full paths help.
E.g., try something like:
mpiexec /home/MyDir/bin/pw.x -in /scratch/MyDir/graph.inp >
/scratch/MyDir/graph.out
(where /home/MyDir/bin is the full path to your pw.x and
/scratch/MyDir/graph.inp is the full path to your output )
( I see you use "-in" instead of "<" to indicate the input. I don't
know too much but _perhaps_ you could also _try_ using "<" instead of
"-in") .
o.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Alexander Kvashnin
wrote:
> Yes, I wrote
>
> #PBS -l nodes=16:ppn=4
>
> And in userguide of MIPT-60 wrote,that mpiexec must choose number of
> processors automatically, that's why I didn't write anything else
>
>
>
> : Huiqun Zhou
> : 7 ?? 2011 ??. 7:52
> : PWSCF Forum
> : Re: [Pw_forum] problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors)
>
> How did you apply number of node, procs per node in your job
> script?
>
> #PBS -l nodes=?:ppn=?
>
> zhou huiqun
> @earth sciences, nanjing university, china
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Alexander G. Kvashnin
> To: PWSCF Forum
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 2:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors)
> I create PBS task on supercomputer MIPT-60 where I write
>
> mpiexec ../../espresso-4.2.1/bin/pw.x -in graph.inp > output.opt
> all other
[??? ?? ? ? ?]
