[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-28 Thread Paolo Giannozzi

On Oct 27, 2010, at 23:02 , Eduardo Ariel Menendez Proupin wrote:

> I think it would be helpful and appreciated to keep scf with  
> tetrahedron method

it is still working: it is sufficient to comment out a check in PW/ 
input.f90 .
Anyway, I'll set a les restrictive condition

> It would also be fine if the program just don't calculate the  
> forces when the tetrahedron
> method is chosen, and give a  warning for the beginners "forces are  
> not variational.
> Use other smearing method"

beginners don't read warnings, and when they do, they don't  
understand it ...

P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry, Univ. Udine
via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222






[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-27 Thread Eduardo Ariel Menendez Proupin
Hi,
I think it would be helpful and appreciated to keep scf with tetrahedron
method, at least to make accurate SCF calculations.

It would also be fine if the program just don't calculate the forces when
the tetrahedron methos is chosen, and give a  warning for the beginners
"forces are not variational. Use other smearing method"


> according to changelog-4.2, the tetrahedron method was forbidden to be used
> for scf at *2010-03-25.*
> What is the reason?
>

>forces are not variational, i.e. are not the derivative of the energy.
>This shouldn't be a big problem if you do not calculate forces, though.


Best regards
-- 


Eduardo Menendez
Departamento de Fisica
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad de Chile
Phone: (56)(2)9787439
URL: http://fisica.ciencias.uchile.cl/~emenendez

They did it!
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101027/8e32b84a/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-27 Thread Максим Попов
Dear Prof. Giannozzi,

first of all, I'm sorry for the typo. Thank you for the quick reply too!
It is true that Hellmann-Feynman theorem does not work for the tetrahedron
method,
but for scf it should not be a problem. Should it?

2010/10/27 Paolo Giannozzi 

> ?? ? wrote:
>
> > according to changelog-4.2, the tetrahedron method was forbidden to be
> > used for scf at *2010-03-25.*
> > What is the reason?
>
> forces are not variational, i.e. are not the derivative of the energy.
> This shouldn't be a big problem if you do not calculate forces, though.
>
> >  Probably, the best person to answer the question is Prof. Gianozzi.
>
> I don't know any Prof. "Gianozzi". Who is he?
>
> P.
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>



-- 
Best regards, Max Popov
Ph.D. student
Materials center Leoben (MCL), Leoben, Austria.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101027/8adb4ded/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-27 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
?? ? wrote:

> according to changelog-4.2, the tetrahedron method was forbidden to be 
> used for scf at *2010-03-25.*
> What is the reason?

forces are not variational, i.e. are not the derivative of the energy.
This shouldn't be a big problem if you do not calculate forces, though.

>  Probably, the best person to answer the question is Prof. Gianozzi.

I don't know any Prof. "Gianozzi". Who is he?

P.
-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy


[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-27 Thread Максим Попов
Hi everyone,

according to changelog-4.2, the tetrahedron method was forbidden to be used
for scf at *2010-03-25.*
What is the reason? Probably, the best person to answer the question is
Prof. Gianozzi.

-- 
Best regards, Max Popov
Ph.D. student
Materials center Leoben (MCL), Leoben, Austria.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101027/41396cd3/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] 'Tetrahedra' and 'scf'

2010-10-27 Thread Nicola Marzari
On 10/27/10 3:35 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>>   Probably, the best person to answer the question is Prof. Gianozzi.
> I don't know any Prof. "Gianozzi". Who is he?

The good-humored, but unhelpful, brother.

 nicola :-)

-- 
-
Prof Nicola Marzari   Department of Materials Science and Engineering
13-5066   MIT   77 Massachusetts Avenue   Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA
tel 617.4522758 fax 2586534 marzari at mit.edu http://quasiamore.mit.edu