[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-30 Thread Hongsheng Zhao
On 06/30/2011 03:48 PM, Stefano de Gironcoli wrote:
> for certain bravais lattice (notably the cubic ones) XCrysDen sometime
> recognizes the conventional unit cell (the cube).
> pw always works in the primitive unit cell, the one defined by the
> fundamental lattice vectors.
>
> Beware that this depends on your input.
> if you define an FCC crystal using a SC Bravais lattice and putting 4
> atoms in the unit cell the BZ displayed is going to be the one for SC

Thanks a lot.  So the correct way is give the correct  primitive unit 
cell vectors in the input file.  Otherwise, it may cause a waste of time 
and cpu.

Regards.
>
> stefano
>
> On 06/29/2011 02:30 PM, Hongsheng Zhao wrote:
>> On 06/29/2011 02:29 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>>> On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:16 , Hongsheng Zhao wrote:
>>>
 > For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the
 corresponding
 > reciprocal vectors may have two different forms:
>>> no, the three vectors that generate the reciprocal lattice are uniquely
>>> determined by the three lattice vectors that generate the lattice:
>>> b_i = 2pi (a_j x a_k)/(a_1 . a_2 x a_3)
>>
>> From the k path selection function of xcrysden, for specific lattice,
>> you can see two options in the band path selection panel: Primitive
>> Brillouin Zone and Conventional Brillouin Zone. If only one set of
>> unique reciprocal vectors was generated for three real lattice
>> vectors, what is the difference between Primitive Brillouin Zone and
>> Conventional Brillouin Zone?
>>
>> Attached please find the the BZ for Si from within xcrysden, could you
>> please give me some hints?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


-- 
Hongsheng Zhao 
School of Physics and Electrical Information Science,
Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China


[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-30 Thread Stefano de Gironcoli
for certain bravais lattice (notably the cubic ones) XCrysDen sometime 
recognizes the conventional unit cell (the cube).
pw always works in the primitive unit cell, the one defined by the 
fundamental lattice vectors.

Beware that this depends on your input.
if you define an FCC crystal using a SC Bravais lattice and putting 4 
atoms in the unit cell the BZ displayed is going to be the one for SC

stefano

On 06/29/2011 02:30 PM, Hongsheng Zhao wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 02:29 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>> On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:16 , Hongsheng Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> >  For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the 
>>> corresponding
>>> >  reciprocal  vectors may have two different forms:
>> no, the three vectors that generate the reciprocal lattice are uniquely
>> determined by the three lattice vectors that generate the lattice:
>> b_i =  2pi (a_j x a_k)/(a_1 . a_2 x a_3)
>
> From the k path selection function of xcrysden, for specific lattice, 
> you can see two options in the band path selection panel: Primitive 
> Brillouin Zone and Conventional Brillouin Zone. If only one set of 
> unique  reciprocal vectors was generated for three real lattice 
> vectors, what is the difference between Primitive Brillouin Zone and 
> Conventional Brillouin Zone?
>
> Attached please find the the BZ for Si from within xcrysden, could you 
> please give me some hints?
>
> Regards.
>
>
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110630/48c035c3/attachment.htm
 


[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-29 Thread Hongsheng Zhao
On 06/29/2011 02:29 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:16 , Hongsheng Zhao wrote:
>
>> >  For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the corresponding
>> >  reciprocal  vectors may have two different forms:
> no, the three vectors that generate the reciprocal lattice are uniquely
> determined by the three lattice vectors that generate the lattice:
> b_i =  2pi (a_j x a_k)/(a_1 . a_2 x a_3)

 From the k path selection function of xcrysden, for specific lattice, 
you can see two options in the band path selection panel: Primitive 
Brillouin Zone and Conventional Brillouin Zone. If only one set of 
unique  reciprocal vectors was generated for three real lattice 
vectors, what is the difference between Primitive Brillouin Zone and 
Conventional Brillouin Zone?

Attached please find the the BZ for Si from within xcrysden, could you 
please give me some hints?

Regards.
-- 
Hongsheng Zhao 
School of Physics and Electrical Information Science,
Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BZ.png
Type: image/png
Size: 116984 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110629/979a2a6f/attachment-0001.png
 


[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-29 Thread Hongsheng Zhao
On 06/29/2011 11:24 AM, jia chen wrote:
> Hi Hongsheng,
>
> You can find definitions of lattice vectors in INPUT_PW.txt and
> calculate reciprocal vectors according to definition of reciprocal
> vector. The name sometimes doesn't matter.

Good, thanks a lot.  I've got it.

Regards.
-- 
Hongsheng Zhao 
School of Physics and Electrical Information Science,
Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China


[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-29 Thread Paolo Giannozzi

On Jun 29, 2011, at 2:16 , Hongsheng Zhao wrote:

> For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the corresponding
> reciprocal  vectors may have two different forms:

no, the three vectors that generate the reciprocal lattice are uniquely
determined by the three lattice vectors that generate the lattice:
b_i =  2pi (a_j x a_k)/(a_1 . a_2 x a_3)

P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222






[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-29 Thread Hongsheng Zhao
Hi all,

For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the corresponding 
reciprocal  vectors may have two different forms:  reciprocal 
CONVENTIONAL vectors and reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors.  In this case, 
the   coordinates of K point used in the calculations should reference 
to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or  reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

Regards.
-- 
Hongsheng Zhao 
School of Physics and Electrical Information Science,
Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China


[Pw_forum] Which coordinates of K point should be used, referencing to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?

2011-06-28 Thread jia chen
Hi Hongsheng,

You can find definitions of lattice vectors in INPUT_PW.txt and
calculate reciprocal vectors according to definition of reciprocal
vector. The name sometimes doesn't matter.

Best Wishes
jia

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Hongsheng Zhao  
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For a set of lattice vectors used for our supercell, the corresponding
> reciprocal ?vectors may have two different forms: ?reciprocal
> CONVENTIONAL vectors and reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors. ?In this case,
> the ? coordinates of K point used in the calculations should reference
> to reciprocal CONVENTIONAL vectors or ?reciprocal PRIMITIVE vectors?
>
> Regards.
> --
> Hongsheng Zhao 
> School of Physics and Electrical Information Science,
> Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
> ___
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>



-- 
Jia Chen