Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

2015-10-22 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Bahadır salmankurt 
wrote:


> in relax calculations, you must add *&cell*
>

no, it is needed only for variable-cell ("vc-relax" and "vc-md")
calculations

Paolo
-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept. Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

2015-10-22 Thread Bahadır salmankurt
Hi
---
&control
calculation='relax',
restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='si',
pseudo_dir = '../pseudo',
outdir='out',

*   tstress = .true.tprnfor = .true.*
/
&system
ibrav=  2,
celldm(1) =10.14,
nat=  2,
ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =16,
/
&electrons
conv_thr =  1.0d-10,
/
&ions
/

*&cell/*
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Si  28.086 Si.pz-vbc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS
 Si 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Si 0.28 0.28 0.28
K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
4 4 4 1 1 1

in relax calculations, you must add *&cell . *Also, you can calculate
stress and force acting on atoms using *   tstress = .true. , tprnfor =
.true. *parameters.

I chanced atomic positions intentionally. Please run the code and see what
happen !

Bests

2015-10-22 18:34 GMT+03:00 Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student) <
am...@mail.missouri.edu>:

> Hi Sridhar,
>
> Thank you for your reply. I followed your instructions on only changing
> the task to both 'relax' and 'vc-relax' in my input file. However, I got
> the following error for both of them:
>
> task # 0
>  from  read_namelists  : error # 1
>   reading namelist ions
>
>
> Following a tutorial on the internet and according to the above error , at
> first, I only added the  namelist &ions and got an output (very small
> output). So Again I added other parameters in the &control namelist based
> on the same tutorial (without knowing what they are) and got another
> output. I was wondering if you would kindly take a look at my final input
> file and tell me what those parameters that I added are.
>
>
> Here is my input file:
>
>
> &control
> calculation='relax',
>
> nstep= 50, <== I
> added this
>
> etot_conv_thr= 1.d-4,   <== I added this
>
> forc_conv_thr= 2.d-3,   <== I added this
> restart_mode='from_scratch',
> prefix='si',
> pseudo_dir = '../pseudo',
> /
>
> &system
> ibrav=  2,
> celldm(1) =10.187,
> nat=  2,
> ntyp= 1,
> ecutwfc =16,
> /
>
> &electrons
> conv_thr =  1.0d-10,
> /
>
> &ions
>
> ion_dynamics = 'bfgs',   <==
> I added this
>
> pot_extrapolation= 'second_order', <== I added
> this
>
> wfc_extrapolation= 'second_order', <== I added
> this
>
> upscale = 100,  
> <==
> I added this
> /
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>  Si  28.086 Si.pz-vbc.UPF
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS
>  Si 0.00 0.00 0.00
>  Si 0.25 0.25 0.25
>
> K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
> 4 4 4 1 1 1
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Amir M. Mofrad
>
> University of Missouri
>
>
> --
> *From:* pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org  on behalf
> of Sridhar Sadasivam 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2015 6:51 PM
> *To:* PWSCF Forum
> *Subject:* Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization
>
> Hi Amir,
> The calculation for geometry optimization does not require data from any
> previous scf runs - It is a separate calculation. You need to use the same
> pw.x program that you use for scf. But just change the calculation
> parameter in &control namelist to 'relax' or 'vc-relax'. Apart from that,
> your input file is quite similar to that for scf.
> Sridhar
> Purdue University
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student) <
> am...@mail.missouri.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>   I have done an SCF calculation on a silicon unit cell and I want to do
>> a structural (geometry) optimization next. The documentation for this
>> purpose was not that helpful and I have a couple of questions, for
>> instance should I use the data generated from the scf calculation or should
>> I define a thoroughly different input file for this calculation? What is
>> the command to do so? Is it the same as pw.x or something else?   Any help
>> would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>
>> Amir
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum@pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum@pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>



-- 

Bahadır SALMANKURT
PhD student
Sakarya University, TURKEY
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

2015-10-22 Thread Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student)
Hi Sridhar,

Thank you for your reply. I followed your instructions on only changing the 
task to both 'relax' and 'vc-relax' in my input file. However, I got the 
following error for both of them:

task # 0
 from  read_namelists  : error # 1
  reading namelist ions


Following a tutorial on the internet and according to the above error , at 
first, I only added the  namelist &ions and got an output (very small output). 
So Again I added other parameters in the &control namelist based on the same 
tutorial (without knowing what they are) and got another output. I was 
wondering if you would kindly take a look at my final input file and tell me 
what those parameters that I added are.


Here is my input file:


&control
calculation='relax',

nstep= 50, <== I added this

etot_conv_thr= 1.d-4,   <== I added this

forc_conv_thr= 2.d-3,   <== I added this

restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='si',
pseudo_dir = '../pseudo',
/

&system
ibrav=  2,
celldm(1) =10.187,
nat=  2,
ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =16,
/

&electrons
conv_thr =  1.0d-10,
/

&ions

ion_dynamics = 'bfgs',   <== I 
added this

pot_extrapolation= 'second_order', <== I added this

wfc_extrapolation= 'second_order', <== I added this

upscale = 100,  
<== I added this

/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
 Si  28.086 Si.pz-vbc.UPF

ATOMIC_POSITIONS
 Si 0.00 0.00 0.00
 Si 0.25 0.25 0.25

K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
4 4 4 1 1 1



Thank you,


Amir M. Mofrad

University of Missouri



From: pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org  on behalf of 
Sridhar Sadasivam 
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 6:51 PM
To: PWSCF Forum
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

Hi Amir,
The calculation for geometry optimization does not require data from any 
previous scf runs - It is a separate calculation. You need to use the same pw.x 
program that you use for scf. But just change the calculation parameter in 
&control namelist to 'relax' or 'vc-relax'. Apart from that, your input file is 
quite similar to that for scf.
Sridhar
Purdue University

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student) 
mailto:am...@mail.missouri.edu>> wrote:

Hi all,


  I have done an SCF calculation on a silicon unit cell and I want to do a 
structural (geometry) optimization next. The documentation for this purpose was 
not that helpful and I have a couple of questions, for instance should I use 
the data generated from the scf calculation or should I define a thoroughly 
different input file for this calculation? What is the command to do so? Is it 
the same as pw.x or something else?   Any help would be appreciated.


Thank you,


Amir


___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org<mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org>
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Re: [Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

2015-10-21 Thread Sridhar Sadasivam
Hi Amir,
The calculation for geometry optimization does not require data from any
previous scf runs - It is a separate calculation. You need to use the same
pw.x program that you use for scf. But just change the calculation
parameter in &control namelist to 'relax' or 'vc-relax'. Apart from that,
your input file is quite similar to that for scf.
Sridhar
Purdue University

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student) <
am...@mail.missouri.edu> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>   I have done an SCF calculation on a silicon unit cell and I want to do a
> structural (geometry) optimization next. The documentation for this purpose
> was not that helpful and I have a couple of questions, for instance should
> I use the data generated from the scf calculation or should I define a
> thoroughly different input file for this calculation? What is the command
> to do so? Is it the same as pw.x or something else?   Any help would be
> appreciated.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Amir
>
>
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum@pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

[Pw_forum] Geometry (Structural) Optimization

2015-10-21 Thread Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student)
Hi all,


  I have done an SCF calculation on a silicon unit cell and I want to do a 
structural (geometry) optimization next. The documentation for this purpose was 
not that helpful and I have a couple of questions, for instance should I use 
the data generated from the scf calculation or should I define a thoroughly 
different input file for this calculation? What is the command to do so? Is it 
the same as pw.x or something else?   Any help would be appreciated.


Thank you,


Amir

___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum