Re: [Pw_forum] Application of LDA+U in phonon calculations.

2015-09-25 Thread Youssef


Dear Saswata,

Have you checked your structure with xcrysden?
For a double perovskite, your input structure is wrong.
When using ibrav=2 you should process your dimensionless atomic 
coordinates before using them with "ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal" or simply 
use "ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat" instead as longs as a=b=c.


Youssef Aharbil,
Laboratory of Physics and Chemistry of Materials
Faculty of sciences Ben msik, Casablanca
Morocco
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Re: [Pw_forum] Application of LDA+U in phonon calculations.

2015-09-24 Thread W2AGZ
Hi Saswata,

WRT your question 2, I have posted on the forum for several years pointing out 
the lack of a tool to calculate e-p interaction in the context of LDA+U.  Such 
a tool is badly needed within QE and supporting response function packages such 
as Yambo.   I've been told the tool may be available in the ELK package, but 
have not had the opportunity to check this out yet. 

-Paul Grant
W2AGZ Technologies.

-Original Message-
From: pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org [mailto:pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org] On Behalf 
Of saswata halder
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:59 AM
To: PWSCF Forum
Subject: [Pw_forum] Application of LDA+U in phonon calculations.

Dear All,

At present I am trying to calculate the phonon modes of double perovskite 
Ba2SmTaO6 having a cubic Fm3m structure. The detailed input of the vc-relax 
file is provided below (and also attached alongwith).

 &CONTROL
calculation='vc-relax',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='BST'
pseudo_dir = '/home/saswata/espresso/potentials/',
outdir='./'
tstress=.true.
tprnfor=.true.
verbosity='high'
wf_collect=.true.
nstep=200
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-7
forc_conv_thr=1.0D-4
disk_io='default'
 /
 &SYSTEM
ibrav = 2, celldm(1) =16.0208, nat = 10, ntyp= 4,
ecutwfc = 80.0, ecutrho=800, occupations='smearing',
smearing='gaussian', degauss=0.02, nspin=2,
starting_magnetization(2)=0.4,
lda_plus_u=.true.,
Hubbard_U(2)=7.0,

 /
 &ELECTRONS
diagonalization='david',
mixing_mode='plain',
mixing_beta = 0.7D0
conv_thr =  1.0D-9
electron_maxstep=200
 /
&IONS
ion_dynamics='bfgs'
upscale=10D0
trust_radius_max=1.0D0
trust_radius_min=1.0D-5
trust_radius_ini=0.5D0
w_1=0.01D0
w_2=0.5D0
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics='bfgs',
press=0.0,
cell_factor=2.5D0,
press_conv_thr=0.2,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Ba  137.327Ba.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 Sm  150.360Sm.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 Ta  180.94788  Ta.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 O   15.9994 O.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
 Ba 0.25  0.25  0.25
 Ba 0.75  0.75  0.75
 Sm 0.00  0.00  0.00
 Ta 0.50  0.50  0.50
 O  0.264 0.00  0.00
 O  0.736 0.00  0.00
 O  0.00  0.264 0.00
 O  0.00  0.736 0.00
 O  0.00  0.00  0.264
 O  0.00  0.00  0.736
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 4  1 1 1

  I specifically have two questions regarding the output of this calculation

1. The structural relaxation occurs but with a pressure value of P=-13.71. What 
is the significance of this negative pressure?

2. The phonon calculation terminates with an error message 'LDA+U is not 
implemented in phonon'. Is there any other way to go about with this 
calculation in the existing QE versions?

Thanking you in advance and awaiting a reply eagerly,

Saswata Halder.

Senior Research Fellow

Bose Institute.


___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


[Pw_forum] Application of LDA+U in phonon calculations.

2015-09-24 Thread Youssef

Dear Saswata,

Have checked your structure with xcrysden?
For a double perovskite, your input structure is wrong.
When using ibrav=2 you should process your dimensionless atomic 
coordinates before using them with "ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal" or simply 
use "ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat" instead as longs as a=b=c.


Youssef Aharbil,
Laboratory of Physics and Chemistry of Materials
Faculty of sciences Ben msik, Casablanca
Morocco
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] Application of LDA+U in phonon calculations.

2015-09-24 Thread saswata halder
Dear All,

At present I am trying to calculate the phonon modes of double
perovskite Ba2SmTaO6 having a cubic Fm3m structure. The detailed input
of the vc-relax file is provided below (and also attached alongwith).

 &CONTROL
calculation='vc-relax',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='BST'
pseudo_dir = '/home/saswata/espresso/potentials/',
outdir='./'
tstress=.true.
tprnfor=.true.
verbosity='high'
wf_collect=.true.
nstep=200
etot_conv_thr=1.0D-7
forc_conv_thr=1.0D-4
disk_io='default'
 /
 &SYSTEM
ibrav = 2, celldm(1) =16.0208, nat = 10, ntyp= 4,
ecutwfc = 80.0, ecutrho=800, occupations='smearing',
smearing='gaussian', degauss=0.02, nspin=2,
starting_magnetization(2)=0.4,
lda_plus_u=.true.,
Hubbard_U(2)=7.0,

 /
 &ELECTRONS
diagonalization='david',
mixing_mode='plain',
mixing_beta = 0.7D0
conv_thr =  1.0D-9
electron_maxstep=200
 /
&IONS
ion_dynamics='bfgs'
upscale=10D0
trust_radius_max=1.0D0
trust_radius_min=1.0D-5
trust_radius_ini=0.5D0
w_1=0.01D0
w_2=0.5D0
/
&CELL
cell_dynamics='bfgs',
press=0.0,
cell_factor=2.5D0,
press_conv_thr=0.2,
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Ba  137.327Ba.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 Sm  150.360Sm.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 Ta  180.94788  Ta.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
 O   15.9994 O.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
 Ba 0.25  0.25  0.25
 Ba 0.75  0.75  0.75
 Sm 0.00  0.00  0.00
 Ta 0.50  0.50  0.50
 O  0.264 0.00  0.00
 O  0.736 0.00  0.00
 O  0.00  0.264 0.00
 O  0.00  0.736 0.00
 O  0.00  0.00  0.264
 O  0.00  0.00  0.736
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 4  1 1 1

  I specifically have two questions regarding the output of this calculation

1. The structural relaxation occurs but with a pressure value of
P=-13.71. What is the significance of this negative pressure?

2. The phonon calculation terminates with an error message 'LDA+U is
not implemented in phonon'. Is there any other way to go about with
this calculation in the existing QE versions?

Thanking you in advance and awaiting a reply eagerly,

Saswata Halder.

Senior Research Fellow

Bose Institute.


bst.relaxcell.in
Description: Binary data
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum